[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 4am / agatha / animu / caos / his / imouto / omnichan / yg ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Winner of the 2∞rd Attention-Hungry Games
/liberty/ - Physical removal time, communist swine.

Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

File: 0f6028efdbc86ad⋯.jpg (130.83 KB, 635x794, 635:794, moses01.jpg)

0f7904 No.520608

Glory to God in the highest!

You can continue discussion with others,as well as reach the mod team on our Discord server! -> https://discord.gg/yETt5fd

This board is for fellowship and discussion among Christians. Please be mindful that some general rules are enforced to encourage constructive discourse.

Please read the rules and ban policy before posting!

Rules

1. This board is strictly Safe For Work.

Please consult the global rule page if this is not clear.

2. Interactions must be for the sake of Charity. Post made in the spirit of disruption or spite could earn you a short to permanent ban.

Charity is a foundational concept in Christianity. It is the virtue of supreme love for God and others. It is the greatest of the three virtues Paul emphasizes, and governs all Christian conduct. Just because this is an 8chan board does not alleviate Christians of their moral duty. All interactions must be done with this in mind.

This includes all antagonism. Personal insults, trolling, disrupting/derailing a thread, raiding from other boards, spamming, and scandal are all considered part of this rule.

Scandal includes encouraging people to commit sin like fornication, masturbation, blasphemy, apostasy, abortion, lying, taking the Lords name in vain, suicide, and the like.

Interdenominational debates are allowed on this board, but they are still governed by charity. Insinuations must be accompanied by explanation and/or primary resources.

3. This is a board for Christian discussion and fellowship. For the intentions of the board, a Christian is one who believes in the Nicene Creed (Specifically the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed) and the Chalcedonian Definition.

This board recognizes Christianity as a religion that exist in real history. Because of this, it chooses these two criteria as the cut-off point for what officially constitutes a Christian for the sake of the board. Not all groups who label themselves Christian simply are by assertion of the title. All who claim to profess the faith must adhere to these two creedal statements and their implications in order to post in Christian fellowship threads.

4. Non-Christians are welcome to post here, and are encouraged to ask questions in good faith. But they cannot proselytize non-Christian beliefs or post antagonistic or otherwise scandalous material.

If you are a non-Christian, you are more than welcome to create a thread asking questions specific to you, but please avoid Christian fellowship threads. This is because the primary purpose of fellowship on this board is for Christians to get the view of other Christians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_(virtue)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalcedonian_Definition

Ban Policy

The mods will use their best judgement when enforcing the rules, and you can contest their decisions by appealing the ban, posting in the meta, or talking to us directly on the discord. The discord server is the fastest way to get a response, followed by the appeals page. Posting in the meta is the slowest and least efficient. Keep this in mind. Do not dispute the ban in the thread the ban took place in, or make a new thread to contest your ban. This is disruptive.

Post that break the rules will be met with temporary bans in accordance with the severity of the post, up to 5 days.

Permanent bans will be given out for posting pornography, explicit material, after being given multiple temporary bans, and raids or obvious trolling from other boards.

Please post any questions you have in this thread, and we will try our best to answer them.

And now there remain faith, hope, and charity, these three: but the greatest of these is charity.

Post last edited at

697243 No.592985

The ads are a problem This toy demon thing might bother no fappers.

Please do something with it redditors


55493f No.593020

>>592985

Those are ads put up by 8ch owners, there's nothing that the mods or owner of the /christian/ board can do about them, sadly.


e36462 No.593041

>>593020

bs

I have removed all ads and other stuff added by admins I didnt like on my board by editing css

users always have option to use adblock


f38bf0 No.593208

File: 82b511631a55fdc⋯.jpg (34.12 KB, 650x600, 13:12, f23849a3ab8812e70630bf426c….jpg)

>>592761

>Still not sure whether Catholicism or Orthodoxy have the true church

>Was baptized by sprinkling

SCREAMS ETERNALLY


697243 No.593263

>>593020

useless on things that actually matter


02a758 No.593586

Even though it's "popular" denom flags are way too easily exploitable for denom D&C trolling. Someone cal easily post as a catholic and troll one denom than switch to a baptist and offend a catholic. Without flags people would have to find the denoms through what the person says.


3d2b83 No.593744

>>593597

So if we make it more difficult for the trolls, it will be more difficult for the trolls? That is your argument?


8da867 No.594138

>>593744

I believe only in Unity and no earthly D&C, our spiritual master Jesus never taught anyone to stand behind some ideology, always walk with the CREATOR.


d2f058 No.594180

>>593597

see >>594111


697243 No.594220

flags are better to avoid denom guessing and accusing. False flag do happen but we have mods for that at least


8596f0 No.594741

>>593597

One of the reasons why i posted that was because i didn't know that Catholics use the denom of Protestantism as a general insult, i'm not even prot but "become" one depending on the subject i post.


3d317c No.594768

Why is it okay for apostolics to break rule 2?

>>594763

>>594765


397a15 No.594775

I know that we can't really do anything about it but what was the reason they created the nerve center? It seems like it would only make it easier for shills to shit up threads informative threads.

see >>588127


0c64ca No.595224

>>520608

Can we get an Assemblies of God flag? Come on, we're Trinitarians!


546a44 No.595714

Where did the 'Dealing with homosexuality' thread go?


98eca0 No.595759

>>595714

where all b8 threads go of course


546a44 No.595764

>>595759

How was it a bait thread? The OP seemed serious and well-intentioned and we had some good discussion going.


05a5bb No.595796

This is a weird request. I don't know if mods can see threads they deleted, but I made an effortpost in that Mormon thread that got deleted, and if you can see it can you paste it as a response to this/screenshot it and post the image? If not, it's no big deal, but I'd kinda like to have it saved for when Mormons come back


466608 No.595857

>>595764

It was an accident, a new mod pulled the trigger too fast. A little bit of comedy: one of the other mods was actually in that same thread engaging in convo when it happened. My apologies.

>>595796

That is outside of our capacity. Sorry about that. If I ever make a large post, I put it in a wordfile first for spell checks, and usually save it anyway. I don't know if you do that but it is a useful tip.

Post last edited at

cc6f65 No.596561

what was this guy ( >>596450 ) warned for?

the post only pointed out why he thinks roman catholics are idolators in a thread about whether or not roman catholics are idolators.

it's a common view among all non-catholics/orthodox.

(not arguing the case for whether or not he's right in the meta thread, pic related is just to point out an example of the above)


466608 No.596582

>>596561

>not making an argument in the meta

>tries to slip in argument pic

Cute.

That said, probably because he wasn't making an argument, he was just calling names. Besides, thinking the apostolics are idolators is not a legitimate position on a board whose rules are directly based on acknowledging the authority of the Church. It's just an insult, or at best it's a misunderstanding from ignorance. Which is why the thread was left up.


cc6f65 No.596594

>>596582

>It's just an insult, or at best it's a misunderstanding from ignorance.

it's a fact.

>Besides, thinking the apostolics are idolators is not a legitimate position on a board whose rules are directly based on acknowledging the authority of the Church.

i want nothing more to do with this place then.

i don't acknowledge your church as the Church.

it's sad that a board started by a baptist for interdenominational Christian fellowship and discussion has turned into this.

please ban me, i waste too much time here anyway.


cb3222 No.596712

File: df73a3b5c787717⋯.jpg (16.23 KB, 255x255, 1:1, hands.jpg)

>>596582

>thinking the apostolics are idolators is not a legitimate position on a board whose rules are directly based on acknowledging the authority of the Church


0978b6 No.596829

Why are threads deleted for no clear reason? are they sometimes removed because they're not popular?

Specifically my thread about freemasons worshipping inside the church?


cb3222 No.596860

Am I the only one seeing the board as completely fucked up?


dadb16 No.596871

File: c7770d8617a525e⋯.png (396.65 KB, 1448x1407, 1448:1407, IMG_1192.PNG)

Why was this guy banned?


dadb16 No.596873

>>596582

Tutor you're messing up.


cb3222 No.596886

>>596871

Wrongthink


b90a7d No.596938

>>596886

>>596871

Is this all that Baptists' do? Do a hit-and-run insulting the Mother of God, then complain when they got warned about.

Crying out as they strike you. This tactic is familiar.


cb3222 No.596944

>>596938

I don't believe your goddess is the mother of God


e36462 No.597009

>>596829

>are they sometimes removed because they're not popular?

I know there is a feature on 8chan you can turn on. If a thread with less then 10 replies gets to page 5 it gets deleted automatically.


d110d4 No.597037

>>596938

>says “Catholics make and bow to statues”

>has pictures of Catholics bowing to statues

>”oy vey, why are you Baptists insulting the Mother of G-d?”

The post had nothing to do with Mary, you’re reaching


dadb16 No.597313

>>597009

Does it account for samefaggotry? It's easy to evade bans just change your up.

