>>5697
>Here's a question: would the German government be right to to not give it tax benefits, and to discriminate against it? Assuming Germany is right about it being an abusive cult?
Yes. Germany has to give this privileges to the Catholic Church because of the Wiener Kongreß rulings in 1815 and the treaties with the Vatican that succeeded it.
Same with the Evangelische Kirche and different smaller Churches of that time, essentially.
To additionally give these rights to other communities, like jews, muslims or scientology is a decision based on Germany's good will and no obligation.
>Wiki says the discrimination is more than just tax breaks. Germany also spent public funds to send undercover investigators inside scientology for years, in the manner that you would penetrate a criminal syndicate. But Scientology is known for trying to infiltrate authorities themselves.
Germany is Orwellian. It is a nightmare, no joke.
>>5698
>I would argue that if Germany wants to continue to consider itself a secular democracy,
Germany is no laicistic republic like France for instance.
There is an alliance between the Church and the state same in Austria
There are religious references for different political functions and i the Grundgesetz ie.
In Bavaria the local laws are even better, but that's a different topic and only theoritical, it is mostly dead law nowadays
>>5699
What does terrorism even mean?
Germany does support terrorists in the middle east right now ie. Sorry, I meant freedom fighters.
It is intriguing why for example Kosovo is no terrorist state while Afghanistan is. It is completely arbitrary.