/antidentity/ - Anti-Identity Politics

I'll contest that the sense of collectivization of people characterized by innate traits are the largest bases for the problems consisting today.

It is that the individual should be valued as the the foremost important entity rather than the group. This is because the individual is the basis for groups that small effects of individuals alter and change the group by the power of the group's consisting individuals.

It is to ascertain and hold that people who hold for equality contradict the principle of equality by produced effects rather than the quality of innate characteristics.

This is to recognize and use not the innate as an identity but rather the decisions and actions of each individual. It is by the actions and beliefs of an individual that a person should be characterized. This is because actions are a better indicator of a person. Collectivists may argue that it is the tendency that should be put forward, yet it is actually the individual that should be put fort. It is not wrong to base certain assumptions based off of tendency but relying on it too much and causing action that harm many innocents are not right.

So in shorter summary, actions and individual are the first and foremost identity that should be used more than now in a place filled with innate and collectivist identities.

Even in actions the individual is the most important form of identity. To mitigate collectivist identity the less identity that one has the more it is harder to assign someone an identity. In this scenario it is easier to judge someone by words rather than some other indicator of identity.

In other words, words are the manifestation of character, actions, and beliefs.

The less identity one has the better is is to not fall into such groupings.

P.S. I disagree with IDs for many reasons, especially at a place that is literally called /antidentity/, but it is your board.