>>596938

>>596944

>>596946

Burn


b90a7d No.597316

What is this, reddit? le baptist brigade strikes again xD

>>596944

If you deny Mary is the Mother of God, then you deny Jesus is God.


dadb16 No.597346

File: 24a985e4800456b⋯.png (2.21 MB, 1536x2048, 3:4, IMG_1195.PNG)

>>597316

Uh.. no I don't. Mary is a human.

Why was this deleted?


298835 No.597371

File: 53c8fc26b303d70⋯.webm (7.34 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Talmudic Doctrine of Shek….webm)

>>597316

Jesus should be the only path to God. Goddess worship is pagan and worshiping any feminine aspect of God is occultism, God/jesus is strictly male.


dadb16 No.597414

>>597405

Do you expect your claim to be taken seriously?


b90a7d No.597457

>>597346

Mary is a Saint. She is called the Queen of Heaven not because she is equal of God, but, in that she is the highest and purest of all saints, for giving birth to Christ.

Why is this too hard, too "mystical" for you to understand?

>>597371

May God open your eyes.


f72e8c No.597463

>>597435

It's bogus.

Look at what they used as a source:

>It is quoted in the article on the Renaissance, which was authored by John Addington Symonds, who merely quotes it in passing as a "witty epigram" of one of Leo's repeated by others. He does not give any source for the quote, and there seems to be very little reason to give Symonds credence in the matter; he was a literary critic and poet, not a historian.


63210d No.597473

>>597457

This really deserves it's own thread…

>May God open your eyes.

I'm not saying Mary is a demon or anything, or disrespecting her as a vital saint, Mary is important, however Jesus should be the only path to God. Isn't it catholic education to teach about the Transmogrification of Jesus and specifically male persist?

>She is called the Queen of Heaven not because she is equal of God

>>If you deny Mary is the Mother of God, then you deny Jesus is God.

When you say both these it sounds like you're saying that you need to accept some divinity of Mary for find God.


b90a7d No.597520

>>597473

>Jesus should be the only path to God.

Of course He is the only path to God, who has ever said otherwise? Mary is here as a path to Christ, as a Blessed Intercessor. Can you find me a Catholic that says Jesus is unneeded, thanks to Mary? Of course not, that's calumny.

"3 And the wine failing, the mother of Jesus saith to him: They have no wine.

4 And Jesus saith to her: Woman, what is that to me and to thee? my hour is not yet come.

5 His mother saith to the waiters: Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye."

Note it. In His love -and yet though it was not His time -He performed a miracle at her bequest. In this same manner, we ask the Blessed Mother to pray for us at the hour of death, because Jesus is also our Judge.

What part of this is so difficult to understand?


dadb16 No.597528

>>597520

>what's so difficult to understand

Um, the whole thing. By that logic John the Baptist is a more worthy prophet.


b90a7d No.597534

>>597528

You're not using logic here at all. John the Baptist was not the ark of the New Covenant, nor was he the Mother of God. However, we actually honor him in our daily liturgies too, I'm sure this is idolatry to you too though.


63210d No.597538

File: 5a9d9e899ce36c8⋯.webm (Spoiler Image, 15.05 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Freemason Initiation Cere….webm)

File: b77e85e9db8eb74⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 237.37 KB, 844x867, 844:867, Accended Demons pretending….jpg)

>>597520

>Of course He is the only path to God, who has ever said otherwise?

This was my main point.

>Note it. In His love -and yet though it was not His time -He performed a miracle at her bequest. In this same manner, we ask the Blessed Mother to pray for us at the hour of death, because Jesus is also our Judge.

I remember a thread about this a long time ago on /christian/ about Mary commanded Jesus vs Jesus being God and therefore her requests being pre-planned or not needed because he was sinless so he would have obeyed his parents and God. It was kind of a paradox of a point.

I'm sure you're aware of this passages, these show the authority that Jesus has over Demons.

>Matthew 12 25Knowing their thoughts, Jesus said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself will be laid waste, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand. 26If Satan drives out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then can his kingdom stand?

>27And if I drive out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons drive them out? So then, they will be your judges. 28But if I drive out demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.

>29How can anyone enter a strong man’s house and steal his possessions, unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can plunder his house.

>30He who is not with Me is against Me, and he who does not gather with Me scatters.

>Matthew 8:16 When the even was come, they brought unto him many that were possessed with devils: and he cast out the spirits with his word, and healed all that were sick:

>Luke 11:20 But if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you.

>What part of this is so difficult to understand?

It's dangerous to pray to spiritual entities that are not specifically God, only Jesus and God have power over the demons. It's clear with occultism and the pagan religions that Satan can take many different shapes, from a male angels of light to transgender goat-man to a Wicca goddesses. This is why it's discouraged to pray to angels/saints. Demons can even impersonate a Jesus-like figure, it has to be something dramatic to keep it from being the biblical Jesus. Feeding statues, worshiping symbols or objects, are all close to indirect worship of another being.

When the Freemasons pray, they use ambiguous phrases to mean "God" they say things like "from "Jesus to Christ" " or "the Great architect". I don't remember the exact name but there was some obscure church that when they prayed they would stop after ever word because they thought that God was in between the words. My point is it's really easy to give indirect worship.

I'm just trying to understand. I don't think Catholicism is completely wrong, i know that the prayer to Mary is in the bible, and that the church is connected to the bible.


397a15 No.597542

>>597520

Since this isn't meta related and if you're still going to reply you can do in this thread >>596297 since it's specifically about idolatry


dadb16 No.597672

>>597534

Neither was Mary the ark of the new covenant. Jesus is.


a302be No.597785

File: ccd0a0757d045ba⋯.jpg (72.58 KB, 484x665, 484:665, http-images.memes.com-meme….jpg)

Did the mods just set the Catholic Art thread to "non-bump"? Cause it ain't bumping.


60b967 No.597797

>>597785

It reached R: 307 / I: 640 isn't that maxed already.


a302be No.597803

>>597797

I just posted there. It is 308/641 now. Its just been set not to bump I think.


db7419 No.597821

>>597803

Maybe i'm wrong but isn't the reply limit 300?


eb4743 No.597824

>>597803

Just posted. Can comfirm. Not bumping.


eb4743 No.597869

>>597785

It seems to be three hours since the thread stopped bumping. Still no word from the moderators. Is this why people always bitch about the mods on this site? If I say something crazy like, “one Baptist mod and see what happens.” will that get their attention and cause them to issue an explanation?

Seriously though, this is the only threat in the last three months were people have posted, multiple times, “what a great great thread, “thank you for posting, “such and such is beautiful. Why was it bump locked?


e176bf No.597883

>>597869

All threads stop bumping after 300 replies, unless made cyclical.

That thread is not cyclical.

The mods didn't bump lock it.


eb4743 No.597886

>>597883

Is that the case? Why didn’t they chime in to say that? They’ve had plenty of opportunity. Or are you a moderator posting as not a moderator?


eb4743 No.597888

>>597885

Yeah man. I’ve never seen an image board before. And I certainly don’t know why the moderators here are really nothing but janitors. When was it? Do you recall? I think it was 03.


e176bf No.597893

>>597886

It's not like they can keep their eyes on this thread 24/7, or get some kind of notification when someone posts in it.

If you don't care about your privacy, the best way to reach them is to register with discord and contact them there.

>are you a mod?

Io non sono cattolico


eb4743 No.597911

>>597893

Thank you for your Baptist perspective. (you know some people post on here without flags when they are not speaking as a representative of their denomination. But, I guess you called on many many centuries of Baptist tradition to make that statement. )


b90a7d No.597913

>>597672

The Ark of the Temple contained God. Ergo, Mary was the New Ark of the Temple, for she contained Christ.

>I remember a thread about this a long time ago on /christian/ about Mary commanded Jesus vs Jesus being God and therefore her requests being pre-planned or not needed because he was sinless so he would have obeyed his parents and God. It was kind of a paradox of a point

What is paradoxical about it? Mary did not command Christ, she requested of it of Him. And in His love, He granted it. A major part of Mariology is that her grace was God-given, but also freely complied at all times.

>It's dangerous to pray to spiritual entities that are not specifically God

A demon would not tell you to "Do whatever He tells ye".


eb4743 No.597920

File: 2beb1d246f79b3f⋯.jpeg (66.83 KB, 1440x900, 8:5, 74761D6D-E422-4F3B-89F7-1….jpeg)

>>597913

Your post made me think of all the inspiring things I saw in the Catholic our thread that won’t bump anymore. Pic related.


eb4743 No.597921

>>597920

“Art” not “our”. Stupid iPhone voice recognition. Never buy an iPhone.


e176bf No.597926

>>597911

Not sure if it's more bizarre that you're attacking me after helping you, or the inane thing you're attacking me about.

But you're welcome.


eb4743 No.597929

>>597926

Many people were attacked today. Many of them suffered crippling injuries and many of them lost their lives. You were not attacked. Don’t be dramatic. I was just wondering why you were flying a Baptist flag when the fact that you were a Baptist had nothing to do with what you were saying. If you’re not speaking as a representative of Babistdom, then don’t fly the flag.

