[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / advice / asmr / bcb / fast / leftpol / tacos / vg / vichan ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
July 2018 Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: 0f6028efdbc86ad⋯.jpg (130.83 KB, 635x794, 635:794, moses01.jpg)

0f7904  No.520608

Glory to God in the highest!

You can continue discussion with others,as well as reach the mod team on our Discord server! -> https://discord.gg/zEfH3ZM

You can reach the board owner at this email: tutorNC@protonmail.com

This board is for fellowship and discussion among Christians. Please be mindful that some general rules are enforced to encourage constructive discourse.

Please read the rules and ban policy before posting!

Rules

1. This board is strictly Safe For Work.

Please consult the global rule page if this is not clear.

2. Interactions must be for the sake of Charity. Post made in the spirit of disruption or spite could earn you a short to permanent ban.

Charity is a foundational concept in Christianity. It is the virtue of supreme love for God and others. It is the greatest of the three virtues Paul emphasizes, and governs all Christian conduct. Just because this is an 8chan board does not alleviate Christians of their moral duty. All interactions must be done with this in mind.

This includes all antagonism. Personal insults, trolling, disrupting/derailing a thread, raiding from other boards, spamming, and scandal are all considered part of this rule.

Scandal includes encouraging people to commit sin like fornication, masturbation, blasphemy, apostasy, abortion, lying, taking the Lords name in vain, suicide, and the like. Any esoteric topics will fall under this as well.

Interdenominational debates are allowed on this board, but they are still governed by charity. Insinuations must be accompanied by explanation and/or primary resources.

3. This is a board for Christian discussion and fellowship. For the intentions of the board, a Christian is one who believes in the Nicene Creed (Specifically the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed) and the Chalcedonian Definition.

This board recognizes Christianity as a religion that exist in real history. Because of this, it chooses these two criteria as the cut-off point for what officially constitutes a Christian for the sake of the board. Not all groups who label themselves Christian simply are by assertion of the title. All who claim to profess the faith must adhere to these two creedal statements and their implications in order to post in Christian fellowship threads.

4. Non-Christians are welcome to post here, and are encouraged to ask questions in good faith. But they cannot proselytize non-Christian beliefs or post antagonistic or otherwise scandalous material.

If you are a non-Christian, you are more than welcome to create a thread asking questions specific to you, but please avoid Christian fellowship threads. This is because the primary purpose of fellowship on this board is for Christians to get the view of other Christians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_(virtue)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalcedonian_Definition

Ban Policy

The mods will use their best judgement when enforcing the rules, and you can contest their decisions by appealing the ban, posting in the meta, or talking to us directly on the discord. The discord server is the fastest way to get a response, followed by the appeals page. Posting in the meta is the slowest and least efficient. Keep this in mind. Do not dispute the ban in the thread the ban took place in, or make a new thread to contest your ban. This is disruptive.

Post that break the rules will be met with temporary bans in accordance with the severity of the post, up to 5 days.

Permanent bans will be given out for posting pornography, explicit material, after being given multiple temporary bans, and raids or obvious trolling from other boards.

Please post any questions you have in this thread, and we will try our best to answer them.

And now there remain faith, hope, and charity, these three: but the greatest of these is charity.

Post last edited at

ecdac0  No.661614

>>661555

I miss the flags, bring them back. The Trinity wants them back as you can see by the trips.


d1febf  No.661792

>>661555

What about the Baptists who totally aren't protestant?


4e9f1d  No.661830

>>661792

I'm pretty sure that's why they got rid of them, to be honest. Because any far-sighted plan to get rid of baptists would have to involve dropping the flags. It also explains the rule change adding Chalcedonian creed which they did even earlier. (You gotta recognize the Fathers, goy)


4e9f1d  No.661901

>>661845

The Edinburgh Encyclopedia, Vol 3, p.251 (1830)

>It must have already occurred to our readers, that the baptists are the same sect of Christians which we formerly described under the appellation of ANABAPTISTS. Indeed, this seems to have been their great leading principle from the time of Tertullian to the present day.


4e9f1d  No.661928

>>661915

And what's the point of doing that? Unlike other people I actually do believe scripture is the final authority, and not extrabiblical teachings of man.


4e9f1d  No.661939

>>661936

>Because its true.

Well I dissent because the credit belongs to God. If I'm not allowed to honor God for his word then I only ask why are you the one writing the rules here?


73bea4  No.661981

>>661830

Why are Oriental Orthodox and Nestorians allowed on here if they don't accept Chalcedon? Also, Nicaea proclaims "one baptism for the forgiveness of sins" yet Baptists don't believe that about baptism. What's the deal?


4e9f1d  No.661987

>>661963

>How is denying what is true honoring to God?

You're trying to make me say something false for the sake of argument. God's precepts don't truly originate with any group of men. They didn't come up with them. No matter how theologically correct or otherwise they may have been at the time, the truth was all always derived from the same source, the final authority for faith and practice, the word of God.

And of course that can be proven by looking up 2 Timothy 3:16-17. And where did we get it from? From God. Which is self-evident.

>I'm not.

Good then, then I'm addressing this to whoever is trying to change the rules on me.

And one more thing I don't place faith in the corruptible reports of what people claim someone said hundreds of years ago, only in the incorruptible word of God. That's the only incorruptible report, every other report is corruptible and untrustworthy. It could have been altered before reaching me.

>>661981

>Why are Oriental Orthodox and Nestorians allowed on here

You'll have to ask them. That is, if they even really exist.

>Also, Nicaea proclaims "one baptism for the forgiveness of sins" yet Baptists don't believe that about baptism. What's the deal?

Probably a matter of wrong interpretation by someone, I'd guess.


154964  No.662015

>>661987

>And where did we get it from? From God. Which is self-evident.

If it's self-evident, why did there need to be a council to declare it Scripture? And why do you reject the authentic Church of Christ that conducted this council (via the guidance of the Holy Spirit)?


154964  No.662017

>>661987

>And one more thing I don't place faith in the corruptible reports of what people claim someone said hundreds of years ago, only in the incorruptible word of God. That's the only incorruptible report, every other report is corruptible and untrustworthy.

Which just so happens to be the KJV, right? Why do you follow a corrupted version that robs the Holy Mother of Her Grace?


4e9f1d  No.662041

>>662015

Keep this meta. I'm simply saying they cannot just up and change the rules for the cause of cutting me out. All they've done is cut themselves out, if they're gonna change the rules.


4ee6fa  No.662055

>>520608

The anime fags have their containment thread, why is it allowed that they spam their bullstuff all over the board, well-knowing people are utterly annoyed with it ? Can you finally make a rule prohibiting people to post homosexual feminizing cartoons in threads with real discussions ? This sh't it is derailing threads, no matter the argument.

I want a petition to keep inherently homosexual, effeminate cartoon depictions of cutesy cartoon girls and all that inherently gay-making and scandalous crap at least out of serious discussions.


322c7e  No.662157

File: 78f16ff9b01f253⋯.jpg (129.66 KB, 1008x567, 16:9, f16ff9b01f253ebb1330578c9c….jpg)


947f80  No.662158

File: 8b8c9593d3bce04⋯.jpg (103.73 KB, 615x623, 615:623, 1314532412903.jpg)

>>662055

Cry more.


8e7f11  No.662204

File: 52b5fabdc8d2510⋯.mp4 (5.46 MB, 854x480, 427:240, wr768.mp4)

>>662055

Agreed.

>>662157

>>662158

Stop ruining the board with anime pictures.

Should anime be banned on /christian/?

https://www.strawpoll.me/15908118/


1c98e6  No.662207

File: 08e2756305c2e12⋯.jpg (48.06 KB, 359x338, 359:338, 13.jpg)

>>662204

>strawpoll.me


8e7f11  No.662209

File: dd260d70f728e87⋯.jpg (56.85 KB, 590x665, 118:133, 1472144217379.jpg)

>>662207

Why are you so keen on posting anime?


1c98e6  No.662210

>>662209

Why are you so keen on posting gay men?


322c7e  No.662211

File: 4ab943f5e21d3fa⋯.webm (4.82 MB, 944x944, 1:1, Proxypo-holyshit.webm)


8e7f11  No.662212

File: 211518956a3e0c2⋯.gif (2.38 MB, 220x392, 55:98, sam.gif)

>>662207

Also stop abusing the poll

>>662210

Why are you so keen on being a gay man?


1c98e6  No.662213

>>662212

There you go posting another gay man. What's with you?


38b15d  No.662214

File: 37fd2056ddd1459⋯.jpg (17.79 KB, 438x428, 219:214, Chew.jpg)

>>662212

>people don't agree with me

>this means people are abusing the poll


8e7f11  No.662215

File: 192fb545e8de054⋯.jpg (66.6 KB, 1270x547, 1270:547, Sam-Hyde-cool-boy-youtube-….jpg)

>>662213

>>662214

Where are all of you fags coming from?

This board is a safe-space from homos.


1c98e6  No.662216

File: 75dd6c04a0c4888⋯.png (1.09 KB, 209x99, 19:9, lrn2poll.png)

>>662212

>stop abusing the poll

You need to learn how to poll.


1c98e6  No.662218

>>662215

Then why do you keep posting gay men?


94df2a  No.662220

File: 20dfd03cacce809⋯.png (344.87 KB, 727x720, 727:720, Mug02.png)

>>662215

>assblasted about cartoons


ac2746  No.662221

File: cc75f195900c1a2⋯.jpg (35.58 KB, 601x625, 601:625, Now See Here.jpg)

>>662215

>Where are all of you fags coming from?

When you post in a thread, it gets popped up to the top of the nerve center. We saw your little poll and decided to come here and wreck your shit for being a whiny little bitch on an anime website.


8e7f11  No.662222

File: fbd324d754faf18⋯.png (389.17 KB, 1000x625, 8:5, Screen Shot 2017-11-20 at ….png)

>>662216

I trust the integrity of the users here, but it doesn't surprise me that anime fags lack it.

>>662218

get out of here shoo

>>662220

>grown men watching cartoons

smh lmao


1c98e6  No.662225

>>662222

>still posting gay men

Damn, son.


8e7f11  No.662228

File: 55a13984f17ff10⋯.jpg (7 KB, 184x184, 1:1, samhyde62.jpg)

>>662221

Don't you have some loli futa traps to watch? Stop posting little girls you sicko.


1c98e6  No.662229

>>662228

I impressed by your knowledge of anime. You clearly know more about it than I do.


eb5d2a  No.662230

File: 87cc593f684cbfb⋯.png (10.45 KB, 658x426, 329:213, anime yes.png)

>>662222

>I trust the integrity of the users here

Then you have your answer.


8e7f11  No.662233

File: 13bedbba21ded39⋯.jpg (89.6 KB, 800x800, 1:1, flat,800x800,070,f.jpg)

>>662229

Nice try, pedo.

>>662230

Good.


a41439  No.662234

File: f105aa0f1354afd⋯.jpg (41.19 KB, 483x533, 483:533, Thinking.jpg)

>>662228

>posting little girls

<he thinks this is a real girl

/christian/, ladies and gentlemen.


1c98e6  No.662235

>>662233

>still posting a man in make-up

You have a strange fetish.

>Good

You realize that says it shouldn't be banned, right? Anime is here to stay.


