>>42514
>how is it so hard to understand that a different genetic group could have a higher frequency of a certain genetic trait (such as antisocial behaviour) ?
After many conversations/arguments with normies along this line, I've concluded that it all comes down to a single line of reasoning
>Humans are intelligent beings that are so superior to every other animal before us, that we *must* be able to transcend race/genetics/nature solely with our minds
Sure, you can show them irrefutable evidence of differences in behaviour/intelligence etc. between clearly defined ethnic groups, but humans are so smart that we should just 'rise above' our genetics/nature! Which to a certain extent is true for the rare outlier on an individual level, but has been proven time and time again not to work at the level of the masses - simply because masses in general are retarded and easily controlled by their 'id' (and/or (((whoever))) controls their id).
Same reason why people think that they can just be whatever imagined gender they want, or be as equally capable of doing everything the other gender can.
Because gender is purely a 'social construct'.
Because race is a social construct.
Culture is a social construct.
Family is a social construct.
Anything and everything that disproves that one line of reasoning that their whole ideology comes down to, is a social construct.
Nature is a social construct.
It's funny how most of the people that consider themselves greenies and nature-lovers, are the exact same people nature would despise if it were a sentient phenomenon.