[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha / animu / arepa / hisrol / leftpol / sw / vg / zenpol ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Old tripcode cracked. Do not believe any posts with that tripcode from now on.
/bant/ rocks, Dr.Medic is an ass
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: 0f6028efdbc86ad⋯.jpg (130.83 KB, 635x794, 635:794, moses01.jpg)

0f7904 No.520608

Glory to God in the highest!

You can continue discussion with others,as well as reach the mod team on our Discord server! -> https://discord.gg/F73De8P

You can reach the board owner at this email: tutorNC@protonmail.com

This board is for fellowship and discussion among Christians. Please be mindful that some general rules are enforced to encourage constructive discourse.

Please read the rules and ban policy before posting!

Rules

1. This board is strictly Safe For Work.

Please consult the global rule page if this is not clear.

2. Interactions must be for the sake of Charity. Post made in the spirit of disruption or spite could earn you a short to permanent ban.

Charity is a foundational concept in Christianity. It is the virtue of supreme love for God and others. It is the greatest of the three virtues Paul emphasizes, and governs all Christian conduct. Just because this is an 8chan board does not alleviate Christians of their moral duty. All interactions must be done with this in mind.

This includes all antagonism. Personal insults, trolling, disrupting/derailing a thread, raiding from other boards, spamming, and scandal are all considered part of this rule.

Scandal includes encouraging people to commit sin like fornication, masturbation, blasphemy, apostasy, abortion, lying, taking the Lords name in vain, suicide, and the like. Any esoteric topics will fall under this as well.

Interdenominational debates are allowed on this board, but they are still governed by charity. Insinuations must be accompanied by explanation and/or primary resources.

3. This is a board for Christian discussion and fellowship. For the intentions of the board, a Christian is one who believes in the Nicene Creed (Specifically the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed) and the Chalcedonian Definition.

This board recognizes Christianity as a religion that exist in real history. Because of this, it chooses these two criteria as the cut-off point for what officially constitutes a Christian for the sake of the board. Not all groups who label themselves Christian simply are by assertion of the title. All who claim to profess the faith must adhere to these two creedal statements and their implications in order to post in Christian fellowship threads.

4. Non-Christians are welcome to post here, and are encouraged to ask questions in good faith. But they cannot proselytize non-Christian beliefs or post antagonistic or otherwise scandalous material.

If you are a non-Christian, you are more than welcome to create a thread asking questions specific to you, but please avoid Christian fellowship threads. This is because the primary purpose of fellowship on this board is for Christians to get the view of other Christians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_(virtue)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalcedonian_Definition

Ban Policy

The mods will use their best judgement when enforcing the rules, and you can contest their decisions by appealing the ban, posting in the meta, or talking to us directly on the discord. The discord server is the fastest way to get a response, followed by the appeals page. Posting in the meta is the slowest and least efficient. Keep this in mind. Do not dispute the ban in the thread the ban took place in, or make a new thread to contest your ban. This is disruptive.

Post that break the rules will be met with temporary bans in accordance with the severity of the post, up to 5 days.

Permanent bans will be given out for posting pornography, explicit material, after being given multiple temporary bans, and raids or obvious trolling from other boards.

Please post any questions you have in this thread, and we will try our best to answer them.

And now there remain faith, hope, and charity, these three: but the greatest of these is charity.

Post last edited at

076727 No.625912

File: 1ab82aa60e77e23⋯.png (252.57 KB, 326x381, 326:381, 1ab.png)

>leave /christian/ for a month

>come back

>its now full of cuckchan maymays like brainlet wojak and caveman wojak


77f369 No.625976

File: 8d256de0fa91643⋯.jpg (16.31 KB, 200x200, 1:1, 2862.jpg)

>>625710

Hmmm. I feel like this has happened before.


0e7196 No.626065

File: ccd157125b557ed⋯.jpg (72.78 KB, 640x679, 640:679, swtH7Ip_d.jpg)

>>625710

I'm fine with flags not coming back, but you are going to be in for some shit knowing how much of this board dislikes you already.


b77e30 No.626069

>>625710

Please answer on the other problems.

I feel like mods don't care about what we say, and don't care about the board.


a39611 No.626139

>>626069

WE WILL ANSWER IT ON THE DISCORD GOY.


0aed64 No.626573

>>625710

<Give up flags "for lent", without the board's input

<Two months later

>the flags are never coming back.

You are supposed to give up something you delight in for lent. No, I'm not playing with you, you're acting like the devil acting cute taking in vain something your church requires solemnity and devotion. Even while disagreeing with the idea of Lent, abusing what is considered to be an act worship disgusts me.

If you and other mods wanted to get rid of flags, just state upfront, "we're getting rid of the flags," instead of making yourselves appear super-pious like Pharisees. I would have been fine otherwise with the removal of flags, but not after this.

>>625753

>Drive-by trollings seemed to be a lot of the problems around the board.

Meanwhile, if you post an anime reaction pic, even if you don't watch anime, you will be called a faggot, a heretic, pagan, queer effeminate soyboi, etc, etc. Nope, doesn't matter if the pic is of a character created or drawn by a Christian. God help those Christians who do enjoy anime and want to talk about it on this board.


f363d0 No.626759

>>626069

What other problems are you referring to? I'd like to be able to answer all of your questions in one big post for everyone.

>>626573

If the mod team suddenly decided to get rid of flags, people would get mad at the sudden change, and it'd be foolish to make a permanent change to the board without first seeing what the effects will be on the board as a whole. Making a change that ends up making things worse just makes things more frustrating for everyone.

>if you post an anime reaction pic…you will be called a faggot, a heretic, pagan, etc.

Due to how many people believed that Rule 2 was being enforced either unfairly or inconsistently, we relaxed the rule a while ago, as you can read in the description of Rule 2 to have insults only be breaking Rule 2 upon personal insults.

If you're making reference to the "Christian-Weeb Thread" that's up currently, It's been looked through and the debate on whether anime is bad or not hasn't devolved into insulting any poster's character, so it's not in violation of Rule 2. If you believe something has been missed in that thread, quote it here, or even better, report it.


0aed64 No.626803

>>626759

>If the mod team suddenly decided to get rid of flags, people would get mad at the sudden change

I truly understand the need to keep the change slow and procedural. I just believe it would show some decorum to not use lent as a facade. I know what you might be thinking as well:

<Why does this Calvinist even care when he doesn't celebrate Lent?

Trying to stay principled with respect to worship, plus voluntary fasting is good with the right intentions.

>Due to how many people believed that Rule 2 was being enforced either unfairly or inconsistently, we relaxed the rule a while ago, as you can read in the description of Rule 2 to have insults only be breaking Rule 2 upon personal insults.

Fair enough. So you're saying there's a difference between "LOL! Anime nerds are gay amirite? :^)" in an anime thread and "You're a faglord for watching show x" after a poster posts a show x pic, right?

>not hasn't devolved into insulting any poster's character,

That's good to hear, and I'm glad that I haven't devolved into insults in that thread.


f363d0 No.626825

>>626803

I just believe it would show some decorum to not use lent as a facade.

Your concern is appreciated, but we weren't using Lent as some cover for a change. We decided on Lent to test the no flags, as well as expanding on what the rules means and how they'll be enforced, because of Lent being a period of change to get closer to Christ. We wanted to use this period to help us get the board as a whole, on both the user and moderation side, to come closer to Christ, and hoped that the flag's absence would aid in that, which it seems to have done.

>Why does this Calvinist even care when he doesn't celebrate Lent?

Wasn't thinking that at all. How the board is run shouldn't need to have anyone default to denominational differences.

>So you're saying there's a difference between "LOL! Anime nerds are gay amirite? :^)" in an anime thread and "You're a faglord for watching show x" after a poster posts a show x pic, right?

Since the first one has the lenny face to denote humor or sarcasm, there is a difference between it and the latter phrase, in that case, yes. If someone continues to do off-hand "jokes" that insult a person based on x or y, however, it becomes clear that person isn't really joking.

Post last edited at

306218 No.626943

>299 posts

What post was deleted?


5b8fb6 No.626997

I just came back to contemplate with you the similarities between the BO denying Colossians 1:15-17 but doing so in secret and the Pope today denying hell; but only doing it in secret, not openly. You can't even rely on these people to tell you what they think. They are avoidant about it. It's this consistent Catholic behavior of not being honest about what you believe and your intentions that I think has had a detrimental effect and caused this place to go downhill. You should just remember, all of the old posters aren't here to speak about it anymore because we've been banned and pushed out by this moderation.

To all the brethren, have a good Easter, and give glory to God


68b2cc No.627041

File: 642f77980630ef5⋯.png (256 KB, 512x512, 1:1, 642f77980630ef52220d842589….png)

>>626759

>>626825

>all this talmudic lawering


349602 No.627051

File: 4971e067e991aa6⋯.png (250.7 KB, 381x354, 127:118, 1522034568099.png)

File: a2793d0dd055ad1⋯.jpg (6.22 KB, 250x250, 1:1, 1521612392814.jpg)

>>625710

>Getting rid of denominational flags

I doubt you're a Christian, to disregard any reasonable denomination like this. You will be upsetting quite alot of people, even with this being a board of God and his love and wisdom. The board enjoys this and you decrease it's quality immensely only to decrease your already small workload.

Someone FIRE THIS PERSON!

The sense of identity from flags helped people feel they must be Christian to join as well. Now it feels like random people.


ae68bb No.627161

>>626943

It's cyclical with 300 max post set. So, there's always the OP + 299.

>>627051

The Board Owner can't be fired and he's the only one who can access board settings. Flags are gone. Get used to it.


7bd7c8 No.627188

File: da10e0553a31169⋯.jpg (173.04 KB, 522x516, 87:86, da10e0553a3116931b9b661b39….jpg)

>>627161

>This response again

If you check the catalog, it says R:300

After a post is deleted, it will say R:299, or possibly R:298 and lower if more than one post was deleted.

So, I ask again, what post was deleted?


ccab2d No.627207

>>627188

No, really. That's how it works. Make a post and check again. Still 299. 300 total posts, 299 "omitted".


4cfd5e No.627222

File: 87796d6b458c90e⋯.jpeg (73.91 KB, 455x610, 91:122, ABACD2F4-D01E-4ACE-9238-5….jpeg)

File: 914687cbd0399e1⋯.jpeg (72.26 KB, 449x607, 449:607, C4E88E6B-5AE8-46BD-ABBE-F….jpeg)

>>627207

That’s not what he’s talking about. You’re talking about the front page, where it says “299 omitted.” He’s talking about the catalog. The catalog always says “R: 300” until a thread gets deleted, then it says “R: 299.” I made a post then deleted it to show you an example


4cfd5e No.627226

>>627222

>until a thread gets deleted

I meant to say post


7bd7c8 No.627233

>>627207

You're not going to answer this or lie about it but I might as well try

Are you a mod?


96cd64 No.627237

>>627222

Well, ok then. Good to know. But, since we're on a board where users can delete their own posts, it's almost impossible to ever know what got deleted and/or why.

>>627233

On this board? No. Are you?


98233f No.627304

>>627237

If only there were modlogs


014e06 No.627331

>>627188

>>627207

Cyclical threads after a certain point begin to delete posts because of how cyclicals work. If you check either the /christ/pol thread, the nofap thread, or the prayer request thread, you'll notice some posts that are referenced are gone.


0c8987 No.627612

>>627304

Mod logs don't give a reason for deletion. It just says X post was deleted.


4cfd5e No.627629

After the success of experimentally taking away flags for lent, why not experimentally adding modlogs for the Easter season. Easter-Pentecost the board can have modlogs, and if it’s as disastrous as the mods say it would be you guys can remove it again


017075 No.627649

File: b275133613abe90⋯.png (237.78 KB, 484x533, 484:533, 1422305708326.png)

>>627331

>Been here since the start of /christian/

>Knows damn well what we're talking about

>Plays dumb intentionally


aa3144 No.627657

>>627649

>I'm going to whine and cry because a number is off somewhere

Do you even chan?


9f20b9 No.628069

>>627629

You are very clever. That is a very interesting idea.


9f20b9 No.628072

File: 80420a599a5bb1d⋯.jpeg (70.48 KB, 436x399, 436:399, B3202E9B-88FF-46DC-B649-2….jpeg)

Happy Easter to the board creator, board owner, the moderators, and all who have volunteered their time.


cb3222 No.628429

>>627612

They show who deleted it

>>627629

>>628069

Let me tell you why that's a bad idea. Does anyone remember when that Baptist was banned for saying "Steven Anderson knows Greek"? Remember the mods' excuse? Anyone remember Ezekiel's thread on /christ/ wherein he mixed up that excuse with the excuse for an entirely different unjustified ban and then shamelessly claimed the inconsistency demonstrated they were telling the truth? Now, in light of that previous false witness, let's examine their excuse for not having modlogs. They've claimed it would be used to slander the moderation, that out of context bans and deletions would be screenshotted and spammed to falsely allege they were banning people just for what they believe. Considering how eerily similar that is to how they bore false witness, I think what would happen is that if the logs were used to expose any unjustified arbitrary moderation, the mods would simply bear false witness in the same way, and claiming the experiment proved them correct, remove them and bear false witness concerning it anytime the demand for clarity be repeated. Because of this, the implementation of the logs must be unconditional and permanent. Though to be sure, the moderation of this board will not and can not improve until the present staff is totally replaced. They must all go, back to halfchan and leddit whence they came. We have seen their uncompromising assault upon board culture, as well as freedom of conscience, thought, and speech, it is the only solution.


ad9216 No.628499

Which faith is correct and why is it orthodox?


038c28 No.628509

>>628499

>implying it isn't Catholicism

Also, wrong thread, big guy.


0e7196 No.628715

Why was trashing flags a higher priority than modlogs?


e69329 No.628917

File: 2863721d92fc24d⋯.png (6.38 KB, 884x70, 442:35, e60f2030553952d315a9d2bb1c….png)

owo what tf is this?


ea2f9d No.628930

>>628917

That appears to be a screen shot of a post made in another thread.


51e983 No.629751

>>520608

When are flags coming back? Lent is over.


0c8987 No.629778

>>629751

See:

>>625710

>the flags are never coming back


6ce3fc No.630645

File: 1b75257413489b2⋯.png (275.39 KB, 400x763, 400:763, 91604D18-5426-4121-B1D2-40….png)


41e5bc No.630701

>>630645

That is what i'm trying to do, but catholics still just call me a prot because i'm trying to have a reliable way to distinguish deceptive churches using the bible.


a68218 No.631006

it's like this board gets progressively worse each time I come here every few weeks or so.

All /pol/bait and redditors nowdays


bab95e No.631014

>>630645

That image is correct but only if you read the "exading brain" meme the way it's supposed to be used.

>>631006

True. I was on vacation for two weeks and I'm a bit shocked how far the cancer spread in such a short time.


dd173c No.631135

File: bc94a4939e3dc4d⋯.png (779.52 KB, 740x737, 740:737, AI_god_not_a_good_idea.png)

Think that this is a good idea?

Just another challenge to deal with.


e782d8 No.631268

HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.

>>631135

It will be a challenge, if any other fabricated victim-hood is anything to go by, unfortunately.


e6484b No.631425

If that was true why didn't you just respond in my thread?


aa77be No.631507

>Someone posts Philemon 1:10 in a thread with prots arguing about calling a Priest Father, the one verse that Protestants can't get past

>Thread gets deleted shortly after

I'm not even sure if the mods intend to do this but its not even having a "pro-catholic"(much less a pro-jesuit) result.


92eaba No.631868

File: 022429be0b05310⋯.jpg (260.38 KB, 1800x1200, 3:2, cleansing-of-the-temple.jpg)

>>626759

>that name

>that manner of speech.

I bet you use "judeo-christian" unironically.


825c6a No.631912

>>625710

This is idiotic. There was, is and will be division always on this board. Difference is, that at least in old days, flag allowed us to identify denominations and we would know beforehand their faith.

If you think that removing flags will be beneficial, you are severely WRONG.


5bce67 No.631921

>>625710

Enable country flags


8fa277 No.631923

>>625710

That's a shame. I think they fueled livelier discussion (good and bad) and this place is going to be waaay more boring without them.


60a82f No.632183

>>631006

>>631912

This. Flags would help a lot. Also redditfags are too dumb to know what anything is beside a Baptist and a Catholic


0e5c49 No.632203

File: 6b76c6f92b50a43⋯.jpg (62.03 KB, 800x520, 20:13, anon, please..jpg)

>>632183

>Flags would help a lot

please read >>625710 There helped trolls a lot more than the people of the board.


0e5c49 No.632206

>>631006

There have been a lot of 4chan members who have come and brought their really stupid style of shit posting.


0c8987 No.632279

>>632206

Yes, blame outsiders. Good … gooood. Don't let anyone new in to hear the Word.


0e5c49 No.632403

>>632279

There has to be a balance, once a place is too pozzed the moment you mention scripture they will stop listening, even if you're right having. I tried showing a family member that her new age beliefs come from blatant satanism (i didn't even use the bible) and she ignorantly evaded all of it completely. Communication isn't a cure all, some people will not listen even if you know right, i know i didn't when i was an agnostic, and sometimes the pressure to believe in something just fuels resistance against it, even if that foundation is vital.


9c25ac No.632592

>>632403

Where'd everyone go after the board went to shit?

I'd like to go there too


0911df No.632675

winnie the pooh are you kidding me


0e5c49 No.632678

>>632675

What is the word filter? Jesus christ?

>>632592

Some tried /christ/ and left, others stayed and parodied their problems with the board. I think a lot lot of the prots left.


ae68bb No.632679


0911df No.632681

>>632679

Was that added today?

Is there a moderator participating in the Relationships general?


0e5c49 No.632683

>>632679

That's pretty winnie the pooh funny


008dc9 No.632691

Look, I posted it again!


0e5c49 No.632696

>>632592

Also don't go to /christ/ it's gnostic infested.


7e4601 No.632772

File: 7f33355f1681834⋯.png (94.92 KB, 500x689, 500:689, hate-kids-with-anime-profi….png)

Absolute filth.

In the thread about the homo pedo trap ring, the recruiters were using anime as symbols and recruitment.

Naturally, part of the post were about PART OF THE TOPIC. It's only natural.

Now some manchild mod deleted all the negative comments about his pedo and sodomite cartoons claiming derailment.

When it's in the winnie the pooh OP. Of course light hearted comments about it is not derailment, they did not hurt the manchild's pathetic excuse of an adult mind.

Anime must be banned from this christian board. The average anime show encourages immaturity, sodomy and pedophilia, things Jesus never commanded.

Reminder the effeminate go to hell.


426343 No.632805

File: e112571238e672d⋯.jpg (137.56 KB, 720x960, 3:4, huh.jpg)

>>632772

>thread about homosexual pedophile ring

>anti-anime fags use the Hitler Ate Sugar excuse to derail the thread towards their eternal crusade against mongolian cave paintings instead of contributing

Absolutely shameful.


426343 No.632822

>>632772

>>632805

To expand on that, there's vulnerable young men having their lives ruined by this fag ring and the first thing that comes to your one track mind is "We have to derail this thread immediately to pin the blame on anime and demand the moderators ban it." D&C shills or not, you fags are winnie the pooh obsessed with purging /christian/ of any traces of anime, a quest as retarded as demanding westerners stop wearing tshirts and jeans because homosexuals also wear tshirts and jeans. If anyone is harming the quality and spiritual state of the board, it's definitely the anti-anime fags who dogpile barely related threads with the same old screeching.

Even if we take this in light of Romans 14 and 1st Corinthians 8, you are intentionally entering a board with a culture that's closely tied to anime (which isn't doing us any harm psychologically or spiritually from what I've observed) and aggravating it with absolutely nothing to back yourself up except the Hitler Ate Sugar and Some X Contains Degeneracy So It's All Bad excuses. Perhaps you should rethink why you're on an imageboard in the first place if you're so culturally incompatible, like the teetotaler who wanders into the vineyard.

To end this, here is Romans 14:3.

Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.


0c8987 No.632832

File: f802615585447f5⋯.png (8.81 KB, 396x181, 396:181, Hugbox.png)

>>632822

The BO could make it a text-only board to appease the tender sensibilities of anyone who can't look at a cartoon without falling into terrible sin. After all, it is how we treat the weakest among us that we are judged.

Or I suppose they could just go into options and tick this box.


cb3222 No.632843


0e5c49 No.632885

>>632772

>ban what i don't like

The biggest criticism this board gets, is that the mods ban too much for nothing. Anime itself clearly isn't the problem, in that situation, it was the death cult in that regard which is separate from anime, just because they were using anime picture doesn't mean anything, they were also using regular pictures of people, we may as well ban those as well.

Yes, it's degenerate, but it so is music, so is video games, or western tv shows, and banning all media on one image board isn't going to turn the posters into christian monks nor prevent another death cult, or stop gay anime posting. banning degeneracy isn't going to help the degenerate anons. Anime itself should not be removed unless it's sexually obscene. I understand that this board get a lot of gay threads with anime avatar fagging, and those are getting cleaned up by the mods and it's fine for the most part, but banning it all together for the smallest connections of that situation is an overraction.

This would be like starting a christian group in a country with a large television watching audience and then banning anyone that watches television because of a unique incident that happened where a commercial was used to recruit people for the incident. Why not use your energy to show weeb anons about the dangers of Anime, like that doc that anderson did about western weebs.


cb3222 No.632902

>>632885

>just because they were using anime picture doesn't mean anything

What if they were using anime because it has an inherently effeminizing influence?


426343 No.632907

File: 8272897b5a41060⋯.jpg (22.8 KB, 213x252, 71:84, 1440020031372-3.jpg)

>>632885

>>632902

>Why not use your energy to show weeb anons about the dangers of Anime, like that doc that anderson did about western weebs.

They tried that route and failed multiple times, proving time after time they have nothing but personal taste and bad theology backing their arguments, so now they resort to crying for an anime ban as a last resort. It's reaching the point where anti-anime posters are actively harming our spiritual discourse by lashing out at anyone using the wrong reaction images.


0e5c49 No.632930

>>632902

They were using anime because it presented an ideal feminine form to be associated along side HRT, anime has a feminizing influence similar to how fapping or having a real sexual gf weakens/feminizes men. Not to mention the audience of /r9k/ are already broken and susceptible people.

>>632907

>proving time after time they have nothing but personal taste and bad theology backing their arguments,

Even if it's ludicrous to ban for reaction images, they're not entirely wrong about the degeneracy part of it, anime is part of the global mass media, and all media comes from the one(s) in control of the world government. No one goes after anyone in the other medias despite have been already proven to just as compromised, like in the music thread. Even though mainstream music teaches to you call out to demons, anime leaves a pacified manchild, the more serious anons want to have more robust community.


cb3222 No.632931

File: c404e2e4c0ec542⋯.png (100.53 KB, 640x640, 1:1, Thinking.png)

>>632930

>They were using anime because it presented an ideal feminine form


0c8987 No.632933

I think the inherent problem with the "ban anime" side of things is that they are just as much part of the problem that they seek to rectify. You have to remember where we are. Now, calm down, before you zerg rush to kvetch about me saying anime is just part of the culture, that's not what I'm saying. Bear with me …

If someone posts an image of an anime character, you can do one of three things:

1] Hide the image, move on.

2] Report the image, hide it, and move on.

3] Reply to the post and complain about the image and start an argument.

Remember where you are. If you choose #3, the person who posted the image - as well as everyone else reading the thread - has a little switch that clicks in their head that says "Found the Trigger!" and suddenly more and more anime pictures get posted, derailing the thread, and destroying any chance of urbane conversation.

If the BO wants to get rid of anime images, so be it. It's his board. Of course there will be backlash and attempts at spamming/flooding of anime, but that will die down over time and the world will move on and eventually /christian/ will be anime free for the most part as people get used to the New Ordinary. If you REALLY don't want anime on this board, then use option #2 above. Report, hide, move on. Don't engage or you roll over and expose your belly.


d5713f No.632936

>>632933

If you want to get Honey, it's wise to not kick the Bees nest.

Ban anime?

What is bad for the bee hive is not good for Honey harvest.

Ponder on such carefully.


0c8987 No.632937

>>632936

I have no opinion in this matter either way. I don't come to this board for anime images and I am indifferent to their presence here - provided they are not pornographic. All I'm sayin' is that option #3 above is the very definition of kicking the bee's nest.


0e5c49 No.632946

File: 9b2687942986390⋯.jpg (128.98 KB, 1242x1370, 621:685, f7d7821b9d53esss3b6ded79fe….jpg)

>>632931

You know what i mean, you cheeky anon. "ideal" in the oversexualized otaku sense, just like how being fat and having dyed hair is an ideal feminist female form, yet neither are my personal ideal. if they would have posted average pictures of failed MtF it would have worked against their cause. The webm that was summarizing this whole thing in the thread even repeated this notion of an ideal anime images to sell their plan.


d5713f No.632947

>>624224

yep there is a conflict between millenials and boomers, people receiving christianity from boomers will be aversive to it but in a more millenial alternative media content it's much more friendly


6cdf0e No.632977

>>632947

Wait, what happened to Gen X? Boomers are millennial's grandparents.


6f9068 No.633044

>>632679

>winnie the pooh

Please get rid of this, or at least change to something less gay.


0e5c49 No.633059

>>633044

It's really funny though.


0e5c49 No.633166

Did you delete your own post just now?


75736d No.633184

>>633166

What do you think?


430c15 No.633311

winnie the pooh

test


d56626 No.633524

>>632933

>Found the Trigger!

Besides that, you are still posting on a himalayan tapestry forum. Of course there's many people here who see it as part of the culture. It's more or less part of this site's origin.


f92ce5 No.633854

File: 912d4c011ecb4c6⋯.gif (44.82 KB, 278x234, 139:117, kS1MAR7LTGMiZRwhbbdEHl1-iV….gif)

>>520608

https://8ch.net/christian/res/633642.html#q633642

A thread about converting jews belongs in the /christ/pol thread.

>implying converting jews is merely political and not religious

>hmmm


0c8987 No.633858

>>633854

>Jews are evil and disgusting

>not politics

I wonder how many people have been converted by someone treating them as subhuman. I'm guessing … none! Therefore, it can't be religious since there's no actual conversion, just a blog about "I hate Jews".


16d606 No.633866

File: 0ae90299699df59⋯.jpg (30.55 KB, 340x370, 34:37, hi-def.jpg)

>>633858

>Thats right! We should never provide evidence of the evils of the jews. We should just forgive them and their hypocrisy.

>never discuss how to convert them

>never discuss with others what they have done

>its purely political

>make sure to only post it in a thread where over time those posts will get deleted.

>yes Jesus is boiling in a vat of his own excrement, (((we))) deserve salvation just like you goys

Really makes you think


0c8987 No.633869

>>633866

Even your use of visual pejorative, the racist caricature, as an argument is further proof that such threads should not be tolerated here - especially if you don't believe that salvation is for ALL mankind.