To represent your people is a very very serious thing. Do not take it lightly, or else you may accidentally disgrace and discredit those you wish to represent.


eb4743 No.597930

>>597926

( there may have been some sarcasm in there somewhere, also, maybe)


9a1064 No.597934

>>597929

You're still on about this, eh?

>>597883

>>597893

he's not speaking ex cathedra


eb4743 No.597942

>>597934

Well yes. Thank you for replying! Yes I am still on about this! Thank you for reminding me to ask the mods why that thread doesn’t bump.

Also, speaking of flying flags in representing your people; There aren’t very many Baptists in Australia. 1.25 Percent of the total population. Are you just speaking like they do because you think it’s cool? Or are you actually a very rare Australian Baptist? Because if you’re actually an Australian Baptist I have a lot of questions for you because I come from the Baptist south in the United States.


9a1064 No.597947

>>597942

Australian? Never so much as seen that hemisphere. You're an odd duck.


eb4743 No.597948

>>597947

Where are you from that you say “on about”.


9a1064 No.597953

File: ff90806588a4618⋯.gif (16.9 KB, 448x364, 16:13, maritimesmap.gif)

File: 563f5210b46dd55⋯.jpg (75.61 KB, 676x380, 169:95, 21432-all-aboard-the-ocean….jpg)

File: 1c97c8207fe9f98⋯.jpg (49.6 KB, 600x400, 3:2, historic-lunenburg_25723.jpg)

File: d2f8c1f4cc508d6⋯.jpg (181.25 KB, 960x640, 3:2, 4.Winter-in-Port-Hood.jpg)

File: 27cf4b94c300889⋯.jpg (486.28 KB, 1000x700, 10:7, scenicdrive-adventure.jpg)

>>597948

It's as if a person could make wrong assumptions when we don't advertise relevant information


eb4743 No.597977

File: ceb4e5ce18d2d77⋯.png (161.75 KB, 750x1334, 375:667, F882A31B-EEF1-4460-9155-49….png)

>>597953

It all gets very confusing when the information that you do advertise is not relevant, Mr. Baptist flag poster.

In other news if you go to the 8CH homepage you’ll notice that the website is pushing the Catholic art thread as a hot thread. Maybe because this entire site is almost dead. Someone should tell the administrators that the thread has been bumped locked.


55493f No.597980

>>597893

There's Baptist board volunteers/mods here.

>>597785

Your pic made me giggle like a little kid for 2 minutes straight, thanks for that. :D


cb3222 No.597983

>>597893

>It's not like they can keep their eyes on this thread 24/7

Or ever, it would seem. If I can keep my eyes on this thread why can't they?


0c8987 No.597999

>>597983

Just a shot in the dark here, but maybe because the mods aren't aspie neets. The question you need to be asking yourself is exactly why you have not only the ability, but the desire, to watch any thread on 8chan 24/7.


eb4743 No.598017

>>597999

I’m beginning to give up on the whole Catholicism thing. The Catholic Art thread that I contributed so much to, maybe it doesn’t mean that much after all. I’m looking around for something new and different and I saw the banner up top. Vitamin K. I searched it on the Internet. Ketamine. One of the most intense disassociative psychedelics in existence. Maybe this is what God wants.


0c8987 No.598027

>>598017

I wouldn't look to banners on 8chan as an answer to what God wants.


55493f No.598275

>>598017

>>597977

It appears that the thread has been made cyclical. :)


cb3222 No.599186

File: 163d42431c4cbe8⋯.jpg (563.32 KB, 1600x1116, 400:279, dghd.jpg)

>>597999

>reading what's new in a sticky at most once a day is watching a thread 24/7


0c8987 No.599192

>>597983

>If I can keep my eyes on this thread

>>599186

>reading what's new

Goalpost Status: Moved


cb3222 No.599196

>>599192

English isn't your first language, is it


05a5bb No.599233

File: 1990affbf214400⋯.png (106.45 KB, 1216x182, 608:91, Screen Shot 2018-02-03 at ….png)

Why does >>599109 404?


6d2a38 No.599240

>>599233

catholic mods keep deleting threads that they don't like. Get used to it.


0c8987 No.599246

>>599233

Probably didn't need more Anderson threads. Just a guess.


73d178 No.599342

File: 62d979478c310f9⋯.jpeg (311.59 KB, 1079x1472, 1079:1472, D2812303-ED79-421A-A39B-0….jpeg)

>>599233

Hey mods, what’s going on big guys?


05a5bb No.599345

File: ce926d5a8af374a⋯.png (900.98 KB, 1000x1000, 1:1, how_bad_things_really_are.png)


cb3222 No.599359

>>599342

>big guys

for you


a538af No.599361

>>599342

keep spamming the thread and I keep banning


2ed010 No.599390

>>599361

Faggot


fa36ce No.599395

>>599233

>>599342

I don't want to defend the mods, but watching the doc is amazingly sjw, they present the wife as this tragic feminist indoctrinated slave, who keeps having kids. It's continued use of christian "hate group" or how crazy it paints Christians who should shouldn't tell LGBT.

>…Pastor Anderson believes 911 was an inside job, and question the holocaust, look how crazy he is!

this is a really really bad doc, but i don't think the threads should be closed or people banned.


6c3064 No.599698

File: e7ba96b156a0cb9⋯.png (1.02 MB, 750x1334, 375:667, 65191175-C688-4009-9267-9C….png)

Why was this thread deleted for no reason?


270e03 No.599701

>>599698

They delete anything they disagree with now


e36462 No.599711

File: 47975111e298138⋯.png (3.91 KB, 327x67, 327:67, gnostic poster.png)


63210d No.600091

>>599342

>>599701

Also this doc isn't even against Catholicism at all, so the previous wrongthink of the mods isn't why they keep removing it.

>>599711

But the misconception of the 2nd commandments isn't gnostic?


75ea25 No.600221

File: 0c67b574ead16e5⋯.png (103.34 KB, 984x604, 246:151, thread-600195.png)

>>599418

>Yeah I don't get it either.

So, the usual hotpocketry then?

See, I would get this if they'd deleted the ninth thread that said the exact same thing visa vie this >>599246 but there isn't even ONE out there, so it does feel a great deal like any Anderson thread is just plain banned/deleted

y'know, the usual hotpocketry then, I guess


cc903d No.600243

>>599342

Mods, why was he banned for this post? There is literally nothing wrong with it and it follows all the rules.


6c3064 No.600257

File: ec9c832c4ae0b51⋯.jpeg (16.85 KB, 255x143, 255:143, 86799AB4-C629-4EF5-9546-8….jpeg)

>>600243

>>600221

>>600091

>>599701

>>599345

>>599342

He has a huge superiority complex and actually thinks he has the authority to interpret Scripture in any ways he wants, that's why you've got so much weird stuff coming from him. He also calls himself a prophet.

Honestly, people give him too much attention. He's just like Westboro Baptist Church, where they throw anger tantrums and scream about homosexuals and people watch them. Except, most people are just laughing at people like Anderson.

tl;dr: he's a crazy guy who isn't worth your attention, I suggest tuning in to people like

(1) Bishop Barron (https://www.youtube.com/user/wordonfirevideo/videos)

(2) Father Ripperger (https://www.youtube.com/user/onearmsteve4192/videos)

(3) Father Schmitz (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVdGX3N-WIJ5nUvklBTNhAw/videos)


cc903d No.600269

>>600257

Why was his post deleted? and why was the OP permabanned for it?


6c3064 No.600285

File: 2318129b03f5652⋯.jpeg (64.03 KB, 800x430, 80:43, A91AF02D-60BA-42B0-B4B6-9….jpeg)

>>600269

Because Anderson has a huge superiority complex and actually thinks he has the authority to interpret Scripture in any ways he wants, that's why you've got so much weird stuff coming from him. He also calls himself a prophet.

Honestly, people give him too much attention. He's just like Westboro Baptist Church, where they throw anger tantrums and scream about homosexuals and people watch them. Except, most people are just laughing at people like Anderson.


cc903d No.600287

>>600285

Spamming is against the rules and repeating something irrelevant to the issue at hand won't answer the questions. I don't care what you think about Steven Anderson. I want to know why the thread was deleted, and why the OP was permabanned for it. The character of Steven Anderson and what you think of him is irrelevant.


6c3064 No.600289

>>600287

I'm not actually a mod. I'm just posting the mod spam


cc903d No.600291

>>600289

Be careful with that, anon.


dc17c8 No.600294

>>600285

>>600257

>bearing false witness

>uncharitable

These are the people who mediate our discussions.


