http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/TheamazingatheistTake a look at this stupid shit. Rational Wiki claims that TAA is an embarrassment to atheism, and yet, they don't even realize their own embarrassing stances.Any sane atheist should renounce feminism.

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1425988489497.jpg (21.52 KB, 300x298, 150:149, Feminsts hate atheists.jpg)

Anonymous 03/10/15 (Tue) 11:54:49 No.3847

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Theamazingatheist

Take a look at this stupid shit. Rational Wiki claims that TAA is an embarrassment to atheism, and yet, they don't even realize their own embarrassing stances.

Any sane atheist should renounce feminism.

Anonymous 03/10/15 (Tue) 12:38:19 No.3849

>>3847
>Any sane atheist should renounce feminism.
bumping just to say this

Anonymous 03/10/15 (Tue) 13:52:25 No.3851

There's already an "atheists vs feminists" thread here: >>3312

Anonymous 03/10/15 (Tue) 14:05:41 No.3853

>>3851
I don't think this is an atheist vs feminist thread. I think this is about the hilarious strawman arguments in that article.

Anonymous 03/11/15 (Wed) 01:54:31 No.3911

>>3847
>that pic
Maybe women aren't people. Maybe men aren't people. Maybe children aren't people.

What is a person? What qualifies someone as a person?

There are lots of arguments and answers to these questions, but you wouldn't have any of them if you didn't bother to ask in the first place. Skepticism isn't ignoring the answers, it's applying critical thinking to determine what answers are good - specifically it's a requirement for evidence. We should be skeptical of everything, but especially skeptical of things that are important and affect lots of people, like political movements.

Anonymous 03/11/15 (Wed) 02:03:56 No.3917

>>3911
So you're telling me everything we take for granted as true might not actually be true? What are you some kind of conspiracy theorist?

Anonymous 03/11/15 (Wed) 02:18:51 No.3921

>>3917
I bet he's from /pol/.

Anonymous 03/11/15 (Wed) 02:23:25 No.3925

>>3921
Or /x/.

Anonymous 03/11/15 (Wed) 02:24:12 No.3926

>>3925
It's not the same thing by now?

Anonymous 03/11/15 (Wed) 02:28:52 No.3927

File: 1426040931725.png (2.03 MB, 680x680, 1:1, 853.png)

>>3926
Fair point, /pol turned out to be such a disappoint.

Anonymous 03/11/15 (Wed) 02:40:23 No.3933

File: 1426041623122.png (5.53 KB, 822x74, 411:37, This is christianity.png)

>>3927
It went to shit ever since the christfags invaded.

Anonymous 03/14/15 (Sat) 07:21:09 No.4296

>>3847
TAA is a fag, but RW is even worse. The real wikipedia already throws out junk science like homeopathy. Creating a second wiki for skepticism is redundant. Their real agenda is to create a SJW wiki and guise it as an atheist one

Anonymous 03/14/15 (Sat) 10:10:04 No.4300

>>4296
Rational Wiki was originally going to be a wiki response to Conservapedie. There'd be articles that were point by point refutations of the bullshit on Conservapedia.

But when Atheism+ happened all the SJWs unsheathed their bullshit and rational wiki was one of the places that fell.

Anonymous 03/14/15 (Sat) 10:11:06 No.4301

File: 1426327866388.gif (988.61 KB, 500x200, 5:2, Everything is permitted.gif)

>>3917
Nothing is true, everything is permitted.