[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For all those who understand

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Alex here, I'm back. I'll make a SAFemail ASAP for those who'd like to contact me. 1-8-16

File: 1458416492293.jpg (161.05 KB, 960x720, 4:3, slide_17[1].jpg)

c97015 No.261524

How are we to interpret the Incident at Antioch in light of the doctrine of Papal Infallibility?

67c25f No.261530

papal infallibillity is false

t. catholic


efdf50 No.261534

>>261524

The pope consults the college of cardinals all the time. The incident at Antioch doesn't conflict with papal infallibility at all.

>>261530

Why do you think it's false?


c97015 No.261537

>>261534

But didn't Peter deliver a teaching on faith and morals that Paul rebuked? Or was Paul merely rebuking Peter's actions rather than any such teaching per se?


5433ea No.261538

>>261534

>The pope consults the college of cardinals all the time. The incident at Antioch doesn't conflict with papal infallibility at all.

Do you really think that citing another modern example of the same problem, does anything more than dig a deeper hole?


283372 No.261542

pope doesnt decide anything these days.


51130a No.261553

>>261524

Itt

>people who still dont get papal infallability is constrained to very rare circumstances


c97015 No.261574

>>261553

You mean like teaching on matters of faith or morals in an official capacity?

Isn't that what Peter was doing in Antioch?

Is there more to papal infallibility than that?

Also how might papal supremacy tie into the incident?


913c48 No.261596

>>261524

So was this dogmatised? I don’t think it was.

>>261530

You’re not a catholic if you do not subscribe to all the dogmas.

Did anyone ITT ever read Pastor aeternus?


c75fa5 No.261741

E X C A T H E D R A

X

C

A

T

H

E

D

R

A


8d3399 No.261755

my own interpretation of the Incident in Antioch.

paul in the best tradition of the leftist try to render all classes unnecessary constructs. although jesus himself said that he brought the gospel to the jews.


2654a1 No.261761

>>261524

>"If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews?"

Does this imply that it is the goal for us to live like Jews? What does living like a Jew include?


761bbe No.261765

>>261761

Crying about antisemitism while rubbing your hands.


67c25f No.261769

>>261596

>You’re not a catholic if you do not subscribe to all the dogmas.

when did Jesus say that?


dab8cf No.261789

>>261769

you might want to check out protestantism




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]