6c3064 No.600334

>>600294

˙uosɹǝpuɐ ǝʞıן ǝןdoǝd ʇɐ buıɥbnɐן ʇsn ǝɹɐ ǝןdoǝd ʇsoɯ 'ʇdǝɔxǝ ˙ɯǝɥʇ ɥɔʇɐʍ ǝןdoǝd puɐ sןɐnxǝsoɯoɥ ʇnoqɐ ɯɐǝɹɔs puɐ sɯnɹʇuɐʇ ɹǝbuɐ ʍoɹɥʇ ʎǝɥʇ ǝɹǝɥʍ 'ɥɔɹnɥɔ ʇsıʇdɐq oɹoqʇsǝʍ ǝʞıן ʇsn s,ǝɥ ˙uoıʇuǝʇʇɐ ɥɔnɯ ooʇ ɯıɥ ǝʌıb ǝןdoǝd 'ʎןʇsǝuoɥ

˙ʇǝɥdoɹd ɐ ɟןǝsɯıɥ sןןɐɔ osןɐ ǝɥ ˙ɯıɥ ɯoɹɟ buıɯoɔ ɟɟnʇs pɹıǝʍ ɥɔnɯ os ʇob ǝʌ,noʎ ʎɥʍ s,ʇɐɥʇ 'sʇuɐʍ ǝɥ sʎɐʍ ʎuɐ uı ǝɹnʇdıɹɔs ʇǝɹdɹǝʇuı oʇ ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ ǝɥʇ sɐɥ ǝɥ sʞuıɥʇ ʎןןɐnʇɔɐ puɐ xǝןdɯoɔ ʎʇıɹoıɹǝdns ǝbnɥ ɐ sɐɥ ǝɥ ǝsnɐɔǝq s,ʇı


dc17c8 No.600337

>>600334

Bearing false witness upside down


cc903d No.600389

>>599711

Prove that the angry Baptist guy is the same guy with the Gnostic flag in your image.


4a8f4b No.600660

>>600641

OP did nothing wrong, the thread devolved into turd-flinging when an anon started screeching that he never wants to see Anderson ever again


75ea25 No.600665

>>600257

Why is it that EVERY one of your counter-suggestions is a Catholic? Not even an Anglican or Lutheran to at least pretend this isn't cuckvol-tier all over again.

Oh, you're not a vol You're triggering my ass, anon


833df8 No.600732

why do mods keep deleting that one guys thread on his ban?


60b967 No.600752

>>600732

I'm not sure why they initially removed and banned it (maybe it's >>600257 >>600285 ) but now they're removing it because he keeps spamming it.


cb3222 No.600800

>>600732

The usual. Wrongthink.


05a5bb No.600820

>>600732

It's spam, so it breaks the rules. That being said, they should just explain why the original thread was deleted so he stops spamming it. Both parties are being stubborn in this case, and it's hurting the board


0c8987 No.600867

>>600820

I take it you've never run/moderated a board. The explanation is never good enough, no matter how sound the reasoning. You can't convince a spammer/crybaby that they're in the wrong, you just have to keep deleting the spam until they get bored.


4a8f4b No.600870

>>600867

Did you see the original thread?


44dd55 No.601364

>>597980

>There's Baptist board volunteers/mods here.

I would like to hear their thoughts on bans like this: >>601247


442892 No.601628

Please add a Reformed Baptist flag so I can tell real Baptists from Calvinist heretics


a302be No.601735

>>601628

It is awkward isn't it? This is one of the reasons I was asking the mods to consider dropping the flags altogether.


05a5bb No.601760

>>601364

Despite there being a "meta" thread, mods never use this thread to explain why they did things. Basically, you say "why did mods do this" in your own thread and you get banned plus deleted. So you post "why did mods do this" in the meta thread and they ignore it.


95d064 No.602022

File: 895889af0c5d3db⋯.jpeg (351.16 KB, 1242x1674, 23:31, 02C7A83E-6FCD-4A3C-9840-D….jpeg)

>ask about mod actions outside meta

>b&

>ask about it in meta

>no response

What the fuck are the mods doing all day?


c5f16c No.602023

>>602022

on discord banning people without avatars and people with suspicious names


95d064 No.602028

>>602023

I’m not even on discord. Is that true?


55493f No.602060


f363d0 No.602115

We admit that the original thread was banned by accident. The original thread had been requested to be deleted by other users due to the topic being derailed and almost nothing but infighting and violations of rule 2. Unfortunately, a mistake was made when selecting the options, which led to the ban. Normally, bans like this would be repelled on the appeals page by the BO, but the proceeding spam caused the original ban to be pushed from the ban logs. As such, We've decided to uphold the ban on the behavior of the poster.


e9170e No.602136

File: c9560adbe51b741⋯.jpeg (911.64 KB, 1242x1892, 621:946, 1D4BEC02-CFBA-43E1-BD8A-9….jpeg)

>>602115

See that’s all I needed to know. Bans don’t bother me, cause I just go around them, but I don’t like the idea of mods banning any thread they dislike, even if it’s not breaking the rules. If we just had open modlogs, stuff like this wouldn’t happen because people could ask about bans they find unfair in the meta.

So this ban was an accident. Alright. I forgive you.


697243 No.602227

>>602115

(((accident)))


5574cb No.602388

File: 7f63e9130a57907⋯.png (269.18 KB, 493x344, 493:344, ff9goa730ysgh6f8hdfg4jy94h….png)

>>602115

>We admit that the original thread was banned by accident but we're upholding the ban anyways.


697243 No.602390

>>602388

reported you for being anti-catholic

enjoy your ban


a302be No.602420

File: 3cc345afa91e4db⋯.jpg (604.34 KB, 673x858, 673:858, St._Maron.jpg)

To the mod that edited the Catholic Art thread; You did a pretty nice job, except why did you delete all of the Eastern Catholic posts? OP asked that it be a Catholic Art thread. Not a Roman Catholic Art thread.

I was going to post St Maron today because today is his feast day in the Syraic Maronite Church. Is this a go or do you want to Eastern Catholic Art???


55493f No.602426

>>602420

When the thread is cyclical it starts deleting some posts when new posts are made so that it doesn't archive.

Without being cyclical, the thread would have already reached its bump limit and would be archived.

Go on and post them. :)


a302be No.602553

>>602426

Thank you for a timely reply that addressed the question. THAT IS GOOD MODERATION!


076727 No.602620

Why was the "Catholics can't meme" thread taken down? It was obviously just friendly banter, why shut it down?


0c8987 No.602626

>>602620

Probably to stop the degeneration of this board into /b/ with Jesus.


99a5a3 No.602706


f363d0 No.602731

>>602620

It was taken down as we already have a meme thread, and creating another thread for the exact same topic was unneeded.


4bf9cf No.602974

>>602626

Agreed.


1c0a11 No.603074

What happened to the Grug thread?


4a8f4b No.603082

File: 61a06bb4add3d32⋯.png (85.53 KB, 709x606, 709:606, 022686c1092b3d5e4676e9af56….png)


1c0a11 No.603088

File: 6f393458e3e8c82⋯.png (48.75 KB, 554x546, 277:273, 4A9DD65D-6271-45BF-B2E1-6F….png)

>>603082

grug become mod, grug do it for free


4a8f4b No.603089

>>603088

post the rest here


1c0a11 No.603091

>>603089

I don’t have a collection of Grugs, I found that one online


0ecf2d No.603097

File: 311733ccbae788b⋯.jpeg (216.92 KB, 1242x1052, 621:526, B6A8628B-328D-4B32-9BE3-1….jpeg)

What the hell is wrong with /christian/ mods?

I found this on /christ/, btw. I’m not ban-evading


70757f No.603137

File: b1fe713d5787304⋯.jpeg (218.94 KB, 1242x1053, 46:39, CE99FF4C-9D3E-4C13-9882-5….jpeg)

>ask about meta outside meta

>get banned

>ask about meta in meta

>get ignored

What 👏 are 👏 the 👏 mods 👏 doing 👏 all 👏 day? 👏


0c8987 No.603144

>>603137

>>603097

That was a fun thread, but it is /b/-tier. Stop trying to make this board /b/.


7f63f6 No.603157

>>603144

>a million faggot/trap threads on the board

>not /b/-tier

>a meme thread that’s allowed on every board

>REE REE STOP MAKING THIS BOARD INTO /b/ REEEEE

Eat shit, faggot


ce9728 No.603160

>>603144

It’s not up to you to manipulate the board culture. This board has four simple rules

>1. This board is strictly Safe For Work.

That thread was Safe For Work

>2. Interactions must be for the sake of Charity. Post made in the spirit of disruption or spite could earn you a short to permanent ban.

That thread was not made in the spirit of disruption or spite

>3. This is a board for Christian discussion and fellowship. For the intentions of the board, a Christian is one who believes in the Nicene Creed and the Chalcedonian Definition.

This thread did not challenge the Nicene Creed it the Chalcedonian definition

>4. Non-Christians are welcome to post here, and are encouraged to ask questions in good faith. But they cannot proselytize non-Christian beliefs or post antagonistic or otherwise scandalous material.

