/civ/ - CivCraft

>>31004

HanTzu does it again

>>31006

Dude, find a new image, you fucking faggot. Go back to Lynchwood before I lynch YOU. You're a fucking embarassment to Chanada and the poster boy of all the useless cucks that have thought themselves to be cool because, not inspite of, the fact that they contribute and propose NOTHING, but instead sit around and whine until the relevant authorities, which they profess to hate, stand up and do something. You're a hypocrite and a joke. Fuck off.

>>31011

>Anonymous

If you had a name I would respond to that steaming pile of shite that can only be considered bait.

Also your wish is granted

>>31014

>No because it's impossible to tell the difference between a random shitposter who's entire purpose on the board is to intentionally waste peoples time and rustle jimmies

Ah, but that's exactly what you are, you smug cuck. You are literally useless in Chanada. You talk a big game. But in reality, you are an underaged shitposter who hasn't contributed or done diddly squat for Chanada, ever. But instead of accepting that, you feel the obsessive need to post some smug, utterly useless reply to literally every thread, supporting whoever is shitting on the person bringing up an issue for discussion.

>inb4 you smugly reply to this trying to blow me out

Or will you just stop responding, like the last time you got blown out over this issue?

>>31011

>You're a fucking embarassment to Chanada and the poster boy of all the useless cucks that have thought themselves to be cool because, not inspite of, the fact that they contribute and propose NOTHING

This was either poorly worded, or you seem to imply that I am the poster boy of people who think they're cool because they contribute nothing. If that's your statement then it's complete and utter shite, I'm assuming that you're hinting towards HanTzu, despite the fact that he is one of, if not the, biggest contribute to all of Chanada.

>but instead sit around and whine until the relevant authorities, which they profess to hate, stand up and do something. You're a hypocrite and a joke. Fuck off.

Okay now you've completely lost me here, maybe you should spend more time actually formulating your argument rather than calling people cucks.

>>31016

>The only reason you care is that you want a name so as to judge the post by the poster rather than content

Incorrect presumption, I want a name so that I know this person is being serious, as you have said, this post is bollocks, I'd waste my time on it if I thought I might be getting through to someone worth talking to, I'm happy to spend hours debating someone if I see hope of something of value being gained, anonymous shitposts are less valuable to me than named shitposts.

>The fact that you're unable to refute your critics at the idea level (or at the very least ignore them) speaks not of your moral superiority over "bait," but of the weak mind you hide behind a mask of smug pseudo-intellectualism

Again incorrect, see earlier point and response to post.

>>31017

>You are literally useless in Chanad

Luckily I don't claim otherwise

> You talk a big game. But in reality, you are an underaged shitposter who hasn't contributed or done diddly squat for Chanada, ever.

Luckily I don't claim otherwise

>But instead of accepting that

Except that I am aware and have accepted this fact multiple times, I have even said to you personally multiple times that I contribute jack and don't act like I do, but this seems to crumble from your memory now that its relevant to your argument.

>inb4 you smugly reply to this trying to blow me out

You can't inb4 in the same post you reply with, that's just cheating.

>Or will you just stop responding, like the last time you got blown out over this issue?

Let's roll nigga

>>31019

>Let's roll nigga

Let's. It's been a while since I've not had anything to lose by getting into an autistic argument.

>Luckily I don't claim otherwise

Hurr, because I accept how shitty and gay my behavior is, it excuses it. No, fuck off. Acknowledging your failings is not a license to continue to expose the world to them unabated. You are like an AIDs-ridden fag who thinks that spreading his AIDs is okay because he admits that his behavior is at fault for his predicament. Is it better than denial? Yes. But it's still an immature psychological reaction to claims against oneself.

>Except that I am aware and have accepted this fact multiple times, I have even said to you personally multiple times that I contribute jack and don't act like I do, but this seems to crumble from your memory now that its relevant to your argument.

I love how you pick out tiny, individual gerunds and clauses, instead of debating the entire assertion. Poor form, friendo. My argument still stands: accepting your behavior as the wrong thing to do does not excuse your doing it, it's still the WRONG THING TO DO.

>You can't inb4 in the same post you reply with, that's just cheating.

I guess I was proven right though, wasn't I? My prediction was borne out: here's the smug reply I was expecting.

Also, based Tigen is 100% correct here bout what he says. And also, if you need the person's name to qualify whether something is a 'shitpost', then you clearly don't quite understand what a shitpost is. A shitpost is determined by quality of the post, not the quality surrounding and giving birth to it. Honestly, if you can't stand anonymous people calling you out (or will dismiss anybody doing so as just a baiting shitposter) then you are even more immature than I thought.

>>31017

>Bg is so much of a cuck he posts anonymously to insult people because he has no argument

Fucking lel

>>31024

>Hurr, because I accept how shitty and gay my behavior is, it excuses it. No, fuck off. Acknowledging your failings is not a license to continue to expose the world to them unabated. You are like an AIDs-ridden fag who thinks that spreading his AIDs is okay because he admits that his behavior is at fault for his predicament. Is it better than denial? Yes. But it's still an immature psychological reaction to claims against oneself.

My shitty and gay behaviour being doing fuck all, literally nothing, you're asserting that may behaviour is shitty, I say "okay" and you then use that as evidence for your first statement. my time on CivCraft has been spent memeing, shitposting and getting into arguments like this somehow this rustles your jimmies to the point of saying I'm like an AIDS riddled faggot and making Deviant-Art level posts of edginess anonymously.

