Men should have the right to ‘abort’ responsibility for an unborn child, Swedish political group say

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1457785077364.jpg (48.14 KB, 603x335, 9:5, Sweden_yes.jpg)

Men should have the right to ‘abort’ responsibility for an unborn child, Swedish political group say Anonymous 03/12/16 (Sat) 12:17:57 82fa0e No.260148

Why do liberals get upset at things like this when this is the inevitable result of everything they've been working for?

I really just don't understand. When you believe in God, you have an absolute truth. You have something to measure all things against. But in this humanist utopia that western youth are promoting, how can anyone stand up and say that something is wrong or "too far"? What grounds do they have?

Even when someone like Peter Singer says we should be allowed to kill severely retarded children, how do people in favor of abortion argue against that?

If you're going to tell women that it's "my body, my choice" then how are you going to stop men from making their own choice about shirking responsibility?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/03/08/men-should-have-the-right-to-abort-responsibility-for-an-unborn-child-swedish-political-group-says/

Anonymous 03/12/16 (Sat) 13:13:54 0db308 No.260150

>>260148

>muh feefees

That's the only justification they can fall back upon, even as they try to portray a veneer of civilization and enlightenment.

Anonymous 03/12/16 (Sat) 13:14:59 0cbcf1 No.260151

>>260148

>When you believe in God, you have an absolute truth. You have something to measure all things against. how can anyone stand up and say that something is wrong or "too far"? What grounds do they have?

so? people pick their religions, so in the end they still "pick their morality" in a way…

unless you believe in hardcore determinism, but that would be even worse

Anonymous 03/12/16 (Sat) 14:05:03 5d661f No.260155

Pretty much. It's why MGTOW is a thing. If women are allowed to abort their children for practically any reason, there's no good way of justifying a man's obligation to his own child.

Allow abortion up to the last second? Being consistent in this issue requires that the father be able to ditch at the last second.

Anonymous 03/12/16 (Sat) 14:49:37 0c8281 No.260160

File: 1457794177732.jpg (37.15 KB, 449x429, 449:429, tumblr_n5wg80rAMb1rsempdo1….jpg)

>>260148

How the fuck does the inane ramblings of some party's youth group become global news?

Also these are probably just young fedoras who idolize Ron Paul, and still haven't looked closely enough into their mother party to realise that it's not liberal at all and never has been.

Anonymous 03/12/16 (Sat) 15:27:27 cac70c No.260169

File: 1457796447228.jpg (114.96 KB, 960x720, 4:3, _raccoon.jpg)

>>260160

>idolize Ron Paul

>support more abortion

Anonymous 03/15/16 (Tue) 13:25:07 82fa0e No.260786

>>260151

They pick a foundation. When you "pick Christ" you get everything that goes along with Christ. You don't pick and choose moral issues. You inherit a system of morals.

Picking and choosing on individual issues is the problem. And it creates contradictions and slippery slopes.