/ask/ - ☻

wtf does he even mean by that…whatever he means it's probably not good.

>>980

He means that it doesn't really matter what your sexual orientation is because that's doesn't hold any significance beyond 3D and some of 4D. 'Sexuality' is only "important" in this density as entities in higher densities don't have any need for sex or gender. (Though some astral critters can use sex as a tool to steal energy from humans but these are exceptions.)

You know all those gay parades, people aggressively pushing for rights and laws and basically priding themselves for their sexuality as if it was some "make-me-privileged token"? That's being obsessed, thus a distraction; that's focusing on the physical and ignoring the soul, which is much more important than physicality. This applies to both sides, straight and LGBT.

>Transgender queer Jewish girl. Neo-Gnostic. Extropist, anti-capitalist and anti-fascist. Artist, amateur engineer and aspiring physicist/neuroscientist. INTP.

holy shit

>>981

>that's doesn't hold any significance beyond 3D and some of 4D. 'Sexuality' is only "important" in this density as entities in higher densities don't have any need for sex or gender

Pure lie, the principle of gender manifests in all planes, a violation of it is as serious in this plane as in any other, and a being in dissonance with the order of the cosmos is failed from the beginning, with clear manifestations from the etheric and up. Now go be an astral-ghoul somewhere else.

https://twitter.com/EvaMonahan23/status/12365351708

>G-d does NOT hate LGBTs! He loves us all!

https://www.facebook.com/iefan.muineachan

http://hynodcymru.tumblr.com/

http://i.imgur.com/3ztizpK.jpg

>being this obsessed

>>983

>the principle of gender manifests in all planes

I didn't disagree here. You misunderstood my argument and attacked it with one that has little to do with my own. I will clarify myself now.

I just pointed out that PHYSICAL sex, gender and sexuality do not manifest in higher densities because there is no physicality on higher densities; thus, there is no capacity for physical sex there.

If you try to use the Kybalion as an authorization, you'll note that it agrees with my point here:

>"On the Physical Plane, the Principle manifests as 'sex' (note: as gender), on the higher planes it takes higher forms, but the Principle is ever the same."

So the 'higher forms' of sex and gender are not physical because there is no physicality in higher densities! And there are no sexual orientations or such in higher densities, too, because there is just no capacity or need for those.

To clarify again: I used the term "sexuality" to refer to sexual orientation and all that it implies, so this might have caused some misunderstanding.

>>989

>>990

Still it remains that a violation of the principle in the material realm is a violation of the principle, revealing unbalance and disharmony with the cosmos, the effects being not limited to physicality.

People tend to think of the planes as if they were different countries with different laws, in that one moves to a plane abandoning the other, as if one could just ignore the analogous correspondents of the higher planes, since this one is just lower. They fail to realize that what is being done in matter is simultaneously being done in all the other planes and with all the other bodies. That's far from being "no big deal".

People who misinterpret and twist Atkinson's teachings are the only astral ghouls here that should be roped.

You did not understand anything are nitpicking on words like some subhuman autist.

Kill yourself.

>>982

I wouldn't trust this "neuroscientist" to not lobotomise me or do a lot of other fucked up and unethical shit.

>>984

>all that degeneracy