>>7861
>Wrong. Well, sort of. Communism is antitheistic because it wants to replace religion with the state. This is because if people believe in something more powerful than the government, then they might believe that it will give them power to fight the government. Without this false hope the government is the ultimate power and would-be revolutionaries pussy out and slink back to the tractor factory. This is the premise of the Catholic Church and theocratic states.
You said my point is wrong…. and then you just…. reinforced my point….
Regardless, as you just said, Atheism tears down the concept of a higher principle more eternal and authoritative than man's law, and thus makes the populace vulnerable to being swayed by an aggressive worldview like Marxism, which has been the case so far.
>right-wing
>Oh, sorry. I thought I was talking to an halfway-intelligent person who happened to have a moral opposition to atheists.
>getting triggered by the word right-wing
You're really not helping your case.
>…Unless you are saying humans are marxist by nature?
No, Jews/Marxism has an aggressive proselytizing agenda in regards to countries that succumb and are succumbing to it though, and for previously mentioned reasons, a mass population believing in Atheism makes this process smoother.
>If you want an atheist to be moral, then just explain why your brand of morality is the best. You just need to help us understand why asatru ideals are good and cultural marxists are bad.
Honestly,as long as you are not a stereotypical left wing militant atheist, I do not care if you are an atheist.
>We can be an ally
I'd break bread with a conservative minded Atheist.
>As for if atheism is a luxury for the wise? No, philosophy and good parenting are a suitable and more honest substitute. And did you just imply atheists were smarter than religious folk? Aww shucks, I love you too, paganbro. No homo.
While you can be intelligent and religious, If you're going to be an Atheist, and be moral and understand religion as being necessary for the vast majority, you have to be intelligent. It's not an option. Which is why "philosophy and good parenting" being good enough for the average joe is bunk. The concept of a blue collar worker ordering his life around the readings of Socrates and Aristotle is preposterous (or those readings would have to be incredibly filtered down in an exoteric way that religion already has down pat, thus becoming religion.)
>And of course I can't find any "right-wing" atheist societies. Because there simply haven't been that many atheist societies in the fist place and are a relatively new thing.
As I've said before, there have been Atheists since the time of Ancient Greece. The fact that it s not a new thing, has been around that long, and the fact that its rise around the world is generally correlating with a rise of Marxist influence should be illuminating.
>Perhaps we should prohibit anybody that isn't a merchant, diplomat or explorer from going overseas, since tourism isn't something we see in history and therefore is a blight on society.
Answered this above, plus, comparing Marxism to tourism or going overseas? Especially since foreign travel did in fact exist throughout history? (only a country having a blatant tourism industry is truly modern.)
>Teach them that they shouldn't be cunts because it'll fuck their shit up, and they'll avoid being cunts for as long as they don't want their shit fucked up.
In other words, teach the general populace rationality and reason, and they will naturally make the right and rational choice…. the general populace… that also happens to have shown time and time again throughout history that they are not rational and will make choices based on emotion and instinct (crimes of passion exist for a reason.)
This is one of the main Achilles heels of modern organized Atheism: overestimating the rational capacity of the common man.