YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
No.516282
I didnt see a thread for this so lets discuss it. will it be good or mediocre/overrated tripe?
No.516311
>>516304
>Frozen is damn good
>Same with Star Wars The Force Totally Awoke
>Awoke
I was agreeing with you up until then, you fucking plebian. Force Awakens was mediocre and forgettable crap on every scale with the only decent character being the nigger. Everyone else was dog shit. The storyline was uncreative and uninteresting as fuck, mainly relying on rehashing elements from the old film knowing that nostalgia fags would eat that shit up. I might've been able to meet you half way with Frozen and agreed with Fury Road, but SWVII confirms how fucking tasteless you are.
No.516341
Edit: I just realized I may not have predicted the future, so I took down my review of a film that hasn't come out yet because I don't wanna look foolish.
No.516434
>>516319
>The Force Awakens
>damn good
>good
No.516438
Star Wars was always mediocre shit. Everything in the franchise was shit
At least Zootopia will give of plenty of cute paws.
No.516552
>>516438
>At least Zootopia will give of plenty of cute paws
You furrs even need more surry shit?
No.516588
>>516438
Fuck paws. Give me some qt bunny tails.
No.517581
No.517582
>>517574
>becomes a full fledged cop
Thanks for the spoilers.
No.517598
>>517582
Didn't see that coming
No.517607
File: 1454702617070.jpg (371.59 KB, 900x1285, 180:257, bb2fbd75ff7f9430f01177e6cf….jpg)

>>517582
>>517598
Yeah, no no one saw that coming.
Spoilers: They solve the case.
Third act: they think they're close to solving the case, go to the place and perform last step of the plan, we all know it's gonna be exciting, and then disappoint. The last piece of evidence isn't there. "You're fired", blah blah.
>I guess I'm not a cop after all, it was just a silly dream. I'm the rabbit.
>Hey, don't say that. Remember when you told me [thing that was said in the second act]? I'm the fox.
>Wait a minute! That's it! The last piece of evidence wasn't there because [reason that closes already established plot point]!
>That means we have to find [character]! We only have twenty minutes left, I'm the fox! This is an emotional moment that brings us closer together as characters but in the context a very cool chase scene which means it'll be an emotional, fun and exciting and therefore memorable ending of the film!
>I'm the rabbit, we've grown as characters through the film and our relationship has gone from not liking each other to reluctantly working with each to trusting in one another because one of us saved the other's life (that's in the trailer) which made us friends and we became open and shared personal things we never told anyone before and now people are gonna ship us together so hard!
>What's "people"?
And then they arrest a character we never suspected could be the villain in act one and two, during the arrest the bunny says a line that has some significance because it was said before in another context and here at the end sounds like triumph, and she's honoured in a ceremony and the fox is there and we're clued in to the fact that something he wanted to accomplish has been accomplished (in a satisfying way which is different to what he envisioned but equivalent to that) but that part is given to us purely as visual information.
No.517613
>>517582
The mayor's assistant is the villain trying to start a race war between prey and predators.
No.517619
>>517613
And she would have gotten away with it, too.
No.517629
>>517607
Disney here, this anon just spoiled the whole movie
Mods please delete
No.517640
>>517613
>The sheep from the trailer where she was right behind Judy and was in the shadows and looked all innocent and only appeared in one second so that viewers trying to guess the villain wouldn't think twice about what looks like a background character.
I fucking called it.
No.517670
>>517640
>"smug_eggman.jpg"
>not smuggman.jpg
>>517613
>The mayor's assistant is the villain trying to start a race war between prey and predators.
Huh. So they have Jews in their world, too?
No.517744
>>517598
>>517607
I honestly hoped that by the end of the movie, she and the fox would become private eyes with a slight noir influence… I guess I should know better than to have high expectations for a movie.
No.517756
>>517629
Like they would care
No.517772
>>516282
The amount of hype that furries have put into it has already guaranteed it will be overrated.
I think it will be mediocre overall regardless.
No.517859
>>517772
It's a little too "funny animal" to be furry
No.517867
>>517859
Yeah, basically none of them except hoofed animals are humanoid. The rest are all funny animals, aka regular animals wearing clothes or standing on their hind legs so it hopefully won't cause a massive furry explosion as some hope. Although the Gazelle seems to be borderline furry to a degree.
No.518418
What do you think her paws smell like?
No.518430
No.518508
>>516438
>At least Zootopia will give of plenty of cute paws
Everyone is either some kind of fat or some kind of a pear.
No.519325
Well, it got promoted from regular showings to also getting a spot in IMAX 3D theaters. So that's one vote of confidence in it, at least.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/disneys-zootopia-released-imax-3d-193000772.html
No.519501
>>519436
>Judy wet and wearing a swimsuit
Oh my
No.519542
No.519849
Will rubbing Judy's feet give you luck?
Or would you already have to be lucky to rub them?
No.519863
No.520444
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
You probably didn't know, but a bunny can call another bunny "cute", but when other animals do it, it's a little…
No.520447
>>520444
He called her the C word?!
Oh my goodness!
I'm actually fine with this. Seriously, trivializing the word nigger by making a joke is great.
No.520467
>>520444
I hate this fat fuck. Hopefully he's correctly depicted as the disgusting worthless piece of shit all fatties really are.
No.520502
>>520444
By Anita! How bigoted!
No.520801
>>520798
Typical female driver.
No.520839
No.521054
>>520444
Yeah, I don't want to watch this movie any more.
No.521062
>>520444
going out of there way to promote victim culture. SU had a scene like this
No.521064
>>520444
Ohhh, I get it. "Cute" is the bunnies' equivalent of "Nigga." That took me too long to figure out.
Heh
No.521067
>>516311
>the only decent character being the nigger
You mean the guy who if you removed from the movie would hardly if even at all change any crucial part of it?
No.521087
>>521064
A Disney animated movie is overtly making fun of the DMV, the Mafia, nudists and sexualised pop stars. This is 2016, people.
No.521534
File: 1455212074224-0.gif (Spoiler Image, 902.43 KB, 458x450, 229:225, Something is afoot!.gif)