Also, the thread isn't about how to convert Jewish people to Christ, rather the OP asks:

>How do I convince my pastor that Jews are disgusting?


cb3222 No.633920

>>633869

>Even your use of visual pejorative, the racist caricature, as an argument is further proof that such threads should not be tolerated here

Go back to reddit


0c8987 No.633927

>>633920

I think I will stay here and preach the Word until you learn that salvation is for all.


cb3222 No.633936

>>633927

We're not going to embrace communism /leftypol/, give it up


0c8987 No.633947

>>633936

>Christ's love is for all

>communism

Quite the leap there, brother.


cb3222 No.633951

>>633947

I chose to respond to what you meant instead of what you said


0c8987 No.633953

>>633951

So, you think you're a mind reader? Are you aware that practicing such witchcraft is a sin?


cb3222 No.633961

File: 50784c945e8437c⋯.png (19.83 KB, 306x306, 1:1, unimpressed frog pepe.png)


30ca10 No.634036

>>633184

The post happened right when other trolling posts happened

>>633151

>>633152


30ca10 No.634086

File: 9d6e0401a973435⋯.webm (1.6 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Nicolas Cage Scene Laughi….webm)

I can't get over that word filter, when i see it randomly on the board, good job.


2929a7 No.634112

>>632977

60+ hour work weeks to pay for eternal interventionist warfare and opioids.


0911df No.634122

winnie the pooh


7386d6 No.634158

>>625710

>>625716

This


739519 No.634179

>>632885

Who cares what children like you think of puritans?

We''re still right.


105d43 No.634209

>>634179

>We''re still right.

At least read before you reply, i agree that anime is degenerate, but banning anime reaction pictures won't do anything, you may as well make this a text only board.


3fc71d No.634301


b29a93 No.634454

>>632696

I think that gnostic anon is really the only that posts over there.


105d43 No.634455

File: c28b5393ff6bc10⋯.webm (3.6 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, Marching to Zion.webm)

File: e4a4499b868c07c⋯.jpg (88.46 KB, 620x960, 31:48, dasda.jpg)

>>633869

>Even your use of visual pejorative, the racist caricature, as an argument is further proof that such threads should not be tolerated here.

Speaking the truth of the jews is biblical, Please watch Marching to Zion, New Friend. https://hooktube.com/watch?v=Rues1gVr338

>especially if you don't believe that salvation is for ALL mankind.

Not all of mankind will be saved unfortunately, and the bible is very clear on groups that most likely won't be saved like gays, deviants, sorcerers.


466608 No.634572

Please keep politics in the politics thread.


305029 No.634655

File: 0bdab4aa1533874⋯.mp4 (733.5 KB, 720x480, 3:2, odIOiSR41Fm (3).mp4)

>>632933

Wait, what's wrong with anime to begin with? Why single out anime pics over reactionary images in general?

Wouldn't silly hangups like this only hurt this board/deter people from seeking advice when they see that the concept of foreign cartoons alone is enough to trouble us?


4f3327 No.634657

>>634454

This. I think 80% of the posts over there are from from autistic gnostic.


4f3327 No.634658

>>634657

>from one*


981728 No.634851

bring back flags


105d43 No.634855

File: e0d9f0366cf60f1⋯.webm (261.48 KB, 352x288, 11:9, videoplayback.webm)

>>634851

see >>625710


105d43 No.634966

File: d97e20fef56ca61⋯.png (1.1 MB, 1528x2827, 1528:2827, We don't need two threads ….png)


b90a7d No.634981

>>634855

if I have to be honest, /christian/ is just a lot less interesting now. obviously there was a ton of D&C going on, but there was real "theological" debate going on. now it's gone back to sort of generic christian themed image board.


105d43 No.635111

>>634981

>obviously there was a ton of D&C going on, but there was real "theological" debate going on.

You can still have threads on theology, there will just be a lot less trolls posting as (insert denom here) and either false flagging or pissing off other denoms. I know that poking fun at each other was lively for /christian/ but i knew that flags would help trolling way too much.


105d43 No.635193

>>635188

I don't know if we're getting hit with 4chan shitposting wave or if it's just trolling from other boards, but we've been getting terrible threads with >(1) OPs with random (1)'s bumping the blatantly bad threads. There was an obvious b8 thread implying that implied that Galatians 3:28 meant that women can whatever they want in the church.

>>629650

>>635178

>>628704

>>626006


0c8987 No.635232

>>635193

Do you check the dates on threads/posts before you complain about them?


da8130 No.635277

>>635111

>have imageboard debate without imageboard culture

Surely this will work


60a82f No.635363

File: 425cf520bb84aba⋯.jpg (114.52 KB, 960x726, 160:121, 30740651_10157298693558032….jpg)

File: 643e682db05e37a⋯.jpg (87.05 KB, 960x716, 240:179, 30725479_10157298693518032….jpg)

My male friend just shared this on FB. This is the same man who told me he wanted to leave Catholicism because he didn't believe in God and disrespectfully called Our Father "Sky daddy".

I always thought he was a private homosexual because of his appearance and his flabby leftist rhetoric but this takes the cake


60a82f No.635364

>>634966

Is it so hard to chase after actual Caucasoid ethnicities? A Christian levant woman and a white american man's chid will be whiter than one by an east or southeast asian. i have never seen an actual excuse that was anything but boiling down to weebism causing a strange fascination for asian women.


35084c No.635375

File: 04c7aff5f38d47a⋯.jpg (51.45 KB, 600x450, 4:3, 04c7aff5f38d47ad1688f4c6c2….jpg)

>>632679

That's an incredibly specific criteria for anti-Marian shitposting

Out of unrelated curiosity, does it seem like there's been a huge uptick on hapa/anti-hapa posting on the various relationship threads? I'll admit I've contributed some posts on the matter but it's seen some kind of resurgence or newfound vigor in constant "tfw no yellow/filipino gf vs KEEP THE WHITE RACE PURE" content.

Is it from a small range of IPs? What's going on?

The first two christian dating threads kept it to a minimum but the new threads seem flooded with various shitflinging about it, along with the (1) and done generic "is [flavor of the month political/cultural topic] christian guise" threads.

Maybe the meta thread needs to be expanded or something to state an opinion on this. I don't mind helping apostates and reprobates convert but having constant threads dedicated to whether sodomy isn't a sin this week is dropping post quality.


105d43 No.635722

Thanks for deleting that Muslim thread where the OP was just re-posting old/false information about the bible being corrupted or islam and Christianity worshiping the same God.

After that one muslim anon who lied about going to college and spreading miss information about videos de-bunking "the bible is corrupted" or "christians worship three Gods", Muslims have earned themselves quite the position here.


ae68bb No.635727

>>635722

They've been busy all over the site. Is it Ramadan or something?


0c1183 No.635766

I really like that the quality of the average conversation has greatly improved here with the absence of flags.

I am curious though, has board activity fallen off a little lately? Is it seasonal maybe? Just my imagination? Do the mods have access to statistics and would they care to comment?


86eaa1 No.635768

The thread about the Pope strongly implying that a boy's atheist father would find salvation was deleted? On what basis?


105d43 No.635772

>>635766

It has increased, a few days ago it went over /tech/ and /cow/ shortly by PPH.

>>635768

I think it was because some anon said the pope didn't actually do that, but the anon didn't source anything, and yeah the thread was closed early.


becc7d No.635892

File: b0f452763964c61⋯.jpg (45.38 KB, 800x792, 100:99, if_only_you_knew.jpg)

>>520608

Your pathetically lax moderation is causing your brothers to fall to sin. Work or give up.


a302be No.635899

File: c8f9b1dc3d708e5⋯.png (32.83 KB, 1476x438, 246:73, 72e1fd4ae5e0769b5cc3e2ba12….png)

>>635892

That cut and pasted 4-ch screen cap doesn't really mean what you think it means. It isn't just a cool sounding thing that applies to whatever you want it to. It is a quote from an actual conversation and you are taking it out of context.


343df8 No.636007

>>635899

Too bad.


be061b No.636252

>>635766

>my, look at these unrelated facts!

hoo boy…


46ebc1 No.636983

File: bd8bc76af3eaeea⋯.png (52.03 KB, 208x156, 4:3, 208x156.png)

>>635899

it's words and words literally DO mean what the person who delivers them wants them to mean.


b9a326 No.636992

File: 3f2d7c2ca36d364⋯.gif (1.3 MB, 540x304, 135:76, 3f2d7c2ca36d364345bb9a7f13….gif)

>>636959


a8a419 No.637219

Why was the thread on muslisms deleted?


f363d0 No.637221

>>637219

It was a question that didn't deserve its own thread. We have a cyclical for those sorts of things.


60a82f No.637319

>>637253

Shut up. you just made me feel more tired,anxious, and itchy. No one wants to read that bizarre shit at 3AM.


60a82f No.637727

>that same autistic antichristian retard with the same ugly reaction pictures and mentally ill posting style

this is why i hate the mentally ill and socially stupid.


105560 No.638135

File: 047e9c5202ef6c9⋯.png (1.22 MB, 1334x750, 667:375, 5FDB0A55-46CD-4CFB-A5D1-D8….png)

Thank you to all the mods for putting up with us. Thank you. Some of the banners you’re running are pretty cool too. And it was nice to see you all interrupt the pump order to push a story of particular interest to the top.


