No.3775
What is with all of the christfags on /pol/? I remember when the majority of /pol/ used to be atheists. Now I see threads on "why religion is good for society", or "Rome did not fall to Christianity, it fell to degeneracy". What the hell happened?
Besides, Christians love Jews. In Burgerland, the biggest monetary supporters of Israel have always been Christians and Conservatives, /pol/ doesn't seem like the type of place they would congregate.
No.3778
Your guess is as good as mine, but I'd wager that the popularity of Christianity has something to do with backlash against and hostility towards SJWs, who have until recently associated themselves with atheists.
I think it will take time for atheism to rid itself of the marxist stench of social justice it allowed into its ranks in the years leading up to elevatorgate.
No.3783
>>3778How can that happen?
No.3784
I've never liked pol, so just take my opinion with a grain of salt.
Right now, I think this incarnation of pol is pretty much a combination of values that parts our new society is trying to push away. Old pol wasn't pushed away by sjw's, and it was more of a board where many crossposters from other boards came.
A lot of pol is pretty much trying to reinforce ideals that are dying in this new world. The problem is, they want to embrace things that really need to die, like religion, and take other things too far, like opposing SJW's so much they often sound like the bad MRA stereotype instead of being more reasonable about it like a lot of people are here.
I realize there are many trolls on there, but there are also a bunch of serious people too.
No.3786
Catholics invaded /pol/ on halfchan. They basically began to link up with fascist thought by strong association with the anti-semitism which used to be a part of Christianity. They was also around the time when plebbit had that dumbass 'faces of atheism' shit, where they took two cringe worthy ones, edited a dozen fake ones and presented that as a representation of all atheists. Finally, a bunch of William Lane Craig fanboys spammed /pol/ with shitty apologetics and /pol/ fell for it
So basically, just a big smear campaign, and /pol/, being the easily convinced tinfoilers they are, fell for it
No.3788
File: 1425923378044.png (73.47 KB, 1195x782, 1195:782, redpilled christians say t….png)
By the way, I just found this little gem on /pol/. Shows you how le redpilled and le enlightened christians on here truly are.
In their defense though, it isn't a Catholic this time, it's a proddy going off the rails
No.3791
OP, this is honestly the reason why I don't go to /pol/ anymore. They're really stretching this shit out, you can't have an argument without the subject of christianity or degeneracy being brought into the discussion as "valid points".
Try to discuss masturbation? "jews invented porn, it's degenerate and you waste your seeds, muh christianity"
No.3797
>>3788>CathocucksWhat the fuck?
>>3791What even is degeneracy?
No.3798
>>3797Basically it's just pol's way of putting themselves on a pedestal above everyone who doesn't agree with them or their lifestyle.
No.3799
>>3798Ah. So there is no specification?
No.3805
>>3797>degeneracyI think it is non christian life style, like if you are any of these:
Not married, gay, atheist, admit to masturbating, consuming violent media, not very social, not wanting children, appreciating sexy bodies.
Then it's anti christian and "degenerate" for them.
No.3806
>>3805Shit, I forgot four that will make you look like a degenerate to /pol/:
Not admitting that everything is the work of jews, not praising Hitler, not constantly talking about race mixing and your superiority to other races.
No.3807
>>3805>>3806Sounds about right.
No.3808
>>3791>Wasting your seedThey are aware that the human body is capable of replenishing its sperm, right?
Probably not. Those people are bigger conspiracy theorists than most conspiracy theorists.
No.4180
>>3805As a former Christian I can tell you /pol/ is a bunch of Biblically illiterate stormfags who probably just nitpick stuff to support their beliefs about the Jews and other races.
Seriously they use a book that says:
>17 If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18 do not consider yourself to be superior to those other branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” 20 Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either. (Romans 11:17-21)If you check the context of the above verses they are undeniably talking about how the Jews (the broken branches) and Gentiles (grafted branches) are to relate. It clearly tells gentile Christians to not consider themselves superior or be arrogant toward Jews.
as for MUH DEGENERATE RACE MIXING
>11 Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all. (Colossians 3:11)
> 28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:28)/pol/ only likes Christianity because they are ultra conservative and that happens to be the religious heritage of the societies their racist idols were born into.
No.4183
>>4180Honestly, that is the most hilarious part of Christians on /pol/. Nothing makes me smile more than Christians taking a religion that is basically Judaism+ and trying to turn it into the ultimate nazi religion. You can hear the gears of their brains as they desperately try to ignore just about the entire early history of Christianity.
