Anonymous 03/21/15 (Sat) 21:46:54 9c6064 No. 4946
Admin Edit: You can see my response at: >>5147 It is about the results of the poll and potentially turning ID's on for trial status for a week or 2. If you don't want this, now is your time to speak up. In thread poster IDs, can we has them?
Post last edited at 2015-03-23 08:53:25
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 02:09:31 9c6064 No. 4965
>>4948 No seriously, this board really needs poster IDs to keep tabs on the Christfaggotry and shitposting.
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 02:44:30 e75f4d No. 4966
>>4965 The only real major christfaggotry is the occasional shit thread and statuefag/"/atheism sucks Islam's dick"/can't write for shit-guy.
But that guy's easy to spot because he never capitalizes the beginning of sentences and has shit grammar abilities.
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 03:05:45 4d9b0e No. 4967
>>4965 Let the mods do their job. I don't see the need for them just yet. Maybe if the traffic increases they might be needed.
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 03:10:21 9c6064 No. 4968
>>4966 But I've also seen the kneejerk reaction some people have here to criticism of Islam because of this faggot. It makes sense if that Christfaggot has been coming here and doing that why I see so many posters being especially suspicious of posters criticizing Islam specifically. But fuck lets not turn on each other and poster IDs may help reduce the incidence of this.
>>4967 It would help in debates with more than two people to easily keep track of what's going on.
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 03:11:16 2ad9e1 No. 4969
>>4966 Hell.. Christfaggotry has given me lots of fun on this board. So idiot posted a thread about bleeding virgin mary statute and demolishing that "miracle" was loads of fun.
In the process of refuting him I learned how I could make my own bleeding statue. Priceless!
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 03:15:01 9c6064 No. 4970
>>4969 I'm not thinking of discouraging Christfaggotry, it's always fun to beat those idiots over the head with reason. I just think we should keep tabs on the numbers.
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 03:24:58 4d9b0e No. 4971
>>4968 >It would help in debates with more than two people to easily keep track of what's going on. That is true I guess
>>4970 This. Let's not let it become a hugbox. Anyway, dissent is a good opportunity to build stronger arguments
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 06:29:58 248aa4 No. 4980
>>4966 He sometimes capitalizes especially since we scolded him or in his OP. I've changed my mind, because of 1 bad apple.
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 06:31:20 9c6064 No. 4981
>>4980 Takes just one sometimes, besides this way we'll be prepared if and when more of them show up.
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 15:00:10 3df085 No. 5016
No, IDs stifle the conversation. Threads will devolve into regular shitposting.
Anonymous 03/22/15 (Sun) 16:31:41 248aa4 No. 5020
>>5016 Explain. We already have some of that without ids.
Anonymous ## Board Owner 03/23/15 (Mon) 08:48:23 aa2a9a No. 5147
I'm guessing no one read the FAQ update. Understandable, that thing is TL;DR at this point. Unfortunately this is something the board is heavily divided on. When we held the poll, it was almost literally divided 50/50. Yet for some reason, most of the antis refrained from posting in that thread. I myself am for ID's. They are good for boards like this, and what you guys have said is true, I have caught "Alex's kid" pretending to be two different people (pic related) >>4490 . People say ID's sniffle discussion and prevent posts being judged at individual value, but already I'm starting to see people guess who made other posts, which in my opinion not only defeats that, but is much worse for the integrity of the discussion. It was one of the worst things about halfchan. But I don't really want to go against what people want. So I propose this: How about we turn on ID's for a 1-2 week trial status? That should hopefully be enough time for us to see if they work out. If you don't want to see ID's for a week or so, now is your time to say so.
Anonymous 03/23/15 (Mon) 14:40:22 d7ccb2 No. 5153
I've already posted about this, so I won't repeat myself. Thank you for taking feedback, Admin. You are a good skeptic.
Anonymous 03/23/15 (Mon) 14:49:42 5c2a27 No. 5156
Yes please, IDs can greatly help to see who you are debating, or who made two posts that result in hypocrisy, and also who is OP. I am for IDs as we still are anonymous.
Anonymous 03/23/15 (Mon) 16:02:11 80c783 No. 5159
>>5147 you caught me, I don't think anyone would have guessed that those two posts were from the same person.
If only we had IDs this all could have been prevented.
Anonymous 03/25/15 (Wed) 05:28:58 3df085 No. 5380
Ugh, we have ID's now. At least now I can tell that 9c6064 Is a faggot.