>>6106
Yeah I live in Commiefornia and I'm putting off my rune tattoos because I know the degenerates wont like it, and the niggers. They think any moderately white symbol is a Nazi symbol.
>>6111
> strong suggestions that it might have been practice to pledge some children to Wotan before there were even born
As much as I would like to believe please give source.
Also from what I have observed the Valknut comes in two forms, the closed or tightened form and the open or loose form. Along with playing into its name as the val-knot, which btw "val" means "the slain", Valhalla, Valfather, etc are all high indicators of something related to the cult of Odin. Not to mention that almost all depictions of a Valknut on runestones are next to scenes related to Odinnic myth; horses, warriors, blood eagles, or even depictions of Odin himself on Sleipnir.
As far as the exact meaning of the Valknot, we know from the Sagas the Odin was known to have the power to "bind" or "let loose" his chosen. Those that were bound lost their ability to fight in battle while those that were loosened became mad and slipped into the beserkergang. And when a warrior died, it was custom to carve a valknot on his chest so that the valkryies would favor him.
The Valknot has very heavy connections to Odin and may be the best symbol to use for Odin/Wotan/Woden, however I agree with the other poster, the Valknot is not a symbol to be taken lightly. Unless you plan to die in race in the next couple of wars, I would strongly recommend against getting it, because the Valknot is a violent and powerful symbol.
I might get one at some point but I'm not sure, I would only get one if I somehow became a warrior. Getting one marked on your flesh is saying to Odin "I want to die a violent death" because that is the best way to Valhall.