[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/atheism/ - Atheism

The rejection of belief in the existence of deities

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1425021383386.jpg (161.33 KB, 640x427, 640:427, evidence or gtfo.jpg)

 No.3247

 No.3263

File: 1425054137059.jpg (209.25 KB, 2048x846, 1024:423, amazing randi.jpg)

>>3247
Truly a great man.

He's been calling "bullshit" on Bullshit for decades.

 No.3272

James Randi is a great guy, watched many of his demonstrations. One thing I would had never guessed though is that he is gay, he looks pretty manly to me.

 No.3276

>>3272
Shouldn't surprise anyone that half of the LGBTs are irreligious, vs around 20 percent for the straight population. (This article uses the word atheist to include the "none" from PewPew so I fixed that for you.)

http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/lgbt-people-more-likely-be-atheist-straights170613

 No.3280

>>3272
That's called prejudice.

 No.3295

There's a documentary about this guy called An Honest Liar that's coming out at some point.

 No.3300

>>3247
Too bad his organization is infested with SJWs…

 No.3306

>>3272
>manly gays are surprising
I never understood this. If you're attracted to men, wouldn't you be attracted to manly men? So wouldn't gays make themselves manly to appeal to other gays?

 No.3340

>>3280
>>3306
Guys, don't be stupid. I am the person who made that post and I should let you know that I am also gay, I would suck a cock if I was given a chance too. I am just surprised because gay men are usually fit and beautiful.

 No.3389

>>3340
It's still prejudice. Like the literal definition of the word.

 No.3391

>>3389
It is still a good idea to have a first impression out of how a person looks, 'prejudice' or not.

 No.3392

>>3389
Not really. If you actually look it up you'll find that most definitions have something to do with unfounded judgement, evaluation, dislike, forming an opinion, etc. All that anon did was make a deduction based on apparent fact. It turned out to be a wrong deduction in this case but I don't think it was hugely unreasonable and certainly not prejudiced.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[Return][Go to top][Catalog]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / news+ / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]