/bmw/ - The Bureau of Memetic Warfare

>Realism and objective truth

Most of us have come to our views by rational reasoning and evidence. We came to our views by debating and studying. In debate we have preconceived notion, and by debating some of our views change, and some are re-enforced. This trial and error is objective method, because it puts your views on the line for scrutiny.

Our goal is objective truth. Many of modern myths trample in the face of objective standards. Thus we should rigorously push forward the notion of objectivity, debate and skepticism of the Status Quo.

Our opponents are mostly relativist and are pushing for subjectivity and feelings. We should bring forward the revolutionary notion that truth is objective and not subjective, and hijack intellectualism as something white and traditional.

>Nature vs Hume

By attacking the notion of equality in nature we can win. Their counter argument comes from Hume; "What is, doesn't mean that it ought to be".

And this is easily won by attacking with practicality, and observations contradicting their ideals, and then exposing their naiveté.

I think George Orwell said it best; all are equal, but some are more equal then others.

We should bring forward more naturalistic philosophy. Before it was attacked by liberals as a fallacy, but I think we have found a way to over come this by evoking evolutionary psychology. In a sense arguing that evolutionary reasons have made us aware of racial and sex differences, and those differences, but also our ability to sense them comes from actual evolutionary struggle. Also I suggest we argue that racism is defensive mechanism evolved through evolution and part of our genetic code, and is essentially logical, since we feel white identity is being attacked.

The liberals have been attacking masculinity and white identity by claiming that some emotions are pathological. Claiming that national or racial pride is irrational, or they claim that hatred is irrational. This is not true. We should make the notion that all emotions are social reactions. Emotions are reactions to a social signaling, and have logical job in social environments, and thus it's irrational to attack them by declaring them pathology by default. So we can say that pride and honor have real social importance for any social identity. Even the Gay Pride event is all about pride for their social environment, but some how whites shouldn't feel any pride in their history and heritage.

So essentially we should make a new white identity, which is essentially identitarian and traditionalist.

We need to promote it by a way of memes and ideals. Here are some pictures of the kind of thing I'm thinking.

I think this meme should be something to do with over all style, that brings forward white racialism in a sexual way.

Here are some good ideas. Firstly just stylish fashion propaganda, implying the picture with the man. Secondly more complex propaganda with the family picture, and thirdly the comparison pictures with the dancers.

These three pictures are all completely different in their content. I see, all of them some what positive. Although the dancer comparison is tricky because it can easily seen as some what negative towards blacks. The wording is very critical. "They say white people can't dance… Oh really?" In a sense it's a good way, when it insist that black people can dance good, while white people can too.

I think the most powerful positive meme pictures are those where there are good social vibe. This means that it has to have some incitement towards love, happiness, friendship, brotherhood, family, playfulness, etc between two or more people.

Pictures with only one person are harder, because the connection needs to happen with the person in the picture and another thing in the picture, or the person has to have one way interaction with a viewer of the picture.

Here are couple of examples of only one guy in the picture having some connection towards the viewer, or towars an object in the picture.

Here are pictures where two people have established a social connection and the viewer can identify it. In these pictures the subject and the object are both people.

Yes.

>>2282

>I think we can win against them by being philosophical and intellectual.

Kek. You can try to reason with them, offer statistics, long explanation, logic, etc only for it to be completely dismissed by some buzzword like "racist", "bigot", etc.

After a year or two you may realize that you must stoop down to their childish mentality to be able to defeat them.

The only way to defeat these children is to throw a dank meme at them and make fun of them. You must become the monkey and throw shit if you wish to repel the shit slinging monkeys.

Negative memes are more fun though.

Sing, sing a song

Sing out loud

Sing out strong

Sing of good things not bad

Sing of happy not sad.

Sing, sing a song

Make it simple to last

Your whole life long

Don't worry that it's not

Good enough for anyone

Else to hear

Just sing, sing a song.

Sing, sing a song

Let the world sing along

Sing of love there could be

Sing for you and for me.

Sing, sing a song

Make it simple to last

Your whole life long

Don't worry that it's not

Good enough for anyone

Else to hear

Just sing, sing a song.

Stuff like this?

>>2412

Yea, like this.

In finnish chan Ylilauta they have a meme, which they say: "How would you feel if in this picture?", or "How does this picture make you fell?"

As this is a question, people tend to answer. Now in ylilauta, this method is done almost hourly. Usually by some degenerates fags, who try to push homosexuality, but imagine if it were made to serve good?

Now, think about this. Even some twitter campain might work.