Your prophet, Richard Dawkins, a white supremacist?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1454375690639.png (390.97 KB, 620x412, 155:103, ClipboardImage.png)

Your prophet, Richard Dawkins, a white supremacist? Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 01:14:50 935103 No.13746

http://archive.is/M5v38

Why am I not surprised.

02/02/16 (Tue) 01:40:52 29842f No.13747

File: 1454377252809.jpg (91.47 KB, 628x1090, 314:545, dawkins tweet gold.jpg)

>>13746

Everyone who disagrees with you is evil.

Amirite?

Are you religious or a SJW or both?

I'm guessing both.

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 02:23:22 63b8a0 No.13748

Why does Saloon have such a problem with New Atheists?

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 05:09:19 a0fc13 No.13749

>if you disagree with me you are a nazi!!

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 10:34:49 86e5aa No.13750

Dawkins has some boss tweets though.

>>13747

>your prophet

Religious, doesn't understand what "thinking" means

>white supremacist, neo-nazi

SJW, Tumblrweed

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 11:00:39 1fb169 No.13752

>>13746

Even the article says he retweeted it because he didn't know. Anti-sjw doesn't mean white supremacist but in this case it was. I don't get the controvercy.

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 19:13:48 c0dbb6 No.13757

File: 1454440428630.gif (86.4 KB, 306x245, 306:245, slap reaction 2.gif)

>Guy gets tricked into retweeting something with some shitty qr code

>He must be an ebil nazi!!!

Salon doesn't belong in the trash, it belongs in the shitter.

Anonymous 02/02/16 (Tue) 19:41:09 f27844 No.13760

File: 1454442069835.gif (3.97 MB, 298x224, 149:112, k6Ku15G.gif)

>the onion which takes itself seriously

Anonymous 02/03/16 (Wed) 02:05:58 aee385 No.13769

Well at least statue fag can't call us SJWs anymore.

Anonymous 02/03/16 (Wed) 02:28:49 a72e0c No.13771

File: 1454466529954.jpg (89.89 KB, 500x572, 125:143, Salon-tier consistency.jpg)

Classic Salon clickbait.

>Title: Dawkins is a NAZI!

>Actual Body: He unknowingly retweeted an image with a QR code which he probably didn't notice

>>13748

Because it's islamophobic not to believe in Allah.

Or, on a serious note, they conflate race with ideology to fuel their victim complex.

Anonymous 02/03/16 (Wed) 02:51:05 f27844 No.13773

File: 1454467865249-0.png (48.84 KB, 674x544, 337:272, salon hyp.png)

File: 1454467865255-1.png (402.03 KB, 672x736, 21:23, salontards salty that athe….png)

>>13771

Anonymous 02/03/16 (Wed) 05:55:49 a72e0c No.13776

>>13773

We can criticize Christianity all day and they won't say anything because it's an "oppressor religion" but when we inevitably criticize Islam too, they undergo mental gymnastics to shut down dissent because Islam is a "PoC religion". What a joke.

Anonymous 02/03/16 (Wed) 06:15:56 f27844 No.13778

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>13776

but muh crusades

Anonymous 02/03/16 (Wed) 16:54:12 71225e No.13785

Dawkins wrote in his book that he believes that human racial taxonomy is meaningful and about the correletion of relative brain-volume and intelligence. He's also voiced criticism about the contemporary Zionist influence in American politics.

And these guys try to attack him over a shitty retweet? Seriously?

Anonymous 02/03/16 (Wed) 20:25:57 88ab40 No.13788

>He's also voiced criticism about the contemporary Zionist influence in American politics.

He doesn't do it in a /pol/ dejoos way. So this should be fine with most people.

>Dawkins wrote in his book that he believes that human racial taxonomy is meaningful and about the correletion of relative brain-volume and intelligence.

>his book

Which one?

Anonymous 02/05/16 (Fri) 00:33:41 71225e No.13826

>>13788

>It is genuinely true that, if you measure the total variation in the human species and then partition it into a between-race component and a within-race component, the between-race component is a very small fraction of the total. Most of the variation among humans can be found within races as well as between them. Only a small admixture of extra variation distinguishes races from each other. That is all correct. What is not correct is the inferene that race is therefore a meaningless concept.

The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution(page 406)

https://books.google.de/books?id=rR9XPnaqvCMC&pg=PA406&hl=de#v=onepage&q&f=false

>It is an article of passionate faith among "politically correct" biologists and anthropologists that brain size has no connection with intelligence; that intelligence has nothing to do with genes; and that genes are probably nasty fascist things anyway.

The Evolutionary Future of Man (1993)

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins