No.92399
Uh, you don't get to create a masterpiece
deepart.io
No.92402
No.92407
>>92399 (dubs)
>Estimated waiting time: more than 201 hours
wew lad
No.92411
>>92407
always thought the wew lad looked like CIA
No.92467
Waiting on the interpretation of this timeless pose.
No.92497
>>92467
waiting on masketta car as a Van Gogh
No.92508
>>92497
you too? I wonder if they'll just do it once and send it to both of us
No.92510
>>92411
It's called le wrinkle face you heck
No.92520
>>92453
Come to think of it, would it be possible to teach the machine to recognise features from the Scene instead of random animals? Think of the possibilities.
No.92982
File: 1447376081512.png (356.94 KB, 500x281, 500:281, GWpXrbMojhrR_1500x1500_mtd….png)
opening scene x starry night
No.92983
>>92982
I just did Van Gogh.
No.93085
File: 1447424884134.png (398.14 KB, 500x281, 500:281, ze0o1TK2cHIF_1500x1500_mtd….png)
No.93109
>>92983
That actually looks really fucking good
Bravo Big Guy
No.93700
>>93691
You're a big algorithm-generated masterpiece.
No.93753
>>93700
UU
UU
Also, the estimated waiting time has gone down to 10 hours.
It is far more feasible now to do the plane scene than ever before.
Please, brothers, let's make something beautiful happen.
Other art styles others than the ones currently on that we could use include Art Deco, Art Nouveau, and possibly Futurism.
No.93850
File: 1447876216164.png (440.24 KB, 366x500, 183:250, N_sx0Sh7zjwd_1500x1500_mtd….png)
I'm going to start another when I get home.
No.93892
>>93822
>>93782
Thank you for keeping the fire, rising, brothers.
No.93989
>>93822
The Munch baneting really disapoints me. CIA looks like a hothead.
No.93997
>>93989
>implying he isn't a hothead
He was never in charge, anon.
No.94004
>>93997
this can't be happening!
Waiting time is only 90 minutes now.
No.94008
No.94017
>>94005
>using the shitty Jesus image
No.94030
>tfw waiting time is so short, that 8chan will discard your posts as flood
No.94032
You can invert an image, resubmit it, and do some minor editing to get rid of that watermark.
No.94034
>>94032
Good idea. I'll have a look how to do this with free software.
No.94035
>>94032
Or you can just pay £0.99 and they'll take the watermark off.
No.94039
I almost want to pay for the full size of some of these, and put them on display in my house.
No.94040
File: 1447963837547.jpg (64.92 KB, 500x281, 500:281, made_with_Green_Is_My_Pepp….jpg)
>>94032
It worked with GIMP. image/canvassize and overlaying the two parts as layers did the job.
No.94041
File: 1447964148376.jpg (62.61 KB, 495x277, 495:277, made_with_Green_Is_My_Pepp….jpg)
>>94040
Adapted it a bit, but the half is clearly visible.
No.94045
I learned a lot about gimp today. The idea is to overlay the two parts a bit and use the blend tool to get rid of any hard borders in the middle. Thank you Richard Stallman.
No.94047
File: 1447967338960.png (301.84 KB, 500x263, 500:263, jyDcqL_6uaHW_1500x1500_mtd….png)
No.94096
File: 1447999747221.png (450.2 KB, 500x422, 250:211, C0NZNxZbKH-m_1500x1500_mtd….png)
No.94102
There's no watermark anymore, when you download your image.
No.94107
>>94101
those on a 100x55 cm frame
it would be glorious.
No.94108
I'm glad that technology finally replaces modern painters. This algorithm restores the art of Da Vinci, Van Gogh and co and combines it with baneposting. What a time to be alive.
No.94114
Keep the fire rising, brothers.
No.94127
File: 1448034065301.png (369.14 KB, 437x500, 437:500, KC01XafM4TBP_1500x1500_mtd….png)
Masketta man in the style of belt pose shot.
No.94158
Could someone do a new art style for the shot of the hothead patrol?
No.94172
>>94108
The second one is Extremely beautiful
No.94274
It's a start, but the website owners are hotheads. They deleted all pictures with the hooded men, so I had to remake them. It's not porn, wtf. They also delete your pictures if you use art with naked women, even the cubist Picasso ones. Come on, it's 2015. Not even 8chan would delete naked women anymore.
