YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play. Biblical Inerrancy DEBUNKED Anonymous 03/19/15 (Thu) 19:35:26 2dc645 No. 4741
Anonymous 03/19/15 (Thu) 19:39:18 dc9e5a No. 4744
They should just rename that board to /salt/.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 01:26:13 da873a No. 4763
>>4741 It's not showing up on their ban log. I think they're doing more thread deleting and less ban + deleting to be more subtle about moderation lately.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 01:46:54 2dc645 No. 4765
>>4763 Its the first one, the mod banned and deleted every single post.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 03:23:41 34a067 No. 4771
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play. This video I found britty gub.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 05:16:22 9b0448 No. 4793
File: 1426828582674.jpg (113.65 KB, 1022x593, 1022:593, ScreenHunter_155 Mar. 20 0….jpg )
oh are we here to voice ocmplaints about board moderation
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 05:17:22 9b0448 No. 4794
>>4793 *to shut down child sex trafficking
should be to shut down discussion on child sex trafficking
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 05:38:41 0865c6 No. 4797
>>4793 >we are even handed with a genuine consern for freedom of speech and not just motivated by weird anti christian sentiment right guiez . .. guiez Learn how to fucking type. It tries my patience to look at your posts. At this rate, I wouldn't be surprised if you became the first person to be banned from Atheism. Apart from the logical idiocy, what you wrote looks like bot spam at first sight.
Then again a ban might be what you want, 'cas in your mind that'd show we're all hypocrites for whining about being banned on /christian/, since we banned a 13 year old who can't type right? If you like being here, spell check and read your post twice before your submit it. You should uphold the bare minimum of internet etiquette.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 06:10:15 62d628 No. 4798
File: 1426831815027.png (382.16 KB, 978x728, 489:364, I have done nothing but sh….png )
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 06:11:21 9b0448 No. 4800
>>4797 does anal retentive have a hyphen
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 06:12:35 9b0448 No. 4801
>>4796 >>4798 so I take it that's a no, only anti-Christian stuff allowed
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 06:18:51 62d628 No. 4805
>>4801 There's a thread for anti Islam talk but you were there defending Islamic countries of all things.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 06:23:16 9b0448 No. 4808
>>4805 that's because you are confused and think that being anti islam is excusing everything bad islam does as a product of cuture or nation or something other than Islam and decide not to hear or follow arguments that counter that
I really don't see why everyone is getting mad, I simply want to help yall in the fight for free speech on the internet in a consistent and even handed way
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 06:25:50 62d628 No. 4809
>>4808 Nigger what are you even talking about? The only person excusing Islam in any of these threads is you.
One of these days you'll learn how to read. One day.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 06:42:12 0865c6 No. 4811
>>4809 And then once he learns to read, maybe he'll learn how to write and type. By the grace of God all things are possible right?
By God, I mean computers.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 07:17:55 e4f693 No. 4812
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play. >>4801 Oh well, if you insist.
And yes, I know you'd capitalize your sentences before you'll ever admit that this post actually doesn't defend Islam
Jacob 03/20/15 (Fri) 07:29:10 231848 No. 4813
>>4812 capitalization is for adults and old people. unlike with atheists christians don't need to do that because God forgives them for their sins. the only thing you need to capitalize is God otherwise He gets mad.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 07:44:34 62d628 No. 4816
>>4813 we need to be cool and hip with the youth. also you forget that it's not atheists but atheist because making things plural is for squares!
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 14:43:59 9b0448 No. 4824
so /atheism/ has taken entirely to responding in ad hominem. I think it's particularly hurtful to you guys when anything negative is said about Islam. I'll try and tip toe around the issue to be kinder, I apologize for my remarks about them condining child sex trafficking and attempting to stifle discussion on that issue. It's much more important that we discuss how your video was deleted.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 14:47:23 9b0448 No. 4825
>>4816 >>4813 >>4812 >>4811 >>4809 >>4809 the islam board just shut down discussion on the issue of islamic child sex trafficking and on the same day you are complaining about a stupid video being deleted on christian
many atheists keep demanding to know why you deserve hell, well there it is, you have your answer. Because you don't give a shit about what's important, you don't give a shit about protecting children, you don't give a shit about the important issues in the world, you want to focus on shit like this. I hope there is no further doubt on the issue of hell and whether it is deserved
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 14:57:35 0865c6 No. 4826
>>4825 As an unashamed lolicon I don't share your crusading passion or values. Perhaps you saw an ideal waifu and are in the closet too? Tell me the truth, do you envy muslims much?
