/ausaction/ - Australian Action

That being said, we have to really start to do something. This is our land, our soil. Wowsers came in on the ship reluctantly and then started trying to grab control. The wowsers lost but now they are back. We can either fight them now or run away, and abandon this country and most of our fellow Australians to a life of oppression. And then what are we to do if they come after us? Wowserism is not an inherently Australian characteristic, all cultures have those who seek to oppress others.

Eight-hundred years ago, our forefathers, our Saxon forefathers, took up arms against the Frenchman called King John. They defeated him, and forced him to recognise he was no longer in France, he was an English king and must adhere to English custom. Winning the freedoms that form the basis of our law and heritage, the English speaking peoples became supreme under Heaven. These are the freedoms and values that our recent ancestors gave their lives for. These are the freedoms that millions have risked their lives to attain by coming here. These are the freedoms we are pissing on.

Yes, it is us who are pissing on them. When our ancestors were oppressed, did they sit down and stew? No! Even when they knew they were going to lose, they fought and fought hard. They fought, and they lost. They fought, and they lost. And then they won. And they won again. What are we doing? We are doing nothing. We stew here about men who do not understand trying to bring about total security at the expense of our heritage.

We have incredible means at our disposal here to fight, but we do not recognise them. And these means are being taken away before we can use them. This board, which provides anonymity, is the perfect staging ground for organisation and operation. For political action we can do no better, and if it goes beyond that, if we are pressured and pushed around, we will have the experience and the will to fight. This experience is necessary.

For there are three fights in a revolution, and we are losing the first.

1) The ideological debate: The people must support our position as correct. The government says our freedoms provide cover for pedophiles, terrorism and all manner of other despPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/1/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

>>>/tripfags/

I've been looking around and apparently, writing emails is the least effective way to communicate to an MP.

Writing a letter is one of the better methods that can be done within a day, but if you can arrange a meeting, that is best. Tips for writing letters:

>Include your name and address: Identify yourself as a constituent by including your address when you write to your elected representative/s. Generally, politicians are likely to pay most attention to people who live in their electoral district.

>Keep it brief: Letters should be no longer than one page and should be about one issue only. Be as concise as possible. Politicians receive many letters on many topics every day. Long letters are likely to be put aside to read on a less busy day and that day may never come.

>Use your own words, not someone else's: An original letter sent by one single person is more effective than a form letter (or cut and pasted texts) sent by dozens of people. Even if your writing skills are not the best, a letter written in your own words will carry much more weight than regurgitating what some else said.

>Handwrite, or type and sign, your letter: A handwritten, or typed and signed, letter is far more effective than photocopied form letters, postcard campaigns or emails. Some politicians regard handwritten letters more highly than typewritten letters (some of these are technologically illiterate, and some find it convenient to claim the sender probably just cut and pasted what someone else said without thinking about the issue themself). Some, very likely many, regard emails as "second class mail" and some do not even read email.

>State the topic clearly: Include a subject line at the beginning of your letter. If it is about a specific piece of legislation (an Act) or a proposed law (a Bill), state the full name of the Act or Bill in the subject line, or at least in the first paragraph.

>Start with a clear statement of purpose: For example: