>>3998
>Now Halloween isn't explicitly about Christianity at all
Mon, Halloween didn't start as being explicitly Christian either, same for Christmas. We just tacked them on previously holy days already. At first it was pagan gods, then it was Christian events, and now it's money events. It makes perfect sense. Catholics don't normally do Halloween, but that will depend on the countries. Here, nobody did Halloween 15 years ago. Nobody. We only saw it in American movies and series. Then they started marketing it to kids, and young kids starting doing Halloween about 15 years ago. Those kids have grown, and now more and more people do Halloween, though adults still don't.
>If we are to reject Halloween because of its roots shouldn't we also reject Christmas?
I wouldn't think so, first because you can't change anything now, secondly, because Christmas being where it is now in the calendar is a symbol for the rebirth of nature, the coming back of crops and all that stuff, so it works just fine and it doesn't matter that it isn't Christ's actual birthdate.
The difference is that we don't believe in demons when we do Halloween, it's purely cultural now. I doubt Santa Muerte is purely cultural.