/atheism/ - Atheism

>>7754

What an enlightened and rational response from such a lovely group of intellectual skeptics. Truly the people who will lead us into a new age of progress.

>Christians think God defines morality. God kills a bunch of children? Who are you to judge he who defines morality?

That's correct.

>Atheists think SJWs define bigotry, so you can't judge SJWs. SJWs want to kill all men? Who are you to judge those who define bigotry?

That doesn't equate, Atheists don't worship SJWs, in fact the majority of us are anti-SJW. Vid related.

SJWs don't define bigotry, they embody bigotry.

>Christians believe the earth is 2000-5000 years old and that evolution is wrong.

This is true.

>They can point to various scientists and other sources to prove it.

This is not

>Atheists believe college campuses experience rape rates comparable to Congo.

This is not comparable, and no they don't. You're talking about that debunked 1/4 statistic, aren't you?

>They can point to various scientists and other sources to prove it.

No they can't. At least this is comparable, though I don't think you did this by design.

>Christians lie for Jesus.

Indeed, some Christian religions have specific doctrines for lying in the name of the religion like the Muslims have Al Taqqiya.

>Atheists lie for equality

>Wage gap bullshit having anything to do with not believing in god.

>Christians actively harass, threaten, vandalize, and kill people who disagree with them.

Yes, that's true.

>Atheists actively harass, threaten, assault, vandalize, and send bomb threats to people who disagree with them.

You didn't actually read that article, did you? There is no mention of atheists at all in that article. So where did you get atheists from?

>SJWs actively harass, threaten, assault, vandalize, and send bomb threats to people who disagree with them.

FTFY

>Christians believe everyone is born with original sin and must atone for it.

True.

>Atheists believe everyone who's white is born with privilege and must atone for it.

lol Where do you get this shit from? That's not true.

>Christians want to teach their creationism shit in public school

Most of them do.

>Atheists want to teach their critical race theory and gender studies shit in public school

I figured you'd say "evolution" as that would actually make this statement true. It would seem you're talking about SJWs and not atheists.

>Christians believe it is the God-given duty and burden of the white man to look out for those poor stupid black people and take care of them.

Perhaps, though it depends on your denomination.

>Atheists believe it is the duty and burden of the white man to look out for those poor intelligent black people and take care of them.

No, it's everyone's duty to take care of themselves. Atheists believe no such thing.

I don't think you realize that your picture was made by an atheist and critical of atheism+ as atheism+ isn't actually atheism otherwise they would call it atheism. SJWs actually hate atheists. Pics related.

It would seem you are trying to equate atheism with SJWism as none of the things you stated that atheists do are true, but they are if you replace atheist with SJW.

Daily reminder!

sage and ignore /christian/ shills.

>>7762

>That doesn't equate, Atheists don't worship SJWs, in fact the majority of us are anti-SJW. Vid related. SJWs don't define bigotry, they embody bigotry.

Majority of atheists are liberals. Majority of liberals are SJWs. This is undeniable. How else can you explain the fact that the Democrats are about to elect a SJW for presidency? How else do you explain the labor party? If the majority of liberals weren't SJWs, their representatives wouldn't be SJWs.

>This is not comparable, and no they don't. You're talking about that debunked 1/4 statistic, aren't you?

Yes they do. Even Obama supported this. And because atheists worship Obama, most of them also quote this like the gospel. Go to any non-chan-related atheist forum and see how they feel about it. You'll encounter some amazing doublethink (Death threats are common? Lololol what world are you living in. What, you don't think rape is that common? You're a terrible person). This was coming from people who weren't even SJWs, mind you.

>You didn't actually read that article, did you? There is no mention of atheists at all in that article. So where did you get atheists from?

Vast majority of feminists are atheists. Or Muslims.

>>SJWs actively harass, threaten, assault, vandalize, and send bomb threats to people who disagree with them.

Vast majority of SJWs are atheists. Or Muslims.

