c7a877 No.11685
Atheists are right in a number of ways.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYTI5XDN3sw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzLKbZyMvas
Though I also think: what if atheism was something that acknowledges God, but is more focussed on right facts about spirituality?
0ce5fd No.11686
>Though I also think: what if atheism was something that acknowledges God, but is more focussed on right facts about spirituality?
No atheism is by definition the opposite of acknowledging god. Not ever atheist uses reason to justify his disbelive. Some think religion feels wrong or just don't care.
Sorry but your post makes no sense.
People who don't believe in ghost don't acknowlege a ghost with their reasoning.
c7a877 No.11687
>>11686
Well, maybe a good example: ghosts DO exist. What I mean is that the people that are about spirituality and deities are doing it wrong. This way we are all a victim.
Feelings, caring one important thing is that that is OK. Not if you would have to believe some people about spirituality.
To give an example that there is a spiritual world.
https://www.google.nl/search?q=a+haunting&gbv=1&prmd=ivns&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AVqFQoTCMW2n_CawcgCFYzUHgodql8KKQ
b6fd0a No.11688
>>11687
I think these are all fakes or misinterpretations.
There is a concept of ghosts but no real ghosts or spirits. The mind is a property of the brain but can't exists without it.
There is no proof for ghosts but a lot of reasons they can't exist.
c7a877 No.11692
Atheism is considered to be about absolute reality. It would be bizarre if the truth is that those two would be too far apart
Have you ever personally or someone else you know that is 100% trustworthy investigated that sort of things?
54b458 No.11693
How do you go about discerning supernatural or spiritual truths? There's already a discipline that concerns itself with that called Theology and to no surprise it has accomplished jackshit in determining the truth of any of it. Spiritually is so nebulous that it's impossible to sort out the bullshit from the truth, if there is any.
Also "atheism that acknowledges God" is nonsensical. Atheism in and of itself is not actually a rejection of the supernatural, just deities. And even then it's not a dogmatic ideology in which you must reject any sort of deity regardless of evidence. It's just a convenient label for those of us who find the god proposition hard to swallow.
c7a877 No.11694
>>11693
That is the exact reason why it would be better that atheism would acknowledge God and focus on correct facts about it then what it is now. The whole thing is enormous bizarre and misleading as it is now.
Theology does not do what you said. It does something else.As can be seen in the videos I posted in the OP post. That is one of the things that causes what you said.
a4dc8b No.11695
>>11694
>That is the exact reason why it would be better that atheism would acknowledge God and focus on correct facts
There are no facts about god. Your whole idea looks like a trick to silence atheists.
I don't care a about the details of the delusion of christians.
I care about the problems they cause.
c7a877 No.11696
>>11695
–Theology is nicer than can be seen in those videos by my knowledge.
The problems it causes exactly. This is in larger parts caused by the opinions of the majority of movements and organisations that are about the subject.
c7a877 No.11697
To take atheism: pragmatism and reality is important in atheism. But there IS a spiritual world. And it is not up to atheism to decide who is what in this world.
c7a877 No.11699
If conclusions and opinions would be wrong everything would be bizarre, annoying and lack taste.
54b458 No.11700
>>11694
Again, you talk about correctly describing god but there is no methodology in which to do so that doesn't come up blank. Theologians have tried for centuries and haven't been able to. It's all hot air.
Steven Anderson isn't really a theologian. He's talking to an audience where the assumption that the Christian god exists is dogma. Theologians do this too but they used to try and prove god's existence. Centuries of very smart men and the best and most enduring of their arguments is the Cosmological Argument. You can look up the weaknesses of this argument yourself. When you do keep in mind this is the very best one. That's why some of us don't believe.
>But there IS a spiritual world
You can't prove this.
c7a877 No.11701
>>11700
>You can't prove this.
That is why I asked before, have you or someone that can really be trusted investigated that sort of thing?
54b458 No.11702
>>11701
You can look into whatever ghost haunting or whatever the fuck you want and see if there's something worthwhile there. I don't have the time personally.
I'll say that every proof for supernatural or spiritual things that I've seen presented has come up short. I don't have the desire to dedicate my life to uncovering the supernatural if there is any at all. So no I can't claim that with absolute certainty that a supernatural realm doesn't exist. I can claim that there's no good evidence however. Unless you have some. Which you don't.
c7a877 No.11703
>>11702
What have you seen about the subject?
54b458 No.11704
>>11703
A lot. I've already mentioned Aquinas. I'm not going to go through every single "proof" I've ever come across. If you've got something to share then by all means. Otherwise I don't have the time.
c7a877 No.11705
Are there notable people in atheism most people read or watch?
3c7efd No.11708
>>11688
Hypothetically what would you say to convince someone that ghosts don't exist? Admiral tryon went down as perhaps the worst Admiral in history because he crashed his own battleship. On the day he drowned, his wife and friends claim they saw him mingling with people at a party at his house, hundreds of miles away.
Also, what about those creepy omens? Abe Lincoln wrote in his diary that he had a dream of walking downstairs and finding a coffin, and when he asked who was inside, a soldier said the president. Then he woke up.
a4dc8b No.11710
>>11697
Proof? You can 't just claim something to be true because it's a cozy idea.
