Is anyone else upset about Youtube? Obviously a huge outbreak came out a while ago with the bob vs. Google+ shit, but still why hasn't anyone moved! So much shit would be better if they moved to a different site, especially if it was a .onion as copyright

Email
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1433208575456.png (97.96 KB, 661x358, 661:358, youtube-censored.png)

Anonymous 06/02/15 (Tue) 01:29:35 No.620

Is anyone else upset about Youtube? Obviously a huge outbreak came out a while ago with the bob vs. Google+ shit, but still why hasn't anyone moved! So much shit would be better if they moved to a different site, especially if it was a .onion as copyright wouldn't be enforced.

I fucking swear, all it would take is for 1 famous person on youtube to move to another site, and it would start a movement to the new site. Just 1 fucking person. Everyone has already had enough of Youtube, with it's strict Copyright shit, they have BOTS that scan through all the videos! The bot can fucking ban you too, without any confirmation whatsoever from an actual person.

Fuck you YouTube, and fuck it's large community for not realizing when to leave.

Anonymous 06/02/15 (Tue) 06:13:06 No.638

I share your sentiment but never plan to leave. There's just a wealth of content there.

That being said I did delete my google account and set up an anonymous one that doesn't trace back to my email or my comments back to a profile.

Anonymous 06/02/15 (Tue) 06:13:30 No.639

>>620

The youtube comment section is reddit and facebook combined at this point.

Anonymous 06/02/15 (Tue) 17:12:13 No.649

>>639

You forgot 4chan. Honestly it pisses me off to great extents when someone used the > to do a greentext on websites that don't have it. That's why all the kids know > as "meme arrows" now.

Anonymous 06/03/15 (Wed) 22:11:33 No.695

>>649

That's an inside joke I'm pretty sure. Same with maymay and other slang terms parodying the culture. Sometimes when the > is used as a stand-in for a name or @ or other sort of mention it is acceptable, but only in very very limited contexts.

Anonymous 06/03/15 (Wed) 23:11:23 No.699

>>695

Yeah, when > is used simply as a quote (its original usage), there's nothing wrong with it. Though when you start spouting memes, lack of meme arrows isn't going to save it…