Pic very related. Also, a chilling reminder that someone actually made this
No.4213
>>4186
It's all good. I wish there was a post moving tool board staff could use. For future reference you do know you can delete your own posts on this board right?
No.4224
>>4213Wait, what happened?
No.4235
>>4224I knew I should have screencapped that. I'll have to get into the habit of doing that.
Basically someone posted that deviantart page that they meant to put in the cringe thread, and then made a post announcing their mistake. They reposted it here:
>>4185 No.4238
File: 1426272817219.jpg (45.45 KB, 550x774, 275:387, Adolf-Hitler-Funny-Picture….jpg)
>>3775There's nothing funnier than a Christard stormfag. Christianity is so contradictory to Nazism I don't know where to begin. For one Christinsanity is the worship of a dead Jew on a stick. Christinsanity rejects race, ethnicity, or anything of the sort - Romans 10:12. Christards led the marches against slavery and segregation, Wilberforce et al and Jim Jones et al. Also Hitler himself hated Christinsanity but used it to get to power. There are many public quotes where he praises Christinsanity but in private was quite the opposite.
Anyway if you want to piss these lowcow faggots off next time post this:
https://answersingenesis.org/racism/are-there-really-different-races/ No.4240
>>4238Just to dispell some claims about Hitler worshiping a dead kike on a stick:
>Hitler was CatholicAccording to what was then Public perception.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler>Hitler's public and private statements on religion were often in conflict. The biographer Kershaw wrote that few people could really claim to "know" Hitler - "he was by temperament a very private, even secretive individual", unwilling to confide in others.[31] In private Hitler scorned Christianity to his friends, but when out campaigning for power in Germany, he publicly made statements in favour of the religion.[47] "The most persuasive explanation of these statements", wrote Laurence Rees, "is that Hitler, as a politician, simply recognised the practical reality of the world he inhabited… Had Hitler distanced himself or his movement too much from Christianity it is all but impossible to see how he could ever have been successful in a free election. Thus his relationship in public to Christianity - indeed his relationship to religion in general - was opportunistic. There is no evidence that Hitler himself, in his personal life, ever expressed any individual belief in the basic tenets of the Christian church".[19]
>Adolf Hitler was skeptical of all religious belief.[11] Alan Bullock saw Hitler as a "materialist", not only in his "dismissal of religion" but also in his "insensitivity to humanity".[12] Hitler's materialist outlook, wrote Bullock, was "based on the nineteenth century rationalists' certainty that the progress of science would destroy all myths and had already proved Christian doctrine to be an absurdity".[20] Richard J. Evans wrote that "Hitler emphasised again and again his belief that Nazism was a secular ideology founded on modern science. Science, he declared, would easily destroy the last remaining vestiges of superstition [-] 'In the long run', [Hitler] concluded, 'National Socialism and religion will no longer be able to exist together'".[17]
>Samuel Koehne of Deakin University wrote in 2010: "Was Hitler an atheist? Probably not. But it remains very difficult to ascertain his personal religious beliefs, and the debate rages on." While Hitler was emphatically not "Christian" by the traditional or orthodox notion of the term, wrote Koehne, he did speak of a deity whose work was nature and natural laws, "conflating God and nature to the extent that they became one and the same thing…" and that "For this reason, some recent works have argued Hitler was a Deist".[127] No.4241
File: 1426272936598.jpg (65.07 KB, 580x852, 145:213, e62fe683078107588db0a7a0b0….jpg)
>>4240
>Nazis were CatholicsHardly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_Nazi_Germany>Pius XI (1922–39) and Pius XII (1939–58) led the Roman Catholic Church through the rise and fall of Nazi Germany. In the 1930s, Catholics constituted a third of the population of Germany and "Political Catholicism" was a major force in the interwar Weimar Republic. Prior to 1933, Catholic leaders denounced Nazi doctrines while Catholic regions generally did not vote Nazi. Though hostility between the Nazi Party and the Catholic Church was real, the Nazi Party first developed in largely Catholic Munich, where many Catholics, lay and clerical, offered enthusiastic support.[1] This early [minority] affinity lessened after 1923. By 1925, Nazism had embarked on a different path following its reconstitution in 1920 taking a decidedly anti-Catholic-anti-Christian identity.[2] In early 1931, the German Bishops issued an edict excommunicating all Nazi leadership and banned Catholics from membership. The ban was conditionally modified in the Spring of 1933 under pressure to address State law requiring all Civil Servants and Trade Union workers be members of the
>Nazi ideology could not accept an autonomous establishment whose legitimacy did not spring from the government. It desired the subordination of the church to the state.[40] While the Article 24 of the NSDAP party platform called for conditional toleration of Christian denominations and a Reichskonkordat (Reich Concordat) treaty with the Vatican was signed in 1933, purporting to guarantee religious freedom for Catholics, Hitler believed religion was fundamentally incompatible with National Socialism."[41][42] Out of political expediency, the dictator intended to postpone the elimination of the Christian churches until after the war.[43] However, his repeated hostile statements against the church indicated to his subordinates that continuation of the Kirchenkampf (church struggle) would be tolerated and even encouraged.[44]Nazi Party, while retaining condemnation of core Nazi ideology.[3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_GermanyI think if Hitler won we wouldn't be dealing with all these desert cults. Say what you will about gassing religious people being morally wrong, it's effective and I'd do it if I ever come to power. Hitler's mistake was attacking atheists, agnostics and deists with Jewish ethnicity. So stupid since he literally alienated so many brilliant minds with this nonsense. And Deutsch Physics, ugh. "Hurr relativity is wrong becuz Einstein is Jewish durr."
