meme team tactical command

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

File: 1431562399990.png (155.29 KB, 900x502, 450:251, US_Army_Special_Forces_Com….png)

meme team tactical command Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 00:13:19 No.818

I'm not saying or implying that we should have a leader. But maybe it wouldn't hurt to have some units or something like that (even if it is just a meme itself and not practically used)

Like completely arbitrary units that are assigned to topics instead of having anons assigned to them.

As in:

Any memegenesis performed that falls under the topic of politics = MEME Team 1

MEME Team 6 of course is in charge of the most elite memegetronics

Fill in the blanks on the other team numbers.

Of course, all the units can have their own extremely autistic unit patches that we can unironically wear out in public while we sperg out on our once monthly foray from our basements and to best buy to find a replacement keyboard. Semen resistant keyboards can't get here soon enough.

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 00:32:52 No.826

I think there are different roles to be played.

Some people simply generate conceptual material and loose claylike idea genesis while others design, implement through hosts, and a further regurgitation and cycling of the material in and through itself. Less of an emphasis on creating and implementing strict ideas, more of an emphasis on freeform material globulization matriculating repeatedly in a process

But that's just what I would call the globulizer unit probably

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 01:13:02 No.837

File: 1431565982573.png (1.35 MB, 2088x3736, 261:467, 1378569990549.png)

A rigid structure doesn't really work well for anons.

I recommend having basic tasks and split them up into general threads and then allow people the freedom to further define them as they go.

For starting out, it would be a good idea to encourage making OC (the gg board I think still has a good example of thread for this)

This keeps stuff fresh and fun

Then you could also have a thread for counter shilling operations, /pol/ did a few of these with the #yessallwomen tag, #killallmen, #endfathersday and the gawker shekel shaoh.

Anyone involved in those would be a great asset for twitter and other forum attacks.

A philosophy general to explore memetics would be good too, and also sharing media that explores these concepts, you could setup a pastbin and googledoc with links

A few good things to read/watch to start with:

Alan Watts is God for 10 Minutes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1LzVN8nqg0

Men among the ruins by Julius Evola:

http://www.juliusevola.com/julius_evola/texts/MenAmongtheRuins.pdf

Century of self torrent:

https://kickass.to/the-century-of-the-self-bbc-complete-series-t4804081.html

These are some of the things that have very much shaped my views.

Other stuff like Ghost in the Shell, other Alan Watts lectures, Bob Whitaker, also contributed.

It's hard to think of all the stuff but I can find more links and such if you give me time.

A recent developments thread, for stuff in the media, or new memes would be a good idea.

We need to keep our fingers close to the pulse, of what memes are rising and falling out of use.

The news would also be a good thing to keep an eye on, but /pol/ and /32/ might be better boards for that.

Anyway anons work best as lose goal based cells, any more rigid hierarchy will cause shit like tripfag drama and make you more vulnerable to infiltration.

Pic related is an old image, but it shows how SRS (now ghazi) operates.

Other groups work the same, and will be out to shut you down.

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 01:19:53 No.838

>>837

Oh and before I forget, a linguistic thread.

This is more my pet project, but I'd love to see a research effort on turning common memes into a full of written and latter verbal dialect.

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 01:20:30 No.839

Flesh out the ideas for divisions and get some flags made and I'll upload and label them if you want

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 01:29:07 No.840

>>837

I know any kind of structure will never work. It's been tried here and always fails.

What I meant was:

>anon make a dank as fuck meme that is directly or indirectly political

>it is credited to MEME Team 1

>goes full meme

>MEME Team 1 gets a confirmed kill

>anon makes dank as fuck meme aimed at the evil elites

>MEME Team 6 gets the credit for conjuring such an elite meme

I meant it should be all shits and giggles… a meta-meme to make it look like we are far more organized than we are.

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 01:31:02 No.841

>>840

then we should have dank as fuck task group names and make up red herrings

Like how /pol/ always said they had orders from "BG"

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 01:30:45 No.842

>>837

That is fucking terrifying

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 01:36:27 No.843

>>837

Public Enemy No. 1

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 08:14:52 No.880

>>818

What we need the most are artists(as in drawfags). Those who can bring our imagination to life.

I wish I continued wanting to be an artist when I grew up past the age of 8 kek. Since then I haven't drawn anything.

Perhaps we should all try to lrn2draw?

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 09:14:08 No.882

>>880

Memetic warfare ops are perfect for chans bc you get all types.

The drawfags, the photoshop wizards, the musicians etc

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 15:44:19 No.903

>>880

I'm a decent.enough artist. I've done some pro-tier photoshopping projects. But I have a son and a house and I don't have the time to do anything that involved on the computer.

Anonymous 05/14/15 (Thu) 18:15:17 No.913

As far as creating OC of course all anons have some ability to create/alter graphics and of course some of the most powerful memes required no real artistic ability.

In general I think this small group will not b3e the source of as much or as powerful a content as the whole of Anonymous.

I think our primary job is to learn exactly how this stuff works; why one thing goes viral and another does not and most importantly why and how one thing can influence the real world in seemingly impossible ways.

Anonymous 05/15/15 (Fri) 00:01:53 No.993

>>913

I agree, we don't need to generate content so much as getting it where it is needed

Anonymous 05/15/15 (Fri) 01:26:12 No.1027

>>818

i got a meme idea i dont know what the image would look like tho

>liberalism is a mental disorder

Anonymous 05/15/15 (Fri) 01:31:01 No.1028

>>993

>generate content

isofag detected. shill your marketing bullshit elsewhere

Anonymous 05/15/15 (Fri) 02:14:55 No.1040

>>1027

Maybe some poorly drawn characters. All of them absolutely crazy. And one of the crazies is spouting progressive mental illness.

Or maybe Dr Dolan and gooby. Couple panels with a patient on a couch. One is a trans otherkin that had their sick surgically moved to the top of their head "I feel like I'm a little girl" or some other tumblresque shit. Dr Dolan "ur r speshuhl! Hug yourself!!"

The next panel is with a character that is a little boy "I like chasing lizards and running around!". Dolan: "triggr! Trehgur!!" While throwing pills at the boy.

Anonymous 05/15/15 (Fri) 02:15:43 No.1041

>>1040

>sick

Dick. New phone with shit tier autocorrect

Anonymous 05/15/15 (Fri) 02:57:07 No.1056

>>1028

What does iso mean?

Anonymous 05/15/15 (Fri) 11:04:36 No.1095

>>838

Through the genesis of a language surely we will begin to seed something new akin to a tree. That tree needs to be hardy and resistant to subversion in the way formal languages are currently twisted. There are two approaches to this the British and French ways. British Methodology requires much more indirect insulation but offers a strange universality: we let the tree grow naturally letting ideas come and go manipulating only the grain of the wood itself to prevent subversion. Or the french way which involves a monolithic institution to canonise things into the language which is better short term against subversion but works like bonsai-ing the tree it only limits growth. It is of course a matter of opinion whether it is salient to have a small amount of always green leaves or is it more salient to sacrifice the green of many of the leaves so that others are greener than any other. Natural selection vs Structuralism

Anonymous 05/15/15 (Fri) 18:02:05 No.1122

>>1095

Is there anywhere I could read more about this?

Anonymous 05/16/15 (Sat) 02:27:42 No.1217