File: 1455212074225-1.png (Spoiler Image, 193.29 KB, 730x616, 365:308, Something is afoot!.png)

>>516588
I've only got cute bunny ears.
>>517607
Beautiful.
No.521540
>>521499
>that voice crack
No.521549
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
And I guess I might as well post this since it was pretty funny.
No.521555
>>517744
Actually I would watch a movie with a pi fox and his bunny assistant solving crimes, it would be fun.
No.521565
>>521499
>White lion Mayor is evil
>diversity bunny who has the world against her… when really she's just a white chick
>don't use the "c" word
at least the furries will be happy with the porn.
No.521568
>>521549
What's this? Some guys reacting to a thing and adding actual content and commentary?
And their production is an actual thing that exists and can be respected? Since when is this a thing?
Is this youtube? Can't be youtube.
No.521579
>>521568
>talking about police murdering da blacks
it's trash.
No.521581
>>521579
Police brutality against blacks is a real thing, and it's also funny. So the show is okay.
No.521602
>>521565
Man, are you going to be pleasantly suprised. The SJW triggering in this movie is going to be epic.
No.521604
No.521658
>>521499
I heard the sheep is the bag guy. I also heard there are clues, but I haven't seen them
No.521761
>>521658
Basically all secrets were fully revealed three weeks ago.
No.521769
>>521604
Yeah, if spoilers end up being true. The plot twist turns the race thing on its head.
No.521793
File: 1455234391505.png (389.22 KB, 292x622, 146:311, Somebody please tell me wh….png)

>>521568
They had a website called Spill.com a few years ago, before the wave of cancerous YouTubers and the like. They're also adults rather than teenagers, so they're probably just as sick of stupid react/prank videos as we are.
hotwheels stop double posting goddammit
No.521849
Disney is such a corrupt company
No.521869
>>521849
Oh my…
I'm not a furry.
I'm not a furry, I'm not a furry, I'm not a furry, I'm not a furry, I'M NOT A FURRY!
Not a god damn furry! WHY?
WHY IS THAT BUNNY SO DAMN SEXY?!
No.521872
File: 1455243663678.jpg (77.61 KB, 478x487, 478:487, Back to a place more suite….jpg)