No.4242
File: 1426273150413.jpg (32.06 KB, 592x350, 296:175, 3919c5572155f7d01f552ef7e7….jpg)
>>4241>Say what you will about gassing religious people being morally wrong, it's effective and I'd do it if I ever come to power. No.4243
>>4242You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into. They leave me no choice.
No.4244
>>4235Ah, okay. Thank you.
No.4245
>>4238>>4240>>4241What's the word for this? Oh yeah, propaganda.
No.4246
>>4245There is propaganda on both sides.
>Propaganda is the organized dissemination of information to influence thoughts, beliefs, feelings, and actions. Like the propaganda that coerces rational people to put up with religious idiots.
No.4292
>>3784>>3786>>4180
>/pol/ only likes Christianity because they are ultra conservative and that happens to be the religious heritage of the societies their racist idols were born into.>Right now, I think this incarnation of pol is pretty much a combination of values that parts our new society is trying to push away.These guys get it. Christianity is politically incorrect, so /pol/acks flock to it like flies to shit.
>Catholics invaded /pol/ on halfchan. They basically began to link up with fascist thought by strong association with the anti-semitism which used to be a part of Christianity. This is interesting too. Here in the states most fundamentalists are protestant, and at that usually some variant of Southern Baptist (or occasionally a Mormon sect). Whereas /pol/ seems to have a lot of disgruntled Catholics who hate the direction the Papacy has gone in the last couple of decades. That would certainly explain their love affair with Orthodoxy
No.4294
>>4183>Khazarian hypothesis>scientifically tenable.And even if modern Jews DO trace their theology to Talmudism, it's still a moot point because the historical Christ would have been a middle eastern man.
I love watching them going through mental gymnastics to try and imagine that ancient Israelites were somehow white.
Then again
>/pol/>capable of skepticism No.4299
>>4213For whatever reason it would not allow me to remove the post.
>>4292>These guys get it. Christianity is politically incorrect, so /pol/acks flock to it like flies to shit.The guy wasn't saying that Christianity is politically correct though. It's more like these people are ultra Conservative and thus more likely to be Christian as throughout the years Conservatives have been predominantly Christian and they have no desire to break away from that leading to dilemmas like
>>4294I think /pol/'s current state stems from Stormfags flooding in but also try hard edgy bitches who liked to scream "The jews!" at everything because it made them feel rebellious.
/pol/ was shit even back on cuckchan and that's when a bunch of edgelord teens flooded wanting to be part of the internet hate machine.
Combine the genuine conspiracy nutters with a bunch of edgelords who want to be the most unpolitically correct group possible even if it defies reason and you get modern /pol/.
No.4307
>>3783It's already happening. Marxist atheism is on the decline, Atheism+ failed and SJWs are attacking atheists any chance they can.
No.4308
No.4319
>>4299To be fair a lot of /pol/acks go there just for fun. But for the past year the -chans have been rubbing shoulders with SJWs (nude leaks, the tumblr raid, GG), and because of it a lot of /pol/acks started taking /pol/ seriously. It drove away alot of the /pol/-for-fun crowd, myself included.
I still lurk there, but I don't post. The mods banhammer atheistic views, which kinda defeats the point of going to /pol/ (unhinged free speech). I really enjoy flinging shit on /pol/, but it loses its luster when the mods start trying to enforce certain views
No.4325
>>4299What the hell is a 'stormfag'?
>>4319>The mods banhammer atheistic viewsHere on infinite?