0911df No.638199

File: d42165fd6ec65de⋯.png (334.89 KB, 500x530, 50:53, latinsBeLike.png)

Old meme I found for anyone whos doubting our removing flags


466608 No.638246

>>638135

You are very welcome. It felt like something we needed to pay more attention to.

>>638199

I love it.

Post last edited at

0c8987 No.638548

>>638539

I'm pretty sure that filter was put in place to stop a spammer. Entire copypastas can be filtered. Want to stop the brown pill spammer? Filter his entire speech to just show a ghost.

The BO has a lot of tools at his disposal. Just have to be creative.


0911df No.638616

Can you add Yahuah to the words corrected to Jesus


27998c No.638830

Thank you for graciously rescinding my ban. Sorry for the misunderstanding.


cb3222 No.639046

>>638830

What was the ban?


8f9784 No.639392

“winnie the pooh” That’s really funny stuff. Thank you for helping me keep my temper. I mean laughter really is the best solution.


0e7196 No.639581

File: c8f31792434b356⋯.gif (980.86 KB, 430x228, 215:114, Whinnie the Pooh.gif)

>tfw the mods implement a wordfilter and it inadvertently starts a meme


e32776 No.639613

>new influx of newfags on every other board

>new influx of Baptists on /christian/

Why are protestants always so annoying?


f1649f No.639627

>>639581

Stupid tigger the tiger


f1649f No.639628

>>639613

>Baptist

>pr*Testant


e32776 No.639632

>>639628

Seems the seem to me really.


0911df No.639682

>>639628

Baptists are Protestant and it's obvious to literally everyone else


3f1fce No.639683

why did I get banned from the discord? all I did was say north korea was better than the west.

seems pretty stupid to ban someone from the meta chat for having a difference of opinion


0911df No.639687

File: 1056e2570660b1c⋯.png (56.32 KB, 1027x1024, 1027:1024, ClipboardImage.png)

>>639683

Mods don't support best korea


2929a7 No.639706

>>639682

I may be wrong on this, but aren't they technically Reformed but just engage in so much ecumenism with Protestants that its just really hard to tell the difference?


0911df No.639713

>>639706

Reformed are Protestants and only Reformed Baptists are Reformed, and most Reformed will argue against that. They are a product of the Protestant reformation as much as Methodism or any other Protestant denom that didn't pop up immediately and their arguments against being Protestant are terrible, like saying they can't be rebelling against Rome because Rome has not authority, as if any other Protestants care what Rome says


cb3222 No.639771

File: 3163040063246b6⋯.jpg (21.18 KB, 439x290, 439:290, jesuit tricks.jpg)

>>639713

>only Reformed Baptists are Reformed


6d2a38 No.639926

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>639682

Ummm…. no sweety


fba418 No.639948

File: 22e675dffe37475⋯.jpeg (162.37 KB, 691x625, 691:625, 508A0304-1FE5-4676-80FE-4….jpeg)

>>639926

>“Sweety”

Do you live in San Francisco?


764eb2 No.639998

>discord

Is the irc dead then?


6f8772 No.640215

>>639683

Friend, they banned me for saying the word "sodomite" one time. You're clearly better off now.


489ffa No.640528

Why did the theif on the cross thread get deleted?


49e31d No.640529

>>640528

there's some militant fedora spamming posts atm


72a589 No.640536

>>640529

The mods could have just deleted the comments


4ee6fa No.640602

>>640536

>delete 15 of 20 posts

or

>delete thread

it's an obvious choice, since it was full of /pol/ gnosticism and conspiracy already anyway


1aace4 No.640625

I notice you said you allow people who don't adhere to the two creeds you posted. However, this is not fair since they are not supported in the Bible. Will I get banned once I start posting Biblical content that doesn't agree with those two creeds. For example, there are threads challenging the Trinity, if I post against it and I have BIBLICAL and SCHOLARLY EVIDENCE to do so will I be banned still?


aa3962 No.640628

>>640625

No, not if it is in good faith and in the spirit of discussion. You really have to push the heretical boundry pretty far before getting a ban, despite what those on /Christ/ may say.


1aace4 No.640630

>>640628

The reason I ask is because I'm a JW. Last time I posted IN AN ACTUAL JW thread started by a NONJW I was banned. Threads between Christians and Muslims are started and allow Muslims to answer back but if a JW answers back why would he/she be banned if that was the point of the thread to begin with?


1c98e6 No.640654

>>640630

>allow Muslims to answer

Depends on how the answer is presented. If you act like an ass, you shouldn't be surprised when you get banned.


510115 No.640826

>>640630

JW on /pol/ is that you?

>>640625

>Will I get banned once I start posting Biblical content that doesn't agree with those two creeds. For example, there are threads challenging the Trinity, if I post against it and I have BIBLICAL and SCHOLARLY EVIDENCE to do so will I be banned still?

Yes, and you should be, because it means you aren't a Christian, and this board is for Christians. If you don't believe in the God of the bible, which is, according to Jesus, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, you aren't a Christian.


1aace4 No.640920

>>640826

Yeah, its me. So to answer your statement if you know me already you would know that I quote from the Bible and nonJW sources. The Bible supercedes the two creeds posted in the rules up above. That should be enough for me to have the right post around here. According to the other anon as long as its within the spirit of discussion, aka a JW thread, and in good faith that is all that is needed.

Not only do I believe in the God of the Bible but I even glorify his name. That gives me more right to post around here. I already proven back at half-chan that the Trinity is not Biblical but Helenistic Greek Philosophy, Hindu Avatarism, and Pagan triad doctrine. I see no reason why I should believe it when most scholars of the Catholic Church don't and even their encyclopedias admit it is not Biblical as well.

Maybe it would be better to start a thread on this subject instead of taking up space here.


510115 No.640927

>>640920

>So to answer your statement if you know me already you would know that I quote from the Bible and nonJW sources

So does the Watchtower society and it is infamous for distranslating and abusing them, respectively. Quoting from those means nothing if they do not actually support one's claims.

>The Bible supercedes the two creeds posted in the rules up above

Those creeds are based on the bible and to reject them is to reject fundamental biblical teaching.

>I already proven back at half-chan that the Trinity is not Biblical but Helenistic Greek Philosophy, Hindu Avatarism, and Pagan triad doctrine.

That copypasta about libertarians using communist terms is so bad and honestly all it ever made me feel was pity. You're clearly very ignorant of actual history because you've been deceived by wicked men. For example, the words essence, substance, and trinity do not come from Greek philosophy, they come from the Latin words essentia, substantia and trinitas which were introduced into the Christian vocabulary by Tertullian.


5623c4 No.641481

Mods, can we do something about these self-described Nu-Christians, they unironically believe in Annihilationism and spout out logical fallacies about God and the Bible. They're just as bad, if not worse, than Mormons and JWs.

>>640920

You're not welcome here. You're free to start your own board, but you're NOT a Christian. Is this clear and to the point?


5623c4 No.641482

>>640630

First, if you were banned, why are you ban evading? That's against the rules. Secondly, JWs are dishonest liars. How about YOU submit to what's being preached on this board, instead of sticking your chest out like you're some god? It's very tiring to deal with JWs, you guys have a persecution complex which you flip around and berate others and pound other Christians down into pulp with your endless arguments and long nonsensicle posts. Apparently you claim you've read the Bible, so how about you take a page from the Bible you claim to know so well and "dust off your sandles" and leave us alone? Apparently we're doing something here that ruffles your feathers, and the devil that controls you doesn't like what this board represents. Think about that.


5623c4 No.641489

>>640625

>I have BIBLICAL and SCHOLARLY EVIDENCE to do so will I be banned still?

If you have this so-called "scholarly evidence," then what is the point of faith? The whole world would simply submit to your "religion" and that would be the end of argument. There is a reason why God requires faith from each and every one us. Abram believed the Lord, and he credited it to him as righteousness. (Genesis 15:6)

This is more of a question of your attitude being unrepentant and unwilling to budge from one's position. WE WILL NOT BUDGE NOR WAVER, AND IF YOU DON'T REPENT AND CHANGE YOUR WAYS, THEN GET OUT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? A little leaven corrupteth the whole lump. (Galatians 5:9). Not everybody is welcome in Heaven, and not everybody is welcome on this board. Either you abide by the rules and respect our FAITH or you leave.


5623c4 No.641521

>>641481

>>641482

>>641489

Sorry for my angry outburst. I get real passionate about this stuff sometimes.


5623c4 No.641524

>>640630

Lastly, I will say this, you are an unrepentant JW and you are actively working against the Kingdom of Heaven. You are against us. There were some JWs who tried to leave Kingdom Hall and you gave them a beatdown and threatened their soul and salvation on this very board. As a result, that is a valid ground for you to be banned permanently. You are actively taking part in condemning souls to Hell, along with yourself.


088cff No.641564

>>641524

<Lastly, I will say this, you are an unrepentant JW and you are actively working against the Kingdom of Heaven

<actively working against the Kingdom of Heaven

>implying this is a bad thing

Do you even realise what you just said? Now for the scripture lesson.

