>>5538040
First of all, I'm saying women took care of kids AND worked.
Secondly, one man did not do metalworking, war, diplomacy, merchanting and farm work all in one. In populated areas where that went on, people chose a trade…and their wives helped them, generally.
>I think you have your shit mixed up, noble women were the educated individuals in society and actually played a part in politics, philosophy, and other typically male dominated activities. If anything, you should be using them as an anecdotal example of women that actually, you know, did something other than breed.
Nice Shakespearean take on things, but the nobility sucked ass. You here all about the actually noble and educated ones and the exceptionally cruel ones, but a lot of them were worthless inbred nepotistic faggots. A good king is better than a democracy, but a mediocre king is shitty enough to never want to mention.
>when
Everywhere wealth sufficient for complacency wasn't. All of this bitching about income inequality now? The reason the US has income inequality of such an extreme level is because it CAN. We're overflowing with abundant, cheap material goods. People can make less proportionately, pay higher taxes and bills than before, and STILL have enough left over to buy more dumb shit. It's not just women, they were just the ones who enjoyed it first because appliances took away home labor and for some reason men were shutting them out of most of the new industrial jobs at first, so they got lazy, demanding, whiny, etc. I mean, that's oversimplified…a lot of things led up to it. The whole cherish and protect women thing got way fucking out of hand and spoiled em rotten.
But now even men are getting stupid body hair shavers and vanity size clothing and bitching about their imaginary genders all day. I mean, the LA fags is a great example of success ruining men too.
>I don't give a fuck if this is past, present, or future.
"I'm uninformed and proud"
>Women have always been shit.
"I believe things arbitrarily"
>There is a reason they were not allowed to vote up until recently.
Because they didn't want to. No, seriously, they didn't want to for the most part. They were raised by their mothers not to want to.
>There is a reason they were called "Spoils of War" and not "Combatants".
The raping and treating women like livestock thing is SUPER overblown because of feminist propaganda. Yeah, women got raped during sieges because the attackers had been sitting out in trenches getting boiling pitch poured on them for months and nary a camp whore dared come near enough. And the men were killed wholesale, in general. The fact that rape is even noted down in historical records is indication that it's remarkable, a breach of military conduct, and was considered unworthy behavior. As for sex slaves, that was more the style of the Hebrews, Egyptians, and sometimes Greeks and Romans. It certainly happened plenty with Europe, but not so much in the grand scheme of things compared to all of the European wars, and not that much compared to normal, generic slavery at all.
>There is a reason they rarely held any position of power. There is a reason you saw men in slaughterhouses and metalworking and women in textile factories.
I don't recall saying women possessed upper body strength equal to men. At the time, someone still had to make textiles all day. Equal division of labor does not mean identical division of labor.
>There is a reason for all this shit: Women are incapable of really doing jack shit besides being kept in a house to fuck and raise kids.
The thing is, I just know of lots and lots of women who shrugged off the daffy housewife thing and also didn't become retarded shrill feminazis, and accomplished remarkable breakthroughs in a variety of technical fields. Take Grace Hopper, for instance. Now, you get more genius men then genius women, and you also have more super dumb men doing petty crime poorly.
The bell curve has always been flatter in nearly everything for men than women; you're just blind to the lower half of it, where both genders are concerned. May not dovetail with your MGTOWing, but them's the truths.
>>5538047
What's wrong with posting a lot?