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 16:28:46 9b0448 No. 4828
>>4826 >As an unashamed lolicon I don't share your crusading passion or values. well from this thread many people do have these values regarding free speech (or at least profess to) just not in a consinstent or meaningful manner.
fuck christian for deleting a video about biblical inerrency, crickets on islam threatening bans to silence debate on the issue of the koran condoning child sex trafficking and its widespread practice in the Muslim world
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 17:06:27 e4f693 No. 4837
>>4828 Listen, retard, you qouted a post which has a one hour video criticizing the historic narrative of Islam here
>>4812 Do you even read the posts you reply to?
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 17:08:37 0865c6 No. 4838
>>4741 If I may sidestep the cry baby and put things back on the OP's track, I like how /christian/ now bans those who argue against unscriptural homophobia.
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 17:18:58 9b0448 No. 4841
>>4838 there's a thread started to advocate homosexuality right here
http://8ch.net/christian/res/48309.html just dont be a dick about it or misquote and misrepresent the teachings of Jesus and you are fine
Anonymous 03/20/15 (Fri) 19:58:06 0865c6 No. 4863
>>4841 I like how you thoughtlessly brushed off evidence of hug box moderation. Just because one thread is still up does not at all justify taking down posts that were fair debate.
Anonymous 03/23/15 (Mon) 09:45:11 2dc645 No. 5149
>>4838 Yeah, banned for stating a FACT! WTF
Anonymous 03/24/15 (Tue) 05:01:45 b45993 No. 5276
Anonymous 05/01/15 (Fri) 07:02:46 0865c6 No. 7357
>>4741
Different authors changed parts of the gospels and you can figure out what they changed by looking at the context. Here is an example from "Misquoting Jesus" by Bart Erhman from the section titled "Textual Alterations Involving Women."
*** Scholars are convinced that Paul did not write the 1 Timothy passage because it occurs in a letter that appears to have been written instead by a 2nd generation follower of Paul in his name. No one doubts however that Paul wrote 1 Corinthians. But there are doubts about this passage. For it turns out, the verse in question (34-35) are shuffled about in some of our important textual witnesses. In three Greek manuscripts and a couple of Latin witnesses they are found not here after verse 33 but after verse 40. That has led some scholars to surmise the verses were not written by Paul but originated as a kind of marginal note added by a scribe, possibly under the influence of 1 Timothy 2. The note was then inserted in different places of the text by various scribes, some placing the note after 33 and others after verse 40.
There are good reasons for thinking that Paul did not originally write these verses. For one thing, they do not fit well into their immediate context. In this part of 1 Corinthians 14 Paul is addressing the issue of prophecy in the church and is giving instructions to Christian prophets concerning how they are to behave during the Christian services of worship. This is the theme of verse 25-33, and it is the theme again of verses 36-40. If one removes the verses 34-35 from their context, the passage seems to flow seamlessly as a discussion of the role of Christian prophets. The discussion of women appears, then, as intrusive in its immediate context, breaking into instructions that Paul is giving about a different matter.
Not only do the verses seem instructive in the context, but they also appear anomalous with what Paul explicitly says elsewhere in 1 Corinthians. For earlier in the book Paul gives instructions to how Christian women should pray, with veils on their heads (11:2-16.) In this passage which no one disputes that Paul wrote it is clear that Paul understands that women both can and do speak in church. In the disputed passage of chapter 14 however, it is equally clear that "Paul" forbids women from speaking at all. It is difficult to reconcile those two views, and unreasonable to think he would contradict himself within such a short period of time.
