Will there ever be a science of God? A way for people to empirically analyze and maybe communicate with God using the power of science?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1456727435669.png (1.16 MB, 1366x768, 683:384, 1442097002633.png)

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 06:30:35 ac8eda No.257896

Will there ever be a science of God?

A way for people to empirically analyze and maybe communicate with God using the power of science?

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 07:00:21 eb68c6 No.257901

>>257896

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 07:41:22 e0192a No.257905

That is not the purpose of science.

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 07:42:39 ac8eda No.257906

>>257905

it is the ultimate purpose and we are heading towards it eventually, most scientists are afraid to face this fact

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 08:33:06 581361 No.257910

Science is just a jewish invention to trick Christians into turning away from God.

Anonymuos 02/29/16 (Mon) 08:44:40 48a800 No.257915

>>257906

Science is the study of the natural world, the Lord is explicitly supernatural.

>>257910

dude what

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 08:52:30 ac8eda No.257920

>>257915

natural vs supernatural is a false dichotomy, you're making an elementary mistake. it's okay

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 11:04:48 f95b1e No.257932

Theology is the science of God.

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 21:37:52 83ec34 No.257998

>empirically analyze something outside the universe

Nah

Anonymous 03/07/16 (Mon) 00:51:35 262c02 No.259183

>>257920

In what way?

Anonymous 03/07/16 (Mon) 00:59:26 45cf58 No.259186

Scientists should be investigating the God hypothesis since its so important to everyone, of any religion…even atheists want to know

Anonymous 03/07/16 (Mon) 01:10:33 386654 No.259188

>>257998

all of aquinas' five ways are a posteriori arguments, and thus technically are empirical.

as a matter of fact, the a priori (non-empirical) arguments for God are normally dumb ass ones, like Anselm's ontological argument.

Anonymous 03/22/16 (Tue) 07:19:39 6cfff2 No.261892

>>257896

> power of science

As an actual microbiologist I don't even understand what you are asking. You can "scientifically" analyse anything. Make a hypothesis, test it and have a control group. The real issue is that much like psychology analysis - you have several variables. Now imagine you are analyzing prayer and healing. How would you actually measure faith? How do you provide quantifiable data?

Anonymous 03/22/16 (Tue) 09:59:16 3e7351 No.261906

Science has become a dogmatic religion.

It's hijacked by the Freemasons to serve a satanic agenda.

Gone are the days when science simply meant the study of things. Now it's become monkey-man God-hating pop science.

>guys he wears a labcoat, that means he's a scientist! you stoopid primitive christians the earth is a ball, the black science guy said so..

Anonymous 03/22/16 (Tue) 10:15:23 8b92c5 No.261910

File: 1458641723076.gif (410.13 KB, 221x196, 221:196, 1457415109108.gif)

>>261906

I wouldn't call it their religion. Ass is their religion; It's god, themselves; Their temple, everyone; Their virtue, sins.

Anonymous 03/22/16 (Tue) 14:35:12 5d14a3 No.261939

Nah. Science can only analyze the physical. It makes too many philosophical assumptions to analyze the psychological realm too deeply, and it can't consider the concept of an unfalsible concept of a spirit, much less God.