>>6275
>I just got a 2 week ban from /christian/. You literally have to praise cuckolding now, lest you get banned.
This doesn't surprise me. I haven't been to /christian/ recently, but some time last month there was a thread up about women sleeping around and NoHymenNoDiamond.
I took the stance that while, as Christians, we should forgive others for their sins, we are under no obligation or compunction to marry them. Ruining themselves for marriage is a permanent consequence for their own choices and actions, and they only have themselves to blame for it. Sins should be forgiven, but only a fool forgets them.
Everyone agreed that this was an entirely reasonable and Christian stance. But there was one guy in the thread, fairly articulate, who kept insisting that you have an obligation to marry someone like that, that it is unethical and unchristian to deny her just because she has slept with other men. He believed that "forgiving" her of her sins meant pretending that they had never happened, that someone who has committed grievous sin is in no way lessened or affected by it for having done so,. So long as they ask for forgiveness, the sin is washed away like it was never there, to no ill effect.
He also clearly implied, though he never outright stated, that a woman has a God-given right to "settle down," no matter what they've done in the past. That is to say, if a woman wants you to marry her, but you as a man don't want to, you are at fault for that. In essence, men aren't allowed to have standards. He was deeply against NoHymenNoDiamond on basic principle, simply because it was men demanding basic standards of decency and self-control from women.
He got blown out by several other people who agreed with me; I myself never actually directly responded to him. One person in particular, IIRC, argued that just because we should forgive a pedophile for his sin doesn't mean that the pedophile shouldn't be locked up or should be trusted to be around children. But he got unreasonably, deeply upset about it, and wouldn't let it go.
I didn't think anything of it at the time, but now looking back at it, I cannot help but wonder if that wasn't the BO. If it was, then the authoritative crackdown and SJWification of /christian/ doesn't surprise me. People like that in positions of power tend to use it to make excuses for their own mistakes, sins, and failings. It stands to reason he wouldn't put up with people telling him he was wrong for long.