9f86cb  No.662238

File: 922636e6ed6ca59⋯.png (771.35 KB, 740x720, 37:36, Supersmug.png)

>>662230

70% No it should not be banned

>>662233

>Good

Confirmed! He likes anime!


8e7f11  No.662239

File: 840d6405a7e0a38⋯.gif (503.38 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, giphy_s.gif)

>>662238

I mixed up the options, stop using your homo tricks on me.


8e7f11  No.662240

File: c6c2616562fb3fc⋯.jpg (104.23 KB, 1075x1011, 1075:1011, dCH5nJQ.jpg)

>>662234

You watch them in cartoon form or otherwise your pedo butt would be in jail. Stop the degeneracy. Do it before it's too late, anon.

>>662235

I'm going to make it my life goal to rid this board of anime. You might as well stop while you can.


1c98e6  No.662241

>>662240

>my life goal to rid this board of anime

That is literally the saddest thing I've ever heard in my life.


5bbd2f  No.662244

File: 4c7090cfe0d7375⋯.jpg (109.93 KB, 1043x720, 1043:720, wut.jpg)

>>662240

So, let me get this straight:

YOU think cartoons are real people and yet you think is is WE who have the problem?


8e7f11  No.662246

File: 2459a499542f424⋯.jpg (37 KB, 600x600, 1:1, osjdb2it1c101.jpg)

>>662241

you spend your free time watching prepubescent girls in Japanese cartoons voiced by middle aged Asian men, get off your high horse pedo

>>662244

yes


1c98e6  No.662248

>>662246

>yes

So, you do think cartoons are real people? Get help.


eb5d2a  No.662249

File: 351990d4329a210⋯.png (289.32 KB, 514x424, 257:212, 31.png)

>>662246

All you've accomplished is making this thread into an anime dump.


08673c  No.662254

>>662240

>my life goal to rid this board of anime

Aim high!

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

8e7f11  No.662255

File: 03369919c2e85f2⋯.jpg (7.61 KB, 231x181, 231:181, thumbs up.jpg)

>>662249

I needed more pictures for my reaction folder, thanks fellas

>>662254

Stop being a reprobate


2e0b54  No.662274

Please stop everyone.


c93a6d  No.662573

>>662274

ban anime or no


f7096f  No.662574

>>662209

>>662212

>>662215

>>662222

>>662228

>>662233

>>662239

>>662240

>>662246

>>662255

The anti-anime anon desperately tries to fend off /a/-fags invading his board.

He is the true hero.


ff556b  No.662743

File: ccb069280982e32⋯.jpg (9.21 KB, 318x159, 2:1, index.jpg)

>>662574

Unironically this.


947f80  No.662804

>>662573

Go back to leftypol.


d26402  No.662864

Anime posting outside of tasteful use as reaction images should be removed.


831dba  No.662890

>>662864

Only if Anderson posting is given the same treatment.


d26402  No.662897

>>662890

Agreed


f9cbdf  No.662957

Please don't post links to polls here. Unless they're made by the BO or one of the moderation staff, they don't mean anything will change because of them.


4e9f1d  No.662958

>>662957

Did we ever have that poll for rule #2?


f9cbdf  No.662992

>>662958

Yes. That was a over a year ago.


b08c44  No.663290

File: a5c6aff9084b62b⋯.jpg (21.61 KB, 314x343, 314:343, horrid.jpg)

>>662743

>>662574

>>662864

>Avatar-f–ging as an homosexual, agnostic comedian who makes edgy videos is somehow fine but smug anime girls are not

Being contentious, adding to God's law, butting your stupid, obnoxious opinions in whatever thread with anime pics, and just being a self-righteous asshole are far worse than any non-lewd anime pic will ever be.

"Do not speak evil against one another, brothers. The one who speaks against a brother or judges his brother, speaks evil against the law and judges the law. But if you judge the law, you are not a doer of the law but a judge. There is only one lawgiver and judge, he who is able to save and to destroy. But who are you to judge your neighbor?" (James 4:11-12)


0e7a83  No.663305

File: 26ae10be1116d9c⋯.gif (488.78 KB, 497x373, 497:373, 1487118321092.gif)

Everytime, everytime I come here every few months or so, this board gets shittier. The level of discourse is on par with /pol/ by now.

People here are not concerned with truth and are generally immature.

For crying out loud, there's a weeb thread. For what purpose?


910f2d  No.663320

>>663305

What do you expect from /b/ with Jesus?


4e9f1d  No.663333

>>662992

But the current Rule 2 was posted on 9/10/17. That was less than a year ago.

The rule used to say "Please be civil to one another,"

and, "Posts that attack a specific Christian denomination or institution without primary sources or an accompanying explanation are banworthy and subject to deletion"

I think those were good rules, there was no vague abuseable language in the rules about "must be charitable" a year ago. A person could consider just about anything "disruptive" depending on their viewpoint. I also asked one of the mods on Discord if he would do a survey on rule 2, back in January of this year. I never got a definite answer.


4e9f1d  No.663334

>>663333

Forgot to include link.

https://archive.is/FDx2V


661c85  No.663840

File: 74211c04a91733c⋯.jpg (11.4 KB, 220x256, 55:64, A. S..jpg)

>>663333

nice digits


706f32  No.664006

>>663333

I'm guessing no answer.


cfeac9  No.664112

>>664006

Kneel in audience with Our Lord. Pray to him, and you'll find an answer.


d342be  No.664233

Please pray for my twin brother. Every time i try to have a discussion with him about Christianity and Atheism, he brushes it off and has a look of disgust whenever i talk about Jesus and God. He says "he's not going to die tomorrow" and "he doesn't have time for it in his life right now". Whenever i finally do get him to talk to me about the topic, he attacks me viciously and eventually walks away. The last time i talked to him about it, he walked away after a 30 minute debate after i told him if he doesn't have logical arguments, it is illogical, and he acknowledged it and doesn't care. Please pray for the lord to enter his heart like I do constantly. God bless.


5d25bf  No.664245

BRING BACK FLAGS REEEEEEE


082254  No.664586

>>664245

This board is shit without flags. Bring them back.


706f32  No.665175

>>662992

So, nothing? The rules were changed less than a year ago. On this day in 2017, Rule 2 was different. How could you have had a poll on rule 2 as it currently is more than a year ago?

See: >>663333


7cb97e  No.665545

I can say anything I want about Protestants and Protestantism on this board, but any thread or post criticizing Catholicism gets deleted and I get banned automatically, even if it's a genuine criticism not meant to be attacking but something rather that could be discussed. What the winnie the pooh!? This isn't right. Is this a Catholic board now? Are Protestants and Orthodox no longer allowed?


e3efe2  No.665636

>>665545

In my frank opinion, the overall board has a bias to Catholicism, but other denominations maintain a presence here.

There are instances of people insulting Protestantism and Orthodoxy for no reason and being banned, though.


cbbcfe  No.665779

>>665636

This board is clearly bias to Catholicism and it is pretty annoying at times tbh


1c98e6  No.665790

>>665779

No, it isn't. The problem is that Protties can't have a civil conversation. On a long enough timeline, all Protestants resort to petty insults when talking to Catholics. It's like some sort of biological imperative.


e3efe2  No.665918

>>665779

It can be a bit discouraging, but every site will have its biases.

Also mods, there's a raid going on.


e3efe2  No.665924

Thanks for clearing up the raid, mods.


49ddc4  No.666047

>>665924

We need to PRAY for the mods


1b84c1  No.666096

How do I debate a Jesus Mythicist? No matter how many scholars I cite, no matter how many times I show them that the historical consensus among all historians and scholars is that Jesus existed, no matter how many times I quote Josephus or Tacitus, they still keep going on with their pseudo-history and make ad hominem attacks against scholars and question their methodology. They're worse than creationist tbh.


4f0a97  No.666175

>>665175

Just so you know I'm monitoring this thread for a response. Mods don't hesitate to reply anytime you have an answer.


a41c6a  No.666839

>>666666


f73382  No.667041

File: f073ecd1a103ffc⋯.png (55.11 KB, 300x100, 3:1, 1500709628514.png)

Please bring the flags that are in this banner back. Catholics, Orthodox, Baptists and Nondenominationals make this board what it is.


5d331d  No.667225

>>667041

We wouldn't be able to bring back the Baptist flag because they are Protestant


3433fc  No.667457

Does it seem like the Baptist shitposting has gotten a little out of hand as of late? They're shitting up every thread. We need a crack down. They'll bitch about how this board is bias but they're literally shitting up every thread so we have to do something.


4f0a97  No.667482

>>667457

I think you should be banned.


3ea000  No.667493

>>667482

I unironically second this


23ac35  No.667528

>>667482

>>667493

t. Baptists


479e58  No.668116

>>667528

Nevertheless, that guy should be banned. It's against rule 2.


482455  No.669423

>>668116

No. These Baptist heretics are shitting up every thread now and it is getting pretty annoying. They need to be treated like any other heretic.


d5f3a3  No.669576

>>669423

>pointing out roman hypocrisy is "shitting up threads" and worthy of death

Apostolics everyone


8771d7  No.669591

File: e0ce288168438bd⋯.png (402.6 KB, 808x1408, 101:176, g.png)

Why was I banned for rule 4 just for saying Jesus didn't have long hair? If it was because I used an image that just happened to be made by JWs, first, I literally just googled "Jesus with short hair" and those were the first ones to come up that weren't that purposely ugly 3d model. And second, you realize I posted three other images that were made by catholics, right?


60f150  No.669597

>>669591

That's odd. I think they believe manmade images hold real power or something, so if the image came from a non-christian artist maybe that triggers rule 4 for them.


60f150  No.669599

>>669423

Honestly you rabblerousers are violating rule 2 by this lobbying to ban people that know the Bible better than you. I think your type should be banned.


ada5e5  No.670802

>>669599

This. Definitely this.


3a7108  No.671328

flags please


313d05  No.671378

Why was my thread asking why perrenialism is wrong deleted?

Can i make another one? I didnt read it all yet

Why is the mod team so annoying?


5bc3a9  No.671620

>>671378

Mods just delete threads randomly. Just wait a few days and make it again


98d1a6  No.671678

File: 8c6c9a0293ca1b3⋯.jpg (459.41 KB, 940x705, 4:3, mel2.jpg)

>>670995

so i get a 7 day ban for "baiting" even though it says right there in the OP:

>Post that break the rules will be met with temporary bans in accordance with the severity of the post, up to 5 days.

why make the rules if you guys dont even follow them? either perma ban me or give a 5 day ban, but dont make rules and not enforce them and then act all high and mighty in the discord.


644c58  No.671694

Nice to see that now bishops are untouchable and you can say nothing about them, or you will be banned

>>671636


4ee6fa  No.671747

>>671694

>insult

>bearing false witness

>language like a 12 y/o

Your brain on "criticizing". Please repent.


ada5e5  No.671763

>>671678

Just chalk it up to Rule 2. It lets them do as they like. If a mod is in a bad mood and happen to be anywhere near an internet outlet, any post that they think as "disruptive" will get targeted, and you will suddenly have a ton of deleted posts with no explanation required.


267f79  No.671774

Is it just me? Or the alphabets tiggers, or the devils and their agents are working overtime lately?


444117  No.671963

>>671774

I think that the board is being raided, we've already seen some threads being shared on other websites.


d5f3a3  No.672269

File: 5020c5e725a344e⋯.jpg (72.63 KB, 500x570, 50:57, u8IldhN.jpg)

>>672249

>posts on anime leads to searching for anime pics of underaged girls and other scandal

Man...if ONLY people on this sub had warned you and everyone the dangers of anime in the past.


947f80  No.672272

File: e26af8674ace573⋯.png (405.69 KB, 1366x768, 683:384, 3ca6d82cec8f682a33e202a636….png)

File: 3533fae4b991e23⋯.png (10.36 KB, 1807x119, 1807:119, Mod.PNG)

>>>/christian/670312 http://archive.is/ppohT

So the anime thread got locked and the reasoning for it was given. Now, if discussion of entertainment and having actual fellowship on this board was against the rules then I wouldn't have a problem with it. The real issue I do have with this decision is how hypocritical, inconsistent and nonsensical it is. The mod in question acknowledges that the thread is not bad, and anyone looking at it can see that the level of discussion is miles above of most threads on this board with good, well thought out posts, good recommendations and people sharing good things they know.

And then a mod suddenly barges in and starts making stuff up in order to lock the thread. For example:

-Claims some of the shows recommended are porn, because there are bad pictures on google search. Which makes no sense since google search is unrelated to the actual thread, the discussion or the recommendations. He even lazily just says "Some shows" despite the the shows recommended were really unoffensive stuff like JoJo and Angels Egg. It's like someone saying all movies are bad because they google searched some movies and saw violence and gore and porn in the search results. Nonsensical and has no relevance to the thread itself.

-Claims that because some anime has sinful content, therefore all of it is bad. This is of course the most illogical claim since that applies to all entertainment and I do not see the video game/Christ-chan/general movie threads being locked despite the exact same claim applies to them as well. And once again, has no relevance to the thread itself.

The reasoning was vague, inconsistent and can apply to everything he doesn't like. Which makes it dishonest. There were no good reasons at all to lock the thread and was purely because the moderator himself feels offended by the subject in the moment. However, if "No fellowship or discussion of entertainment one mod does not personally like" is the new official policy of the board owner Tutor then please make it official.


cf91a0  No.672278

File: 2babf372422ff9c⋯.jpg (101.97 KB, 620x876, 155:219, Mary-and-the-Witchs-Flower….jpg)

>>672272

I did the search also, I would not blame the mod though. Same really raunchy stuffs were there, the catch is that some are 'fan arts' and those are often lewd in nature and those stuffs pops up pretty much on the top of the search though.

>inb4 mods cannot differentiate between official and fan-arts, lol

Brother, anyone who does not watch anime often or does not know or watch that show would not be able to be.

>some sinful content

After an image search and some of the top images are naked girls which the "parts" was covered by droplets is not really convincing (fyi, I googled "Darling in the Franxx")

>inb4 any accusation towards me

I do watch *some* anime. Not really often because I find wanton so-called "fan-service" in anime these days really tasteless. The last anime I watch was a movie and it is called "Mary and The Witch Flower", it is Ghibli-esque (Japanese Disney when it was in its renaissance counterpart) animation. Pretty wholesome, it is about how one should not be doing sorcery or get involved with it in any way, courage, and taking responsibility and not brushing away ones own mess; it is pretty much a relatively simple children anime.


154161  No.672279

>>672269

It's a dumb reason. You can find "scandalous" images of anything in google. Even Christianity. Literally searching "Jesus" brings up an image of Jesus smoking weed, and that's only on the eleventh row of images. If the mod had a problem with the posts in the thread, he should've just deleted those posts, and not locked the entire thread.

Not to mention, if you don't have an adblocker, you're seeing way worse than that just on the front page of /christian/.


4ee6fa  No.672281

>>672279

trolls and bait posters are constantly ban evading in case you didn't notice. this kinda filth is going to be posted over and over again. therefore it's better to not have the thread up and going than to risk breaking the commandments and you know that pretty well


cf91a0  No.672283

>>672281

I did not noticed any trolls or bait. But I know the concern that is anyone who is not into anime came seeing that thread and looked it up and then find out that the animes which are recommended turned out to be raunchy then there are going to be problems.


741f69  No.672319

>>672272

>>672278

>>672281

>>672283

Honestly, after doing some Google and Bing searches with the safe feature off, the most I found were a few questionable images for Darling in the Franxx and Hanasaku Iroha (with Darling in the Franxx being the biggest offender) Everything else was clean.

We've had bigger and longer threads in the past with a lot more anime recommendations across the spectrum being shared, and also a lot more derailment and trolling via back and forth over the merits and morals of anime as a whole.

The locked thread was one of the most surprisingly civil and intelligent threads we've had on the subject in a LONG time. Then Iroha (one of the offenders) gets posted and all of the sudden a total lock-down, when basically just deleting the posts related to DitF and Iroha would have been enough to clean up the thread? Seriously?

I smell a rat.


741f69  No.672320

>>672319

Oh, and there was also some troll who recommended the Ghost Stories dub IIRC.


ada5e5  No.672352

>>672272

If it disrupts their good mood, then it technically violates rule 2. Even if true.

You cannot disrupt anything the mod doesn't want disrupted. It's written into the rules and there is no discussion allowed. Notice how this was never answered. >>663333


cf91a0  No.672402

>>672319

>I smell a rat

I am going to take your paranoid off here, I was the one who recommended it and also is the poster here >>672278.

Inb4 you troll or whatever. You can check it yourself if you do not believe me that it was not a lewd stuff, it is even kind of hard to watch because realism hits hard in this. I do not know why images I saw when I searched came up a bunch of lewd fan-art and 3rd party merchandise (pillows, etc.) though.


4ee6fa  No.672418

>>672319

Yeah right because every time something happens that you don't like and you can't imagine that it really has something to do with being Christian, it must be a personal thing or better some kind of conspiracy. Next thing you'll say is that it's the jews or something.


741f69  No.672432

>>672402

I believe you, I did the searches myself as well. So why not just report that the specific anime(s) were scandalous rather than shut down the entire thread and effectively ban all anime discussion ever?

It would be like if a video game thread got locked, and all video game discussion become forbidden, because Doom or Diablo got mentioned, and someone stumbled across some rule 34 of a female Diablo character (even in a case such as this, why not just use a Safe Search filter?); or a movie thread got locked and all movie discussion become verboten because "The Last Temptation of Christ", "Jesus Christ Superstar" and some sort of avante garde European New Wave cinema portraying Christ in a scandalous light were brought up as recommendations. It's unmeasured and extreme.

>>672418

Considering the anime thread before last went on for 300+ posts and was easily more chaotic and scandalous by the standards outlined here, while the recent thread was the most civil yet and had a couple of scandalous anime posts that could have just been deleted, along with the fact that yes, there is a dedicated contingent on this board that literally has a borderline psychotic obsession with disrupting anime discussion, whether for personal or trolling reasons (Exhibit A: >>662574 )….

….yes, it may not be personal or a conspiracy, but forgive me if it does come off as being personal, petty and capricious, for reasons outlined earlier.


741f69  No.672454

>>672432

It's also very suspicious, that right before the mod post explaining the lock and ban, someone recommended Hanasaku Iroha as a "wholesome, heartwarming anime with Christian themes." An anime that bears fruit in the "questionable portrayal of underage girls" department in searches on Bing/Google.

Shortly, a couple of posts later, the mod specifically says:

>Time and time again this board shows that as soon as anime is brought up scandalous cartoons of barely dressed underage girls become a red thread.

Shortly after an anime that validates this stereotype is "recommended", boom.... lock and ban. An anime that is an archetype of what the anti-anime crowd hates about what they perceive all anime is, comes up and "it's just the red thread of fate, it can't be helped." I find this more than a little "convenient." That someone championed an anime that is like blood to the anti-anime sharks as something "wholesome", and then this transpires. Even the people bringing up Darling in the Franxx had criticisms about it and did not champion it as "the most perfect Christian anime ever!" Up until the Iroha post, DitF and a troll post of the Ghost Stories dub were the only scandalous animes in the entire thread.

I mean, compare this thread: >>670312

with this thread: >>626006

Yet >>670312 is the thread that gets locked for "scandalous" reasons? Give me a break.


ada5e5  No.672460

>>672454

There's no rule against themselves making rule 2-breaking posts through another IP and then citing the violation of rule 2 as a condition for shutting down the thread either. This can be done over time to discourage any types of posts which are personally disliked by the moderation but which they couldn't make a rule against, make people afraid of causing another thread lock or just not post the thread altogether. It's a very efficient and plausibly deniable method to fundamentally transform the board and to show who is encouraged and discouraged from posting without actually directly saying anything. Just slowly whittling at the same people who don't actually break any of the rules to generate a long term effect, while denying anything is going on. It's been going on for months. That's why the rules were re-written to they way they currently are, why board logs are disabled, and also why nobody is being allowed to openly talk about this. Nor is anyone permitted to make polls. We're all just left to ourselvese. They don't ever seem to want to talk but are ever present to delete all polls immediately, no explanation required. They are just waiting for you to leave and then it's mission accomplished. This was the plan of whoever wrote those rules from day 1, I would know as I've been here since before they changed it. Someone wanted to kill this board and turn it into a small catholic only forum. You can expect more restrictions to appear unless something dramatically changes.


ada5e5  No.672463

>>672460

Also this whole plan reminds me a lot of reddit and how they run things over there, just with less tools available to suppress the people they dislike.


7428b8  No.672482

>>672454

What does anything in that post have to do with glorifying God?

>>672460

You imply that the mods are deceptive, do you have any direct proof other then the occasional bans, of which aren't breaking the rules?

TBH none of the rules should exist unless backed up by what the Bible says. Like rule 2 excluding the part about scandal as that's not in the Bible. Adding rules or tradition to what Christians must obey is spoken of in matthew 15:1-14

>THEN came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,

>Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.

>But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

>For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.

>But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;

>And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.

>Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,

>This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.

>But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

>And he called the multitude, and said unto them, Hear, and understand:

>Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.

>Then came his disciples, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, after they heard this saying?

>But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.

>Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

>>672463

That's because the same people run both boards with the same objectives. Shun anything that doesn't fit the babylonian worldwide religion of doing nothing and fetile submissiveness toward tradition and rejecting God. If you have a interpretation based on the Bible that isn't good for (,((them)),) such as the existence of jeremiah 27, hebrews 9:4, revelation 18:23, and revelation 17:18 proving (,((them)),)) having the golden pot of mana contained in the ark of the covenant and the ark of the covenant making them babylonians, then you get rejected because of galatians 4:21-31.


741f69  No.672492

>>672482

>What does anything in that post have to do with glorifying God?

Gee, I don't know… maybe recognizing a "coincidence" that's a little too much of a "coincidence" and calling it out for what it is? Desiring fairness, honesty, and truth, instead of what is seeming more and more like bordering on gaslighting/hoodwinking?

"This thread was mostly okay, and only needed a post here and there deleted to be wholesome, but this recent post about an anime that conveniently lines up with just about every negative stereotype anime-haters have about anime is "recommended" as a "Christian" anime; so we must now lock this thread and effectively ban all /christian/ anime discussion forever! (even though we have had many threads with this theme before in the past that have been far far worse, mostly thanks to the antics of the very people who hate anime in the first place!")