>>521868
>>521869
ah bro i knoe rigt!!!!///????1/!?!?!?!?!/! ebic post, hab an upboat xDDDDD
No.521890
>>521793
I'll be needing that template for some serious memeing.
No.521902
>>518418
…probably like asphalt/dirt given that she's harefoot.
No.521910
Living in this world of animals must be a nightmare.
Business must be a niightmare. Imagine PC stores in Zootopia. You think an elephant can use the same keyboard a dog can use?
Not just different sizes, different positions of the fingers. If the elephant just wants a normal keyboard, fine. A huge keyboard with huge keys should do, but if the elephant is a gamer you're fucked. You need products that are too specialized.
No.521916
>>521890
I never saw the template, actually, just that image, so this 9000+ hour effort in Paint is the best I have right now.
No.521917
>>521910
Elephants are shit animals anyways.
Zootopia needs a race war to eliminate all the shitty worthless species. Especially those disgusting hoofers
Zootopia 2: Ethnic Cleansing Boogaloo
No.521931
>>517859
I never said the movie itself was furry.
Just that furries are already praising this as if it's their Holy Grail.
As in, once the movie comes out they'll be running about every site claiming that it's fucking awesome, though from the looks of the trailers it's probably going to be okay, maybe even good, but definitely nothing mind blowing.
No.521934
>>521917
They already had an ethnic cleansing.
What do you think happened to the reptiles?
No.521941
>>521934
>What do you think happened to the reptiles?
Living in the Herpegovina equivalent of the former Zoogoslavia?
No.521962
>>520444
This scene was okay.
Clawhauser a shit, though.
No.522017
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
sample of every songs from the soundtrack
No.522077
>>522017
I just noticed the racoon dog from the Japanese trailer and "Wreak-It Rhino"
No.522101
>>521499
>do you think when she goes to sleep she counts herself?
How would this concept even exist in anthro-world in the first place?
No.522134
>>522101
Same reason similar tropes exist there?
No.522202
>>522134
I'm guessing that anthros have gotta eat each other to some extent in this universe. The fox mentions that this is the first time a sheep has let him get this close- the implication being that foxes eat sheep normally, right?
No.522362
>>522202
>I'm guessing that anthros have gotta eat each other to some extent in this universe.
The animals were eating each other in the past. Predators eat bugs and shit now.
>The fox mentions that this is the first time a sheep has let him get this close- the implication being that foxes eat sheep normally, right?
Foxes take lambs and old, sick sheep. I think what the implication here is is that sheep are really skittish, especially around conmen like Nick.
No.522617
Cheech and Shlong are now both Disney, but not simultaneously (yet)
No.522739
Disney exec 1: "All of the furniggers we reared in the 70's and 80's are getting old or killing themselves off, and all these young twenty-somethings are throwing their money at those nips at hasbro for cartoon horses and the rest of those nip companies over the ocean, and the trash who translate their bullshit moonspeak into real words."
Disney exec #2: " yeah and if I hear "LET IT GO" one more time, I am going to kill myself, I can't believe people love that fucking stupid fucking song."
Disney exec #1: So what should we do?
Disney exec #2: How about we make some furry movie that will rope sexually confused teenagers in and make them buy tickets in droves and buy tons of furry bullshit?
Disney exec #1: BRILLIANT! Unzip! We have work to do!
No.522744
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>521499
> JK Simmons is the mayor.
No.522753
>>517607
omg you should be a writer for hollywood.
I liked when Chris Nolan would pull a "fuck you" in his movies where you think the bad guy is going to get away with it or monologue, or the persona about to die gets to finish their thoughts, or even gets swooped away last minute and BAM dead.
Though it became formulaic after a while.
No.523282
This is already out in Europe and apparently it's good
No.524057
>>523282
Europe is apparently good?
No.525799
I'm betting it'll be a mediocre yet fun film but it won't be worth all the furry porn threads that will spawn from it.
No.525864
>>525780
>pic 3
Crossover fanart of the video in >>522611. That's amazing.
No.525960
>>522739
>people still believe they made this movie for furries
No.525974
No.527602
Just saw it.
I liked it, but the sequel is gonna be better. Judy & Nick buddy cop movie.
No.527766
They released and spoiled way, way too much in advance of this movie. All the trailers and preview scenes aside, they published book of the entire movie's story a full month ago. Scenes which should have had more impact had much less knowing basically every line they're going to say in advance. And a few scenes I'd pictured from the book ended up not being as impressive on-screen.
Sure, it's still good overall, but their launch strategy was highly questionable.
No.527769
How long does it usually take before new movies are torrentable in decent quality?
No.527771
>>527769
When it releases on bluray/dvd and you don't have to watch camrips.
No.527786
>>521910
>Business must be a niightmare. Imagine PC stores in Zootopia. You think an elephant can use the same keyboard a dog can use?
It is been a while since I remember this comic.
No.527827
>>527771
So how long does it usually take for new movies to get a blueray/dvd release?
No.527849
No.527957
>>525780
That third pic.
Well hotdamn thats nice
No.528480
>>527827
It varies. Out of movies released last November-December that have DVD release dates, the time in between theatrical release and home release ranges from 88 days (Alvin and the Road Chip) up to 123 days (Mockingjay Part 2), or possibly even beyond (Star Wars is still playing in theaters and has no DVD date yet).
No.528518
>>527786
>forcing the joey into child labor
No.528523
>>527602
So did she and the fox fuck?
No.528876
>>528523
No, but they become BFF.
I don't think rodents and canines can fuck.
No.528881
>>525780
>pic 2
She lives with two faggots?
No.528888
No.528891
>>528876
Lagomorphs and canids
No.528894
>>528891
Actually foxes are vulpisomething. Related to dogs but not dogs.
No.528913
>>528894
They're genus Vulpis while dogs/wolves are genus Canus, but both of them are classified under family Canidae.
No.528917
File: 1456018815647.png (426.63 KB, 992x828, 248:207, untitled_by_ganym0-d9nsbr5.png)

