/autism/ - Autism

>>84

FUCK YOU REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

who brady here

>>97

jim brady?

>>99

nice dubs

>>109

if all are autism then none are autism

>>110

If all are autism then all are autism. You are making an all too common "ironic" juxtaposition between an objective reality and a "relative" perspective. If I have two red apples in front of me, the fact that they are both red apples does not change their existence, it only changes context. They do not magically become blue apples because "There is no relative difference between them" and then you can just pick whatever fucking descriptor you want for them.

>>119

Always a learning experience when somebody makes the same mistake twice.

The developmental delay would be the norm if it were there from the beginning of recorded medical history. If it appeared somewhere along the way, then no, it would still be a condition, regardless of the "normalcy" of it, which has very little to do with medical diagnosis. Would it still be considered an impediment? Perhaps not, but it would still be autism. A rose by any other name is still a rose. Autism is autism, even if it is what society calls, "Normal" at a given period.

>>119

Always a learning experience when somebody makes the same mistake twice.

The developmental delay would be the norm if it were there from the beginning of recorded medical history. If it appeared somewhere along the way, then no, it would still be a condition, regardless of the "normalcy" of it, which has very little to do with medical diagnosis. Would it still be considered an impediment? Perhaps not, but it would still be autism. A rose by any other name is still a rose. Autism is autism, even if it is what society calls, "Normal" at a given period.