Honestly, I would much rather have the mods just come right out and say: "We hereby ban anime because we don't like it for personal reasons", or that "It's more trouble than it's worth and we don't want to deal with it." in a direct way, instead of what just happened.

They effectively said the later, but in the most slimiest round-about way possible. Truth, fairness and justice glorifies God, not this garbage they're pulling. If the thread was truly just a caveman-eque, lustful, scandalous, autistic degenerate fanservice fest, I would understand the course of action they took, but that scenario is simply not the truth.


7428b8  No.672494

>>672492

>Desiring fairness, honesty, and truth, instead of what is seeming more and more like bordering on gaslighting/hoodwinking?

Well there's a word for desiring such, it's called godliness.

>Honestly, I would much rather have the mods just come right out and say: "We hereby ban anime because we don't like it for personal reasons"

But that would be more truthful, which you seem to have already established that the mods are decietful by the false bans and the non-openess of the ban list, against what john 7:4 commands

>For there is no man that doeth any thing in secret, and he himself seeketh to be known openly. If thou do these things, shew thyself to the world.


ada5e5  No.672514

>>672482

>You imply that the mods are deceptive, do you have any direct proof other then the occasional bans, of which aren't breaking the rules?

They announced flags would go just for a little while then after a little while they announced it would be permanent. Ever since then it is never discussed. Several polls have been made and they delete them without explanation. This is just blatant deception and suppression meant to wear people down and pretend on the outside like nothing's happening. The absolute slimiest, grimiest strategy. The only problem with it is that to most of us it's barely a nuisance. So I'm sure they have more tricks and tactics planned until whoever it is can get what they want, kill the traffic of this board, And with rule 2 as it is, anything's possible. It can never be questioned, it is his long-term strategy to destroy and occupy the board, in the making since September. Despite all his attempts to divert attention away from these rule changes, including patiently waiting to fully implement their full intended effect, that's still what it is.


7428b8  No.672516

>>672514

>meant to wear people down

Did you not read the Bible? daniel 7:25

>And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

But this is implying it is a organized pattern by the mods to wear out the users of this board. Sure the pattern is there, but do you have proof it is willful and intentional to what is going on? Maybe it was an accident(s)?

How did I become the one defending the mods indirectly?


ada5e5  No.672523

>>672516

Stay a while. Every once in a while you'll notice a ton of posts that are replying to deleted posts. Now normally if someone actually did something counterproductive, they would have no problem leaving the post up with a ban message, but in order to hide their shameful decisions often the targetted post is just deleted. Even if it was text only, which is the majority of the time. I've had ban/deleted posts for which the mod simply say "no." or "you can just leave." It seems like they have moved more toward deleting whole threads now to remove the evidence of deleting tons of posts. In over half of the cases they would be wiser to have just left it alone even if they didn't like it, but the goal is to pursue certain types of posts (ones which there is no actual rule against), and they just want to make a bunch of unwritten rules, all of which, if necessary, rule 2 can be invoked. It is the grand fallback which can be used to justify any action, although they still prefer to hide their activity as a first defense. If that means a few people's post activity has to be erased via deletion, that doesn't really bother them. Anyone who bothers them just gets banned and their content quietly removed. That's how it works in a lot of places after all. I just didn't like the fact it has happened here.


7428b8  No.672526

File: 4c226d13fc80a75⋯.png (107.28 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 4c226d13fc80a758bafd8a7006….png)

>>672523

>but the goal is to pursue certain types of posts (ones which there is no actual rule against)

Such as picture related?

>Anyone who bothers them just gets banned and their content quietly removed. That's how it works in a lot of places after all. I just didn't like the fact it has happened here.

I am incredibly aware of what is going on worldwide in secret, it is what daniel 8:11-12 predicted

>Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down.

>And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practised, and prospered.

The "daily sacrifice" being the fullfillment of revelation 6:11 by stopping the act of 1 corinthians 15:31 and luke 9:23. The truth being the word of God since God can't lie titus 1:2. you do realise you are responding to the so called "hafizposter" right? I still don't know what that means. Is it a curse or something?


741f69  No.672543

>>672494

>>672514

>>672516

>>672523

>>672526

But where does a possible false flag against an anime thread fit in all this? I could understand them possibly shutting down Christian/Biblical viewpoints they don't agree with, but what's the big deal about anime? I enjoy it, but at the end of the day it's an occasional secular diversion/entertainment with some good values if one is discerning, and many with bad values as well. Yet this board seems fiercely divided amongst those who love it, like it or tolerate it, versus those who hate it with a burning passion due to negative experiences or trolling. I've even vaguely read people on here tossing about theories about /leftypol/ or whatnot utilizing this division as a D & C tactic.

I really don't understand what the big deal is. Why can't Christians who are interested in having a discussion about discerning what anime is suitable for viewing and whether or not said anime has good or bad themes do so without it becoming a war zone?


ada5e5  No.672586

>>672543

>But where does a possible false flag against an anime thread fit in all this?

Well there was a short time long before the rule change when some goons took over this board, because the owner accidentally let it be dropped, and during that period they handed out perma-bans for posting anime, things they didn't agree with or even for simply posting links to other boards, and all kinds of other stuff received perma-bans for trivial reasons for a little while until it got recovered. They also removed flags during that time. So now it kind of feels like that is returning again, or that the same people are trying again.


cf91a0  No.672589

File: c39fbc19b874307⋯.jpg (73.91 KB, 324x600, 27:50, c39fbc19b8743079e61a01e94f….jpg)

>>672543

There have been many in-fights amongst us lately regarding many topics (pews, this board is now baptist only) that went far beyond our usual inter-denominational "banters" , so I think the mods heavily suspect D&C and other disruptions. Anime has always been a hard topic to talk about here. There are many of us here and each of us are of different mind on what is "acceptable" here. Some are very conservative/traditionalist, some are more okay with anime (probably been avid watcher before converting or just enjoy some okay "animes" from time to time).

Like I said before here>>672278 >>672283 and >>672418. I will own up to my mistake of recommending Iroha; on the glance it does really seem like the "cute girl" anime on the cover even though it was not and even painful to watch because realism bites hard in the drama. I really felt bad about it because it got thread seemingly shut down, cause this bickering amongst us, and have troubled many of our mods and brothers. I will use utmost caution in the future recommendation thread (if there is any more after this) or abstain from it altogether.


4ee6fa  No.672650

>>672454

See, that's not suspicious. I was one of the people that ranted in the thread before. This time I thought I wouldn't start sh't just for the sake of it, because I don't want to scandalize people in return by making them angry and going stupid things. So what I did was simply google the things mentioned in the post. What I got was lewd and straightout sexualized little girls and borderline sodomy. Hence, I reported the posts (with the little girls and that pink hair sh't).

Now Lind simply decided that - BECAUSE it was praised as "perfectly Christian" whatsoever - to not only delete the post and ban the user or whatever (because see my other post above - the troll and fedora crowd evades bans and will simply be back later on) but lock the thread.

There is no conspiracy going on. We're simply concerned for people. Again, imagine someone having issues with that - reads "ah yeah it's totally nice and Christian", googles it and then … rest of story is known.

No. What Lind did doesn't even need any kind of explanation further than what he posted in the thread. And everyone here should be supporting this.

Stop behaving like a mad little girl please


87f14d  No.672661

>A day after seeing the worst possible ending for Darling in the Franxx

>Want to get back to the /christian/ anime thread to fume because I would have to explain to /a/ and /animu/ that Nishgori's and by extension Japan's, nihilistic worldview sucks and caused this crapfest ending. That would very quickly get me banned there.

>Find the thread unbumped

>wonder why

>scroll down

>Lind prevents any future discussion on anime based on…

<…no I'm sorry, but your "reasons" are stupid Just a quick Google search (with Safe-search OFF are you kidding me?) is all you made? What the heck? This is not wise discernment.

>Not a word from tutor who cleaned up the last thread of the pooh-posters who only wanted to bicker and busybody themselves against Christians who wanted to carefully enjoy anime.

>Now if Lind and the mod team wants to be consistent, you can't talk about great pagan literature you enjoy, because they have things as """"bad"""" or """""worse""""" than whatever Iroha or Darling

>You can't show renaissance and neo-classical art, some made by great Christian artists, because they show things as """"bad""""

>You can't discuss many great Christian poets, like Chaucer, Boccaccio, Shakespeare, Donne, and the like, because they most certainly had """"worse"""" things than either Iroha or Darling would ever show that some filthy 17th-century bastard would masturbate to if he could just to degrade what is beautiful

>You can't discuss video games, because most have things, almost all made by non-Christians lead developers, supposedly equally bad or worse than whatever Iroha, Darling, or another anime rec'd in that thread would have

>You can't even discuss even uplifting secular music or hell Johnny Cash because sung a song about cocaine

>If a Japanese animator because a Christians and makes a really great anime that's uplifting, pure, honorable, etc, you can't discuss it, because it's now associated with a blacklisted medium, because some janitor on some Christian board on a mongolian-hand-waving forum lacked judgement and knowledge for several key minutes

Lind, seriously, you need to apologize and retract or step down. And mod team, you need to make the clear differences between things that might lead to evil by tertiary proxy and some goober headed weak Christian or LARPer with discernment (like someone recommend a decent show that unfortunately has heavy porn "fan art" or some FPS video game that might trigger some anti-Christian wacko to shoot up a school) and things that are explicitly meant for evil (like porn spammers on our board, inter-denom pooh-flinging, Catholics who want stop spouting baseless bull—- about protestants over and over again that is so easily refuted and only causes board contention yet nothing is done because Rome dominates the mod team).

>>672589

>I will own up to my mistake of recommending Iroha

You shouldn't be hard on yourself. You saw some redeeming qualities about that series despite the major flaws and wanted those Christian anime fans to perhaps consider it. Sure, you could have offered a heads-up first, but your conscience was sure at the time. Besides, see my post above and below.


f7a32d  No.672664

File: 213a2764c3be9d4⋯.png (4.04 MB, 1912x870, 956:435, Poor judgement.PNG)

File: fd501af07d37b1e⋯.png (15.56 KB, 1011x173, 1011:173, proof.PNG)

>>672650

You wicked, wicked hypocrite!

>I was one of the people that ranted in the thread before

You were one of the people who kept being busybodies, flaunting your pride, and refusing to understand that you only added to God's law without justification from Scripture (and not even from philosophy) and without edification. You, and whoever else was posting in that weeb thread would not stop your mindless wailing over and over about how anime was effeminizing men and was irredeemable crap without any edification or sharing of God's Word, or not even any offers of any recommendation for any supposedly better medium. Either you or the other guys got banned and posts deleted because you two or three loons got so bad in that thread that Israel got involved directly. BTW, Lind did you learn anything from what happened there.

>We're simply concerned for people.

A busybody is as bad as a a murderer (Proverbs 6:19, 16:28, 17:15, 18:17, 1 Peter 4:15) Get you head out your butt and get your butt out of other Christians' business when you have nothing good to give.

