[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/atheism/ - Atheism

The rejection of belief in the existence of deities

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Google blocks 8ch.net with obscure message.
If you know any community sites of similar size to 8chan blocked with this message, please email their URLs to admin@8chan.co. I feel like we've a glitch in the matrix.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


New to this board and want to know the rules? Have a question for atheists? Then you should probably read the FAQ (Updated: 3/19/15). It's not necessary, but don't be surprised if people ignore you if you don't elaborate further on a question already answered here, or the moderator does something you didn't expect.

File: 1439062654776.jpg (46.61 KB, 667x466, 667:466, image.jpg)

1fe3c1 No.10327

Christians tend to be "skeptical" that global warming is possible, because God fine tuned the universe, and keeps his finger on the dials. He wouldn't let Earth greatly fall apart if it rose by a few degrees celsius.

Of course, I'm not sure how much of what is happening is human caused, and we have gone through mini ice ages or warmer periods such as the Jurassic period. I think environmentalists exaggerate the human effect for their own noble goals, and that Astronomy also has a huge effect on our climate.

58b883 No.10330

>>10327

I think environmentalists exaggerate the human effect for their own noble goals, and that Astronomy also has a huge effect on our climate.

Nope it doesn't. The radiation of the sun isn't correlated to the temperature on earth. The distance to the sun isn't correlated. Vulcano activity isn't correlated. Co2 emission is.

The bible thing is just a cheap excuse. They just don't want to change.


916d61 No.10331

The Pope's been trying to get his flock to worry about this recently.


2d0a19 No.10333

File: 1439075532870.jpg (39.55 KB, 600x399, 200:133, 474S015a-i1.0.jpg)

>>10327

>I think environmentalists exaggerate the human effect for their own noble goals

Not quite, they exaggerate the value of nature. Also very few know anything about ecology at all and believe in bullshit like trees crying when you cut them down. They sensationalize a lot of shit but CO2 and other GHG concentrations causing climate instability aren't one of them.

Modern environmentalism is very much rooted in Biblical nonsense that nature is sacred. They call upon this oxymoron called subjective intrinsic value of nature. Now intrinsic values do not exist because of the nature of values being subjective. Value isn't an intrinsic property of an object like it's mass or chemical composition, it doesn't get value from itself. A mind has to assign value to an object for it to have value. Therefore an object doesn't have value in itself. Value is entirely an extrinsic property. Weight is an extrinsic property because it varies depending on the gravitational field the object is subject to much like the value of nature varies depending on the subjective evaluations of people.

Now that we got that out of the way, artificial systems, where man just modifies nature for his needs, are often superior. Nature has a lot of shitty schematics like the laryngeal nerve.

Personally, I think a much nobler goal would be shaping the earth into a controllable environment. Where we have control over the atmospheric gases and their cycles. Where there are no mosquitoes and other pests, rather genetically modified species that aren't fucking annoying can occupy those trophic levels. Where we shape ecology so that we get the weather patterns which are best for us at steady state. Look at it this way the environment always changes, most of the species that have ever existed are extinct, might as well mold the earth to serve us. Might as well have the Earth operate like an ecological machine that we can control.

Environmentalism is nothing but cuckolding progress for nature. I had a prof in an environmentalism course I took to avoid gender studies bs for my elective who literally suggested feedlots were a problem because of cramping then suggested we should live in denser communities to leave more nature alone. Fuck that, those cows can't even do basic arithmetic.

>>10330

Planetary distance from the sun matters, it's just we're still in that safe range. Solar intensity also matters because of how GHGs work, they trap heat. The thing is the variation is solar activity is minimal.


16d9cb No.10334

>>10327

>Christians tend to be "skeptical" that global warming is possible, because God fine tuned the universe

Isn't it because christians correlate with conservatives?


1203e5 No.10339

>>10334

This. They're just politicking.

>>10333

>subjective intrinsic value

There must be a silent "noncognitivist" in there. Funny that they don't have animals have them too.


64e774 No.10350

>>10333

>>10330

human-induced climate change is a scientific fact, confirmed over and over and accepted by the overwhelming majority of experts. I don't need to care what the environmentalist activists may think or whether there are big PR campaigns to try to discredit the factual accuracy of climate change


2d0a19 No.10352

File: 1439183694579.jpg (122.41 KB, 600x960, 5:8, CKsU4WyUYAQb3i6.jpg)

>>10350

>human-induced climate change is a scientific fact

Don't say this like I disagree anywhere. I don't, it's clear as day the role GHGs have in tapping solar radiation and that we are changing the concentrations of those gases with industrial emissions of CO2, methane, etc.

>I don't need to care what the environmentalist activists may think or whether there are big PR campaigns to try to discredit the factual accuracy of climate change

Except they are the largest groups influencing policy regarding how we are to deal with climate change.

Environmentalism is to environmental science as astrology is to astronomy. Was the only point I was trying to make.


d2602b No.10425

File: 1439571304824.jpg (30.56 KB, 413x425, 413:425, not even the dead.jpg)

My parents are boomers who watch mainstream TV news and shitty reality TV a lot. I like to talk to them about stuff like this to get a sense of what your average idiot American thinks.

Apparently, it's the height of arrogance to think humans have the ability to change the planet, that a few degrees difference in temperature is irrelevant, and so is a few feet in sea level rise.

In other news, we will never ever run out of oil and alternative energy is just an attempt by a fascist NWO trying to control what our air conditioning is set to. And oil spills don't matter, because we can just go clean it up, and fracking doesn't matter, because natural gas leaking out into the atmosphere just makes it easier to harvest. Besides, if we ever pump too much pollution into the atmosphere, we can just pump it back out, or pump it into space.


1fe3c1 No.10426

>>10425

Fracking does strike me as terribly short sighted, especially in agricultural areas, on account of what it leaves behind. The other day the Colorado river became highly poisonous because some idiot construction workers punctured an ancient mine that was filled with chemicals, unleashing a pink slurry.

Fracking is really a rush to access all of our obvious mineral resources asap. Our showdown with Russia has given political ammunition to bought off memembers of congress to allow unlimited fracking, "to help Europe and Ukraine."


687869 No.10429

Weren't CO2 levels much, much higher in the Jurassic Period, and burning fossil fuels is just returning the trapped Carbon into the carbon cycle?

Bad stuff will happen sure if CO2 levels get that high again, sure, but extinction of humanity is an exageration no matter how you look at it.


885533 No.10435

File: 1439589454116.png (82.82 KB, 533x1097, 533:1097, 1418059460910.png)

>>10429

I think you are referring to the Carboniferous, a geological period marked by the unrestrained growth of land plants.

this increased the O2 levels in the atmosphere and coal levels on earth. when volcanic eruptions occurred shit was set on fire and moved all that carbon in form of CO2 to the atmosphere, giving birth to the next great geological era: the Permian, a period marked by increased temperatures and mass extinction.

the Jurassic period occurred way later.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]