/boards/ - 8chan Boards

>>7261

Right. I'll stop by, since the old attentionwhore bitch is gone.

>>7262

Thanks, no pressure.

I'm a bit bothered to have found that the previous owner of the place was a shitstirrer and nobody seemed to have believed it at the time.

Hotpocket here, was hired to help moderate but primarily to spread the information I have on gardening, cooking, and technology. Enjoy your stay.

>>7265

I won't go back and forth with you on the subject because I don't want to fill the thread with it, but I'll just say this and be done. I don't even expect a response of any sort so don't feel obligated.

I'm the one who made the thread about the owner leaving, which eventually got stickied. Seeing as it's gone now, there isn't much that I have that would prove that aside from a screenshot that I took to show that while the BO's posts were gone, mine were still there.

I think that the reason why a lot of this got out of hand is because of everyone, including myself, jumping to conclusions, and in most cases people assumed the worst. I don't think it's entirely fair to say that you want a fresh start and want everything in the past, as you mentioned in the new sticky in the board, and simultaneously cast slights at the previous BO by calling her a "shitstirrer" and a "samefag". That's the same sort of accusatory behavior that led to the drama before.

But based on your efforts that have taken place to revive the board, I will choose to believe that you're only making a distinction between yourself and the previous BO in good faith and I hope that the board will see success.

As excepted, first thing I see is

>Well I'm not a womyn

S R S

R

S

>>7275

Not even after 24 hours and someone has to be passive aggressive.

>>7280

If only females tried to get involved into a community rather than get angry at the smallest things to not put in effort, but oh well, I guess most females are incapable of doing anything but complain.

>>7288

>boogeyman

S R S IS

R R AMONG

S R S US

>>7275

It's kind of funny that the new owner has so much to say about the previous one isn't it?

>>7327

I wouldn't say it's that peculiar.

I think it's somewhat natural for people to want to say their piece. But I also think that sometimes we don't realize if it's the most wise or helpful thing to do, since it's coming from ourselves. I could understand why someone would say such things out of good intentions, but I just thought it would have been wiser to just not voice a stance on the previous board owner, as either stance has the possibility to bring about negative reactions.

The rest of this is more of an aside, not really directed to the post I quoted:

More so than a complaint, I was just trying to offer a bit of insight and advice to the new owner. My stance on the previous board owner had no bearing in the advice I gave. I also gave advice to the previous owner–much of which she even followed through with–because at the end of the day, I thought the board was what mattered most. And that's what matters to me now. I don't want the new BO to go through what the previous one did because when the BO suffers, so does the board.

I tried to make all of that as brief as possible, but man it's hard. There's more that could be said but it may do more harm than good. The only reason I responded again was to make it known that I've got nothing against the new owner and I'm hoping for the best. I'll shut up for real now.

>>7384

You're really nice and it's refreshing, but be aware that people lie and misrepresent themselves on the internet. This is a weird situation and the trolls who incessantly took down tradfem now have control of it. Why they are going to such great lengths to manipulate the 8chan community is anyone's guess.

>>7385

I know I said I'd shut up, but this is kind of an important topic and I only neglected to mention it in my previous post in an attempt to be brief.

I addressed this at >>>/meta/73380

bumping