You know what. I decided to check that one anime through image search. And what did I find? Only possibly offending image, of a girl in a bikini. The other, blotted-out image? A body pillow that's probably not even official and definitely not a part of the show itself. Nothing else. A total lie. And you called that other guy who despised that sodomy-enabling coward so-falsely called a bishop the one who was lying >>671747 .

. Shame on you and Lind both! And no, I'm not giving those Commiefornian, Moloch worshiping Googlians a single page view. Startpage uses a similar algorithm anyways. And why would you even disable safe-search in the first place as if that mattered if you knew anything about Google. You and Lind call yourselves wise by doing that?

And if it wasn't for you and Lind, I would have explained why I retract my recommendation for Darling in the Franxx, explaining how the Japanese eschatology in the very last episode ruined the potentially beautiful Christ-like romance. That's too late now. Good job!

>Stop behaving like a mad little girl please

Stop accelerating yourself to hell by calling your brother (and I doubt that you are one) a fool (Matthew 5:22). He has done nothing to deserve that. You have done everything to deserve to such a name. Repent! Turn to Christ and live!


4ee6fa  No.672665

>>672661

How is it possible that you're so angry about the a mod seriously caring for souls when you call yourself Christian, too ?

Do you not care that what you can "carefully enjoy" can potentially scandalize others, especially when they have only the means to casually google the stuff, just as we did ?

Do you really get angry that on a Christian board - dedicated to, you might've guessed it, the Christian religion - you don't get your own fetish/pastime preference-related thread or that it gets curbed when scandal is on the rise ? You accuse the anti-anime crowd (which is btw an a lot bigger fraction than the weebs) of arguing only emotional but what you do is getting emotional, angry and ignore everything else, just because you don't get what you want, which is entirely un-related to the overall topic of this board ?

I give you an advice - and that goes for your whole life: You cannot always get what you want, especially if what you want opens potential to damn others. If "christian anime" is so important to you, make create a new board. Make a /christian anime/ or whatever board and go there. There you can post all day, you can post whatever you want - and bonus points: You don't potentially scandalize and/or simply annoy others with things they don't want to see.

Other than that: Hold your face shut, your personal taste doesn't matter. What matters is Christ.


4ee6fa  No.672666

>>672664

This is still a Christian board and not the right place for insults and ad hominem. You're acting like an angry little girl over cartoons and why you can't have them in this particular case. Leave the computer and go for a training session. Pray a Rosary or two.

The problem is - as we can see - that I was right, wasn't I ? This fetish, this whatever you wanna call it, is so important to you - perhaps, because you really thoroughly identify with the cutesy anime girls - that you get upset and behindmad about it. So mad that you keep damning me while I'm trying to help people. You need help mate, because you can't distinguish friend from foe anymore.


f7a32d  No.672673

>>672665

This is what you said here >>672650:

>What I got was lewd and straightout sexualized little girls and borderline sodomy.

I just showed you that you are liar and worse here >>672664 and all you can say in response is "waaah you're too emotional waah SCANDAL SCANDAL". You have nothing to show for this idea of scandal from Scripture (or heck even past theologians and church fathers) and you expect me to take you seriously as a wise person? You don't even at least reciprocate me showing you verses you need to understand by showing me Scripture or speaking truth in love, humility, understanding, etc. You are deceiving yourself (1 Cor. 13:1-8, 1 John 3:10-19).

>What matters is Christ.

You only heap condemnation for yourself claiming to know Christ and the law (Romans 2:17-27) but not doing what He commands. You will not acknowledge your sin against your supposed bothers >>672272 >>672278 >>672319 >>672589 (Ephesians 4:1-3) and true scandal throughout your endless contentions and speaking half-truths and lies through hate and not beginning your spiels with the word of God (Psalm 1:2, Proverbs 10:23). You do not show a hint of humility. You need to repent. God save you because I'm done with you: Christ tells me to not keep throwing holy things to the dogs (Matt. 7:6).


4ee6fa  No.672674

>>672673

Are you really that misguided that you want me to post the scandalous pictures here I've found over google image search ? That's a whole new quality of ignorance. I ask you again to stop bearing false witness. This is not good for your soul.


f7a32d  No.672678

I have one final thing to say about this mess:

>>672272

>>672278

>>672650

and Lind used Google and Bing, both of which are known to be heavily invasive towards privacy and will tailor search results based on your internet fingerprinting. I used Startpage, which, to the best of knowledge of every /g/ and /tech/ poster and professional privacy and security advocates, does not invade a person's privacy with safesearch off; therefore, it will not 'talior it's search results except solely by the words you type at any given time and the setting you have saved through URL or cookie. Consider carefully what that means.

>>672272

>>672278

I know I'm insinuating that you guys search for lewd things above. I'm not claiming you two go out of your way to search for bad things, I don't know you personally. What I do adivse that you guys stop using Google and Bing even for a quick search. These companies are evil. If you have stuff you guys need praying about, and God knows I need prayer too about certain issues, let me know. I need to get the point across that Lind needs to get kicked off as janitor, and this other asshole needs to be banned, again, for both being hypocrites.

I'm probably going to get banned for telling the truth so zealously, so God speed yall glorious Christian weebs. Here's to God giving us our waifus for laifus and a future Christian Japan making Christian anime.


f7a32d  No.672679

>>672678

Meant to say with safesearch off I did not get a single in-show pic that was anything as described by the others when searching by the title, Hanasaku Iroha. Good night, God bless!


4ee6fa  No.672686

>>672678

Are you aware of the fact that this outright almost worship and the way you handle that whole weeb thing is almost idolatry, but in any case extremely unhealthy for both, you body and soul ? Don't you think there's something wrong when you get so mad about people actually giving a fck that you throw insults etc. on no end because this what you call "lol only a medium for entertainment" has such tremendously huge space in your life ?

Can't you imagine for one single second that there are people out there that really do care, because y'know we're real Christians, not just internet larpers ? Are you really that blind ? I will pray a Rosary for you that you may see.


741f69  No.672727

>>672650

>Literally describes the process I described to a T.

>Literally made the following post: >>662055 and thus outright displays obvious bias.

>Entire argument hinges on "people here are literally too stupid to use a Safe Search filter with their search engine or differentiate between fan-art and original art, and that mods are too lazy to delete a single post so it must be locked; when in other threads, when something non-Christian goes on, like a bad movie suggestion, or borderline heresy, it is either allowed to be argued against, is deleted, or a ban is done (even if their are troll/ban evaders.)

>See, that's not suspicious.

No, you have literally affirmed and validated my suspicions. Look, I get it. You won. You got your way. You can ad hominem by calling me a "mad little girl", an "idolator", act condescendingly self-righteous by claiming you just care for Christian souls and tell me to pray the Rosary. Whatever.

The cold hard truth is that you hate anime for personal reasons, and was looking for any underhanded flimsy excuse whatsoever to get it banned. Well done. Bravo. Well-played, slow clap and all that.

I'm not going to leave this board… yet. Unlike what you want to believe, while I enjoy anime, it is not the center of my existence. You're absolutely right, anime should not become an idolatrous hobby.

However, I am going to remember this. If y'all are underhanded about something as trite in the large scheme of things as anime…. what else are y'all being underhanded about?

Remember: as much as you hate anime, bearing false witness is a sin.


444117  No.672738

File: 442ac17a6718c56⋯.png (173.49 KB, 303x269, 303:269, 1529751052127.png)

>weebs going this far to defend their chinese anime girl cartoons

smh lmao

Why don't you guys just post about Christianity?


58bffa  No.672801

>>672727

All my life I just have believed in one thing, That everything I like is something God hates and everything I hate is something God likes. Therefore cartoons= Satanic, therefore, Anime = Not Satanic.


a41fee  No.673066

>>672666

A christian board is the right place for telling the truth about those people. Learn what an ad hominem is, pretentious meme spouting liar. You are the one triggered because people dont' talk like children, so it is you who oviously is not mature enough to use the internet.

People are just fed up with subversive snakes that smugly tell people to pray rosaries when they have a million planks in their eyes. YOU need help, and anyone who listens to you,


989e49  No.673200

>>673066

Well yes cartoon wiz. What you like is basically what an animal likes. Murder, scheming and good ol in and out. What you dont like is truth.

So yes you are right.


18939c  No.673292

File: ab78a189e2c30dc⋯.jpg (31.57 KB, 400x400, 1:1, zI8q5Qjl_400x400.jpg)

>>673200

I don't think you know what a cartoon is supposed to be like and why It should not be posted.


1f623c  No.673396

Tried making a thread about Gregorian chant twice, but I didn't see it appear in the catalog either time. Any idea whats up?


d8cf2b  No.673434

>>673396

Seem like a tech problem, something only Codemonkey and co can fix.


183b9b  No.673493

>>673396

The site has not worked for me most of the day, it happens every now and then. Wait a day or so and try again.


8e4ca3  No.673759

There needs to be a rule about not appropriating a thread out of antagonism. This is sort of like derailing but technically on-topic. See for instance how, whenever somebody makes a thread about the Eucharist, Protestants invade to say that the real presence is a heresy and Catholics are dumb. Or when Catholics make a thread about anything pertaining to Catholicism, Orthodox invade to say that Catholicism is a heresy and Vatican II proves it.

It's annoying. It disrupts conversations because people on this board can't sit for five minutes without rushing to defend their confession of faith and attack others.


154161  No.673864

File: 36671b6d90b901f⋯.png (327.3 KB, 611x717, 611:717, 36671b6d90b901f41671738024….png)

>>673759

So ban people that offer differing opinions? What's the point in having a discussion thread if only one opinion is allowed?

You people are turning this place into reddit.


1c98e6  No.673870

>>673864

Discussion != Debate or Argument

Since you posted Nico, I'll give an example. If you made a thread for the discussion of Love Live!, how would you react to people coming into your thread and screaming about how anime sucks and western cartoons are superior?

It's the same principle. A thread for the discussion of a specific denomination or an aspect of a denomination is not for debate between denominations.


ada5e5  No.674036

>>673870

>how would you react to people coming into your thread and screaming about how anime sucks and western cartoons are superior?

You obviously haven't been here very long. Maybe reddit is more your speed. An honest suggestion.


1c98e6  No.674116

>>674036

1] That's not an argument.

2] That doesn't answer my question.

3] This is /christian/. It needs to be held to a higher standard than /b/.


3ce136  No.674136

>imagine defending effeminate cartoons


8e4ca3  No.674248

>>673864

"You say X but in my opinion/belief/experience I'd say Y" is not necessarily the same as forcing debate (especially if having a debate in the thread is far from OP's intention).

>>674036

I mean, people coming into inoffensive "christian anime" threads to condemn the OP and everybody like them to Hell is already a problem we have here.

Also, you're literally rolling yourself in shit then screaming "G-GO SOMEWHERE ELSE THEN" when somebody tells you to stop. Do you really think that a Christian board should be childish and incompetent because it's on 8chan?


ada5e5  No.674278

>>674116

I'm not here to argue, I'm here to unequivocally tell you that your behavior is out of line. And to suggest you go to one of the many places where your censorious behavior would be accomodated. Someplace where the people who offend your feelings simply get shadowbanned, since that's what you're openly agitating for at this point already.