>>528913
That's very interesting, nerd. But that's not the point.
The point is, can bunnies and foxes even fuck?
If they can't, Judy will never orgasm.
No.528939
>>528917
>can bunnies and foxes even fuck?
They seem compatible in regards to size for penis in vagina sex. Judy could take the knot.
>If they can't, Judy will never orgasm.
Foxes have long, agile tongues. I'm sure Nick would be down for some bunnylingus. After all, foxes do eat rabbits.
No.528969
>>528939
>down for some bunnylingus
You do realize you just created something beautiful, right?
No.529005
>>528876
>No, but they become BFF
I was actually hoping they we're gonna do some inter-species type shit. Not even a cliché/awkward kiss moment?
Fucking dropped.
No.529044
>>528876
So wait all that build up and forced moral bs about differences and we don't even get some implied interspecies lewds? That was the only reason I was willing to watch this pile of garbage. Dropped.
>>528939
This. They shouldn't be able to reproduce but that's never stopped other horny animals from fucking the wrong species. My dog is always trying to rape the cat.
No.529112
>>528917
He can still fist her tiny cunt.
No.529346
>>521017
Take a look at that snout!
No.529350
>>521499
I want to smell her!
No.529351
>>522202
Have you ever touched an afro before?
No.529354
>>524077
Man I love her shirt and undershirt combo, so normiesexy
No.529403
>>525780
That crosses into the uncanny valley for me
No.529553
This movie has the SJW meter cranked up to the max, it's almost disgusting to see. And this is coming from a gay furry so take your chances
No.529554
>>529553
By that do you mean stuff like the nudist jokes are trigger bait?
No.529557
>>529554
I mean that it's all so overwhelmingly politically correct and shoved diversity it makes me puke. Also here they hired youtubers to dub it so all the good that was left was animation.
No.529558
>>529557
So it gives you a feeling
No.529559
>>529558
while coming out of the cinema me and a friend found the perfect synopsis: cute bunny and smug fox find a trail of metaphors which lead to the conclusion that black people are aggressive because of flowers
No.529574
>>529563
>the movie turns 100% grimdark at the end
>all the guro
No.529597
>>529563
Movie should have cut to black and started rolling credits right there for five seconds before revealing what they were actually doing.
No.529603
>>529563
Well this movie got interesting.
No.529741
>>528939
>After all, foxes do eat rabbits.
>>529563
>smugfox gets a dose of the flowers and goes rabid
I can't believe nobody predicted this until now. Maybe we all just thought it would go without saying? But that looks very grimdark, so maybe it'll be a good heart-wrenching moment even knowing it's coming.
No.529746
>>529563
>>529741 me again.
Something just occurred to me: what if Mr. Big is in on the whole thing and he gives smugfox a dose of the flowers/drug/whatever instead of icing them to get around the promise he made to his daughter? Then smugfox, through the power of friendship, acts like he's trying to kill Judy but manages to restrain himself enough to avoid actually harming her and they have a tender emotional scene afterwards.
I really shouldn't care this much about a two second webm from a children's movie. God dammit /co/.
No.529748
>>529741
>>529746
But we already had spoilers from the novelization a month ago. What actually happens isn't quite that interesting.
No.529751
>>529748
That's just what they WANT you to think! Don't you see? It was all an elaborate ruse! Disney knew we'd examine every single scrap of spoiler material, so they led us on a wild goose chase to ensure we went into the movie blind! Now we've discovered their true intentions: coerce the furry fandom into violence and incite nationwide riots! We've been played like cheap mandolins and there isn't anything we can do about it!
I know the spoilers and I know that Mr. Big isn't the overarching antagonist of the whole thing, but I think there could be room for what I described in between the plot points we know about. Even if Mr. Big isn't in on the flowers/drug/whatever, he could still have access to it since his goons all seem to be polar bears and he could use the fear/respect of the drug to his advantage.
No.529754
>>520444
This shit is not ok.
No.529824
>>529746
>…a children's movie.
No, it's a fucking family movie. There are a lot of scenes in the movie which only adults would understand.
No.529836
>>529563
And yet they still didn't fuck despite that massive hicky. Fucking bullshit.
>>520444
What a shitlord.
No.529888
So Gideon Grey is gay, right?
>"i had a lot of self doubt as a child"
>becomes a pastry chef
He was just acting out because he didn't understand his feelings for his qt ferret friend Travis.
No.529894
>>520444
that was hilarious. that fucking fat piece of shit though, what a waste of screentime.
No.529935
No.530090
>>529836
>And yet they still didn't fuck
How do you know they didn't?
No.530095
>>529746
wait… Disney actually went through with shipping a fox and rabbit…
No.530103
>>530090
I don't which is why I need to see him lick her fucking face and just give somebody fuel to draw more creepy ass porn.
No.533591
So is everyone here just waiting for something better than a camrip?
No.533592
>>524077
the smug on this fox..
No.533610
>>533602
It would have been cool if WDAS was the only Disney studio that didn't do sequels, mostly because of "muh legacy"
No.533619
>>516282
>will it be good or mediocre/overrated tripe?
It will be a movie people enjoy
Some may even overhype it like Inside Out and claim it's brilliant
But all people want is an enjoyable movie
And some bunny ass. Space Jam thirst is in us all
No.533677
I saw it. It was fun and funny. I gritted my teeth during the whole "It's okay for rabbits to call each other 'cute,' but you CAN'T" bit, and I sat there waiting for the inevitable denouncement of white men later in the film. Enter the fox. "Now it begins," I thought.
Then something magical happened.
In a surprising twist, the "white male" turned around and BTFO the rabbit by telling her about the time he was gang-raped by negroes/gays/women/etc. and that maybe she had a little of her own fucking privilege to check.
Glorious.
No.533679
>>533677
You are too obsessed with this shit
No.533683
No.533810
>>533683
>current year
>encouraging species-mixing with a shit-tier rodent
Get the fug outta here.
No.533818
File: 1456702580385-0.png (Spoiler Image, 393.55 KB, 1253x954, 1253:954, 00d85066fedd727698005cccdc….png)

File: 1456702580388-1.jpg (Spoiler Image, 200.72 KB, 1280x989, 1280:989, 0999efada1aa3e45aed006084a….jpg)

How far would you go for her?
No.533876
File: 1456708541183.jpg (114.1 KB, 459x444, 153:148, Jughead gives his thoughts….jpg)