Turn to matthew 12:25-26

>And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:

>And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand?

Satan has a kingdom. Jesus also has a kingdom, which is not of this world as said in john 18:36

>Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

Now what is Jesus' kingdom you ask? Read matthew 12:28

>But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.

Clearly, since Jesus does cast out devils by the Spirit of God, owns the kingdom of God. Satan however owns the kingdoms defined in matthew 4:8-9

>Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;

>And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

Satan's kingdom, all the kingdoms of the world, is commonly known as the kingdom of heaven. As it is all the kingdoms under, or that is to say "of", heaven. Now you must be wondering, since satan has a kingdom and Jesus has a kingdom, why didn't Jesus just take all the kingdoms of the world back in matthew 4? He could have set up a Godly government, made revelation happen, yadda yadda yadda etc. But who you serve and worship is who you glorify. So Jesus said matthew 4:10

>Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

If Jesus had voted to have taken power from Satan instead of God, He would be worshiping/serving satan instead of God. This is why you shouldn't vote too, as you take authority from Satan instead of Jesus until Jesus receives all the kingdoms of the world in revelation 11:15

>And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.

<but anon, all power is of God in romans 13:1

Indeed, that is why satan needs permission from God to do anything like tempt job in job chapters 1-2.

<but anon, all power is given future tense to Jesus in matthew 28

Yes indeed, but then Jesus commanded us to go and make disciples of all nations, baptise, and preach the gospel. Nothing about taking power from Satan by voting nor warring to fight for this world as spoken against in john 18:36. And to top that off Jesus immidiatelly went to sit at the right hand of God until His enemies are made into His footstool as spoken of in psalms 110:1. So don't serve/worship Satan's kingdom of heaven which is the kingdoms of the world. But rather serve/worship Jesus' kingdom of God which is not of this world.

Also can this go back into being a meta thread now? Make new threads if you want to talk more about the kingdoms, insulting others, and shitflinging about JW's and the such.


1aace4 No.641571

>>641489

>>641566

Without Accurate knowledge, wisdom, understanding, insight, perception, and discernment faith is just blind faith. Notice how in the verses they all interlap with one another. One is nothing without the other. Without one, the other is nothing. All is woven, all is connected. JW seek knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and spirituality. The churches do not provide that at all. Only empty formalities, emotional validation, and human approval. That's why we seem so strange to you and others. Same as how a archetypal "wise man" seems off and strange to the normies.

JW have a history of mistakes because that is the price to pay for knowledge, wisdom, and understanding. That's why we have changed so much throughout history because we seek to conform to accurate knowledge and apply it to ourselves. 80 years ago you would find JW celebrating christmas and smoking outside Kingdom Halls. Now we know better and are willing to make the necessary changes to conform to Bible understanding and wisdom. That's why we come to offer.


1aace4 No.641575

>>641564

You speak with wisdom and understanding. You are either a JW or associated with them. Nice to meet you.

I'll see you out in the threads. You'll recognize my style.

(No, he won't.)

5623c4 No.641577

>>641564

I've read the entire Bible many times, why can't you speak like a normal person?

>>641566

Literally a wall of text and you've said nothing. Here's the answer: Jesus Christ

>>641571

Now that's a great excuse to change your doctrine on a whim.

>>641575

JWs are not allowed. Either you repent of your foolish ways or you leave.


088cff No.641581

>>641571

>That's why we have changed so much throughout history because we seek to conform to accurate knowledge and apply it to ourselves.

Gird up thine loins and read >>641564

>Without Accurate knowledge, wisdom, understanding, insight, perception, and discernment faith is just blind faith.

No, faith is faith. Read hebrews 11:1

>NOW faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

romans 8:24

>For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?

That is what faith is. It is always blind in the physical sense for it is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. If you see it, then it is no longer hope. The knowledge/wisdom/understanding/discernment comes because of romans 10:17

>So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

You have to have ears to hear though.


5623c4 No.641583

>>641581

Are you a JW?


088cff No.641584

>>641575

I am neither, I am simply a christian who follows Christ.

You say you are a JW? Read 1 corinthians 3:4-7

>For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?

>Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?

>I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.

>So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.

<I am of JW

<I am of calvin

<I am of morioni

1 corinthians 1:12-13

>Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

>Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?


5623c4 No.641585

>>641584

Do you attend your local Kingdom Hall?


5623c4 No.641587

>>641584

No, I'm not a JW.

Also JWs are not Christian so that verse doesn't apply to them. They don't even believe that Jesus is the Christ. How could they be Christian?

Answer honestly, are you a JW? Yes or no?


088cff No.641588

>>641587

I am not a JW, I am simply a follower of Christ. What even is a "kingdom hall"?


5623c4 No.641590

>>641588

Okay, God bless.


6f8772 No.643404

>>635375

>but having constant threads dedicated to whether sodomy isn't a sin this week is dropping post quality.

Looking at their behavior, obviously honesty isn't the top priority for the moderation. That's probably why they let sodomite lies stand.

As long as its not attacking their cult, they don't seem to care. I mean I've been warned for posting straight out of the Bible, yet these sodomite bait threads have been an out of control problem, chronically. And yet they never seem to do anything to take care of it, not then, not now.


661c85 No.643567

Any apple users here?

Anyone else having trouble posting to the board since the iphone 11.3.1 update?

Phone will not post images or text. Loads 60% and freezes. No matter what the ip is.


65cbf6 No.643659

>>639046

I made a joke about one of the phrase filters, and I think I was mistaken for a spammer.


a72a7c No.643738

>>643567

since the update ive had problems browsing 4chan where it would freeze but using a different browser fixes it


b4e701 No.643925

File: 29cb0e8f41e6399⋯.jpg (7.92 KB, 225x225, 1:1, download (9).jpg)

>Christchan is back up after maintenance! The flood errors should now be resolved. Thank you to everyone who submitted a bug report!

Can yall change this now? Its been a long while and im tired of seeing it. Maybe change it to something more uplifting? Maybe this:

> The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

>Psalm 27:1

Maybe have it change with different Psalms (like the banner)?


b23d41 No.643931

>>643925

Good suggestion.


b4e701 No.644028

>>643931

Thank you :)


f5edc5 No.644087

Have I been shadow banned or something? At least two of my posts have been deleted without explanation or notice.


52e2ba No.644968

>>520608

Odin should be filtered to Cum Drinker.


4931d2 No.645016

File: 5edd4e183d7dd78⋯.jpg (21.77 KB, 236x176, 59:44, IMG_3474.JPG)

>>644968

Absolute this, than they will say Heil cum drinker


7a0d77 No.645088


ff556b No.645183

>>644968

But among you, as is proper among the saints, there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality or impurity or greed. 4Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk, or crude joking, which are out of character, but rather thanksgiving.


801436 No.645879

>>644968

Has there been an increase of LARPagans? I didn't notice any. Also, wouldn't be something like "false idol" be more fitting and more in the spirit of this board?


bee095 No.645920

>>644968

Cum Drinker


a72a7c No.646036


9d95c7 No.646041

As stated in that one thread. I think f_ck should be changed to "bother"

Pretty funny I just noticed they filtered tigga too.


65cbf6 No.646585

>>644968

"Honey hoarder" would be better.


65cbf6 No.646586


6f8772 No.646644

You can call me whatever you want, you can change the rules to whatever you want. I personally forgive you. But for the sake of everyone else, you need to explain, what non-Christian religion am I proselytizing here. Because I have no idea what you're talking about.

>>644958

If you can't give one, I can only assume it's solely because of the rule change. In which case, I am following all of the original six rules that were there before you changed them, and those are the ones I'm following. I don't respect the rule change.


1c98e6 No.647274

>>646644

>I don't respect the rule change.

>So I'm gonna break the rules and cry when I get banned

Good luck with that.


a72a7c No.647519

File: 97cdcd70e723fba⋯.jpg (29.16 KB, 334x393, 334:393, 1446122632593.jpg)

>>640654

>>647274

why do you mods come here and post and try to blend in like your a normal poster? just log in to your mod account and stop hiding in the shadows like a jew


52c99e No.647535

>>640630

I find this a bit irritating too. Like if I present something against Islam and a muslim was to respond to it, then he gets banned, there is nothing constructive about it. It just makes Christians look as if we can't defend ourselves.


94df2a No.647610

>>647535

>>640630

The big difference between the JW and the Muslim is that the Muslim isn't pretending to be Christian.


1c98e6 No.647612

>>647519

>no regular poster would ever possibly agree with something the mod(s) did.


873730 No.647850

>>647612

sycophant


fd5b4a No.648049

>>645016

>>645088

>>645879

>>645920

>>646036

>>646585

>Not filtering O d i n to Captain Sweden the First

Step you game up, /christian/.


da1149 No.648071

File: 31952d0885bcdee⋯.mp4 (4.54 MB, 640x360, 16:9, FUCKINGNORMALFAGS.mp4)

>Alright, let's continue reading the Catholic thread

<deleted lol

Well take it up the peehole, you scumbags.

