>>5555
>I'm pretty sure that this is a dead thread, but I just wanted to respond to something here for posterity's sake. I just wanted to post this quickly before I forget and I'm also not even done reading the post.
No, it's not dead. It will be going on for months. Not only because it's a huge subject, but because I am renovating my house, and that needs to take priority.
Before I go back to why Nordic people and pigmentation, I just want to mention one thing I found out about the word "with" in English.
I have already explained how you navigated in the archipelago, but I'll just repeat it with the Norwegian words so you understand the difference.
From start, row MED(with) daymark A
When VED daymark B (daymark is straight right or left), change direction and start rowing MED daymark C, until VED D, then row MED E……
In practice this would look like
MED A
VED B MED C
VED D MED E
VED F MED G
….
until you reach your destination.
This primitive method only works on rivers and in an archipelago, if you need to navigate the English coast, some form of primitive compass rose is needed.
Both concepts MED and VED wasn't really needed in England or in Germany, because you "always" had to triangulate between daymarks all on one side of the boat, to know you are far enough out for some dangerous skerry or tidal bank.
I Germany the word "mit" is used, when you go "with" somebody. A synonym for "ved" is "by"-"bei"-"bi", but that is not used in navigation in Nordic.
I'll talk a lot about this, directions, references systems whenPost too long. Click here to view the full text.