>lol Where do you get this shit from? That's not true.

Gender studies and critical race theory class.

>I figured you'd say "evolution" as that would actually make this statement true. It would seem you're talking about SJWs and not atheists.

Again, majority of SJWs are atheists.

>No, it's everyone's duty to take care of themselves. Atheists believe no such thing. I don't think you realize that your picture was made by an atheist and critical of atheism+ as atheism+ isn't actually atheism otherwise they would call it atheism. SJWs actually hate atheists. Pics related. It would seem you are trying to equate atheism with SJWism as none of the things you stated that atheists do are true, but they are if you replace atheist with SJW.

Those people aren't REAL atheists! A REAL atheist would never do such things!

You really think No True Scotsman is going to work after you people spent years mocking it?

>>7788

You know who's also mostly atheist? MRAs. A survey on the biggest MRA forum on the Internet polled that 95% of participants are atheists/irreligious/agnostics and 84% of them even regard their poltical affiliation as strongly conservative.

The thing religious people like you don't understand is that there is nothing more to atheism than a lack of believe in deities because you were brought up with this big, overreaching religious world view. But to atheism there is nothing to it, no doctrine,no political affiliation, no circus.

You can erect as many strawmen you want, beat them down and feel like a victor ITT. We'll watch with amusement but the truth is that atheists range from humanists to moral nihilists, from MRAs to SJWs and from anarchists to conservatives.

>>7788

>Majority of atheists are liberals. Majority of liberals are SJWs.

>some atheists are SJWs

>therefore all of them are and atheism = SJWism

This is your thread in a nutshell

Ok so let me get this right.

You people strongly object when I generalize all atheists by the actions of a large group.

You have no problems with me doing it to Christians, and actively support it.

Nice to know.

>It's OK when we do it

>>7794

>You people strongly object when I generalize all atheists by the actions of a large group.

At no point do you demonstrate this is a large group. Also, lots of things indicate that it really isn't a large group, for instance the fact that christposting involves posting the same few pictures over and over again

>You have no problems with me doing it to Christians, and actively support it.

Depends on what you mean with 'it'. If 'it' means having a discussion where people give arguments for the things they believe, I would indeed support that

If it's shitflinging and namecalling, I really wouldn't

>>It's OK when we do it

Speak for yourself

>>7794

>You people strongly object when I generalize all atheists by the actions of a large group.

What large group? It sure wouldn't be of atheists. You couldn't generalize atheists even if you wanted to. There are no actions that "atheism" itself would condone as atheism isn't dogmatic.

>You have no problems with me doing it to Christians

I have no problem with people doing it to atheists even though it's faulty logic.

>and actively support it.

Support what? Generalizing a dogmatic movement? Not believing in a god isn't dogmatic as it's a call to inaction. In order to be dogma, it has to be a call to action. Atheism is the neutral position if it can be considered a position at all.

>It's OK when we do it

It's okay for us to eat pork, but not for Jews or Muslims. What's your point?

>>7794

You, see being an atheist is a lot like not playing golf. There is no requirement to not playing golf other than not playing fucking golf, so the group of people that doesn't play golf can be pretty diverse and even play all kinds of other sports.

But if you are a person who plays Golf than they are a lot of requirements to you in order to do so, your membership in a golf club, knowlege of the rules, the equipment. Maybe even your parents passed down their passion for golf down to you.

It's the same with Christianity. There just are basic doctrines and views that all Christian adhere to.

>>7819

/end thread

>>7819

>basic doctrines and views that all Christians adhere to

If that was true, how do you explain the existence of Christian atheism?

>>7925

That's because christian atheists aren't actually christians. They are atheists. You can't just change the commonly-held definition of a word.

>>7925

You can't just indefinitely extend and redefine the definitions of words. There is a point where all of language will lose its meaning. This is a commonly used tactic by SJWs. There would be people who think that minorities can't be racist and that sneezing and staring constitute as rape