So are there any good torrents that aren't taken by some guy's iphone or did everybody who's seen it just see it in theatres/previews?
No.534304
>>521017
This movie will be breeding grounds for a new generation of macrophiles, lovely.
No.534312
>>521017
This movie will be breeding grounds for a new generation of macrophiles, lovely.
No.534321
>>533810
Rabbits are lagomorphs, not rodents.
No.534332
>>534312
>>534304
I will shove your chair up your ass hotwheels.
No.534461
>>533810
… so do they?
Why don't you like love anon?
No.534562
No.534594
>>521549
I didn't know Al Sharpton's fedora wearing neckbeard brother reviewed movies.
No.534611
>it's a furry-baiting race commentary movie
No.534613
I liked the part where they battled hitmen on the train with all the super meth.
No.534666
File: 1456784334324.png (607.19 KB, 654x497, 654:497, What the thousand year fuc….png)

No.535819
>>533679
Feminism has cucked Disney enough. This is a rare anomaly for them.
No.535836
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>IGN: how Zootopia reflects real world gender roles and racial issues
No.535918
>>529563
From a different view.
No.536124
I think the best part of this shitshow is how hard it falls on its own face.
The entire point of this Aesopian Fable is to beat you over the head with one simple ethical moral: that you cannot judge other people on the basis of race. That's really the gist of the entire movie; we are all different on the outside, but we are all pink on the inside and you can be anything you want in this crazy wacky world.
Only one problem; every single Fox we see is a social misfit or criminal (hurr cause discrimination; it's not their nature.) Why is the construction scene a bunch of beavers? Is it because beavers build things? Why is the mob boss and obvious yid? Oh I know they try to hide it behind the old Italian mob boss cliche, but take a look at that nose. Also his daughter was clearly a jewish princess. Every single character in this movie only serves to reaffirm the fact that huge differences between races are indisputable facts of nature.
No.536137
>>536124
How do you get this close and not understand that's the point?
Hete, this should make it easier. Take the Gustave line Ego talks about at the end of ratatouille and apply it here.
No.536138
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>536124
>this whole post completely missing the point of all the trailers and promotional material
>take a look at that nose
Nice try, /sp/.
No.536164
>>536137
>>536138
No, YOU missed the point. The entire movie is intended to be liberal indoctrination for kids. She's first rabbit police officer, you can be anything you want, her realizing that she had internalized bigotry towards predators, all predators are just like herbivores and are no more likely to "chimp-out". It was a plot by da ebil govment dey din do nuffin. There was no secret redpill intended in this movie. It was entirely mainstream narrative but it was so badly done that they used animal stereotypes without even realizing it, hence the construction beavers, trickster foxes, etc.
No.536168
>>517607
>Spoilers: They solve the case.
But do they solve the mystery of the dick?
No.536170
>>536164
That's literally the point of the movie. Did you miss the part in the trailer where Mr. Big said "We may be evolved, but we're still animals?" It's a movie about recognizing your own stereotypes and living with them.
>hence the construction beavers, trickster foxes, etc.
Those are what we call "visual gags," a subset of "jokes" which are a form of "humour" for people who enjoy "fun." You should try it some time.
No.536178
>>536170
Naw, I'm pretty sure that for example the Mr. Big line, the Fox telling the Bunny how the world works, etc, were all intended to be strawmen and not actually internalized by the viewers. In the end the predators were chimping out because of a drug they were given, not because of their nature. This movie was liberal bias pretending to present a well-rounded world view. Sorry you can't deal with that, but that is the reality of the situation.
No.536874
No.536895
>>520444
All of this scene is to camouflage that the cheetah's a faggot.
No.537346
The winning streak ends at 97-1.
No.537352
>>537342
Can we please have one Disney movie that doesn't have a shitty pop song as it's main theme?
No.537357
>>537346
My god, it reads like a review from one million moms.
>From Aesop’s Fables to Franklin the Turtle, animals have always been used to coach young people on how they should behave. But as Zootopia busily tells the kids not to stereotype different groups and to love everybody, it creates a city in which some creatures fear that others are inherently savage.
>That’s a pretty close match for both America’s historic racism and its new Islamophobia.
I mean, what the fuck. How is this person a movie reviewer? She also seems have some fixation of the "sexulization of the elegant gazelle."
https://web.archive.org/web/20160304153441/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/film/film-reviews/zootopia-fun-for-kids-but-adults-may-think-twice-about-movies-message/article29015450/
By the way her twitter name is thatkatetaylor if anybody wants to spam her with furry porn
No.537380
>>518418
carrots and semen
No.537416
Loli Judy was to adorable.
No.537493
>>537352
I'll reserve judgement until we figure out what the character is for the gazelle, beyond having legs, neck and hips for days.
It's not inherently shit until it's something the character should be singing(even though I do not quite appreciate it as 'music').
No.537497
>>537342
This gave me cancer
No.537510
>>520444
>A fag calls the bunny the bunny-equivalent of nigger
What is up my cuties?
No.537586
File: 1457130917919.png (Spoiler Image, 107.53 KB, 957x592, 957:592, You merely adopted the dar….PNG)