Anonymous 05/04/15 (Mon) 02:27:37 69779d No. 7413
since this is /christian/ shitposting general
http://8ch.net/christian/res/78714.html
this is an interesting thread
some of the theological stuff I don't really care about but I think it's interesting that the priest is expressing entirely reasonable, positive, and comparatively more sane beliefs and the entire thread reacts in horror. I really just don't get it
Anonymous 05/04/15 (Mon) 03:06:08 0865c6 No. 7415
>>7413
I hope he remains in the Catholic church. I bet there are a lot of morons that want him gone judging by the 8chan posts. His words if implemented would do a lot to correct the worst of Christian behavior.
Anonymous 05/04/15 (Mon) 03:20:23 66c0a3 No. 7418
Anonymous 05/04/15 (Mon) 03:25:39 66c0a3 No. 7419
>>4825
So start a thread or go complain about it on /christian/.
Anonymous 05/04/15 (Mon) 03:43:32 66c0a3 No. 7420
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play. >>4824
What the fuck are you talking about, Statuefag?
We hate Mudslimes as well, it's just that Muslims do stupid shit all the time. If someone posts a thread about Muslims doing stupid shit, that's to be taken for granted because we expect Christians to be more civilized than Muslims, but if you're any indication, Christians are just as bad.
Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 03:18:51 c1d04f No. 7443
OP here, I'm at >>>/goodchristian/ for now, its pretty dank
all atheists or anyone can post freely there so
bring your fedora
Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 03:32:01 0865c6 No. 7444
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play. >>7420
We might need the Muslims someday if we are invaded by aliens. They can be our suicide bombers and crash our fighter jets into the alien mother ships like in Independence Day.
Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 03:55:55 66c0a3 No. 7445
>>7443
You do know no christians actually post there, yes?
Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 07:39:15 0a232f No. 7450
>>7443
I don't have a fedora. I do have a newsboy cap.
Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 08:59:05 c1d04f No. 7451
>>7445
pffft
>>7450
All head apparel is welcome
Anonymous 05/05/15 (Tue) 20:55:23 d7cd9a No. 7452
Anonymous 05/09/15 (Sat) 10:38:13 fd80ac No. 7552
But noone says the Bible is the infallible word of god except fucking illiterate American protestants.
However, the infallibility of the Quran (which is supposed to be the word of God transmitted to Muhammad through Archangel Gabriel) is an important part of the Muslim dogma (even if the Mutazili says it was written by man, but they are a minority). That's why the Quran hasn't changed since the third caliph (who actually wrote the Quran from various oral sources).
And I have never seen any documentary debunking that myth. There should be one imo.
Anonymous 05/09/15 (Sat) 10:48:24 69779d No. 7555
>>7552
Most christian apologists say the bible is the infallible word of god. If there is anything we perceive to be inconsistent or inaccurate it is only because we do not understand it properly.
This is why many biblical scholars spend decades, literally, interpreting and extrapolating the meaning from fables that are mostly written in very plain and straightforward language. Although not a christian, I remember specifically a jewish woman stating that the true meaning behind the first two commandments was to reinforce the notion that there are things more important than yourself.
Anonymous 05/09/15 (Sat) 10:52:05 fd80ac No. 7556
>>7555
The Genesis and such are fairytales with morals, according to Catholics. I remember in Religulous, Bill Maher interviewed a Catholic priest in the Vatican, and he said the Bible has been written by dozens of people along centuries and it has no historical value and lots of contradictions.
Anonymous 05/09/15 (Sat) 11:10:01 69779d No. 7557
>>7556
>it has no historical value and lots of contradictions.
That's the most reasonable viewpoint to have. But there are many people who posit that scripture can be proven with scripture. I think this is mainly due to the fact that cosmological arguments can only go so far to prove that there is an unknown force if the assumptions of said arguments are true. It says nothing of a personal god, much less the christian one. Stretching logic to its limits, they have to somehow prove that the bible or whatever holy book has significant truth or meaning.
I've kind of gone astray with my original point I'm just saying that christians can be just as guilty of this sort of thing.
Anonymous 05/10/15 (Sun) 05:26:29 b338c6 No. 7600