And to answer your question I wouldn't care in the least, I would move on immediately or perhaps be slightly amused that they came here. That's just the way things work, and I never browse /b/, you are just bewraying your own out of control hysteria by bringing up such an example. I wish you people would get lost and go back to your padded safe space where you come from instead of making impudent demands to limit speech like some kind of progressivist student union member. If anyone should be banned from here, it's you and people like you. You have other places that are "safe" for you to go already. Stop acting like a malignant cancer. There are many other places suited to you which you are welcomed to try out.

>>674248

Your proposed solution to the problem only makes it worse. Go to any safe space echo chamber to find that out, please stop agitating here if your feelings got hurt so badly. Or maybe just learn to cope with disagreeing opinions. That right there isn't against the rules, yet some of these agitators want it to be. And they won't stop agitating until they get more speech codes, but of course, ones that favor their opinion over the other one of course.

>Also, you're literally rolling yourself in shit then screaming "G-GO SOMEWHERE ELSE THEN" when somebody tells you to stop.

Who asked for the foul language? You are just like those student "safe space" protestors. No patience for anyone else, but demanding everyone be patient for you. Just because I don't agree with someone doesn't mean I won't defend their right to free speech. So you can't just identify me with whatever post offended you to tears elsewhere on this board. Just know that this attitude of censorship has a way of boomerang'ing back on you. With that said I'd have no problem seeing that kind of person get permanently removed from here. Maybe they should follow their own advice, and stop disagreeing with me thereby causing the dreaded DEBATE, and just remove themselves from here to fix that problem.

Then everyone will be happy. There will still be a place where discussion is allowed, while the safe space with the play pen can still exist somewhere else for the easily offended ones. I don't care how many times they lie and complain and say it's unreasonable, they're just lying to get what they want, it IS reasonable. They're just waaaay too sensitive and willing to mischaracterize things to get what they want. We see it on the college campuses and it's spreading.


0dfaa7  No.674399

Someone is certainly mad. Rousing the fights left and right and now spamming the board. Either that or the one that the agents of the enemy assigned to disrupt us finally gone bonkers.


183b9b  No.674405

File: 173f64a37b113b4⋯.png (219.2 KB, 332x387, 332:387, ClipboardImage.png)

>>674399 Yeah, someone is pretty upset with us mods, and he seems to believe that spamming the board, showing everyone why moderators are needed, is somehow going to prove his point.


444117  No.674431

File: 24308f6a1fee5db⋯.png (30 KB, 128x128, 1:1, 416781506061795339.png)

>>674405

We have an old and tested cure for this in our Pomeranian culture.


989e49  No.674465

>>673292

Low iq brazilian


0dfaa7  No.674472

File: 04e8bb71ca938cd⋯.jpg (46.42 KB, 500x500, 1:1, 04e8bb71ca938cdd6a6cf762b5….jpg)

>>674405

To be fair I am a bit upset about the anime fiasco (no, I was not the guy who raged about anime in this thread) and other small matters I find disagreeable about you guys, but that is a matter for different occasion. Right now I find this board colder than I first came across it and it converted me back to faith last year around this time. It is now about more bashing non-Christians, ill-tidings regarding Christianity, etc. It is slowly becoming /pol/, not the unlikely shelter of faith in this darkest corner of the internet. I still have the old threads saved because I like to look upon that time when Christanons here are kinder and warmer.


1c98e6  No.674483

>>674278

>There are many other places suited to you which you are welcomed to try out.

I repeat that exact same statement back at you.

I've been on this board since the beginning and I've watched it grow into one of the least welcoming, argumentative, hatred filled boards on this entire site due to the allowance of /pol/-like behavior to propagate. I could not imagine tolerating such behavior in an actual church, but it's not my personal board so I generally shrug and move on. This, however, is a meta-thread and I will use it to bring out my whip of cords.


1c98e6  No.674485

>>674472

I've noticed the same thing. I've spent the morning trying to find one, just one, thread that doesn't have "I hate/want to kill X" or "omg da jews!" or pablum about race-mixing. The church is supposed to be warm and inviting, not handing out antisemitic flyers at the door and telling "not quite white" people to "gb2 X".

People have forgotten that you can be modest, conservative, and righteous without being racist, antisemitic, misogynist, or filled with rage and hate. Maybe this is the board the BO and Vols want and that's fine, but I'm pretty sure it's not the board Christ would want.


154161  No.674510

>>674485

>The church is supposed to be warm and inviting, not handing out antisemitic flyers at the door and telling "not quite white" people to "gb2 X".

I think you're confusing people being honest about race in general with racism, most people here aren't really racist. Even the relationship threads are full of people thirsting after Asians and Nubian kweens. And tbf, almost all churches in history have been openly "antisemitic", at least until the last hundred or so years.


183b9b  No.674577

>>674472

>>674485

I'm afraid I have noticed how much of that there is, too. I wouldn't be able to quantify it and compare with how it was when I started coming here, but that's really besides the point you're making. Many of those posts are removed and the poster banned, usually because of rule 2(lacking the spirit of charity) or 3(it's not exactly Christian fellowship to hate Ethiopians for being black). When you see those posts, report them if they break those rules.

Unfortunately, we can't use the good, old, tested and reliable method of dealing with /pol/acks suggested to be used on spammers in >>674431

Post last edited at

3c7d11  No.674669

>>674577

>>674472

The whole national socialist insecurities/ Christians feeling the need to explain themselves to /pol/ friendly ideologies likes /fringe/ and /asatru/ with lazy buzzwords, and the opposition on other boards has hardened Christians.

>>673759

More "ban this option"

>whenever somebody makes a thread about the Eucharist, Protestants invade to say that the real presence is a heresy and Catholics are dumb.

I want to understand the Eucharist, and so i ask questions in those threads.

>Or when Catholics make a thread about anything pertaining to Catholicism, Orthodox invade to say that Catholicism is a heresy and Vatican II proves it.

Maybe there could be a rule in the Catholic general against, this but board wide that rule would purge too much.


83a15b  No.674696

File: a93797a347ce4b1⋯.png (203.5 KB, 500x375, 4:3, YH1sbQT.png)

Hey guys it looks like we're being raided (I assume by leftypol)

DO NOT TRUST FALSE FLAGS CLAIMED TO BE BY BAPTISTS AGAINST CATHOLICS

THIS IS D&C 101


e3efe2  No.674715

File: 557f680998786b6⋯.jpg (48.85 KB, 753x564, 251:188, 8231485.jpg)

>>674698

>>674702

>>674703

I have my issues with Rome, but how about you don't start 11 threads?


1c98e6  No.674745

>>674696

>(I assume by leftypol)

Why would you assume that? /pol/ hates Christianity just as much as /leftypol/ does. It could be anyone from anywhere. The knee-jerk reaction to it being /leftypol/ is one of the things that allows /pol/ to infest this board under the ideology of "/leftypol/ is our common enemy so surely I can make a 'we hate black people too' thread every day".


7e3886  No.674750

>>674745

One of /leftypol/'s ops back in the day was to go on /pol/ and /christian/ and constantly try to drive a wedge between the two. There's even a screencap of them talking about it that used to be passed around a lot. /pol/, at least a good portion of it, used to be pro-Christian until around mid 2015. Personally I think /pol/'s shift in attitude towards Christianity had more to do with all the /baph/ refugees who started going there around that time.


5bbd2f  No.675049

>>674856

>to correct their delusions

How's that workin' out for you? I'm checking those boards and I'm not seeing any BO announcement that says, "I'm Christian now, so this board is deleted." on top of an empty board.


a8a4e4  No.675583

File: 70e6972f72f1199⋯.jpeg (180.89 KB, 1521x593, 1521:593, FB0870CA-A45F-4C47-B86A-9….jpeg)

why was this thread locked?


444117  No.675591

File: 42b94354832d074⋯.jpg (247.16 KB, 635x1024, 635:1024, DCNXIDJWAAAlJPd.jpg)

>>675583

That was your first post on the board (at least with this IP). This lets me know that the intention of the thread is to most likely troll, especially considering the content of your thread. We've had a lot of similar trolls in the past few days that post in a similar manner.

I'm looking at the only other post you just made on the board and I stand by my decision, friend.

If I'm wrong, then feel free to continue posting, but keep in mind the rules we have here (especially rule 4).

Post last edited at

a8a4e4  No.675628

>>675591

>>675591

i always change my ip.


a8a4e4  No.675665

not sure if this belonged in meta or questions, but my question is why has this board completely died?

all of the questions are barely sincere milk of the word questions and nobody talks about the kingdom.


ada5e5  No.675668


a8a4e4  No.675748

>>675668

actually thats very clear, thanks. capped.


3c7d11  No.675797

>>675748

>capped

Good idea haha.


200bc2  No.676120

Discord link doesn't seem to work.


af62a6  No.676344

File: 85d4e11c56b7693⋯.jpeg (258.58 KB, 1434x385, 1434:385, 27349024-D407-401D-BF80-A….jpeg)

why are there so many plebs here? there has to be at least one cleric with whom i can fellowship.


79c367  No.676791

>>520608

Is it possible the shorten the amount of threads available?


9ea0ee  No.677003

>>676344

Does a split Cleric/Monk character make one a Hieromonk?


58bffa  No.677063

>>674399

Ban cartoons, but allow 2D


876af3  No.677214

File: 7c032258d081472⋯.png (6.99 KB, 999x427, 999:427, 63FC0E7D-C43A-4011-9779-86….png)

>>675591

>>676344

Hm. I haven’t really looked around here in six weeks or so and I must say that things have changed greatly in that short time.Anytime there is an ebb and flow in new posts things get weird. The entire vernacular of the board has changed.


67d873  No.677312

Why was my thread asking about a gnostic diagram deleted? There was some discussion going on and if anything it was an honest question about biblical origins of gnosticism


719f72  No.677441

>>677312

There are no "biblical" origins of Gnosticism.


2a03c5  No.677503

>>677441

There is though. He's name is Simon Magus


6e3235  No.677862

>>677503

Simon Magus is not described as being a "Gnostic." Nor is there any mention of Gnosticism present. As such, Gnosticism is not Biblical.