So I broke down and watched a cam rip, and it's pretty good.
A shame this big emotional moment was co-opted by memes, though.
No.537728
I just got back. It's a fun movie. They didn't pebble the noses correctly. If you thought the sloth scene was funny it's pretty much that sort of thing for two hours. I anticipate a barrage of smugfox.jpg once a good rip is available
sheep villain has mastermind plan based around fear, just like a sheep, bravo
No.537774
>>537493
actually, I saw it with my niece today there were 0 songs by the actual characters. no musicals felt oddly out of place in a Disney movie.
No.537777
>>537342
>shakira
huh. I thought it was sparkletits, the chick who did that half time show with the hilarious dancing sharks or one of the other plethora of shitty pop singers
No.537788
>>537586
>meme
Nigger that scene had nothing to do with bane. It's a coincidence you're mistaking for being thematic.
No.537792
File: 1457155300720.png (462.01 KB, 875x1025, 35:41, Judy Hopps and Nick Wilde ….png)

>>537788
As soon as I saw him wearing the mask, that was all I could think of. That's what I meant; obviously they didn't put baneposting in the movie.
Probably. They did, after all, confirm they marketed it towards furries, at least partially: https://archive.is/yHENL
No.538054
File: 1457192262855-0.jpg (Spoiler Image, 189.04 KB, 1024x1365, 1024:1365, escena_uno_spoiler_by_napo….jpg)

File: 1457192262855-1.jpg (Spoiler Image, 204.03 KB, 1024x1365, 1024:1365, escena_dos_judy_se_disculp….jpg)

File: 1457192262901-2.jpg (Spoiler Image, 208.27 KB, 1024x1365, 1024:1365, zootopia_el_comic_by_napo1….jpg)

No.538066
No.538150
Judy was an example of how to actually write a strong female character but it's funny how you never seem to hear anyone mentioning that because she still fucks up a lot.
No.538175
>>538150
a strong female character for tumblr would be a transgender rhino with down syndrome or something like that
No.538177
>>538066
>implying looking up images and finding them on tumblr means you're a hardcore ball-busting SJW
Your dumbass is showing, mister illiterate.
No.538181
>>538175
nah, it would generally just be a lesbian mary sue who didn't "conform to beauty standards".
It's pretty easy to make a character the media and feminists eat up because you just make a dude that has tits, give her no faults besides maybe being quick to anger, then make her always on top of every situation.
The funny thing about this movie is that all the progressive sites were claiming it would be a feminist love letter when ironically it seems to be everything they hate and we are seeing the result of that through their bitching.
No.538196
File: 1457207964544.png (876.38 KB, 1000x793, 1000:793, c0861b1a4e1bd354b8e31db914….png)

>>533810
Actually, doing a bit of thought: the city would be at the very least several decades old. Their civilization would way older than that. At least someone, at some point, would try to do the nasty with someone of a different species. But there isn't anything even close to an hybrid. So an either/or conclusion: two different species can't breed or two species can breed but the offspring will be of either species, not a mix or a third unrelated one.
(pic unrelated)
No.538225
>>538181
I get the feeling at least one crazy sjw type saw this movie, got to the bottem where Judy was apologizing and just couldn't accept what was going on.
"W… women can't…. be wrong… she's only apologizing because she internalized the misogyny!"
In that vain, was it refreshing to anyone else to see a male/female dynamic that involves BOTH sides getting the better of the other throughout the story rather than just the woman destroying/proving herself to the man.
Also, I absolutely love that Nick was just calling her racial slurs throughout the whole movie and nobody really seemed to notice.
No.538254
>mfw i find out that there's a scene where the rabbit bitch is in a mouse city knocking over buildings and almost stepping on people
Is the rest of the movie worth watching to see this?
No.538257
No.538493
>>538257
so far all of them get blurry as fuck near the end and the dark scenes are unwatchable. idk where this one came from >>535918
No.538681
>>538150
Well that's because it's not about making females strong it's about making characters good.
I imagine if Judy was the 'strong female character' every socially inept tween girl dreams about, this movie would be a load of tripe. That scene in the beginning with the fox bully would have ended with him getting his ass kicked with Judy's off-screen kung-fu training and her sauntering away saying something along the lines of 'silly boys', coming off to anyone with all their chromosomes in order as a massive cunt.
She's confident in who she is, but still has flaws to overcome along her journey, flaws that aren't based around her sex.
pic not related
No.538698
>>538150
Probably because there's no such thing as a strong female character. Just characters that are female. This concept of a "strong female character" is just pure propaganda.
No.538873
File: 1457277224258.png (Spoiler Image, 405.61 KB, 889x648, 889:648, 1457244371.caroo_judy_and_….png)