>I love how you pick out tiny, individual gerunds and clauses, instead of debating the entire assertion. Poor form, friendo. My argument still stands: accepting your behavior as the wrong thing to do does not excuse your doing it, it's still the WRONG

Which is what you're doing right now and is that happens in literally any argument on Chan boards.

>here's the smug reply I was expecting.

>I said you would reply smugly and you did therefore nothing else matters and I am the victor

okay dude

>anonymous people calling you out

BG I think you might have some biased towards this post "calling me out" which contains nothing but insults and poorly worded points without any explanation, that bias being stemmed from the fact that you fucking wrote it.

>>31026

You're so much of an attention whore that you constantly shitpost, meme, and slap your name on every stupid statement that has ever come out of your mouth. You are like an exhibitionist; the type of person who would pull his pants down and take a shit in the middle of the street just for attention. Honestly, this is classic homosexual behavior: put yourself and all your freaky shit on display and then act shocked and offended that people want you to keep it private. And you point at them and say "HOW DARE YOU HAVE PRIVACY! YOU SHOULD BE AS MUCH OF A FLAMING FAGGOT AS ME!"

I post as anon occasionally because unlike you, if I raise hell or cause mischief, I don't want my name attached.

lol that image is true but its so salty omg lol........

did it take a bunch of brits to call you guys out

>>31031

>I'm just posting what I feel like posting, if you want to get edgy over it go ahead but it doesn't make me a faggot for it, if anyone is getting shocked and offended here it's you.

Funny, I feel like I could say the same.

>I didn't want to respond to an anonymous shitpost and I was completely correct.

But yet, here you are.

>It happens on Chan boards, if you don't like Chan boards go back to reddit or even Gaia, bye!

AHAHAHAHAHA, good try, but that's still not valid. Just because it happens on the Chans doesn't mean that it's what must always happen or what should. As you have already said, you treat everything here as an opportunity to shitpost, it doesn't surprise me that you've justified your doing so on the rest of the chans.

>also that statement in general makes you a coward and a faggot.

A coward? No, Beamish, the only coward here is the person who takes credit for a behavior in a vain attempt to appear mature. This is just a pseudo-intellectual way of getting out of actually confronting the reality of your own poor behaviors.

>For the sake of the Oldfriend Conspiracy's survival my sources must remain unknown, but you already Freudian slipped and admitted it here

Asking for proof is not the same as admitting to anything.

>I'm quite comfortable with who I am and what I do, I don't feel the need to shitpost anonymously or hide anything I say as it would just be lying, you call me a faggot and a cuck for doing similar shit to what you did in this thread, except not hiding anonymously.

Dude, if me calling you a faggot and a cuck is a point of contention, you're clearly pretty soft. Get over yourself and just stop doing what you're doing, as opposed to blasting paragraphs of hot air explaining that you're perfectly happy to accept what you do. It's still the wrong behavior.

>>31035

My steam is skoopdahoop pls add me bg

>>31031

Beamish tbimho you are losing here

you say "back to reddit you go" despite raging over someone posting anon.

In reality you're the one pulling a reddit by refusing to argue unless you know whos posting (so you can fling ad homs like you already have. This is p much exactly like going through someones reddit history so you have the higher ground)

now bg is my home boy pls refer to the last minion pic for my reaction (the one with the mario)

It's really nice having 8chan back

Beamish and and always will be a faggot. You know this yet you continue to give him attention, you're lowering yourself to his levels of faggotry, that makes you a fag as well.

Call him a cunt/troll/fag/shill/whatever and be done with it, don't argue with him.

>>31035

>AHAHAHAHAHA, good try, but that's still not valid. Just because it happens on the Chans doesn't mean that it's what must always happen or what should. As you have already said, you treat everything here as an opportunity to shitpost, it doesn't surprise me that you've justified your doing so on the rest of the chans.

Yes but it's the accepted format, to the point where you are doing it too.

>A coward? No, Beamish, the only coward here is the person who takes credit for a behavior in a vain attempt to appear mature. This is just a pseudo-intellectual way of getting out of actually confronting the reality of your own poor behaviors.

You're worse than NES, I am literally just posting whatever I find fun to post and not being an anon faggot

>Asking for proof is not the same as admitting to anything.

I didn't claim it was

>Dude, if me calling you a faggot and a cuck is a point of contention, you're clearly pretty soft.

It isn't, you are illiterate.

>Get over yourself and just stop doing what you're doing, as opposed to blasting paragraphs of hot air explaining that you're perfectly happy to accept what you do. It's still the wrong behavior.

You're the one who started this shitstorm by smugly posting trashmen when I called out an anon shitpost as being an anon shitpost.

>>31036

>you say "back to reddit you go" despite raging over someone posting anon.

Incorrect, as I've said many times I wasn't going to respond to some anon shitposter since there was nothing to be gained, and I was correct.

>so you can fling ad homs like you already have

I didn't start the ad homs nor have I said the most of them, that title goes to bg

>>31039

my skype is rabi greene w/ a cat in a cage as pic

>>31044

And so the argument finally comes to an end, with you being unable to refute my core points and instead calling me a retard. What a petty, schoolyard fight sort of way to get that one last zinger in.

The fact is, if you truly didn't respond to anonymous shitposting, we wouldn't have had this argument to begin with, because there would have been nothing for me to draw issue with. The fact is, anonymous shitposting forces you to respond because in order to feel relevant, you need to make yourself stand out. You are like every other tripfag, attention whore, e-celeb, or other filth on the chans and you know it.

Can't you guys just get along. ;_;

>>31045

ok

>>31046

He started it, I'm going to my room to play Tony Hawk

>another thread derailed by Beamish

>>31100

NOT AGAIN