>>108990
>Trump has the lawyers already, not making millions by using them to crush everyone would just be bad business. He's the first who will tell you he uses the systems at his disposal to make fat stacks and win
So, would it also be okay for rich liberals to use their connections to sue people who say stuff that hurts their feelings or say "bigoted" or anti-PC comments? How about a very rich jewish man who sues people for making "anti-semetic" comments?
And if Trump is allowed to use his vast swaths of money to sue people who make fun of him to get more money, can other public figures do it? Can George Soros sue people and institutions who call him a kike or deny the holocaust to make more money?
Personally, I think it'd be ideal if we could live in a world where people were free to insult whoever they want and not get silenced for fear of getting sued so already rich public figures can get even more money by suing people who dare exercise freedom of speech and the press. But alas, this is one American value which, judging by your post, is not one shared by Trump or his supporters.
And Trump didn't actually win the case as far as I know. So he didn't really make any stacks, in fact he probably lost a bit of money and time on this.
>the wall
Illegal immigration is something that needs to be addressed, you're right. But I'm not sure if it's the only issue.
>Doesn't mean you should vote for that gallery of cucks and cunts.
And I don't plan to. Probably best to vote Trump, honestly. Eliminate the middleman and all that.