And please no hour long yt bullshit.
a4dc8b No.11711
>>11708
Cool story bro.
You know people like to tell stories for alot of reasons.
If you actually research these ghost tales then you will often find out that even the characters didn't existed. Or there is no source for the quotes or they said it because they wanted attention or it was probably wishful thinking.
I found 3 million gold bars behind my house isn't proof that I'm a millionair now.
It's a claim. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary (good) proof.
Omen are just bad dreams. Almost all people have them. Some people tell them to others. Some of them die horribly. If the person is famous then you have a story.
It's a numbers game. Unlikely things can happen in large numbers.
Well, if there is proof that even the omen story is true. Are there personal letters with of this story?
c7a877 No.11712
c7a877 No.11713
>>11711
What is your exact source about
>If you actually research these ghost tales then you will often find out that even the characters didn't existed. Or there is no source for the quotes or they said it because they wanted attention or it was probably wishful thinking.
493afc No.11714
>>11685
>acknowledges God
>right facts about spirituality
Since you don't believe in them, why don't you investigate animal spirits?
c7a877 No.11715
54b458 No.11718
>>11712
You are very gullible.
444e33 No.11719
>>11712
Millions of people visit this place every year. Of course some will have the unlikely luck to survive their illnesses. The
Other millions are just dead. It's like saying lottery is a great investment. Every week a new millionaire.
c7a877 No.11723
But what is the core thought in atheism? What are key atheist sites?
a4dc8b No.11725
>>11723
>But what is the core thought in atheism?
The doubt in the existence of deities.
And only that.
But some also reject religion. Some are very pro-science materialists. Some are humanists. Some are spiritualists. Don't generalize.
>What are key atheist sites?
Dunno. Everyone has an own idea.
I watch some youtube videos for imput but don't like "communities" and moral authorities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfyoDgszas0
c7a877 No.11727
What would atheists consider good or bad in atheism?
a4dc8b No.11728
>>11713
What would you consider good or bad if you are not believe in God?
Probably that.
I see it that way: people created gods that shared the things they considered to be good. Morals come from experience and our brains/genes. Anti-social behavior wasn't successful enough in early populations so we aren't needlessly violent or immoral.
a4dc8b No.11729
>>11728
Woops
I refered to this guy >>11727
c7a877 No.11730
>>11728
That way of thinking has, I think, effects that confront with reality. So has being part of what is shown in the first post videos. One thing could be the culture of it.
a4dc8b No.11731
>>11730
You are are not a native speaker, aren't you?
Can you please rephrase your sentence.
c7a877 No.11732
>>11731
What is it exactly with that sentence?
a4dc8b No.11733
>>11730
>That way of thinking has, I think, effects that confront with reality.
I think I know what you mean but how?
>So has being part of what is shown in the first post videos.
Which video? And what is part of what?
One thing could be the culture of it.
???
c7a877 No.11734
>>11733
Some posts back this:
>>11695
>I don't care a about the details of the delusion of christians.
I care about the problems they cause.
A serious problem the status of spirituality causes is a handicap in the functioning of the majority of the people. Status of spirituality = what the organisations or movements that are about it basically state about it.
Anyone that can agree sufficiently and on the right matters in atheism and christiannity will probably be rid totally of that problem.
a4dc8b No.11735
>>11734
I think he meant that you can get lost in details and they want that.
The christians argue about the nature of "flying pigs".
Are they invisible?
What do they want from us?
When will they help us?
Are we good in their eyes?
How should we live with "flying pigs"?
What do they think of our problems?
Is bacon a symbol of their suffering?
Can we be moral without them?
They pretend it's a science to study "flying pigs". Christian get angry if you ask "stupid questions" and you can't even tell the anwer to the questions above. You are not a pigsologist you can't talk about these topics. You have to study it first or else you are just ignorant.
c7a877 No.11736
>>11735
You are right some attitudes can not be taken. (And where can and about the same sort of thing). It's like a machine that keeps on stamping in a certain direction. And so do some other things.
493afc No.11749
>>11715
You figured out what's real and what isn't. It should be easy for you to find out right facts about spirit animals, flying pigs, meme magic, or whatever.
c7a877 No.11764
It's a lot said here in this thread in a small time frame.
c7a877 No.11766
>>11749
Could we talk on chat or something?
3c7efd No.11768
>>11711
I looked into it again. Apparently lincoln believed his dreams were sometimes omens, (sucks that he isn't more rational like Jefferson.) He had a very superstisious wife, but only his body guard told the dream about the coffin, and that was 20 years after Lincoln died, so it isn't corroborated. I wish we had evidence it had happened so we could collectively muse at how spooky it was. He did tell several friends he had just dreamt of racing across the dark waters towards the unknown at high speed the the morning before he died, but he said he had dreamt that before, and that is more ambiguous than the coffin embellishment.
45b55f No.11770
>>11768
So the story is basicly a guy who died had nightmares before his death.
Meh, doesn't sound like a proof.