>>38339
I'm getting real sick of these statements.
>the leadership is falling down around itself and nobody knows what's what anymore
Nope. Things are going pretty well, all things considered. The fact you said this implies you don't play in Nixonia.
It also doesn't help that I am literally the only older player to be on during the majority of the day. Even Qral, Hairyn, Muckknuckle, and others have dissappeared recently. But all things considered, we're moving forward very nicely.
>We need someone to head the cause, a rock to hold us up, but it's not going to be easy.
I can assure you that even God Emperor Immer couldn't have done too much better here. It's one thing when you are being overrun with newfriends, it's entirely another when you are basically trying to start from scratch. A singular leader wouldn't have accomplished anything more than I have.
I can assure you that Nano will come in in 3.0, or immer, and all the 12 or so actually powerful, dedicated players who opted out of Civtemp will return. And people will suck their dicks, 'Oh, look how much more effective this is', forgetting that the reason shit isn't going as well as it could on Civtemp is because those very same people didn't show up.
And, it's Civtemp. We're experimenting and trying things out for a reason. This isn't some sort of vast failure of leadership, it's just a trial run for the real deal in 3.0. And let me tell you what, I've learned a few things from Civtemp.
Stop hiding behind anonymous and say this shit to our faces in a Chan Meeting and see how right your ideas are.