File: 1432859216647.jpg (72.18 KB, 500x434, 250:217, barack-obama-bling-bling-2….jpg)
No.1
Discuss future rules or settings for /b32/. If I see it as popular demand and reasonable I will add it to the rules.
View the rules here: http://www.8ch.net/b32/rules.html
Going to clean up this thread a bit, so don't be surprised if you see posts missing.
Post last edited at
No.4
No.5
No roll threads of any kind
No pony threads
No pedo content
No porn threads
No.7
>>1
>implying
Also, please forced anonymity.
No.8
>>4
shit also force anon, seriously it works wonders
No.17
No.20
You don't need to advertise the board on /b/.
No.23
No maymays.
Some exceptions might be fine. Cant think of any off the top of my head.
No.27
>>17
I enabled them for threads only.
No.37
Are le funny banana man threads allowed?
No.38
No.114
Do you want to be like the new snacks or something
No.119
No.120
No.121
You know, the only way this will really work is if there are no rules, and the moderator takes out threads that are unpopular in moderation. And sometimes ban when its funny I guess. It really just depends on what kind of person the Board Owner is.
No.122
>>119
Actually, it just pisses some people off.
>>120
>no scat
What are you, a normie?
No.123
>>120
no furfaggotry seconded
scat should be fine to sink a shitty thread
No.144
>>11
hey /b32/ this is WitchDoctor from /b/. I like your attempt to create something new and remove the things that made you want to leave /b/. With all due respect I think it should also be named something other than /b32/ because it is different than what /b/ is.
>Also I'd like to thank the academy for being the one to check the very first set of dubs on /b32/
CHECK EM FAGGOTS
No.148
>>144
>dat censorship
Enjoy North Korea kids.
No.150
>>148
sorry about that. I thought I was in the OC thread.
I have a shitload of tabs open.
No.152
No.204
I have high hopes for this board, though it'll probably get crushed by either lack of posting or cancer will overwhelm the mods. Still hopefully
No.205
>>204
Only time will tell my anon.
No.228
Alright so so far we have:
No roll threads of any kind
No pony/furfag content
No threads specifically made for posting porn
No memes, rare exceptions unclear
No pedo content (children -18 with little cloathing)
No.230
No.231
>>230
Usually they tend to be cancerous. Not saying they all are, but a good amount of them are.
Mostly because they get repeated, I could see an exception to them if theyre original/new but the ratio of reposts to OC is offset.
No.232
>>231
In threads we could use them to recognize each other without tripfagging. Like the ponyfags did when they first started out, insted of tripcodes or names we could just use the images in posts to be recognized.
No.235
>>232
If your using the name Anonymous, then you don't need to be recognized.
No.288
>>232
>just use the images in posts to be recognized
That is avatarfagging and it's twice as cancerous as tripfagging.
No.294
>>288
How so? Atleast it is still semi-anonymous.
No.297
No.298
>>297
Limited /pol/ack discussion plox
No.299
Nobody gives a flying fuck about your life, no threads complaining about your life/asking for advice for self esteem.
No.343
The board subtitle says "Chans were made for discussions, not porn threads".
Lol thats just wrong. They were made to dump pics for real boards out there. Learn in2 chan history. /b/ was created to get the talk out of /a/ dumping.
No.344
>>343
You're probably right. Should have looked into that.
No.351
>>230
Memes are like Frosting on a cake, but you wouldn't eat a cake made entirely made out of it.
Its something that you use to coat the surface your cake and maybe put in between the layers.
Something would be missing if you didn't have frosting , but you wouldn't have frosting make up 60% of a cakes' volume or mass.
Its not like you can get rid of them entirely.
>>343
Then maybe we should just have one cyclic porn thread or contain it to one thread at a time in the event this board gets a few hundred UIDs
No.358
>>298
Please this. /pol/ spent months ruining every thread on /b/ while saying shit like "this is our board now kike".
They are the SJW but Right-Wing.
No.359
For the love of god also no avatarfags.
We don't want posters like the one on /b/ avatarfagging with sena to shit up this board.
Especially when this board has forced anon and avatarfagging is just an attempt to get around that.
No.380
>>379
Fuck off.
>>358
>They are the SJW but Right-Wing.
I agree with that. Instead of saying that the patriarchy controls the world, they say the jews control the world. It was funny at first but now it's just annoying.
No.382
>>228
/b32/ should take a hint from bath and allow users to ban each other by reporting posts
Also, make it so users can vote out mods who make shit decisions.
No.387
>>382
Well, as far as right now we only have 3 mods so I don't see much happening.
Also I'm completely fine with people reporting it, not that it will matter on a board that is less than 5 PPH.
No.389
>>387
Well, we're already up to 77 UIPs. That's a lot better than most other boards.
No.390
>>5
Fucking finally.
Someone had to make a board like this.
No.411
>>390
And I'm glad I'm not the only person that sees them as cancer.
The roll threads were getting to me.