Yeah, I might as well use insults. After all politics, maymays, shitposting and template threads are more valuable to this board than religious discussion so this clearly isn't a christian board.


c119dc No.648078

>>648071

Wow, it really is gone. There was a lot of good stuff in that thread.


da1149 No.648081

File: 06eb21262b2c4de⋯.png (495 KB, 1232x818, 616:409, ClipboardImage.png)

>>648078

I know, right? There was so much interesting information and some actual good discussion. The fact that this thread was deleted just saddens me. It's inexcusable.

>The discussion got heated so we had to delete it all

will literally not be an excuse, if complete, utter worthless threads like these are allow just fine. What could you get from them some bantz? Maybe something to circlejerk about how correct we all are? Even if they turn out decent by some odd chance, it would simply be impossble for anyone to learn even a fraction of what they could have learned from that one.


6f8772 No.648120


c119dc No.648121

>>648120

Thanks bro


6f8772 No.648123

>>648121

Glad I could be of some use here.


da1149 No.648129

>>648120

Thank you very much. That won't make the shit mods any less shit but at least I can read it now.


da1149 No.648130

>>648129

Also, I can't get the images. Man, I'm so mad about this.


516255 No.648170

File: e4dd4f1a916400e⋯.jpg (1021.54 KB, 1100x1099, 1100:1099, ad5e5cd416dc1b2e4a5411bdb8….jpg)

Thanks for deleting my thread on spiritual meta-physics that was up for less than a day, while 4chan shitpost threads like these remain healthy and threat-less. It's pretty interesting what /christians/ thinks of the trivial video game outlast, or being able to shit post another *blocks your path* thread, or the pointless and vague illuminant/gnostic spam. But no, a thread about a spiritual topic that really tests my faith in Christianity is what should be deleted ASPA. I get that it was almost dead thread, but discussion sometimes happens in threads beyond the life span of almost a day. Whats the point in having a board if it's all focused on a confirmation bias?

>>647858

>>645673

>>647790


da1149 No.648177

File: 40c138f624738b8⋯.jpg (36.39 KB, 745x408, 745:408, steve-anderson-orlando-you….jpg)

>>648170

No discussion allowd, now post some more maymays.


6d0279 No.648193

>>648130

Use archive.fo next time, it saves thumbails of the images and gives the direct link to the image so you can just click on it and see it, if the 8ch server hasn't deleted it yet.


516255 No.648196

File: f9a7161f359f390⋯.jpg (9.28 KB, 358x270, 179:135, image85.jpg)

My thread had 8 replies in that screenshot >>648081 and in the archive it only has 6. I was explicitly clear that i wasn't shilling the New Ager but instead was looking for an answer to meta-physics from a christian perspective, Neither did i say that YWHW was a tulpa but that people can make a tulpa accidentally of him (and that shouldn't 'invalidate' or speak against YWHW at all).

The thread wasn't even dead, so what reason was there to delete it?

Post last edited at

516255 No.648202

>>648177

I'm not even angry, it's just odd to me.


da1149 No.648204

>>648202

Well I am. I'm also angry about the fact that the mods are here but don't care to give any reason for their shit decisions.


d13cb1 No.648240

>>648204

Even if they did, you wouldn't accept the reason and would just argue like a sperg until the end of time. Same reason there's no board log.


516255 No.648280

>>648240

>Even if they did, you wouldn't accept the reason and would just argue like a sperg until the end of time.

Not everyone, sometimes the mods mistake initiation of discussion with some type of trolling. I once got banned for trying to talking about the symbolism of the crescent moon in the Virgin Mary. A mod thought i was calling her a demon instead of asking why she has to be depicted with a sun and moon, my post was really open ended, but actually being able to understand the issues helped me to change how asked the question when i did and not get banned. Obviously not everyone has misunderstandings by that lack of communication is reckless.


9df06f No.648481

>>648196

>Pseudo-gnostic new age crap gets purged.

>Nothing of value was lost

You should visit /christ/ there's gnostic there who would love some company.


873730 No.648507

>>648240

t. tutor


516255 No.648562

File: 2c1c409e4a9f881⋯.gif (773.18 KB, 295x221, 295:221, Seinfeld-Leaving.gif)

>>648481

>>Pseudo-gnostic new age crap gets purged.

You did not read the OP nor watch the missing webms from the archive or else you'd know that not only is meta-physics not Gnostic nor New Age, but that the author makes fun of the New Age in the webm. There is also a Christian side of Meta-physics which was the point of the discussion, learn to read.

>everyone i don't like/everything i don't agree with is a gnostic/New Ager

That is a confirmation bias.


967510 No.648577

winnie the pooh tiggers


1c98e6 No.649283

>>649279

My goodness. That is a LOT of salt. So salty that you actually saged a sticky. Only /pol/ is capable of this level of salty tears.


071c9f No.649299

Why was the harmless Gangs of New York funposting thread deleted?


1c98e6 No.649429

File: 82376fd2418a78e⋯.jpg (30.1 KB, 410x539, 410:539, LMIPIA.jpg)

>>649425


5312fb No.649432

>>649429

>look mom, I posted it again

A trend that will continue, by the way.


3f309f No.649442

>>649432

>saging a sticky

Lay off the sauce, LARPagan

by sauce I mean semen btw


1f623c No.649590

Why do Baptists get there own general and the Catholic post gets deleted?


d2c1f7 No.649597

File: b3cbad5e79ebbe9⋯.jpg (57.5 KB, 489x611, 489:611, KqlOCij.jpg)

I love the worldfilter, but have but one small complaint: please chage it so that fu…ing filters to winnie the poohing rather than just winnie the pooh


7029ba No.649630

>>649590

I'm pretty sure that was all in preparation to delete the Baptist thread. Stay tuned on that.


23edd9 No.649862

>>648240

Can't really know since I don't see any kind of reason given so far. I mean, I can't expect them to check the meta all the time so I waited a few days but they still didn't bother to write even a single word about it.


72929b No.649916

>>648562

Your weird pseudo-gnostic crap isn't metaphysics, that's a branch of philosophical study.

This is a short lecture series that serves as a good introduction to what's widely held for Christian metaphysics

https://soundcloud.com/thomisticinstitute/sets/fr-thomas-joseph-white-op

First goes over the foundations of our understanding of reality then to how God is neccessary for that

something for reading material would be

http://www.thesumma.info/reality


72929b No.649921

>>648562

What you posted wasn't metaphysics, but it was weird new age stuff so that gets deleted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics

(if you ctrl+f for tulpa you will get 0 results)

Witches, and all the other weird stuff you mentioned has again nothing to do with metaphysics, or Christianity. It's just newage nonsense.


9d25de No.649991

So? Still no reply about the Catholic thread?


82e54a No.650015

>>649991

>So? Still no reply about the Catholic thread?

The jews are still celebrating sabbath, be patient.


7029ba No.650041

>>649991

I'd encourage you to try making a new one, provided that you get their blessing and their direct permission of course. These things have to be screened, you know.


a398dd No.650151

>>649991

Are you the OP? The thread wasn't deleted by any of the moderators.


eb5d79 No.650172

>>650151

This just gets more and more bizarre.


e3a793 No.650178

>>650172

Maybe it's God trying to tell us something…hmm


82e54a No.650302

>>649442

Based on massive projection and hypocrisy, it's extremely likely that you unironically swill actual cum.


b4e701 No.650373

>>650302

>le (((projection))) may-may

"No u"'s jooish cousin


f567e5 No.650396

>>650373

>if I talk like a baby then I am blameless as a baby

You really strive to be as close to semen as you can, don't you?


b4e701 No.650405

>>650396

>still thinks he can sage a stickied thread

Your'e mad because your a pagan, I get that.


5326a4 No.650466

>>650405

Whatever you say, baby.

Have you watched some more winnie the pooh with your babysitter mods?

Your bantz sure are on that level, anyway.

Have another sage that doesn't make YOU made at all.


b4e701 No.650476

File: 83017123b38c15e⋯.png (68.95 KB, 1022x961, 1022:961, j09je57fuad01.png)

>>650466

>Have another sage that doesn't make YOU made at all.

Hmm, what did the LARPagan mean by this?


873730 No.650482

>>650151

Proofs?


b4e701 No.650551

>>650516


516255 No.650675

>>649916

>>649921

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics

>The weak, modern view assumes that the objects studied by metaphysics exist inside the mind of an observer, so the subject becomes a form of introspection and conceptual analysis.

This is (in a simply sense) what the webms i posted in the thread were talking about. The other mystery religions and thought forms i mentioned relate to that definition of mental metaphysics because they would be entities or practices created from the mind.

I understand that the mods are constantly banning and deleting troll posts from the mystery religions (really i do, i been fed false interpretations of the bible from New Agers on here), but that doesn't mean that it we have to purge every topic that somewhat explores from a christian perspective them before an answer can surfaces. It wouldn't be re-treading false information since the above definition from you link you gave me shows it's not entirely part of the mystery religions. Whether it as is part of gnosticism, the New Age, or a has a Christians perspective on the topic was the very point of the thread, your posts would have also been helpful in it, I'm sure you would have rather had this exchange in there than here. Sometimes people aren't sure if it's Christian or New Ager/gnostic.