58fead  No.678004

>>677441

Biblical influences then. There was someone discussing neoplatonism etc. It was interesting


f7b72b  No.678087

>>677503

your headcanon =\= biblical truth


f7b72b  No.678088

please filter "christcuck" to "s-senpai oWO"


84c0e6  No.678098

>>678088

I would suggest "s-senpai notice me!" or something besides the "oWO", like (n_n), (* ^ ω ^) (´ ∀ ` *) (◕‿◕。) ☆*:.。.o(≧▽≦)o.。.:*☆

(o^▽^o) (⌒▽⌒)☆ <( ̄︶ ̄)> 。.:☆*:・'(*⌒―⌒*)))

ヽ(・∀・)ノ (´。• ω •。`) ( ̄ω ̄) `;:゛;`;・(°ε° )

(o・ω・o) (@^◡^) ヽ(*・ω・)ノ (o_ _)ノ彡☆

(^人^) (o´▽`o) (*´▽`*) 。゚( ゚^∀^゚)゚。

( ´ ω ` ) (((o(*°▽°*)o))) (≧◡≦) (o´∀`o)

(´• ω •`) (^▽^) (⌒ω⌒) ∑d(°∀°d)

╰(▔∀▔)╯ (─‿‿─) (*^‿^*) ヽ(o^ ^o)ノ

(✯◡✯) (◕‿◕) (*≧ω≦*) (☆▽☆)

(⌒‿⌒) \(≧▽≦)/ ヽ(o^▽^o)ノ ☆ ~('▽^人)

(*°▽°*) (。•‿•。) (✧ω✧) ヽ(*⌒▽⌒*)ノ

(´。• ᵕ •。`) ( ´ ▽ ` ) ( ̄▽ ̄) ╰(*´︶`*)╯

ヽ(>∀<☆)ノ o(≧▽≦)o (☆ω☆) (っ˘ω˘ς )

\( ̄▽ ̄)/ (*¯︶¯*) \(^▽^)/ (◕‿◕)

(o˘◡˘o) \(★ω★)/ \(^ヮ^)/ (〃^▽^〃)

(╯✧▽✧)╯ o(>ω<)o o( ❛ᴗ❛ )o 。゚(TヮT)゚。

( ‾ ◡ ‾ ) (ノ´ヮ`)ノ*: ・゚ (b ᵔ▽ᵔ)b (๑˃ᴗ˂)ﻭ

(๑˘︶˘๑) ( ˙꒳​˙ ) (*꒦ິ꒳꒦ີ) °˖✧◝(⁰▿⁰)◜✧˖°

(´・ᴗ・ ` ) (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧


5d1500  No.678132

>>678088

Filter it to "Bring them out to us, that we may know them"


84c0e6  No.678144

>>678132

Something similar to whinie the pooh would be great as well.


78e9a1  No.678237

>>678088

>>678132

Filter “Christcuck” to “Servant of the Lord” and “Christcucks” to “Servants of the Lord”


e2358b  No.678433

>>678088

This is great, since it humiliates the poster, and takes away persuasive power from their non-argument.

>>678132

>>678237

These I feel aren't as effective.


ada5e5  No.678452

>>678433

They should rather reduce the number of filters than keep expanding them.


8a7405  No.678564

>>678563

Ok fedora


84c0e6  No.678568

One key part of Christianity is getting saved and having Jesus save you then sanctification, i feel like this doesn't get enough focus. I personally didn't even know about it despite being Christian for my entire life.


84c0e6  No.678711

Does anyone have the link to the word filters?


1c98e6  No.678773


84c0e6  No.679107

>>678773

Thank you.


e42e2e  No.679356

Lol.

"Reminder that every time yo​u pray to Mary it makes her cry because you're not praying to God"


1c98e6  No.679360

>>679356

There was someone spamming that for a long time. I guess he got bored of it or the word filter stopped it.


c242b8  No.680637

>>679360

Surely no one actually prays to mary.

That's freaking idolatry.

Christians have been instructed how and who to pray to. Matt 6:9-13


154964  No.680715

>>680637

Surely no one confuses the idea of intercessory prayer and worship. Surely.


00b1e0  No.680968

I got a rule 2 ban for saying Catholics are heretics.

Seriously?


1c98e6  No.680997

>>680968

>insult a billion people

<why does that violate rule 2? D: D: D: D:


741f69  No.681020

>>675665

>>675668

"Ye shall know them by their fruits."


f58853  No.681380

>>681327

It means your a faggot


c242b8  No.681447

>>680715

Surely no one confuses the fact that Jesus is the only intercessor? Surely.

1 Timothy 2:5


154964  No.681516

>>681447

All intercessory prayer is directed towards Christ, who is God. There is nobody in Heaven that is there of their own accord, not one person in Heaven who lifted themselves up, except by Him alone who has the power to lift Himself, and thus the rest of us.

If you were even remotely interested in the truth, you could examine Catholic dogma and see for yourself, but you'd rather join the revilers. Well, may God rebuke you.


23bc3b  No.681609

>>681020

They know I'm right that's why the mods never respond. If it weren't true, then someone would deny it. They don't ever plan to bring things back to the way they were a year ago, and they will never do a user poll on rule 2. They are determined to turn this place into rеddіt.


1c98e6  No.681672

>>681609

Why would they respond again and again and again? If you missed it, I'm sorry, but there's no reason for the mods to answer to every new user who comes down the pike.


01e1fd  No.681787

>>680997

It's not an insult, it's a doctrinal statement. Roman Catholics are heretics and do not have either the Son or the Father. This shouldn't be worthy of a ban. Catholics can say non-Catholics are heretics too, if they want.


5defa9  No.681820

>>681787

But they all look and act the same. The only difference is between the religious "leaders" who wrote the rules and how theyre trying to claim God for themselves. There is literally no difference.


5defa9  No.681821

>>681820

Furthermore this is probably why these people cant agree on anything because they think there is a difference, theyre arguing a difference, but they cant agree on a difference that does not actually exist. They are literally deflagrating and sending themselves to whatever hell they have.


23bc3b  No.681835

>>681672

Just notice they never once answered >>663333

And yes, I wrote that. They never answered. Not once, not ever.


23bc3b  No.681844

>>681672

>>681835

Also I've been asking why they don't allow discussion about the rule change since long before that. I've been asking and every single one of them is unable to say anything because they know how wrong they are and how unjustified all this is.

Also I've been asking about this for long time. See post 559249 in this same thread here: https://archive.is/JVedj


5a123f  No.682042

>>681844

>unable to say anything because they know how wrong they are and how unjustified all this is

Maybe they're just sick of your whining and are ignoring you because children should be seen and not heard.


5d1500  No.682175


80b1af  No.682211


c242b8  No.682322

>>681516

And no one in heaven is a "catholic",they are all christians.

And before "catholic dogma" was even a thing people were getting saved.

Catholics have come up with so many rituals its insane.(Matt 15:19,Mark 7:8,mark 7:13,)

They pray to saints and mary,when all prayer is supposed to go to Jesus.

They have rituals that border on spellcasting.

And here you are,denying the biblical truth i have quoted and instead said "but these men said". You need to repent and start reading the bible and cut this "dogma" out of your life.


154964  No.682324

>>682322

>And no one in heaven is a "catholic",they are all christians.

If the Church is authentic, then yes, everyone in Heaven will be Catholic, because they are part of Christ's Church. That you proclaim there's a difference between catholics and christians is your problem.

>And before "catholic dogma" was even a thing people were getting saved.

wut

>They have rituals that border on spellcasting.

wut

>You need to repent and start reading the bible and cut this "dogma" out of your life.

ya, i need to give up on this "trinity" and "hypostatic" thing, it's not in the bible


c242b8  No.682328

>>682324

Dear lord,you're serious arent you?

You actually believe that nonsense.

2 chro 7:14-if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.

Blows most of what you've said out of the water.

He is called Jesus Christ,Not Jesus catholic.

Christ meaning anointed.

So his people are christians,or the anointed.

Jesus even says that denominations is how the devil moves in to establish traditions.

Matt 13:31-32 The branches are the denominations that sprang from the base (Jesus).

Mark 4:5 States that the birds are the devil that destroys the faith.

So there are those that will define their salvation by their denomination instead of their relationship with christ and will damn themselves with heresey.


183b9b  No.682469

>>682328

>>682324

Reminder that this thread is strictly about meta issues.


741f69  No.682876

File: 42aa4d1a40f972e⋯.jpg (76.69 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault (1).jpg)

>lind: Instead of just deleting a couple of posts, I must lock this anime thread and de facto ban anime discussion forever in order to nobly save Christian souls from their inability to properly utilize a search engine and/or self-discernment.

Several threads later:

>>682757

>lind: You can't be this stupid. Even if English is your second language you ought to be able to use a search engine and self-discern.


1c98e6  No.682881

>>682876

Oh god … is this going to lead to a 100 post spergout about "omg fire lind!! D: D: D:"?


23bc3b  No.682885

>>682881

This coming from the guy who keeps on complaining about not having enough biased, anti-christian censorship and won't just pack up his bags and go to rеddіt.


741f69  No.682941

>>682881

No. This isn't about firing lind. It's about pointing out blatant hypocrisy and double standards.

I did a search on "chastity" in Bing and Google. In Bing I set the Safe Search to "Strict." In Google I turned the Safe Search on (there's no low, moderate or strict settings in Google.) In both cases the image results were literally 99% degenerate fetishistic garbage that would scandalize any Christian.

One of the main justifications for the de facto banning of anime discussion that lind did is that someone might run across a scandalous image if they did a search for the wrong anime, or neglected to use a Safe Search. The vast majority of the anime in the thread where the lockdown took place were either non-offensive in Google searches, or could have easily had scandalous content, like rule 34 fan art, filtered out by utilization of the Safe Search. The thread had good and civil discussion up to that point, and could have gone on just fine with some simple common sense measured moderating.

This isn't about anime being banned, it's about unfair moderation. I've seen lind do good work in the past, but his call on the anime thread was legitimately unfair and extreme, especially given anime threads in the past, and his recent response to someone's search engine competence: >>682757

A simple apology, an acknowledgment of a bad call, and a rescinding of an unjust decision would be nice.


1c98e6  No.682952

>>682941

>>682885

So … the answer to my question is "Yes".


2197d5  No.683015

>>520608

discord link doesn't work anymore, why is this?


13e3c1  No.683119

File: cc47d238c0e0a45⋯.jpeg (122.62 KB, 876x333, 292:111, A17C3ABB-03CA-4745-A86D-0….jpeg)

Why did the Mods delete the thread on the Pope’s change to the Catechism on the Death penalty?

http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2018/08/02/0556/01210.html

It’s official and isn’t just some ‘misinterpretation’ of the Pope’s words by the media


7e6c06  No.683123

>>683119

yeah mods wtf. This is a big issue. Even reddit has a big thread on it


d5f3a3  No.683202

>>683119

Are the Mods Sedes now?


2e736c  No.683277

>>683202

No, they're IFB now.


183b9b  No.683546

>>683119

I will look into it, but I find it doubtful any of us deleted it.


f810fd  No.684120

Is the word "discord" going to be filtered?


1c98e6  No.684137

>>684120

Man I hope so. discord.gg should be filtered to fbi.gov.


b88feb  No.684185

File: 5bb6e47f0e9cee1⋯.png (175.77 KB, 1309x198, 119:18, Screenshot 2018-08-04 at 8….png)

So explain to me why this thread was deleted? Criticizing Judaism automatically equals /pol/ now?

>don't criticize our holy talmud now goy

This thread was posted literally to have a helping hand in arguing against Rabbinic Judaism and bringing these people to Christ.


1c98e6  No.684187

>>684185

Because nobody want literal /pol/ crossposting crap here.


b88feb  No.684190

You're literally that same person from that thread, please please winnie the pooh off. This isn't /pol/ crossposting, you're just acting like an idiot. winnie the pooh off. Please just winnie the pooh off.


f88a2c  No.684191

>>684185

>oh noes! muh i haet j000z thread got deleted! D: D: D:


1c98e6  No.684193

>>684190

>I can't express myself without using foul language

Yeah … I'm done with you.


b88feb  No.684196

>>684193

Are you kidding me? You told me to go f myself in the previous thread.


b88feb  No.684197

>>684191

Stop switiching IPs to make it look like everyone is one your side.


0245a3  No.684206

>>684197

Just make the thread again in a day.