That thread was not proselytizing a non-Christian belief

You can’t throw out random bans every time you dislike a thread. If if the thread breaks the rules, fine. If it doesn’t, you can’t ban people for it. This is the ban for posting the Anderson documentary/the ban for saying Anderson speaks Greek all over again


c48bba No.603168

Wait, why not just have a gay/lesbian/SSA general thread? So that way we have a containment for all the "I'm gay/lesbian/SSA what does /christian/ think I should do?" threads.


ce9728 No.603169

>>603168

Bad idea. The people who post that shit are trolling. They’re not gonna contain themselves to a general just cause we make one for them


bfa563 No.603171

>>603168

It’s just spam meant to trigger us. It would be like /pol/ making a designated interracial porn thread


bfa563 No.603183

>>603181

They never will. These mods are openly trying to destroy this board. We could have an organic chan culture grow based on Christianity, which would be fun, but they refuse to. They delete any interesting or otherwise entertaining thread in favor of homosexuality spam and dry, lifeless Catholic shill threads. I honestly might stop posting, but there’s nowhere to go. /christ/ is too small. They will never address why this thread was deleted, but they’ll great joy in deleting any other thread injecting some joy in this sullen place ever again


a538af No.603195

In case it isn't clear, having threads solely based on calling other denominations mentally retarded is out of spite and is ban worthy.

Not really sure why this would need to be said but there you go.


4a8f4b No.603196

>>603195

Nobody was offended,

Except you.


3f4288 No.603197

>>603195

The grug meme has nothing to do with mental retardation, it’s just cavemen in a modern setting. If you’ve ever seen the Flintstones, you get the premise. It wasn’t solely “”””attacking”””” another denomination, it had posts about many different denoms. People were actually requesting their denoms, like there was a post saying “make an Anglican one” and stuff like that. I don’t see why you had to delete without even looking at it


da78b1 No.603206

File: ad70202a6c818c9⋯.jpg (59.16 KB, 485x443, 485:443, uwaaaaaaa.jpg)

jokes make dergo upset

dergo hungry


3f4288 No.603208

File: 3cbeeaf4baeb68f⋯.gif (564.42 KB, 800x430, 80:43, 8F8ABAF2-157E-43E8-BB93-1C….gif)

>>603206

YOU ARE MY FUCKING HERO!


697243 No.603213

>>603206

I thought the name was a joke but its actually a name kek


ae5e6d No.603346

Why are the mods intentionally trying to ruin this board?


86eaa1 No.603373

>>603195

It was about all denominations and portraying them as funny cavemen. Lighten up..


8fb39d No.603520

File: 82446919544f943⋯.png (1.42 MB, 2076x2134, 1038:1067, what the fuck.PNG)

hey, mods, enforce a 2 year lurking policy for all your cuckchan/reddit chucklefucks that keep spewing into here.

Also why are you trying to ruin this board with women?


0c8987 No.603545

>>603520

>enforce a 2 year lurking policy

How?


8fb39d No.603570

>>603545

>how

ban the daylights out of newfag/low energy *teleports behind you*-tier posts. pic above you related.


0c8987 No.603574

>>603570

That doesn't work in the era of VPNs and Tor. If I want to shitpost something that I know will catch me a ban, I just switch IP, make the post, then switch back. The ban means nothing.

The only way to truly enforce a 2 year lurk period is to disallow anything but bare IP - like what 4chan does - but even that doesn't work very well on dynamic IPs.


f1ef50 No.603575

>>603570

That sound terrible, they already have rule 2.


ee70c5 No.603601

If the mods would just repent for being Neo-Jesuits everything would be fine


cf3b73 No.603637

>>603520

There’s no way to enforce that


db7419 No.603831

File: fb00a236bc8fae7⋯.gif (496.84 KB, 250x140, 25:14, 1411264608611.gif)

>>603520

tfw we're going to become a tumblr backdoor like /co/ was on 4chan before the exodus, except with reddit's brand of cancer.


cb3222 No.603837

>>603520

One way you can tell if someone just got off the boat from reddit is if they call a board a subreddit


697243 No.603854

>>603520

hey thats me :))))


cb3222 No.603973


05a5bb No.604052

I didn't expect my Grug-thread-ban to get so out of hand when I posted it on /christ/. I just thought that posting it on /christ/ got me a better chance of having the ban lifted, because people could post about it in the meta for me. I didn't expect people to be so angry/passionate about it, and I didn't expect it to create some quasi-revolution and a spammer who's gonna post Grug threads for all eternity. So, I'm kinda half-sorry about this. Half-sorry because I still think I was banned in error and that the ban should have been lifted; but at the same time I didn't mean to just fuck up the whole board.


e36462 No.604065

>>604052

>I didn't expect it to create some quasi-revolution and a spammer who's gonna post Grug threads for all eternity.

He was spamming the board earlier. He's just going to add Grug threads to his spam collection.


ae7eee No.604075

>>604065

Which is a shame because grug threads are now gonna be deleted on sight, and I think grug threads are fucking hilarious


466608 No.604208

>>604052

In the future please just appeal the thing. If you don't appeal I'm not going to see it because i'm not crawling through the log looking at every little thing the mods do. Anytime I see an appeal I go to my mods and ask why something was done, and if it it was unnecessary I tell them so they won't make the same mistake in the future.Then I unban the person. This is a critical part of feedback for me.

When people get banned then just change IP and start spamming, I don't feel like I need to even ask my mod what went wrong, the person clearly is just a troll, and it affirms the correctness of the original decision.

>>604075

Just put it in the meme thread if you want to post a bunch of them or something.

>>603983

Because it degenerated to cursing and name calling. Much like the new thread is.

Post last edited at

cb3222 No.604231

>>604208

>In the future please just appeal the thing. If you don't appeal I'm not going to see it because i'm not crawling through the log looking at every little thing the mods do. Anytime I see an appeal I go to my mods and ask why something was done, and if it it was unnecessary I tell them so they won't make the same mistake in the future.Then I unban the person.

>>>/christ/15314


f1ef50 No.604340

>>604231

Mods are liars and would do anything to back up their fellow Jews.


591a8a No.604551

>>604548

I voted no for females being mods, but I don't really care about mods banning "funposting". A lot of it is either annoying, thinly veiled attacks on other denominations, or autists thinking they're funny by posting stupid twitter memes.


75ea25 No.604642

File: b7765d0292fa19b⋯.png (20.89 KB, 961x340, 961:340, Should christian get rid o….png)

>>604013

>yet another poll thread deleted by mods

>surprise level == {null-set}

Mods are aware that it doesn't hurt that dissent is out there?

You're exhorted to keep every one of your thoughts captive … not keep every one of everyone else's thoughts captive …

Just sayin'


75ea25 No.604650

File: c3be61eed23b128⋯.png (206.05 KB, 732x859, 732:859, thread-603679.png)

>>603679

And why was THIS thread deleted?


0e7196 No.604654

>>604650

It was a shitshow which threatened to spill over into other threads.

It was filled with heresy, hethans, and people telling others to commit suicide.

I'm glad it's gone.


27a867 No.604696

>>604650

Every few weeks we get a new sodomite+anime thread. Pay no mind to it


a9f75f No.604700

>>604698

Don’t worry, it’s back


cb3222 No.604701

>>604700

Not for long


591a8a No.604706

>>604650

>>604696

They're all made by some Brazilian queer from a 4chan general. Most his posts there are posting nude images of himself and trying to lead other anons astray, so it's pretty clear that he's not being genuine in any of his threads here. I wish the mods would just delete on sight instead of letting them get that far, tbqh.


1cf83b No.604734

>>604706

Is it an lgbt thread or what?


591a8a No.604756

>>604734

/bant/. I had a bunch of his posts saved because I was going to make a thread on him, but I thought he left so I never did.


e5ec5d No.604850

>>604681

i think he may have been talking about this.

>>603520


f7c7a9 No.604926

I was browsing the catalogue and I saw a post about redditors from women are moderators now? It was deleted by the time I clicked it so I guess I can't find out the facts.


f363d0 No.604951

>>604926

It's a thread made by a ban evader, which is why the thread you probably saw was removed. He's responding to another anon's post about how the mod team has a range of people on the moderation team, and he happened to include women. People like him have taken this to mean that now there are multiple women moderating the board, but this isn't true.

The truth is that there is a single woman moderator who's exclusively a mod on our official Discord server. She has no powers here on the board. Hope this answers your question.


0c8987 No.605081

>>604951

I gotta be honest here … you should not have had to clarify that. People sitting on a board on a website that's surrounded by gay porn, bestiality, pedophilia, racism, and all manner of grotesquery should have the idea of a female volunteer be the LEAST of their concerns. It is literally a non-issue.


b67f40 No.605090

File: 6785384a29db79b⋯.png (123.93 KB, 1650x2003, 1650:2003, Can't Show That.png)

Pic related and several other Serenity images that I've seen floating around have got me wondering. Would you guys be alright with a Serenity thread? It is, after all, the magnum opus of "Christian manga." Having been on this board for quite some time now, I find it surprising that I haven't seen it posted yet. I think it would be a silly, self-aware bit of fun for the board.

