>>7369
>>7385
>I am not even going to argue with you anymore, because hurr I demote you from edgy teen to child
>Argues in a new reply 8 hours later anyway
You sure showed me with your mature resolve! And don't try to backpedal with "b-but I thought the other reply was you" either, you won't be fooling anyone. It's easy to see by syntax alone that different people are responding.
>Also I only said I studied anthropology not that I fucking got a degree in it. I majored in it for two years. I ended up dropping it and dropping college.
>Too stupid to finish a social 'science' major in a 'murican college, tries to lecture others on his flunked major
Big surprise!
>Hate you "Muh Pureblood" /pol/ fags
I already stated previously that I didn't subscribe to one drop rule. But thank you for letting me see the light. I will retract that previous statement. One drop rule it is! Giving mongrels an inch and they will take a yard, it will only lead to degeneracy and genocide.
>And the funny thing is if someone has a differing opinion from either group they automatically label them as the other. Much like partisan politics.
>'"Stormfag!"
I guess you are too mongrelised to realise you are implicitly calling yourself a SJW with this. wew lad
>You literally just described sociology not anthropology
Point to me where I literally just do that, please.
>I dropped it because I was tired of arguing
Yet here you are, still trying to argue. Not saying your lack of intellectual consistency is surprising, just pointing it out once again.
>And still it is derailing the thread. If you had any sense you would cease your shitposting and let people go on to discuss beards.
It takes two to Tango, and you have been leading this dance to this place from goalpost to goalpost. You were the one, once again, making shit up about vearded bikings and others called you out on it. I only sidestepped into the conversation because you tried to falsely deflate your Jap admixture. On top of that, unlike you, I have still contributed to the thread of examples of male grooming with my posts.
>In fact 75% of your posts are nothing more than memespouting or overuse of buzzwords and sprinkled with ad hominem attacks
Insults =/= ad hominem, you mongoloid. You also didn't provide any fact and pulled, once again, a percentage out of your ass.
>If you were to scroll down you see that I have been posting against Hilmar condemning him for performing gay marriages. In fact I have been outspoken against Universalism plenty of times.
>the way you are acting is reminiscent of how some children will create clubs and say "No girls allowed" or forbidding certain people from their group.
So, kid, are you going to admit your hypocrisy? Is the cognitive dissonance kicking in yet? "This religion is not for non-Europeans! Except for me of course! Pls accept me, I like vearded bikings just as much as you!"
>Literally google "Racial Identity" and read the first thing that pops up. I even said back in a previous post that "Race does not equal racial identity".
Okay. Let's literally google "Racial Identity" and literally read the first thing that pops up. Oh look! It's about being phenotypically similar enough to be able to pass. Which is almost exclusively an American phenomenon. As I said earlier, being a passable trap does not mean you are female. You aren't white, sliteye.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passing_(racial_identity)
>See also
>Transsexual/transgender; White privilege; Whiteness studies
top kek
>I even stated that I did not agree with the term.
Perhaps in your mind, but you did not do so in the real world.
>This is the third time a thread got derailed by someone (most likely the same person)
Your gookeyes seem to inhibiting your reading skills. My very first sentence in this thread was stating to be someone else. The fact that multiple people in multiple threads are calling you out is perhaps a signal that the community does not accept you. You don't belong here.