Alright, good stuff here!
>>29464
>Resin was just about the only actual titan citizen caught in the crossfire of the war so it should be no surprise you don't see eye to eye. He's an oldfag (from before I joined) you two may not be personally acquainted but as a leader of the titan conflict you reputation precedes you
He wasn't playing at the time, at least not in Titan (there was a 3 week period where I was in Titan before anything happened, the only person who showed up at all was Jarl_Heisenberg). Anyway, it's of no matter now so w/e
> - Treason, fraud, espionage, snitching - the definition of treason needs to be spelled out more fully. Immelol attempting to make Viridian + versailles an electorate of the HKE could be considered treason especially considering his dubious dual citizenship. The other 3 are easy yes' - self explanatory
Sure, it wouldn't hurt to more clearly define some terms. In immelol's case though, nothing would happen (according to this document) because it only affects non-Chanadians. Obviously if it harmed us enough then we'd still deal with immelol ourselves, but internal strife is not what I'm trying to focus on with this.
> - Trespassing, violation of banishment or exile -Yes - We need a full list of exiled individuals.
Agreed.
> - Failure to identify, failure to comply with a lawful order - I feel like failure to Identify needs spelled out as well. I get what you mean but in order to cover our ass it needs to be rock solid
Yep yep.
> - Defamation, slander - It's defamation when 'reddit' claims we are poor, do nothing but meme, and walk around in gold armor. /pol/ynesia gets slandered constantly. This one will be a bit difficult to prove and prosecute, I'd say remove it
You're right, but I'm thinking in more of an altbot type situation where he keeps bringing lies/bullshit to the sub to cause problems. Is there something else we could call it or specific way we could word it?
> - Encouraging, goading, or supporting others to attack, defame, or slander us - agree with the first 3, defame and slander is again difficult
Same as above
> - Misleading us to attack, defame, or slander others, or support others in doing so - Needs flushed out with a clear definition. Something that gives us an advantage in providing concrete proof. Again I would remove the defamation, slander bit
Aye, any suggestions?
> - Mishandling a prison pearl or freeing a prisoner by any means - mishandling a pearl...what ever made you think of that?? :DDD -agreed
No idea!
>>29468
>These loopholes and exceptions could be used to allow infiltration and slow poisoning of Chanada from outside forces
If this is the case then we have a much larger internal problem. In this scenario the ideal situation is to convene and kick whatever nation is allowing such things out of Chanada and remove them.
Also the definition was there for more of a situation where a Chanadian decides to take up another residence outside of Chanada (there are a few who do this already, are we just going to tell them they can't now?) or for those who have joined Eden and the like. It wasn't intended to allow other political leaders inside Chanada, but that could be expanded out to make sure it doesn't happen.
>Us'. Who is this us? You and your pals? The Chanadian government? Vigilante Chanadian groups? Also, what is the point of making a law code if it only applies to foreigners? The MUCH bigger issue at hand is how we treat our internal issues. I smell a power play of you testing out a few ideas without offending parties within Chanada by making them feel threatened with internal rules.
>power play
Okay I'm done responding to bg for the rest of the day, I'm sorry that that means the rest of your posts will go unanswered...