The reason I'm asking here ahead of time is because it would take me a while to dig through archives and find all of the pages – not to mention all the sorting and labelling required. If the thread's going to be deleted as off-topic or something, I'd be wasting all of that. I'd like to get clearance first.


f363d0 No.605093

>>605090

There's nothing wrong with it. If you want to do it, go ahead.


60b967 No.605098

File: 94c9cbe340f40ab⋯.png (247 KB, 1344x2896, 84:181, IARPA for feminism.png)

File: 5ce4012485a355b⋯.png (35.78 KB, 626x421, 626:421, Common core related endevo….png)

File: db83d4e0370758f⋯.png (7.26 MB, 3424x4852, 856:1213, Common core gamifacation.png)

File: 334ff24bc259128⋯.png (20.43 KB, 743x313, 743:313, Common core books bad, vid….png)

File: 1bff702270087f3⋯.png (20.95 KB, 420x466, 210:233, FT_16.11.09_exitPolls_gend….png)

>>605081

>the idea of a female volunteer be the LEAST of their concerns.

More often than not women are leftist/sjw. Leftism/feminism is how women are manipulated. All it takes in one sjw mod of that ideology to bring down an entire board, or even culture.

You clearly have no idea the damage one weaponize woman can do given the right Jewish tactics/lawyers.


3caa69 No.605105

>>520608

As a former Christian, I have some hard fucking questions. Will they be seen as trolling?


466608 No.605123

>>605105

Not at all, make a thread specifically saying you want some questions answered. Just be sure not to call anyone names or to be unnecessarily rude (i.e. just random blasphemies, profanity at people and the like).

>>605098

We had someone try that on the discord community, I saw it a mile away and put it down hard. I'll burn the place to the ground before I let an SJW get anywhere near an authority position. I'm a bit older than most of the people here so can much more easily see when they are try to pull something with the thirsty guys. I have no tolerance for female shenanigans. So don't worry about that.

Further reading, iirc it was "SJWs always lie" that covers this pretty well, but I think Vox put out a new book specifically about infiltration, haven't read the new one though.


0c8987 No.605124

>>605098

The fact that you're so terrified of women shows me way more about you than it does about women. I will pray for you to learn some respect for what is half of God's creation and to stop buying into MGToW propaganda.


63210d No.605130

File: 89272f997ed47ca⋯.jpg (77.34 KB, 454x594, 227:297, RosietheTefillinWearer.jpg)

File: 9da3e714a067bd7⋯.png (1.28 MB, 988x1500, 247:375, serveimage.png)

File: 1cde7a0bb58b336⋯.jpg (970.02 KB, 3204x2412, 89:67, b3c0242c4ae6468161d3d12b46….jpg)

>>605124

>The fact that you're so terrified of women shows…

>i can't/don't want to refute your point, so i'm going to call your sexual game into question while using the evidence you've posted against you.

>MGToW propaganda.

Being a false witness is a sin, i never said not to date them, i'm stating fact. Nice try though.


0c8987 No.605133

>>605130

You're not stating a fact. You're stating a supposition based on /r9k/-level propaganda surrounding what amounts to less than 5% of the women on the planet. You're acting like a petulant high-school boy who didn't get his pee-pee touched by that cute girl he stared at all year in algebra.

You need to man up. And THAT is a fact.


fa36ce No.605139

File: 9a91a2b1828be1a⋯.jpg (81.4 KB, 640x486, 320:243, You .jpg)

>>605133

>/r9k/-level propaganda

Playing the odds? try /pol/ or /v/ level propaganda, maybe that will work.

>what amounts to less than 5% of the women on the planet.

Yeah, it's not like a minority can have a more powerful victim-hood for being less than 2% of the population.

>You're acting like a petulant high-school boy who didn't get his pee-pee touched by that cute girl he stared at all year in algebra.

>so i'm going to call your sexual game into question

You're blatantly proving my point.

Also none of that i've posted or talked about has to do with the sexual market nor dating. But by all means, keep being a repetitive and wrong.


8596f0 No.605201

File: 74ff976dceb97a6⋯.png (238.67 KB, 1003x1875, 1003:1875, Datamining.png)

Why dose no one care that we have an active archive going on like 4chan?


86eaa1 No.605216

>>604666

Hi Satan. People actively struggling to resist their sodomite impulses ought to be able to have a thread to discuss it, ask for moral support, etc. If we get to have threads where we talk about resisting the urge to jerk off, they ought to get threads where they discuss their struggles with their own bad sexual impulses. Just make a rule of one thread max, or make one permanent thread if you're worried about too many threads fagging up the board.


466608 No.605220

Just a heads up, I disabled flags (for Lent) and added some explanations to the rules. There were a lot more internal changes on the mod team so you will be seeing some changes in the way modding is done. Specifically the red text. No more "joke" red text, and less vague "user was banned" text. The reason text block will also be more full (the mods will give more information for why they banned something and how to avoid breaking the rule in the future). The only things exempt from this are spam because of the sheer number of deletions involved in it, and porn for obvious reasons.

edit: Locking meta thread for a day so everyone can see this post on the front page.

sidenote: thanks for the dab random poster

Post last edited at

4e3fd6 No.605598

File: 9ab1604232f9c16⋯.png (930 B, 235x30, 47:6, --christian-- Turning off ….png)

>>605220

Sounds familiar.


0911df No.605626

File: f99471e31ead0dd⋯.png (341.48 KB, 444x640, 111:160, ClipboardImage.png)

>>605220

Please give up Roman Catholicism for lent


c6202e No.605635

>>605626

Try giving up schism first


4a8f4b No.605636

>>605220

>disabled flags (for Lent)

Explain this? You dislike the flags.

I thought a person was supposed to give up something he likes.


3b7b9a No.605692

File: 426e71d63173522⋯.jpg (48.52 KB, 637x310, 637:310, f5affcec97.jpg)

>>605220

>no more joke red text

will have joke red text again after lent?

if no, ill cry. >>605220

>>605220


0e7196 No.605702

File: 7e9e28f58c4750a⋯.jpg (31.94 KB, 444x110, 222:55, Screenshot_20170908-100138.jpg)

File: 68cf9299ab7f3f7⋯.jpg (44.05 KB, 608x98, 304:49, Screenshot_20170831-151623.jpg)

>>605220

I'll miss the redtext bans ;^(


a5e5a4 No.605755

>>605702

redtext bans was actually fun to watch

rip redtext


3b7b9a No.605767

File: c4d5bb52c1b061f⋯.gif (175.75 KB, 333x286, 333:286, 1471549698121.gif)

Fun Redtext ban enthusiast uprising!


0e7196 No.605770

File: 6d91d4f2d771c4f⋯.jpg (84.8 KB, 600x550, 12:11, Boatmurdered.jpg)

Before:

The board is divided between mod supporters (mostly Cathodox) and antimod forces (mostly Baptists)

After:

The entire board enters an uprising because the mods decide to stop using funny bantext


4badd6 No.605823

>>605636

Also aren't you supposed to give up something of your own that you like, rather than forcing those of us who don't willingly participate in your extra-Bibical holiday tradition to give up our flags?


4e3fd6 No.605901

>>605220

You should also turn on mod logs (for Lent).


05a5bb No.605941

>>605901

Sounds like you're trying to give up /christian/ for lent


0faa2b No.606061

Why did you (((mods))) delete my "SHALL" post in the gun thread?


0faa2b No.606063

>>606061

nevermind. apparently there are 2 gun threads right now! and i got confused. :)


86eaa1 No.606156

>>606078

Where do the rules mention the fathers? Do you mean the part about the Chalcedonian Definition? I just looked it up and that does seem troublesome since the Chalcedonian Definition mentions Mary being the theotokos (mother of God), something which virtually no protestants would agree with. Why did mods add the Chalcedonian Definition to the requirements to be considered a Christian? That would exclude almost all protestants, except maybe Lutherans and some Anglicans.


4a8f4b No.606177

File: dd52e123bcd78f3⋯.png (5.12 KB, 551x92, 551:92, Untitled.png)

I'm not sure I understand the ban text for this post.

>User was warned for attempting to incite interdenom fighting

It seems like the thread he posted that in was the most relevant active thread he could have posted in, because OP asks for "the scoop on the Catholic religion"

Would the same warning be given to a post that said (mormonism, Andersonism, Pentacostalism, Protestantism) instead of Roman Catholicism?


466608 No.606209

>>606156

I don't want to be rude, but you have a very poor understanding of Christianity. Virtually all protestant groups are Chalcedonian. Up until recently, the only non-chalcedonian Christian groups were Oriental Orthodox and Church of the East. But this is no longer the case in large part. The only people who are no longer Chalcedonian are non-trinitarian groups like some SDA, JW, and the like. They are not Chalcedonian de facto. This has not been controversial

Mary as Theotokos is imperative otherwise you worship a different Jesus. I won't break it all down in one post but you need to do your research.

