/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

Christianity is all about turning the other cheek. Love your enemy, like Jesus said.

I bet you deny evolution and think gays shouldn't marry as well.

>>260393

>Christianity is all about turning the other cheek. Love your enemy, like Jesus said.

this shit again.

Stupid shill fuck off.

>>260393

>You either have to believe that apostates should be killed or support gays

>>>/r/christianity

Gays can't marry

Marriage is by definition the union of a man and a woman

>>260395

>>260397

I was just memeing, calm down, lets stay on topic.

My first post is essentially the reason why.

>most Christians ignore or dismiss to sanitize Christianity.

Most Christians treat Christianity like a buffet, its common knowledge, even most westernized Muslims do the same thing with Islam.

I live in Cuckanada so my experience will probably differ from yours, but I've met only one other Christian who doesn't engage in casual sex or pornography consumption, etc. Their excuse is always "Well, the bible also says not to eat shrimp/trim your beard/whatever!"

This is at an Orthodox church btw, modern society has dealt a horrific blow to Christian culture and behavior.

>>260395

It means something, just not what liberals think it means. It doesn't mean sinning is OK, or should be encouraged or recognized by Christians, but it does show how to be a Christian is to suffer. Christ saves us from our sins, but we should still try to stop them because they are sins, but we do not get to fight against or judge the sins of others. Maybe it doesn't seem fair, and Christ will save the worst of the sinners, but we still should sin no more, which includes things like homosexuality and the other sins which some Christians are starting to accept.

>>260406

NO I just hate hypocrity.

Dont attack muslims for something that is not wrong.

Also if you read Deuteronomy 13 and 17 its not talking about witchcraft but people who changed the religion.

>>260390

There is the ceremonial, civil and moral law.

The killing of apostates was part of the civil law. Which is no longer binding because we are in the new covenant.

Ceremonial law and Moral law. Please.

>>260454

>>260553

If they are no longer binding, why did the churches burn witches and heritics?

I thought we no longer have to observe them?

And if the catholic church who has no theological errors justy the killings of apostates is it then not still part of christianity?

Why did the church persecute protestants and have war with protestant nations for not of the reason of apostasy?

And its not only the old churches but even the protestants who burned witches and warlocks. And you could even get killed by the public if you blasphemed Christ.

You can not claim they are not bounding but still justify your actions by qouting these laws that are supposed to be passed away.

>>260395

You don't have to reply to bait.

>>260573

You're going to have to come up with some proof that the Catholic Church actually did this.

>>260454

According to Paul. And who appointed Paul? Paul appointed himself. His evidence? A vision that only he saw and claimed meetings with the disciples which have no independent attestation.

And it totally contradicts the world of the Messiah himself that he did not take away even one word of the law.

>>260582

Nonsense. Peter would not have acted on Paul's advice if it was solely based on a false apparition.

>>260401

Beautiful. Going to a Catholic Youth movement in Ireland this week so I'll do well to learn as much of this as possible

>>260573

In the spirit of C.S. Lewis. If the extent of your knowledge in those times, told you that there was a woman whom had made a deal with the devil, inflicted curses on others and targeted children, wouldn't you eliminate said threat.

In addition:

>WHAT HAS BURNING WITCHES AND WARLOCKS GOT TO DO WITH THE IDEA OF MURDER FOR APOSTACY?