>Sign of The Hammer (Neo-pagan self-delusion, borrowing from christianity due to leftover mental baggage, ie signing the Cross)
>Hammer Rite (Wiccan borrowing, no historical records speak of it afaik)
>Temple of Set
>uses Crowleyan term 'Aeon' when discussing runes (not hating on individuals dabbling with the occult here, but in a broad context mixing Aleister Crowley with heathenry seem quite off, akin to icelandtruar claiming feminism)
Tell me again why he's any sort of authority, since Asatru is a non-NewAgefluff attempt at reconstructing a worthy tradition? I see his books being recommended just about everywhere, yet he seems like a edgy LHP wiccan when I look at his work. Also pushes LOADS of "Runes Guide"-type books filled with his UPG, similar to New Age self help books.
I admit that he's contributed to the revival by translating rare/somewhat obscure german/icelandic texts to an english-reading audience, his scholarship there IS of great importance, but that about covers it imo. Having a Left Hand Path devotee as Rune Guru in the english speaking world doesn't seem authentic to me (unless you dabble in LHP and occult matters yourself).