Why is this board filled with literal landwhales? I like big asses and stuff, but people who are far and away wider than they are tall is disturbing to me. These are people who struggle to even walk. What the fuck, guys?<tin

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki	Show oekaki applet (replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks) Hide country (this board displays your country when you post if this is unchecked)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1445113791187.png (210.06 KB, 338x388, 169:194, 200pct_standing.png)

Anonymous 10/17/15 (Sat) 20:29:50 8b6174 No.5341

Why is this board filled with literal landwhales? I like big asses and stuff, but people who are far and away wider than they are tall is disturbing to me. These are people who struggle to even walk. What the fuck, guys?

Anonymous 10/17/15 (Sat) 21:05:25 f509df No.5342

>Complaining about fat girls on a board devoted to fat girls

Hide threads you don't like, or fuck off.

Anonymous 10/19/15 (Mon) 02:26:39 8b6174 No.5351

>>5342

It's just about every thread. Don't mistake my words for hyperbolic generalization over everything, I'm just wondering why people 300+ lbs. are posted seemingly predominantly on the board as opposed to the 180+ weight range.

Anonymous 10/19/15 (Mon) 03:08:19 f8e9ef No.5352

>>5351

>It's just about every thread.

Well, you were given two options. Maybe it's time to try the second one?

Anonymous 10/19/15 (Mon) 03:38:48 2afc52 No.5355

>>5341

For a guy who flirts with libertarianism, you sure act like a hand-wringing liberal.

Anonymous 10/19/15 (Mon) 03:59:09 753665 No.5356

>>5341

>trying to comprehend another fetish while having you're own.

it is not that hard man…

Leejunne 10/19/15 (Mon) 05:06:34 a28711 No.5358

>>5351

>>5341

We do have threads on smaller women, but since they're not as bumped as often, they're obviously not as popular.

Check the catalog to see if there are ones you like, and of course you could always make your own.

Anonymous 10/20/15 (Tue) 13:44:14 00cfe4 No.5366

>>5351

180+ Range tends to be more in the thick range rather than BBW. Depends on height though. IMO at least.

BBW isn't really set in stone, it depends who you ask. Years ago, there was a discussion on one of the BBW image boards that BBW had lost it's meaning, since too many people considered women who were thick/chubby as BBW, and women who were BBW as SSBBW. It was then suggested that what was then SSBBW become Ultra Sized BBW. I don't recall it ever taking off.

I will admit that in recent years when looking for BBW content that the term seems to have lost it's meaning. It's frustrating to see women who are very clearly not fat use the word BBW.

KFD 10/21/15 (Wed) 02:19:05 80efe9 No.5369

File: 1445393946500-0.png (60.58 KB, 642x768, 107:128, 9.png)