/asatru/ - Asatru / Heathenry / Paganism

Nice blog m8, upvoted and subscribed ;)

Wow, just now "let it go" started playing at random in this vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-axY5plYXvE

*synchronicity detected*

Feel free to delete this.

Just check muh synchronicity first.

Oh hello Christfags! Did your priest send you here to troll?

Your home is that way buddy. Us Devil-worshipping pagans are too PG-13 for you guys.

>>>/christian/

>>5036

No I'm serious there are multiple women that want me and I'm just wondering if Asatru approves of me taking at least 2 wives (possibly more).

It's better I think than having one commit suicide because she can't have me. Besides they're both wonderful women. Both have blonde hair. One has green eyes the other blue eyes. The green eyed one is tall and can bear me tall sons, the blue eyed one isn't so tall, so I don't know how tall my sons would be.

I want to just marry them both and make them both happy.

I wonder if polygamy is even legal in my country; not that the law is going to stop me.

Varg's comment on Polygamy:

http://thuleanperspective.com/2014/03/15/the-goddess-freyja/#comment-63124

If I may jump in here: I think having only monogamy will dig a deeper and deeper cleft between peoples of the same race, because the good guys get all the good girls, always, for generation after generation, but… the bad guys only get the bad girls, for generation after generation. So the good gets better, and the bad gets worse… we might get more divine on one side, but also… horribly stupid, ugly, coward and cruel on the other — all in the same society and because of monogamy.

On polygamy, I agree with you Mr. Talin: only the nobility/aristocracy had multiple wives/concubines, and this was indeed justified by nature itself. The good should get more children than the bad. And a good guy can perfectly well produce as many children as a dozen bad ones, if only he has enough wives and can afford it.

Today though, I think most men and women are unfamiliar with the idea, so to speak, and would not accept or appreciate polygamy. Yet they seem to think “serial monogamy” is perfectly okay…

Let’s raise our children to think differently.

http://thuleanperspective.com/2013/09/03/forever-young/#comment-49197

Tacitus wrote that German man were content with 1 woman. This was very strange in the eyes of the decadent Romans. However there are also historical records which say that Europeans were polygamous, women took care of the house and adoption was very common. This was a huge problem for the Holy Roman church because they could not confiscate land and property when the master of the house died, so they introduced marriage to solve this problem.

http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/tacitusc/germany/chap1.htm

18. For all that, marriage in Germany is austere, and there is no feature in their morality that deserves higher praise. They are almost unique among barbarians in being satisfied with one wife each. The exceptions, which are exceedingly rare, are of men who receive offers of many wives because of their rank; there is no question of sexual passion. The dowry is brought by husband to wife, not by wife to husband. Parents and kinsmen attend and approve of the gifts, gifts not chosen to please a woman's whim or gaily deck a young bride, but oxen, horse with reins, shield, spear and sword. For such gifts a man gets his wife, and she in her turn brings some present of arms to her husband. In this interchange of gifts they recognize the supreme bond, the holy mysteries, the presiding deities of marriage. A woman must not imagine herself free to neglect the manly virtues or immune from the hazards of war. That is why she is reminded, in the very ceremonies which bless her marriage at its outset, that she is coming to share a man's toils and dangers, that she is to be his partner in all his sufferings and adventures, whether in peace or war. That is the meaning of the team of oxen, of the horse ready for its rider, of the gift of arms. On these terms she must live her life and bear her children. She is receiving something that she must hand over unspoilt and treasured to her children, for her son's wives to receive in their turn and pass on to the grandchildren.

>>5048

>>5049

>>5050

Who do you believe will make up the nobility of our future society? I guess it's generally the founders of a society, in particular the most noble and virtuous amongst them, that tend to make up its elite later on?

I personally think if any of strive to be noblemen we must do so by refining our characters and taking good care of our bodies and inspiring others and so on; the question of our nobility then will be obvious.

IMHO only in times of female surplus (like right after a costly war) and it shouldn't really be something that would stick… monogamy seems to be the strongest building block of a society

>>5125

What about times like now when we need to steal away as many females as we can from the general populace of bluepills?

>>5327

ROPE ROPE ROPE

>>5392

Perma-virgin christfag.

>>5395

Monogamy is a building block of social order, and should be valued. The underlying premise of Pagan morality is whatever is best for the folk, and polygamy is not best for the folk, because it devalues bonds of kinship and makes the family unit weaker. Quality is more important in this case than quantity. Polygamy would set a dangerous precedent, and frankly at this stage, would do more harm to our numbers than good.

Stop being degenerate and pick a woman and love her and be loyal to her as she is to you. Modern women may be corrupted but you can either go MGTOW and disgrace your ancestors or you can stand and fight and show that honor and family is not dead.

t. virgin neckbeard who never leaves his basement

>>5395

kek, there's plenty of precedent for polygamy in the Bible, monogamy is a Roman tradition carried over.

>>5401

>Quality is more important in this case than quantity.

This is actually a great argument FOR polygamy. The top 20-30% of men make all the babies, so that means that all kids only get the top tier genes. How the hell is it a good thing that unfit, dumb, below average men with a shit income (or even worse, sick men or men with hereditary deceases and shit dna) are allowed to breed? All they're good for is to do the heavy low tier work that no one else want to do. They're do a lot more good for society that way instead of putting low quality children into this world. The only men against polygamy are the ones who know they're not good enough. Monogamy is basically the same as giving out welfare money to lazy niggers. "Herp derp it's only fair that they can live a good life too!". Monogamy=socialism and SJWness.