>>119
Always a learning experience when somebody makes the same mistake twice.
The developmental delay would be the norm if it were there from the beginning of recorded medical history. If it appeared somewhere along the way, then no, it would still be a condition, regardless of the "normalcy" of it, which has very little to do with medical diagnosis. Would it still be considered an impediment? Perhaps not, but it would still be autism. A rose by any other name is still a rose. Autism is autism, even if it is what society calls, "Normal" at a given period.