No.94276
>>94274
Should have known better, VP9 doesn't like stillimages. Here's a better webm.
No.94282
>>94108
I really, really like the first one.
No.94285
>>94276
BRAVO
R
A
V
O
are you going to do the whole thing? will there be sound?
No.94292
>>94285
Depends on the behaviour of the webpage. If they delete my requests from the queue or finished pictures for whatever reason I won't be spending much more time on this.
Sound should work with Firefox or Chrome, opus-audio still doesn't work with webkit browsers.
No.94355
Added a bit more, but I won't work on it anymore. The siteowners keep deleting stuff they don't like, like CIA holding a weapon in his hand. The site is a safespace for hipsters who upload their own selfies to put the
No.94366
>>94355
You made the fire rise, brother.
No.94375
>>94355
>the siteowners keep deleting stuff they don't like
They expect one of us in the wreckage, brother.
Brother, for the love of Bane, please don't stop. Keep rising the fire.
Maybe they are deleting it because it is made public?
If you put it privately then it should be a-ok, I'd think.
Out of curiosity how many frames do you still have left to work with?
5000?
No.94385
>>94375
I just made 5 frames per second, 400 out of 1550 are ready, so more than 1000 still to go. The algorithm is open source, so I might run it myself and automate the task. I will do some testing first, if my hardware can handle it and if it doesn't get too hotheaded.
https://github.com/jcjohnson/neural-style
No.94390
>>94385
I swear on my flight plan that if you get this pushed through, I will find a hired gun that you can crash, Brother.
No.94667
>>94385
B-brother, did it work out?
No.94698
>>94667
I will try it next weekend. It should be rather slow for me, as the program is optimized for nvidia cards and I don't own and won't buy nvidia.
No.94700
>>94032
I haven't actually tried it, but what if you add a frame to the image? Wouldn't the watermark get added on the frame and you could crop the frame out?
No.94719
>>94698
It would sure be a nice feather in the board's hat for the anniversary.
No.94729
>>94700
Having tried it, I'm aware that doesn't work now.
No.94745
>>94700
You can get the image without watermark from the link that the download button provides.
No.94771
>>94698
Can you imagine how beautiful the scene would look with an impressionist painting filter in HD at 30 frames a second?
No.94789
>>94771
it would be extremely beautiful
No.94804
No.97757
A-art brother, are you still there?
No.102850
Bump for cutting edge meme technology
No.102864
>>92402
>>92399
>>94276
You magnificent bastards.
No.102871
>Estimated waiting time: 828.0 minutes
thanks
No.102880
/pol/ here looking to find new advancements in cutting edge meme technology. What would it look like if you were to use MS Paint Pepe/Wojak images as the style reference?
No.102881
>>102880
We'll get to see in 800 minutes.
No.102882
>>102881
Is the software available somewhere?
Or is it some proprietary stuff?
No.102883
>>102882
No idea, I'm just using the website.
No.102884
>>102883
Hmm, the about on the website state it is using the paper's algorithm.
I can read it and understand it to some extent, but I always have trouble applying what is written in technical papers.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06576v2
No.102901
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Greeting Brothers, I come baring gifts. Mainly because /pol/ was just being faggots about the greatest meme revolution
Here are some links for a script that does what the website does.
https://github.com/jcjohnson/neural-style
It's a bit involved but someone here should be able to work with it. There's even a video about it being used to translate a 3D scene into a different style using NND.
The fire RISES!
No.102959
File: 1451406561383.png (320.22 KB, 500x281, 500:281, fDEWJeHvqLY9_1500x1500_mtd….png)
Here's the ms paint Wojack.
No.102963
>>102901
>/pol/
Tell us of their sins. We must be aware of their hotheaded deeds.
No.102975
File: 1451418192520.png (Spoiler Image, 512.34 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 16PbXp4N88ig_1500x1500_mtd….png)
>>102963
They were just being fags and shitposting, nothing major. Now commence the posting Dank Mega Memes.
All I got it is related to something else
No.103050
>>94276
SURREAL
S
U
R
R
E
A
L
We're in charge of Deepart.
No.103112
>>102959
Looks like a glass pane
No.103139
>>103136
I-I can't take how deep this has gone