No.4326
>>4308I see it as a good thing. Atheism becoming more about skepticism.
No.4327
>>4325>What the hell is a 'stormfag'?People who frequent this forum:
www.stormfront.org/forum/
No.4330
>>3797I saw an image on halfchan /pol/ once that explained it as anything that doesn't serve society, even if it doesn't particularly harm society, which is fucking stupid.
No.4349
>>3808Very valid point! Read about a Japanese porn actor today who had sex with 7000 people over his career and his seed hasn't run out yet ;)
No.4354
>>4325>Here on infinite?Yes.
No.4360
>>4349It's like saying you should spit because you're wasting your saliva. Anyone who uses the "don't masturbate because you'll run out of sperm!" clearly doesn't understand how the body works.
>>4354Is there an example you know of or a screen cap?
No.4376
>>4360Unfortunately I don't, but I'm pretty sure there's some on /meta/.
If all else fails, then go start a thread on /pol/ and see how it goes
No.4437
To put it simply /pol/ has been reddited.
The Commies circlejerk in /leftypol/.
The Nazis circlejerk in/pol.
Everythign inbetween those views is moderated away(eventually) on either board, under varying pretexes.
Generally if your post is not gloryfying enough of the natsoc ideas these things will happen and flood your thread into derrailment/deletion:
>/polacks/ DEMANDING you disclose your ethnicity("you nigger/kike/mudslime").
>/polacks/ calling you a shill and mass reporting
>/polacks/ starting troll arguments en masse, making outrageus claims backed solely by bullshit infographics/propaganda sites.
>Demanding you provide strict peer reviewed scientifical proof on any arguments you made and on many others you didn't make at all.
>Moderation outright bans you/deletes your thread on sight.Calls you a shill/Jew.
>Moderation bans you/deletes the thread for shitposting,after the /polacks/ themselves have been the only ones shitposting,
No.4440
>>4437I got banned so many times from there just for correcting their flawed predictions. It's sad really. /pol/ used to always be right. Now? Not so much…
No.4591
>>4437>>44404chan /pol/ is modded by normalfags who have started banning anything that would put 4chan's ability to advertise at risk, like anything GG related. I don't give a shit about GG, but 4chan's mod team are trigger happy. They've also placed tons of retarded globals over the past few years (i.e., you can't say "sage," you can't say you've reported something, and a bunch of other shit)
8chan /pol/ is modded by neocons who ban anything that David Duke wouldn't agree with.
The entire /pol/ subculture is fucked, they've declined into "just another stormfront." What made early /pol/ good (and early 4chan/b/ for that matter) was the fact that you could say basically anything and not get banned. It was very libertine with free speech, much more so than it is today.
No.4662
>>4437>>4440>>4591I don't understand. If the /pol/s have gotten so bad, why doesn't someone just make a new "anything goes" pol board?
No.4685
>>4662I don't browse /pol/ but I assume it would be something to do with all the stormfags getting wind of a new board, bumrushing it and shitposting about jews until it closes down.
No.4692
>>4662/everypol/ when? A pol where you don't get banned for disagreeing with christianity or don't think that not posting a picture of the happy merchant whenever someone asks why something happened is a bannable offense.
No.4694
>>4692Would support the hell out of this but what about
>>4685 No.4695
>>4685>>4694But who cares if they do? If anything goes, then their presence is fine, too. If you can just refute their arguments easily, then who cares what they say or how often they say it?
No.4696
>>4695Yeah ok then. I remain cautiously optimistic. /everypol/ when?
No.4706
>>4685>>4694It sounds like you two don't know the story of /leftypol/. Used to be back a couple months after the exodus they were a not well known and pretty decent board. Then /pol/ caught wind of the board and raided the fuck out of it. Little did they realize that by raiding the fuck out of it and not even learning from their raid on /fem/, like /fem/, they brought /leftypol/ to the top. Once the leftists discovered the board, they stabilized it's presence on the top spot and /pol/ unintentionally helped by continuing to view the board. Unfortunately however, after that point they began to polarize. So regarding invasion you guys have nothing to worry about.
>>4696Within the next week hopefully. I have a potentially interesting idea that I'm going to try that will hopefully help with more transparent moderation on there and this board as well, but I'm not going to shill the board here. Just telling you all now so everyone will know who is "secretly" behind the board. So if you see a general politics board advertised on /boards/ it's probably me.
No.4707
>>4706Didn't know the story of leftypol, I'd only been on there once and since I'm not a marxist I left pretty quick. But your idea sounds pretty cool.