>>606177

I had lifted it right before I checked the meta thread. When I first saw it, I read it wrong and thought he was saying something else so I let it stand. He put in an appeal and it made perfect sense so I unbanned him. It was a day ban anyway, but hopefully this did not cause him too much inconvenience.


86eaa1 No.606215

>>606209

>Mary as Theotokos is imperative otherwise you worship a different Jesus. I won't break it all down in one post but you need to do your research.

Most protestants don't believe in referring to Mary as the mother of God. Not because they deny that Jesus is God but because of the other implications of that title.


3b7b9a No.606258

File: e0d84e6f39e15aa⋯.png (132.11 KB, 652x869, 652:869, e0d84e6f39e15aab9aed3e9e9e….png)


a8ac1f No.606276

>>606215

Lutherans and anglicans plus not-100% calvinists reformed do believe that Mary is the Mother of God. Some evangelicals do to. And even some baptist. Defientlly no andersonites, but that;s the good thing, only thing that they bring here is shitpost that is funny only in some cases.


86eaa1 No.606289

>>606276

That's what I said in my previous post, only Lutherans and Anglicans believe it and not all of them. Reformed is basically synonymous with Calvinist so not sure what you mean there. Of course you can find people on the fringe in any denomination with beliefs outside their denomination's norm. But in general prots do not use the theotokos title.


a8ac1f No.606302

>>606289

Lutherans and Anglicans are half of protestants. They are reformed who does not agree with everything that Calvin said (and I don't blame them, he was nuts). Don't know about this board statistics but I can bet that majority of us are chalcedonian.

But seriously, even orginal non-chalcedonians agree with tilte of Theotokos (thought they prefer to use Christotokos still). At this point non-chalcedonian protestants are like non-nicean protestant - not christian.


466608 No.606306

>>606304

So you think Jesus was not born like a human? You deny Jesus human nature?


cb3222 No.606315

>>606276

>plus not-100% calvinists reformed

You've got that wrong. The only groups that deny her the title are influenced by Anabaptism. The only Calvinists you'll find denying it are some sort of Reformed Baptist.

>>606289

>Reformed is basically synonymous with Calvinist

Not really. Calvinism is just a soteriological position, while Reformed theology is a whole systematic theology which is why Reformed Baptists aren't true Reformed


862421 No.606332

>>606319

I'm at work, sorry I can't sit on the board all day.

I'll make the explanation as simple as I can: Mary gave birth to Jesus. Jesus is one person. Jesus is both 100% human and 100% divine. There was never more than one Jesus. He isn't some composite of two Jesus'.

For the sake of this board, if you do not believe Mary gave birth to Jesus, and that Jesus is one person who is fully God and fully man, then you are simply out of order and should not post in fellowship threads.

If you want to discuss it further, feel free to visit the discord.


cb3222 No.606339

>>606336

Jesus Christ is both created and uncreated, anon.


d2c50d No.606436

Who took away flags? I liked flags.


430c15 No.606452

>>606436

Flags are gone for lent. They'll be back when it's over I'm sure.


4a8f4b No.606552

>>605220

Can we get an explanation on the flags? >>605636

>>605823

>>606436


f363d0 No.606729

>>606552

The flags are gone for the period of Lent as an experiment, to see how the board changes without the flags, and since Lent is a time of sacrificing things we enjoy for Christ, flags seemed to fit the bill as a board-wide sacrifice.


3b7b9a No.606763

>still no explanation on if Fun Redtexts will be back

>no explanation on why they are gone


11bfbf No.606793

>>606763

One of the reasons is people asking as to how the rules fall. Rule 2 is one of the bigger reasons we offer warnings or bans, and often people don't understand its application when we have to use it. Redtexts as of now offer the rule broken and why it was broken so as to ensure there's no confusion on either end.


cb3222 No.606819

>>606793

>Redtexts as of now offer the rule broken and why it was broken

>why it was broken

I hope you mistyped


11bfbf No.607057

>>606819

It wasn't a mistype. For example, if Rule 2 was broken by a post, the anon who made it would receive a warning, and the redtext for the ban would read like:

>USER WAS WARNED FOR BREAKING RULE 2: REASON UNDER RULE 2


5f417d No.607058

File: 4b5352a870ed4eb⋯.jpeg (277.91 KB, 1242x1491, 414:497, D4400D26-60AC-4E6F-9EA0-7….jpeg)

What happened to this thread? It was interesting with the Lectio Divina stuff. It’s also a pretty old thread, I don’t get why it was suddenly deleted out of nowhere


46f0b0 No.607060

>>607058

The mods want to keep board traffic to a bare minimum. The only new threads that are allowed are question threads. Everything else goes into the containment threads


4df650 No.607062

>>607058

stupid mod thinks it's his wife but she's mine!


5f417d No.607063

>>607060

Is that true? Cause that’s stupid if true, especially considering that it (1) was a question thread and (2) was an old thread


46f0b0 No.607064

>>607063

Sorry i meant question threads about catholic events and stuff is only allowed. And the occasional "im a fag/loser/autist please help me" thread.


cb3222 No.607066

>>607057

>It wasn't a mistype

Then you are claiming to read men's hearts, because why it was broken is the intention for the post.


4a8f4b No.607106

>>607066

>>607057

The rules have been expanded and explained a bit, but I think something's still missing.

Rule 2 will always be subjective until you mods provide an exhaustive list of exactly which words/phrases/doctrines/thoughts will get you warned/banned.

If rule 2 states that calling someone a retard earns you a day ban, a person who calls someone a retard knows exactly what he's doing. The person reporting the infraction knows exactly what he's reporting. The vol knows exactly what to ban and what to allow.

Standardization.


a8ac1f No.607125

>>607106

We probably should made few denom-specific thread so each denomination can provide list with obvious lies and slanders. But it would have to be backed by some good source. For exemple, it's easy to point out that "pope is dagon priest due the hat" is literal meme from someone who know shit about both Babylon and Church and that mitre came from Byzantine helmets. And after a while, say, week, mods would gather data, filter it and put oficial list of banable offenses. And we could revision it regulary, say four times a year (maybe on ember weeks or whatever).


cb3222 No.607165

>>607125

>let's ban good arguments because they're "lies and slanders"

How about no


60b967 No.607170

>>607125

>We probably should made few denom-specific thread so each denomination can provide list with obvious lies and slanders. But it would have to be backed by some good source. For exemple, it's easy to point out that "pope is dagon priest due the hat" is literal meme from someone who know shit about both Babylon and Church and that mitre came from Byzantine helmets.

How about you instead find answer or debunk whatever criticism motivated this obvious post.


4a8f4b No.607194

>>607125

>some good source

Its a nice idea, but there would be no interdenom fighting if we fundamentally agreed on what a good source was. I'll accept Biblehub, not catholicanswers.com.

Personally I don't think there's any doctrine that should get you banned, that the truth is worth explaining and striving for, but it seems that that's the state of /christian/


a8ac1f No.607263

>>607165

>Dagon fish hat is ANY kind of argument

Really nigga?

>>607170

What do you mean by that?

>>607194

>Its a nice idea, but there would be no interdenom fighting if we fundamentally agreed on what a good source was. I'll accept Biblehub, not catholicanswers.com.

Well there are creeds, councils, official statements, catechisms etc. for Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, Calvinists, Anglicans, Orientals, Easterlings and some old Baptists. That would be it. There are well respected historians, lawyers, and theologians from each denom too.

It's rough idea but it should sound better in those who oppose total modocracy

>Personally I don't think there's any doctrine that should get you banned, that the truth is worth explaining and striving for, but it seems that that's the state of /christian/

There are things that Christians cannot agree on in their tolerance. Mormonism is not acceptable. Arianism, paleo-nestorianism that even Easterlings don't subscribe to, pelagianism, gnosticsim etc etc too.

And there are obvious lies that are so udoubtly stupid that it's just miserable. I mentioned dagon hat meme alredy. I could add up things like "Petrine cross=satanic symbol", "all reformed don't belive in free will", "lutherans don't belive in real presence", "all baptists are andersonists", "all evangelicals belive in rapture/are zionists", "all anglicans belive in women ordination", "orthodoxies are cryptobuddhists" et cetera ad nuseam.

Though I will admit, big if not the biggest portion would be anti-anti-catholic. But it falls from necessity, for we are here (according to who you talk) 500-2000 years, so memes grow in size and kind. And we are biggest denom out there (and I think that also here, though I don't know). Plus anglo-saxon culture (and by extend, chan culture as well) was for a very long time anti-catholic.

Some mod should answer this proposition.


4a8f4b No.607290

>>607263

I do like the idea of a frequently asked questions sticky, but it would have to be kept as far from moderation as the east is to the west. It should never be a bannable offence to say that the pope wears a fish god hat, especially if its so easy to disprove.

And of course it circles back to the fact that people are going to read the proofs they want to read and ignore the proofs they want to ignore. I think, for instance, that pastor Anderson is one of the most lied about people on this board, and most of the lies come from people who haven't listened to one sermon of his from start to finish, but feel like they intimately know everything about him from a few clips. Post anything positive about him and certain folks react like snails and salt.

if a position is worth defending, is worth arguing for. If trannyposters are taken on good faith here, everyone should be.