5d1500  No.684240

File: 4d6d6ec27dc4d82⋯.gif (3.8 KB, 452x523, 452:523, whos behind this post?.gif)


2af0bc  No.684348

>>684274

Go be a pedo somewhere else. You won't convince us to support your perversion.


968bd0  No.684545

File: 3a7eee7f64aadf7⋯.jpeg (508.08 KB, 1242x569, 1242:569, 55EB893D-CE2F-4B6F-95F6-E….jpeg)

Why is this subject banned?


fbced3  No.684548

>>684545

Because supposedly a "jew-run" operation always bans the message the way a "jew-run" roman empire killed Jesus Christ. If the Jews supposedly did it, then why are the Christians doing it? Maybe they ditched their old name and stole the face of another.


b733f5  No.684568

>>684548

Oh yes. They stole his identity (ressurection) and now they call themselves Christians. This explains why most of them are two-faced and work in the line of theft and fraud.


f7bb6b  No.684659

Why you blasted the thread about taking cartoon back from satanists? I know it is not exactly a straightforward Christian topic but there are some productive conversations going on there about why and how children cartoon can be wholesome again.


a3d804  No.684776

File: d0b0c026ec9ea23⋯.jpg (244.36 KB, 1203x1447, 1203:1447, 1480032008360.jpg)

Stop raiding other boards with your shit falseflagging, you're not christians, all you're doing is giving christianity a bad name.


e8127d  No.685185

>>666096

Can you cite them bro? That is my one hangups with christianity in general. I believe in god, it does not make sense for this world to exist without a god. The stories in the bible are pretty realistic. Jesus walking on water and doing all of his achievements before Youtube and Newspapers existing is a bit harder to swallow.


0a9423  No.685374

>>684348

What did he say?


d2e4ca  No.685380

>>685306


fbcc19  No.685467

File: d6a351ffaaa68a4⋯.png (192.8 KB, 1188x358, 594:179, 18BE86DC-5CC4-49BB-BBE7-DA….png)

So what’s the story mods?


fbcc19  No.685481

File: b765ef97bc71ce0⋯.png (96.9 KB, 1192x245, 1192:245, 2EA07342-0F2A-4206-B1E9-C5….png)

File: 8f934bfb2a1c880⋯.png (71.06 KB, 708x504, 59:42, 365A5033-233C-4EEA-8E1C-FB….png)


98ca37  No.685490

>>685481

This board actually has a huge number of permanent bans.

Perhaps it is time to make it global, too.


b5397f  No.685508

>>685490

Permanent bans vanish after 60 days.


e7c4a8  No.685571

Why are flags gone? Did we have a vote?


150452  No.685585

>>685571

I also wonder. I miss them.


b5397f  No.685587

>>685571

>>685585

The mods made it clear that they aren't coming back. Post is somewhere itt.


9cada4  No.685589

>>685571

>>685585

>>685587

It's the only good change they've made in a while, flags only gave strength to trolling, false flagging.


e7c4a8  No.685606

>>685587

But why though.


b5397f  No.685609

>>685606

Because the flags were used almost exclusively to troll and false flag. Their removal increased board quality 1000 fold.


e7c4a8  No.685611

>>685609

Was there a vote?


b5397f  No.685619

>>685611

No. Why would there be?


0a9423  No.685827

>>685609

>flags were used almost exclusively to troll and false flag

Nonsense.


183b9b  No.685857

>>685611

>vote

You tickle my sense of humour, kompis


f810fd  No.685896

File: fbf9a8d29d1d8c1⋯.jpg (152.98 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, fbf9a8d29d1d8c13b24dc63d5d….jpg)

>>685606

>baptist flag used as a license to shitpost

>catholic flag used as a license to shipost, but ironically :^)


59fda4  No.686982

>>685827

Hey man anything to shift the overton window. Next they'll say its the most popular decision ever made and that people (other than them, mods) were COMPLAINING about them. Like, nonstop, man.


ba3a34  No.686986

Please get rid of the word filters. They're not funny and stink of Reddit.


bac50f  No.687074

File: 22c022d18807269⋯.jpg (94.84 KB, 600x450, 4:3, Winnie the poohed from Tig….jpg)

>>686986

This is just me, but i would disagree.


721e5a  No.687202

File: 7549f3c0f21d2f5⋯.png (57.29 KB, 393x263, 393:263, Sem título.png)

>thread asking whether shadow people are demons

deleted (why?)

>these

not deleted

hmm…


c31318  No.687237

>>687202

Why do mods keep deleting interesting threads? Do we really need a million variants on “guys I can’t stop masturbating”?


721e5a  No.687253

>>687237

There were also two (or three) threads on perenialism/traditionalism that got deleted. I don't know why. The thread about shadow people was legitimate and relevant.

Traditionalism/perenialism had an enormous impact on the islamization of europe and it is also studied in some seminars (which may be alarming in case of guenonianism). Some catholics like Wolfgang Smith, Jean Borella and Jean Hani came from the tradionalist school and have a lot to say.

The thread about possessions in contemporary times also got deleted. There were others legitimate threads I don't recall right now.


59fda4  No.687289

>>687237

Mods have already deleted enough posts to prove their evil intent. The only question is now how long until someone from site administration has to step in to straighten this place out.


154964  No.687317

>>687289

I'm sure leaving /x/ and /fringe/ stuff on /christian/ is "evil intent".


30056f  No.687353

>>687289

>someone from site administration has to step in to straighten this place out

point at him and laugh


b074bc  No.687471

Why was the thread on redditors finding and posting about /christian/ get deleted? It was very worthwhile discussion


1c98e6  No.687476

>>687471

>nobody should go to reddit

>reddit needs to gtfo

>reddit is literally satan

<w-why can't we link to reddit? D:


5d5a74  No.687481

>>687476

Why is reddit linking to us? We need to figure it out and it a stop to it. The thread shouldn’t have been deleted


1c98e6  No.687491

>>687481

It's not up to us to stop a site from linking to us. We don't own this site and it's not exactly a hidden site. We're also not a secret club. If even one person from another site comes to this board and is saved, then it is all worth it. However, if you instead run screaming to reddit and demand they stop linking to here, then you'll just bring the trolls.


5fb029  No.687534

File: a041782a288bea5⋯.jpg (456.61 KB, 792x1080, 11:15, __kotomine_shirou_fate_apo….jpg)

Hello. I was one of the people who reacted to the anime "ban" a while ago. I want to make it clear that I reacted to the perceived injustice of one lone mod imposing his rules based on his own preferences on the board back then - Injustice is a universal feeling that one wants to be compliant to by any rational human being. That by itself is the definition of shit moderation and had me worried. After a time of reflection. I understand why Lind would want to lock/delete threads that he perceived to be harmful to Christians and their chastity, regardless of any circumstances or the fact that the shows themselves would not lead other into temptation. I would like to apologize for any hostility perceived by mods who are by all means just volunteers because of Christ. I was unfair and I did not mean to put any vols in a defensive position.

It was never my intention to sow dissent or lead brothers or sisters of Christ away from Christ because of Anime. But to simple show good example of Anime that made people cherish Christian values in Anime, or any media they consume for that matter, be they videogames or chinese cartoons, like hollywood movies.

However if the final word of the board owner is "No anime, whatosever" and it becomes and absolute rule, then I won't disobey.


1c98e6  No.687537

>>687534

>then I won't disobey

I will. :^)


721e5a  No.687540

>>687317

shadow people are an actual phenomenon and not /x/ stuff. Demons are also real. Don't you believe in them?


f88a2c  No.687595

>>687317

Even /islam/ deletes this /x/-tier crap immediately. Why does /christian/ allow anything even remotely /fringe/ when /islam/ doesn't? It makes /christian/ look weak and cucked.


721e5a  No.687596

>>687595

why should one care about what /islam/ deletes or not? go back to pol you larper


8c1c64  No.688188

File: 59f8b71e898c0d2⋯.webm (86.69 KB, 480x360, 4:3, jiggabooin.webm)

>>688173

>watching any sort of anime


bac50f  No.688356

https://8ch.net/transparency.html

10 DMCA reports in 30 days? what is going on?


1c98e6  No.688681

>>688356

We don't know. According to previous transparency reports, though, it's not unusual.


1cdae5  No.688784

Why are so many posts and then entire threads being deleted? Is there a way to get less interference from people who don't have a clue what they're doing?


1c98e6  No.688924

>>688784

Depends on the thread/posts. The board has rules and your personal interpretation of those rules doesn't matter. If the BO/Vol decides your post/thread is breaking the rules, then it'll get deleted. That's literally how everything works on every website and even in real life. If you personally interpret a law to mean one thing but a judge interprets it another, the judge wins and you go to jail.


4dd9b4  No.688941

>>688924

Funny coming from the guy that's constantly agitating for more deletions and interference into the site. Would reddit be more your speed?

>If the BO/Vol decides your post/thread is breaking the rules, then it'll get deleted.

And then I'm gonna post again, and I'm gonna keep posting because this isn't reddit and you can't shadowban me because I don't have an account.


1c98e6  No.688947

>>688941

>Would reddit be more your speed?

If it were, then I would be there. Obviously, I've been here for quite a while.

>then I'm gonna post it again

Ah, the edgy anarcho-teenage angst. "The rules don't apply to me!" Well, enjoy that.


4dd9b4  No.688950

>>688947

You can't even quote my post accurately. How can you be trusted to run this board when you can't even read correctly?


1c98e6  No.688954

>>688950

I don't run this board.


3ef958  No.689081

The thing you can't answer is that this board was better before you came in with your rule changes. It used to be run by someone with a semblance of impartiality, now everything's just become a tool to one-sidedly promote the moderator denomination. Everything from the way the rules were changed, the avoidance of answering questions, the intellectually dishonest method of changing things in the middle of the night (like how he removed flags without just admitting it was his plan up-front, but jewishly announcing it was permanent later) and the drunken purges of posts by catholic mods whenever they happen to decide to log on.

This board was better before you got here, and that's why you have no backbone to answer. And I've been asking since day one practically. Because I've seen what was possible before this biased group began.


154161  No.689090

>>688924

>That's literally how everything works on every website and even in real life.

If we had laws as subjective as rule 2 in real life, everyone on this board would be in prison.


1c98e6  No.689127

>>689081

>(1)

>>689090

How is rule 2 subjective? If you spew vitriol and insults, you're violating rule 2. That shouldn't be difficult for any rational adult to understand.


ceb1d9  No.689136

File: f075cde27a0a9c6⋯.png (19.68 KB, 709x475, 709:475, Capture.PNG)

>Rule 2 in action

I was talking to a troll, now the whole "greentext thread" I was the OP of got deleted I don't know why. Why mods ?

I even had posts mocking the pope that got deleted in the thread about the inquisition.

I'm catholic and I'm tired of this moderation.


6fe6f6  No.689152

>>689136

Yeah they seem to think that they can just remove whatever posts they don't like, and somehow not disrupt the whole thread, but end up having to delete the whole thread. This keeps on repeating and the meta thread is simply left unanswered. There's really nothing they could say that would explain this behavior anyway, it's base reddit mentality. Too bad they couldn't take it somewhere else.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / advice / asmr / bcb / fast / leftpol / tacos / vg / vichan ]