>>35682
>A /pol/ based town and group of players.
This is pretty much a given, considering active chan players are 90% /pol/, and shilling anywhere besides /pol/ has proven to not yield much newfriends in the past (except maybe /v/).
>2. Strong Natl. Soc. Style of government.
Good point, I'm all for it. We did incredibly well under immer as our Führer in 2.0, and in the unlikely case our new one becomes inefficient, the whole nano incident has proven that if push comes to shove, a minecraft Führer can't really hold his position if the majority of the people don't want him anymore.
Camo and Out want this anyway, Bg Tigen Auf and co basically want to do the same, just with 5 Führers instead of 1. I'm sure we can somehow make a compromise here, since theres enough powerful positions even with a Führer anybody interested and efficient can fill.
>3. I want to be able to shitpost about Jews and niggers in chat.
This will be no problem, no true channer is triggered by this, and I never experienced /v/iridian, /v/ersailles, /int/is or aki having any problem with it.
>4. I want /pol/ to lead the chan domination of the map.
While I personally would not instantly object if, say a /v/irgin proved exceptional leader qualities, I think this is irrelevant since the two main parties involved in this conflict are both lead to 100% by /pol/ynesians (Camo&Out and Bg&Tigen respectively)
>>35703
>My own private land to collect my autism along with my future residents
Should be doable once we're set up, but pls no multiple nations at first, wait until we have enough infrastructure and wealth to pull it off.
>Neighboring shard/area to /pol/
Don't see a problem with that
>Have /pol/ as a federal authority, as it was in 2.0
This might be a problem, considering one party wants to be a union and the other more isolationalist. Also, /pol/ being a federal authority wasn't planned in 2.0, it just happened that all towns in chanada were inactive as fuck and only /pol/ was organized enough to handle international affairs.
>Coordinated PvP team, having two separate teams is just going to be a cluster fuck
This will hopefully be moot once a compromise is reached
>Vault that is NOT directly under the town, as to avoid lag and confusion when PvPing
Important, we don't want our town to be griefed to shit if a siege occurs too.
>Regular PvP practice
Although I hate mineman pvp, this is a good and important point.
>Some land that would yield us the most benefits in terms of realistic biomes, resources, etc. (Not necessarily for myself, though it would be preferred)
Future music, but going from the experience of 2.0, towns had pretty much free reign on where to settle outside of a reasonable buffer zone around the already established ones.
>No paper currencies, as everyone has seen they DO NOT WORK
I don't think anyone wants to try paper money again
>Regular shitposting
guaranteed
>High quality memes
unlikely
>Coordinated/encouraged material gathering for necessities such as armor, EXP, etc.
Camo and Out have had some good ideas about this too, people acting like branches of a corporation, each taking care of a ressource.
>Time zone diversity among players, currently its just myself and GB who play in GMT
We'd need to shill on britpol maybe, but that is not relevant to the discussion atm
>Self sustaining nation
Both parties want this
>Behind the scenes power playing to our benefit
depends if we got the right characters for this
>More caution should be heeded when:
>>Giving people bastion access
agreed
>>Giving people government access/trust
agreed
>>Allowing people to build without access to their reinforcements (NOTE: This should apply to building infrastructure only, not chests or otherwise)
IMPORTANT POINT! really, houses and such should be reinforced to a group owned by the player, but the current Führer needs to have admin on it. Scrapping newfriend builds is a chore, chests etc can still be private.
>>Giving people prot
Its expensive, maybe only longtime active residents who a) can fight and b) did enough work for the state that such an expensive investion would be justified.