8596f0 No.607301

>>607263

>What do you mean by that?

You're basically trying to make a containment thread for what makes the denoms different instead of letting them discuss their differences. If something like the theory that the pope is a dagon priest bothers you, than look into it and find a good answer.


11bfbf No.607305

>>607058

>>607060

The thread was devolving into shitposting beyond any of the topics you'd discuss on /christian/.

>>607066

>>607106

It's not so much an issue of reading men's hearts than it is being able to look at a post and understand it as breaking rule 2. Posts like:

>something something fucking retard something something

>catholics don't read the bible

Would be examples.

>>607170

>>607263

>>607290

>>607301

If a concern about a certain denom's theology is brought up to a point where it wouldn't otherwise be better placed in the QTDDTOT thread, then by all means wholesome discussion should be done. One of the points of the board is ecumenicism that allows for us to understand each other beyond memes and basic knowledge. There IS a difference between a bait thread and a genuine question, however, the chief characteristic being the nature of the question itself. If you ask a question in good faith, such as:

>What is the filioque and how does it apply to us?

as opposed to asking in bad faith, like:

>Why is the Pope a heretic / Why is Luther burning in hell?

If you have a question or observation, then, try to make sure it's in good faith.


db7419 No.607313

>>607305

>One of the points of the board is ecumenicism that allows for us to understand each other beyond memes and basic knowledge.

I guess it depends on the board, but Isn't the point to discuss topics more than working together? There will always be information that will offend certain poeple, that might have some truth to it. Hushing them doesn't bring closure, that is why the memes happen, as a way to poke fun at certain topics without getting into a looping subject.

I actually agree with you more than i disagree, i would want the denoms to find an answer to their differences.


11bfbf No.607327

>>607310

The problem is that it was a thread that wasn't quality at all. If you want to talk about girls that aren't figures within Christianity, there's plenty of other boards to do that, namely

>>>/b/

where I'm sure you could talk to your heart's content.

>>607313

Memes are perfectly fine, but we're also here to figure out the principles of Christianity, and the extensions that each denom offer.

Post last edited at

11bfbf No.607333

>>607332

The OP's pic had the consequence of causing derailment to begin with. If you want to talk about Lectio Divina, then do so while also not inviting the opportunity for derailment.


11bfbf No.607337

>>607336

No, I'm asking that if you want to talk about serious subjects like Lectio Divina, then do so in a constructive and wholesome manner. Posting for the sake of derailing would just get your posts deleted.


05a5bb No.607341

>>607327

>>607333

We shouldn't have esoteric rules that are left unstated. All rules should be posted in the OP. I shouldn't have to guess and check and, through trial and error, determine the rules. Let's list off the rules so far as I have them

>1. This board is strictly Safe For Work.

>2. Interactions must be for the sake of Charity. Post made in the spirit of disruption or spite could earn you a short to permanent ban.

>3. This is a board for Christian discussion and fellowship. For the intentions of the board, a Christian is one who believes in the Nicene Creed (Specifically the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed) and the Chalcedonian Definition.

>4. Non-Christians are welcome to post here, and are encouraged to ask questions in good faith. But they cannot proselytize non-Christian beliefs or post antagonistic or otherwise scandalous material.

>5. No acknowledgement of Steven Anderson's ability to speak Greek or posting of his Greek lessons. Violators will earn a permanent ban for this

>6. No grug-posting of any sort. That's not in the spirit of charity, bruv

>7. If you post a good on-topic thread which leads to interesting discussion, but you use an unrelated picture for it, you can expect a ban for that. We don't tolerate unrelated pictures here.

>8. If your thread gets derailed, we'll delete the OP and not the derailers

>9. If someone posts that they are leaving the Baptist faith, and you tell them to not leave the Baptist faith, you can expect both a ban and a humiliating redtext to accompany your ban

>10. If the catalog doesn't have at least ten threads about being homosexual in it, so help me God I'll burn this board to the ground

You guys can have any rules you want, I just want them all written out so there's no confusion


11bfbf No.607381

>>607341

>>607351

>>607340

My concern was twofold:

1. How the OP was written out

2. The picture that accompanied it

Considering we had an influx of spam threads, I wasn't sure if the thread was one of many spam threads that had shown up on the catalog. I'm sorry for misreading the situation and for misunderstanding your intention.


c0ebe4 No.607388

File: cc3c5f876099cd8⋯.png (931 KB, 1571x707, 1571:707, Some anons, still want to ….png)

>>607340

>There was nothing “deconstructive” or “unwholesome” about the OP of that thread

You're missing the point, the first few posts in the thread were ones criticizing how low effort and mindless the thread was, having it become beta and waifu faggotry isn't Christian. The OP (intentional or not) artificially inflated the thread.

While i don't like that threads get ended early on such subjective evaluations, it was a dead end thread bumped by waifu faggotry.

https://hooktube.com/watch?v=EhyJabdsdCk


46f0b0 No.607438

File: fb28e74587b6d6a⋯.jpg (27.02 KB, 504x415, 504:415, reece.JPG)

>>607388

If mods delete all the bad threads then what do we use to measure the quality of a thread?

No bad threads=No good threads


75ea25 No.607442

File: 27d687517ce6e9e⋯.jpg (13.49 KB, 130x179, 130:179, zif.jpg)

>>596938

>Crying out as they strike you

>they

Yeah, come on, m8. We know you're one of the mods pretending "I'm just a normal guy like you fellow /christian/s"


75ea25 No.607444

>flags are gone

Soooooo, is the BO's mission complete: no one but Cathbros are left on the board?

>>605220

>you will be seeing some changes … No more "joke" red text

oh ffs, there goes ANOTHER one of the few remaining reasons I still bother to contribute to this snivelling milquetoast board

>I disabled flags (for Lent)

I'm betting this will be the longest Lent in Christian history

>>607341

>I'm-okay-with-this-ruleset.xlsx

>Rule #5 kills best

>Rule #8 is killing the board best

Least we'd all know where we all stood


a8ac1f No.607484

>>607444

>Soooooo, is the BO's mission complete: no one but Cathbros are left on the board?

There were always three kinds of catholics here: Cathbros, soon-to-be-catholics and jesuit shitposters aka baptists


3b7b9a No.607549

>>607381

your mom gay


0e7196 No.607567

In my opinion, the noflag experiment has had some interesting results.

Before, all the denoms would divide and bicker with eachother. Now, it's now a bizarre mire of anons blindly arguing with eachother not knowing who's the Catholic and who's a Baptist.

The threads seem to get derailed a bit less often though.


4a8f4b No.607599

>>607567

It just lends to needless confusion.


c2d78f No.607830

>>607549

Is this Max?


c2d78f No.607841

Why did my post in this thread get deleted that said calling Mary "the queen of heaven" is stupid pagan crap when it's literally stupid crap pagans in the Bible did?

Jeremiah 7:18 The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.


3b7b9a No.607847

>>607841

It's really sad how you protestants manage to horseshoe into literally spitting on on the mother of God or depictions of her the same way a Satanist would.


c2d78f No.607849

>>607847

It's literally a name retard fagans made up.

Also how does me not worshipping her mean I hate her?


c2d78f No.607850

>>607849

>>607847

Also

Bake more cakes fggt


4a8f4b No.607859

>>607857

>>607850

>faggot

Prepare to have your arguments ignored


4a8f4b No.607879

>>607876

Nah, I'm saying you'll be banned because you said a mean word and you have "the wrong opinions"

I have the same wrong opinions and you'd know that if flags were enabled.


466608 No.607909

Please do not carry on your debates in the meta thread.

Post last edited at

c2d78f No.607921

>>607909

Okay I'll make a different thread for it. Please don't delete it


0978b6 No.608010

Thanks for deleting that trolling thread and the one directly linking to Lactacia YT video.


0e67fc No.608114

File: c6d5bf82f0c285f⋯.jpeg (364.86 KB, 1134x1787, 1134:1787, F41DCC0B-8B38-4094-8CB2-3….jpeg)

What the fuck? Why is telling someone to eat a sidewalk a bannable offense now? That’s not even an insult! Someone calls Joseph a cuck (thereby calling Mary a whore and Jesus a bastard) and it’s okay, but if you tell them to eat a sidewalk you get banned?

Hey mods, eat a sidewalk


f363d0 No.608139

>>608114

Apologizes. The bans in that thread were in an attempt to prevent a thread derail by a single obvious troll post. Your ban has therefore been lifted. It'd be better in the future to just file a ban appeal for situations like this instead of switching IPs to post about it in the meta thread. Ban evasion tends to make any reasoning by the poster to the believed error of their ban fall through, since to the moderation team it appears as if that poster has no regards for the rules anyway.

Again, apologizes on behalf of the mod team.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 4am / agatha / animu / caos / his / imouto / omnichan / yg ]