>THE CHURCH SETS VERY HIGH SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF MIRACLES

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1428334503742.jpg (917.58 KB, 1273x955, 1273:955, fedora.jpg)

Anonymous 04/06/15 (Mon) 15:35:04 26fc10 No.6274

>THE CHURCH SETS VERY HIGH SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF MIRACLES

Anonymous 04/06/15 (Mon) 16:56:25 26fc10 No.6279

like when the shroud of Turin was independently shown by 3 recognised laboratories to have been fabricated in the 15th century and the Church immediately stopped allowing further research on it and started to shill alternative unscientific explanations in their media?

I still see preachers and catholic spokesmen passionately defending pseudo-scientific explanations about the Shroud of Turin to this day. People talking about modern patches and other desperate excuses, and they present these ideas as actual science. I guess they fucked up royally when it occurred to them that opening to proper research was a good idea, I guess they were actually convinced that it was authentic or something.

In any case I would like to see more proper research than just debunking its age, like testing the Renaissance photograph hypothesis looking for silver or any other photo-reactive chemical on it, which I think is one of the most plausible explanations for the origin of the image, which by fucking common sense can't be a mortuary shroud given that there's no blood and that the image is a clear projection over a plane and not a wrapper of a human image (actually probably two separate images because the proportions of the head don't correspond to those of the body).

Trying to impress the religiousfags with pseudo-science or educated remarks by one or two scientists that get further derailed and distorted to make the faith in question sound like a scientific fact makes me feel mad.

Anonymous 04/06/15 (Mon) 17:07:42 26fc10 No.6280

File: 1428340062772.jpg (90.89 KB, 634x355, 634:355, article-2684147-1F77DA7200….jpg)

>A DECLARATION OF SOME ABNORMAL EVIDENCE BY A FEW POSSIBLY SELECTED AND BIASED RESEARCHERS WHO HAPPEN TO BE AFFILIATED TO THE SAME RELIGION IS CLEAR INDICATION THAT THE EVENTS ARE SUPERNATURAL, AND THAT THEY COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED BY CHANCE, AND THAT THEY WERE AUTHORED BY A GOD, AND THAT IT WAS SPECIFICALLY THEIR GOD AND THAT THEREFOR THEIRS IS THE TRUE GOD AND TRUE RELIGION. SURE

Anonymous 04/06/15 (Mon) 17:12:00 26fc10 No.6281

File: 1428340320417.jpg (37.55 KB, 402x347, 402:347, christianobesity.jpg)

>WHEN SOMETHING STRANGE HAPPENS IT IS EITHER THE WORK OF GOD OR THE DEVIL, DEPENDING ON WHETHER IT MAKES PEOPLE THINK MY RELIGION IS TRUE OR NOT. NATURAL SPOOKY EVENTS HOWEVER ARE NOT ALLOWED TO EXIST, FOR I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DISTINGUISH THEM FROM MUH MIRACLES

Anonymous 04/06/15 (Mon) 19:55:07 c0d7e3 No.6288

>>6280
>explain the difference
The one on the left would pussy out of actually killing someone. Unless they were Mexican.

Anonymous 04/06/15 (Mon) 22:36:58 ea3173 No.6296

>>6279
And yet, we hear nothing about the gospel of Judas.

Anonymous 04/06/15 (Mon) 22:45:12 ea3173 No.6297

>>6288
>Implying that Americans aren't Mexico 2.0

Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 02:08:57 4ae229 No.6304

>>6280
The one on the left is a qt

Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 02:18:46 ea3173 No.6306

>>6304
>shit taste

Good to know.

Anonymous 04/07/15 (Tue) 02:36:00 4ae229 No.6307

>>6306
>shit taste
She's cute m8, the only one with shit taste is you.
>Good to know.
Why?

Anonymous 04/08/15 (Wed) 02:30:47 ae9dee No.6343

This is beside the point but his arm looks almost unattached to his body.