>>6697
>I never said it was usurped from Paganism into being a Christian symbol, that was the other poster.
>I am not amused with your dancing of words
I asked that poster the question, if you're going to reply the least you could have done was start off with "not that anon but.."
> the original question was "Is the iron cross a Pagan/Germanic symbol?"
That wasn't the original question, although even if I were a pagan I would acknowledge that the Eisenkreuz used by the modern Germans had a Christian origin, and probably wasn't based on the earlier Germanic version.
>Also not to mention, the earliest crucifixes found in the Germanic world have all been in the shape of an Iron Cross.
Source? I think you mean crosses*.
>So yes, it was a syncretic effort where the old pagan symbols were given a new Christian meaning. That's what most of European art and culture is. Even all your depictions of angels come from Roman artistic motifs, the actual Biblical angels sound like acid-induced mindfucks (albeit they are one of the most based things in that big Jew tome, I will admit)
I don't deny that such syncretism took place, but it's simplistic to assume that all our practices and symbols were based on it (as that other anon claimed).