No.538875
Who was the worst character and why is it Clawhauser?
No.538883
>>538875
>Who was the worst character and why is it Clawhauser?
Because he's a fairy and a fatty and a retard and he probably plays the Kim Kardashian-parallel's phone game and considers himself a "gamer."
No.538904
>>538883
It's not that he's gay, it's that he's the worst kind of gay, the sort of womanly faggot that listens to lady gaga and watches Bravo reality TV shows.
Gideon's gay but hes the good kind of gay.
No.538967
Why is it such a conflict for Judy to be taken seriously as a cop? Wouldn't different-sized districts need their own police forces to fit inside buildings? Do rabbits never commit crimes?
Of course a much larger person could beat the shit out of Judy if she was unarmed and cornered, but that's just F=MA, not prejudice.
No.538969
>>537342
I would a Shakira gazelle.
But I'd much rather a Shakira
>those faggot tigers, tho. For a minute I thought I was watching Madagascar 3.
No.538970
>>538904
> Gideon's gay but hes the good kind of gay.
Gideon's a redeemed villain. I love me the shit out of redeemed villains.
No.538978
>>537586
>A shame this big emotional moment was co-opted by memes, though.
You cheeky cunt.
No.538984
Saw it last night.
This movie was pretty smart. Not only were the characters pretty clever, but the way the law, politics, and certain items were treated made sense.
>Judy catching the elephant and Nick violating certain business codes, and using this information to blackmail them
>The red herring shit with the term "Night Howlers"
>Bellwether using a potent form of a common chemical to frame predators and stir up racial tensions, thereby taking over Lionheart's role as mayor.
>Nick and Judy pretending in order to keep Bellwether there until the ZPD arrived.
>All those times the carrot phone was used.
But, there's just one problem…
>Judy not disabling calls or Wifi on her cell phone before investigating the asylum.
No.539065
>>538984
She probably never had reason to turn it off before while living at home and she completely forgot she was carrying it.
No.539070
>>539065
I'm kind of surpised she even had reception in there, she's like in the middle of a decades old building in a special containment room.
She has a damn good service provider
No.539119
>>521062
Well, it's Disney, what did you expect?
I really hope some day all of disney's employees die of colon cancer.
>>521910
The same in monsters inc and all those.
It makes me wonder how they got to the industrial revolution, since you can't have one with mass producing if you can't actually mass produce shit.
Or are we talking of a population of trillons?
>>521917
Knowing disney, kosher animals will clean the earth
No.539268
What is the in-universe reason for nearly every movie title in Zootopia referencing a main character's species?
For example, Cinderella isn't at all about race, the main character is different from others only in that she's an orphan. Presumably there was never a fairy tale titled Cinderella in the Zootopia universe, so the pun title isn't referencing anything but the fact that it stars an elephant. From an in-universe perspective, it's not a spin on a known title. Why do they draw attention to species when it's the least interesting thing about the story they're implying?
>durr it's a cartoon just turn off your brain
So you like cartoons, but admit they are a garbage medium that should be held to lower standards. Got it.
No.539348
>>539339
I do not speak reaction image. Please answer my question in English.
No.539360
>>539348
There is no proper way to describe how stupid >>539268 is. Most of the time when people use strawmen, they're at least, you know, responding to something. But your post is just something else. Up until the greentext and the following line, you pose a reasonable enough question, but you completely throw away your point to say WOW I CAN'T BLIEVE YOU'D NOT TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY GUYS WOW JUST WOW.
Nobody even responded to you and you're already trying to win arguments against yourself. I can't help but laugh.
Honest question: did you come here from the /pol/ thread? The way you typed that out reminds me of a lot of the posts in that thread.
No.539362
>>539360
I was going to give >>539268 a serious reply until that limp-wristed attempt at a preemptive rebuttal.
No.539399
>>538904
>>538883
…I didn't really get a "gay" vibe from either of them though
No.539486
>>538967
They even mention they have tiny cops for the mouse and lemming areas.
No.539564
>>539268
Okay, this is pretty tinfoily, but hear me out, what if this is because the whole movie is very heavy on animal stereotypes, and this allows to create parodies of known brands and franchises while sticking to a consistent, and full of potential jokes, theme? Also go see a doctor you paranoid shizo fuck.
No.539613
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>538177
>>537849
Tai Lung?
>>538177
There's still the problem of not getting the full resolutions, unless they were specifically made for that colossal shitshow. Similar reason why you try to avoid faecesbook, twatter, and imgur.
(and also avoid imageshack and photobucket because they're 100% AiDS-filled now)
>>521869
>>521872
ah gots bad news fer yu ayyy-non
No.539835
>>516282
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=disney2016.htm
>opening weekend
>$75,063,401
I joked about it making $34 million, but I didn't think it would make more than double that.
No.539914
>>525780
That last one is some gud shet. I'm just not clear as to why the rhino is crying. Is it specifically one of the victims or is it the situation as a whole?
No.539919
>>539914
The situation as a whole. See >>525864
No.539967
>>539835
People aren't kidding when they say furries are profitable. Damn.
No.540007
>>539967
The fact that it's the only animated family film in between Kung Fu Panda 3 (late January) and Ratchet and Clank (late April) also helps. It's got the demographic effectively to itself for a while.
>Zootopia had clear four-quadrant appeal this weekend, as the film's audience skewed towards female moviegoers (53 percent) and towards moviegoers 25 years and younger (54 percent). Family audiences represented 73 percent of the film's overall audience. Early word of mouth looks to be especially strong for Zootopia, as the film received an A rating on CinemaScore and currently boasts a 96 percent Flixster audience score. Given its strong word of mouth and the relative lack of competition for family audiences it will continue to face throughout March, Zootopia is very likely to hold up well going forward.