No.421
No.423
>>421
It doesn't and shouldn't violate our rules, as long as they don't make specific threads for trap porn then it shouldn't really be a problem. I hate traps to but they don't seem very cancerous.
No.470
Pedos are literally the anti-cancer.
[nothing spammed]
To not tolerate it is akin to SJW/Moralfag values, which have no place here.
Or since you guys are probably moralfags, means this place is just "even more" SJW /b/
And of course by default I must be a pedo, not someone who sees the SJW trend which turned halfchan /b/ into the cancer hall it is today.
TL;DR
>NORMALFAGS AND MORALFAGS HAVE NO PLACE IN A GREAT /b/
No.471
>>470
I guess we just don't repeat and unoriginal pedo threads.
No.472
>>470
You know what, this man actually has a bit of a point, but so does the other post
>>471
Most of us hate pedos because of their repeated threads. Only a small amount of the usual /b/tards hate them for just being a pedophile.
I have updated the rules a bit, however still no threads just for the specific posting of it, as it will just be labeled repeat threads.
No.513
>>470
Well lets put it this way: pedos have always been there and won't go away. They are chemo, but chemo also makes your hair fall out. There are many users who are:
1) not willing to risk the van for a couple of pedos who feel the need to post on a random board,
2) simply not fans of the material and will sagebomb it into oblivion.
Moralfaggotry isn't a factor, it is a simple case of browsing experience. I personally come to b32 for laughs and discussion not qtpa2tea lolis so I get nothing from their pics, but also wouldn't mind if the pedos make a thread with links as I'd just hide it.
Seriously, if you need to post pedo just post it on a dedicated board and link to it. This eliminates many issues and as long as you don't make dupe threads it should be fine. Don't expect a warm reception with a red fucking carpet though you faggot.
No.553
>>513
>cannot get vanned for someone else's posts
You are also pretty ignorant of the actual legal precedence involving such things. But I won't go into detail as it would be a waste of time
>also assumed I was a pedo
You are a credit to your SJW kin.
No.567
>>1
what about anime? they mind as well just be ponies or pedos. not that they are the same things, but they are still groups.
No.599
>>567
I don't think they will ever come here really.
No.600
>>599
I think it should be added to the rules still though. Since they are really just like any other fandom
No.611
lets make #/b32/ the official IRC channel of this board
No.637
>>513
I have been thinking about this, I'm pretty sure I've said this before, but up to this point people on 8chan have mostly hated pedos because they are tripfags, and or just general cancer. As any cycle threads on /b/ have already been proven to be cancer.
Most people don't hate pedos because they are actually pedos, and don't get me wrong. A lot of people do, but on 8chan atleast they are confined to their threads, and only noticed by their tripcodes outside of them.
I would like some opinions on a new rule, if I see a great amount of people for the rule, I may add it.
Rule 9?: Pony Content and Pedophile imagery may be posted, under the circumstances that:
If it is a thread, it cannot be completely about the posting of pony/Pedophilic images.
If a post is made including pedo or pony content, if it is related to the OP and or related to the reply it may be allowed. However under circumstances the moderator may remove the image, but you will not receive a ban.
Post your opinions. This isn't a poll, I am just asking what you think about this.
No.647
>>637
The rules look good to me as they are. No need to add any more until there is a problem.
No.648
>>647
I know, but I'm just throwing out ideas.
No.675
>>637
Seems more reasonable than "Lol, we moralfags now." I can agree to that.
No.681
>>637
Honestly I can agree to it, after all this board is for non-cancer posts, and well. They aren't really cancerous themselves, it's just cancerous how they post.
No.938
Here's an idea.
BOARD RINGS
I'm not sure whether it should be with other top board alternatives or just other boards in general, but I think it might help. A board ring could give them and us a more stable userbase by uniting different communities too small to sustain themselves.
Another idea is with other /b/ alternatives. I've seen 1-2 other /b/ alternative lately (one was /1123/), so I was thinking it might be mutually beneficial, but since were similar they might not want to lose their small userbase (or we lose ours).
So, what do you guys think? Any suggestions for boards (if you like the idea that is)?
No.939
>>938
I have no clue what your trying to say.
No.940
>>939
you know how /v/ has a ton of boards in the blotter? I was thinking of something like that with other boards.
/8lounge/, /a/, /am/ and /n/ also have the same thing. For most boards, it's all with similar topics such as /kind/ for /am/ and /u/ for /a/. In 8lounge's case however it's with a wide-variety of boards, such as /newspaper/, /videogames/ or /fa/
It's basically mutual board shilling.
No.942
>>940
The fuck is a blotter.
Maybe I need to catch up on my internet lingo.
No.965
Dead board.
We just can't have nice things. /bunker/ got shilled hard for the last several months so now it gets refugees while /b/ is trying to weather the storm. But anons that are still acting pretty shitty come there in large enough numbers to keep the quality low. We can't save it. Internets were a mistake.
No.967