72929b No.650741

>>650675

We will always ban anything esoteric/"mystery religons" and nothing you can say will ever change that. (Not just troll posts, anything, it's in the rules)

Curiosity is a vice and scandal is a very serious sin.


516255 No.650808

>>650741

>and nothing you can say will ever change that.

Why are you so jaded about this, Do you really think I'm expecting you to change your precious rule 2? I'm just using the meta thread for it's purpose.

>Curiosity is a vice and scandal is a very serious sin.

So is pride.


d558b5 No.650872

File: 5130e6c31ef2026⋯.jpg (268.22 KB, 600x832, 75:104, thinking_anime_girl.jpg)

>Actual good arguments against this guy in the Anderson thread

>thread get's deleted

How odd.


6c5190 No.650889

>>625710

ecumenical filth


c1064b No.651025

Out of curiosity, is Peter the antithesis of /christian/?

Peter 3:9 and 3:10, for example. See it getting broken all the time.

9 Do not repay evil with evil or insult with insult. On the contrary, repay evil with blessing, because to this you were called so that you may inherit a blessing.

10 For, “Whoever would love life and see good days must keep their tongue from evil and their lips from deceitful speech."

11, too.

11 They must turn from evil and do good; they must seek peace and pursue it.

9 and 10 are the prime offenders, though.


7029ba No.651115

>>651025

You have the right idea, anon.

Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.

For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no guile:

Let him eschew evil, and do good; let him seek peace, and ensue it.

For the eyes of the Lord are over the righteous, and his ears are open unto their prayers: but the face of the Lord is against them that do evil.

And who is he that will harm you, if ye be followers of that which is good?


a41c6a No.651284

>>651025

The acerbic nature of this board made me make a hard shift towards this kind of mindset, and even then I'm lukewarm at it at best. We all gotta follow our Bibbles more.


dfded9 No.651346

File: d837c976cc06e91⋯.jpg (42.31 KB, 250x467, 250:467, abandon.jpg)

This board is rife with fools. Who can I go for advice in this time.


dfded9 No.651347

File: ee1a9b337450d9c⋯.png (402.99 KB, 640x480, 4:3, 3 - sad askance.png)

>>651025

Not just /christian/, and it was not always this way.


61c6bd No.651481

File: 51a6792fb6b8737⋯.gif (440.28 KB, 400x278, 200:139, 787813785.gif)

>>624400

>"So, by my definition, this board - most specifically this thread - is the most fun I have all day."

Fug, I'm sorry m8, maybe try to join some sparring club or something, surely it's unhealthy to have so little and dull hobbies in the """current year"""


1c98e6 No.651544

>>651481

>replying to a 2 month old (1)

Seriously?


33dc4b No.651783

Just wanted to drop by and let you guys know that all the MSM slander threads and anti-Catholic shitposts made me examine their teachings in earnest and now I'm seriously considering joining.


f039c2 No.651873

File: f15d4921db485e2⋯.png (52.15 KB, 853x872, 853:872, a38cbce590cff0606883a0125b….png)

File: 81a843e679e6e04⋯.jpg (134.61 KB, 853x696, 853:696, begome aint free.jpg)

Can there be a Catholic vs. Orthodox General? There seems to be a new thread about this issue every day and sometimes the arguing spills over into other threads.


516255 No.651885

File: 56fb40f783dd932⋯.png (379.22 KB, 1380x511, 1380:511, Fight smartly not abandon ….png)

>>651025

Sadly that doesn't always work, and this board used to be very different.

>>651346

try /po/ or /christ/ but get read to filter through pagan, gnostic, new age doctrine, but by now you should be able to tell who is what.


b12826 No.652008

>>651873

This. Along with an Apostolic vs Protestant General as well.


f9cbdf No.652058

>>652008

>>651873

We've talked about making threads like these before, but in doing the usual routine of cyclical topics being restricted to that thread, it'd kill a good amount of discussion on the board, designating it to those threads. You can make them if you want, but they won' have any mod action put on them. It'll be similar to the relationship general we have now.


657080 No.652096

>>651885

>/christ/

I don't know why anybody would go there. As annoying as the "I'm a Baptist, debate me!" posters here are, replacing them with many more gnostic shitposters that aren't even looking for a discussion doesn't seem like a good idea.


516255 No.652154

>>652096

> "I'm a Baptist, debate me!"

Heh, before it was people complaining about prots. /christian/ is good for getting a very narrow catholic perspective, The problem is that it uproots part of the story (this is done with the intention of providing context, but it leaves the one trying to understand without the whole picture), just like how the Mormon board banned an anon for posting Mormon scripture that would go against the Mormon religion.

>I don't know why anybody would go there.

>with many more gnostic shitposters

It's actually only one gnostic shitposter, but the biggest problem is that the board is slow.


873730 No.652201

>>652154

> just like how the Mormon board banned an anon for posting Mormon scripture that would go against the Mormon religion.

Sorta like how the (((mods))) here have banned people for posting scripture


d07fa0 No.652277

There was a thread asking 'why do you pray to Jesus instead of God the father' that seems to have been deleted. Maybe a mod assumed the OP was non-trinitarian but if he was he never said so. This is the sort of thread that could be a springboard for interesting discussion and then it just gets shut down, kind of frustrating. I think this is overzealous moderation.


b16eeb No.652282

>>652277 (checked)

Hey there anon, im the guy that reported that thread. I reported it because:

1. It was a one line OP with anime take that garbage to halfchan

2. IMO, that question didn't deserve it's own thread as (majority of) Christians on here are trinitarian.

Had you put more effort into it or made the question better I think the mods would have allowed it. Other than that, utilize the 'QTDDTOT' thread for future one line questions you have.


ae3d75 No.652404

File: 08c14d930112109⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 11.97 KB, 1090x127, 1090:127, 56e035b28.png)

>>652201

I can verify this.


b12826 No.652435

>>652404

kek! (((mods))) don't even know their own scripture. Embarrassing.


f63546 No.652467

Why are threads about National-Socialism getting deleted?


1c98e6 No.652492

>>652467

Probably because National Socialism and the Christian Identity movement are antithetical to Christianity and Christ's message.


516255 No.652525

>>652492

That's not correct.

>Acts 17:26 From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.


1c98e6 No.652556

>>652525

That doesn't mean what you think it means unless you worship skin.


873730 No.652615

>>652556

>nothin to see here, goyim


a72a7c No.652725

File: 5ab13d5939415c5⋯.jpg (44.28 KB, 492x449, 492:449, 5ab13d5939415c5e12b0706de4….jpg)

>>652492

>>652556

>the crypto mod is still at it


a72a7c No.652726

File: 17b2bd8583369b9⋯.jpg (2.08 MB, 2580x3152, 645:788, 1525497356023.jpg)

Hey (((mods))), can i make a thread with pic related or are you going to delete that too, like you do 90% of all my threads?


a82349 No.652769

>>652726

Not even a mod, but i see why they might want to delete your cancerous, derailing ass posts


e5c797 No.652969

File: f2d73d422bfb4f9⋯.jpg (110.71 KB, 528x512, 33:32, a day in the life.jpg)

>post two nonsexual anime reaction images

>both deleted

>once was a kid in summer clothes with a confused and slight disappointed expression on her face

>the other was some cropped image of a smug woman at the beach

>(((coincidentally))) both were from posts disagreeing with Catholic doctrine as was the post with a dog raising his leg over a poster of Ted Cruz's face


4ee6fa No.652999

>>652969

It's more like anime pictures disqualify your post immediately, no matter the content.


b4e701 No.653001

>>652969

Bruh, you aren't supposed to question El Papa or his doctrines. The Pope is always right because Jesus said so. Now just accept the fact that God made the gays they way they are and buy an indulgence for you sin.


f63546 No.653008

>>653001

>memes


e5c797 No.653017

File: 1bbd3d9fc4b1214⋯.jpg (36.19 KB, 600x441, 200:147, cuck responds to anime.jpg)


a72a7c No.653189

File: 471810436a80c24⋯.jpg (92.16 KB, 537x591, 179:197, 1526367197469.jpg)

>>652769

kvetching at the truth again, Chaim?


516255 No.653440

>>650741

>We will always ban anything esoteric/"mystery religons" and nothing you can say will ever change that. (Not just troll posts, anything, it's in the rules)

Why doesn't this thread >>640944 get deleted for going into esoteric topics and violating rule 2? "Any esoteric topics will fall under this as well.". Is Freemasonry not part of the esoteric/mystery religions anymore?


8cc4e8 No.653459


de530a No.653543

Hey mods, why did you locked the christian/pol/ thread? Is it because of what's going on /pol/ as of late?


ec30a2 No.653562

File: 9e2005bdc886783⋯.png (284.58 KB, 606x580, 303:290, Capture.PNG)

>doesnt ban pagans

>bans the christian instead

This pretty much sums up /christian/ in 2018 tbh


300580 No.653571

IMKAMPFY IS GONE FROM /POL/

>>>/pol/11619182


1eeed6 No.653583

File: 45f6b825171c6b0⋯.png (54.08 KB, 507x464, 507:464, top ebin.png)


6b1bff No.653605

>>653543

I think it means political topics are allowed again




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha / animu / arepa / hisrol / leftpol / sw / vg / zenpol ]