[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For all those who understand

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Alex here, I'm back. I'll make a SAFemail ASAP for those who'd like to contact me. 1-8-16

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

cdc7bc No.260119

How accurate is this?

I say very.

441a60 No.260122

100%


441a60 No.260123

Any time anyone posts about anything the pope says his apologists always find some contrived verbal loophole to allow them to say he didn't really say what he appeared to say. When the Trump thing happened they were arguing that because the pope referred to people who "only" build walls not being Christian he really wasn't referring to Trump. Either that or he was a poor confused victim who was tricked by the sneaky media. It's a little pathetic.


cdc7bc No.260124

>>260123

This. I can never understand how my fellow Catholics keep defending him. Muh infallibility can only go so far.


441a60 No.260127

>>260124

I think they somehow don't know how to reconcile being Catholic with admitting that the pope believes and advocates many wrong things. Pat Buchanan manages to do it somehow. There have been many bad popes, as most Catholics will admit, Francis is one of them.


820eb6 No.260131

My opinion is that the jewish media is actively trying to make Francis look bad by interpreting his words like protestants interpret the Bible (Not saying whether or not that's bad.) and making him look unprofessional for a shepherd of men. But I also think at least his holiness should write down what he's going to say (probably the whole point of the above video), at least so that he can't make any mistakes the media can use against him. Or he should be quiet like Ratzinger (was he quiet?) and not keeping his apologists defend him and try to find out what he actually means when he speaks about something. Not further dragging down everything by keeping ambiguous and all that shenanigans which comes after. When every other Christian denoms attack you for whatever they think you imply, it's time to stop speaking in parables and hit them with straight unambiguous words.


e430f8 No.260132

>>260131

>defending the heretic

Antipope "the reformation and islam dindu nuffin" Bordiglio


818964 No.260141

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>260124

>Muh infallibility can only go so far.

Correct, goofy media appearances are not part of the infallible magisterium.


cdc7bc No.260162

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


b95d41 No.260166

File: 1457795222041.jpg (118.33 KB, 680x689, 680:689, ecclesia sanctorum duploru….jpg)

This is now a dubs thread.


b24e7e No.260205

File: 1457823906185.gif (252.42 KB, 371x371, 1:1, 1452718543206.gif)

>>260166

Good job


9576cd No.260211

>Yeah i h8 the pope 2. Dnt wrry tho guys im going to join SSPX soon n then i wont have to deal with antipope bergaglio's liberal jewish agenda to literally change doctrine. Vatican 2 was a mistake and no im not doing what luther did because im being traditional, u retards.

Friggin spoiled cradle catholics tbh




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]