>>10327
>I think environmentalists exaggerate the human effect for their own noble goals
Not quite, they exaggerate the value of nature. Also very few know anything about ecology at all and believe in bullshit like trees crying when you cut them down. They sensationalize a lot of shit but CO2 and other GHG concentrations causing climate instability aren't one of them.
Modern environmentalism is very much rooted in Biblical nonsense that nature is sacred. They call upon this oxymoron called subjective intrinsic value of nature. Now intrinsic values do not exist because of the nature of values being subjective. Value isn't an intrinsic property of an object like it's mass or chemical composition, it doesn't get value from itself. A mind has to assign value to an object for it to have value. Therefore an object doesn't have value in itself. Value is entirely an extrinsic property. Weight is an extrinsic property because it varies depending on the gravitational field the object is subject to much like the value of nature varies depending on the subjective evaluations of people.
Now that we got that out of the way, artificial systems, where man just modifies nature for his needs, are often superior. Nature has a lot of shitty schematics like the laryngeal nerve.
Personally, I think a much nobler goal would be shaping the earth into a controllable environment. Where we have control over the atmospheric gases and their cycles. Where there are no mosquitoes and other pests, rather genetically modified species that aren't fucking annoying can occupy those trophic levels. Where we shape ecology so that we get the weather patterns which are best for us at steady state. Look at it this way the environment always changes, most of the species that have ever existed are extinct, might as well mold the earth to serve us. Might as well have the Earth operate like an ecological machine that we can control.
Environmentalism is nothing but cuckolding progress for nature. I had a prof in an environmentalism course I took to avoid gender studies bs for my elective who literally suggested feedlots were a problem because of cramping then suggested we should live in denser communities to leave more nature alone. Fuck that, those cows can't even do basic arithmetic.
>>10330
Planetary distance from the sun matters, it's just we're still in that safe range. Solar intensity also matters because of how GHGs work, they trap heat. The thing is the variation is solar activity is minimal.