No.540366
Movie: "Jewtopia"
Intro: "Disclaimer: We are not associated with the ones with the big-eared mouse. Making puns on 'Utopia' is not reserved to them!"
About: "Shlomo wants to become an ice cream man, but he needs 1000000 shekels to do it! In Jewtopia, the rich can be anything!"
No.540435
>>533727
Stupid sexy feels…
No.540436
>>539835
OH SHIT! FURRY ILLUMINATI CONFIRMED!
No.540440
>>540436
Yes sheepim. Soon a new age of expensive fursuits worth plenty of sheekels will be sold while our kind profit.
No.540470
>>540366
>Movie: Jewtopia
>Two childhood friends reunite as adults to help each other land the women of their dreams. Chris wants to marry Allison, a Jewish girl, so that he'll never have to make another decision for as long as he lives. Adam is on the verge of getting married to Hannah, a woman he is not content with. When Chris enlists Adam's help in pretending to be Jewish so that Allison will date him, cultures collide and chaos ensues!
No.540476
>>540440
I shouldn't be surprised by this.
No.540481
>>540470
>Ivan Sergei
Every time
No.540763
(SPOILERS)
Got to see this at a 10pm showing yesterday. First welfare night after the premier last week, the theatre was pretty empty. 12 people including us and we might have been the oldest there (30) with everyone else being at least 24 or younger looking. Only ten minutes of trailers, and good god almighty I groaned my way through each one. Same formula, music stop, joke, repeat. Vocal overdubs to squeeze in oddball jokes. Everyone just plucks licensed music from the 70s and 80s for trailers even if the song has little to do with anything else in the movie. Middle School: The Worst Years of My Life (We're Not Gonna Take It), Angry Birds (Hot Blooded), Finding Dory (Solsbury Hill). New Ice Age movie had none, but all four movies looked hokey as hell. The Jungle Book looked okay, standard trailer formula again but done differently for a more serious film (heavy drum dramatics with lots of visual shots of Mowgli jumping out of high places).
Zootopia starts and the movie wastes no time in blanketing that title on the screen, on a flat black background of course so the name can be easily changed for other regions. Lets get what I liked about the movie out of the way first. Good voice acting, extremely detailed designs, colorful and fun to look at visuals, nice flowing animation and expressions, and good music scores. Now, if only the story could match everything else in terms of greatness.
Judy from the get go is an obnoxious character. Always preaching to do 'right' but on the second day on the job, she causes havoc by disobeying her superiors (and would have gotten fired on the spot had it not been for the timing of Bellwether and social media) and she basically uses extortion tactics to get Nick to do whatever she wants. And for what? For her own gain and prosperity so she can become a cop. Her motives were completely selfish from the get go in the beginning, Nick was just a pawn in her strategy.
My wife was quick to point out within the first five minutes of the movie, that even though they preach to you verbally that you should not support stereotypes, there were already two jokes about bunnies multiplying like bunnies. And then later on even Judy makes a crack at her own species about being good at multiplying because, surprise, she is a bunny! It seemed so misplaced, given that this character from an early age showcased the viewpoint that all animal people are equal. The entire film has animal stereotypes peppered throughout it right until the very last joke, the problem is that the underlying moral that runs alongside next to all of these jokes gets undercut. It contradicts what the movie is trying to say. It wants me to be accepting and not judge others (based on their species), yet it turns around in the same breath and reinforces a stereotype that foxes are sly creatures. Or that sloths are slow. Or that all wolves howl together.
I lightly brushed over some of the comments people were making about this movie in regards to race and privilege. I tried not to get too muddled down in the politics of it all, because at face value it is just an animated kids movie. However, after watching it I do 'get it' in regards to the comparisons some other people have made. That you could argue the parallel between species differences and race differences. But the problem here is that it doesn't work. The movie actually reinforces that stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason. It is a bit foolish to try and conceive a message of everyone getting together on the same moral plateau when animals of different species are used as an example. We are all human, we all have that trait in common. The idea is that we are all equal, we are all the same species. But if you use different animals from different species, no matter how hard you try and preach that they are all equal, they simply are not. Foxes will always be sly, sloths will always be slow, and wolves will always howl together. Judy says you can be anything you want, but the stereotypes confirm that your skills are limited by your biology. It is as if the entire premise for Zootopia is fundamentally flawed right from the start.
No.540765
And that is a shame, because I really wanted to like the movie a whole lot more. The movie is not terrible, but if you really start picking it apart, being older and bitter as my wife and I tend to be, you can easily see the cracks that start to form on the surface of the storyline. The overall story is incredibly predictable. I feel like I have seen the same plot four times already in other films. A cop story that involves a bigger conspiracy. Oh, and a small mafia leader named Mr. Big! How original, complete with Italian stereotypes all around. Yes, the movie was partially spoiled for me online, but that doesn't matter. At times I caught myself rolling my eyes. Many times I thought character emotions weren't strong enough. Judy and Nick get almost get killed several times, but the reaction seems minimal. Like at the end of the subway scene where the car explodes and a propane tank flew right between the two of them and then explodes behind them. The reactions felt underwhelming, as if Nick and Judy did this type of thing for five years prior. Judy is just a small town girl thrusted into all this chaos, yet sometimes she seems almost too fine with some of the crazy, dangerous situations. It makes the character somewhat unrelatable. In fact, I would say that the audience could relate more to Nick in how he acts and speaks early on in the film, being brutally honest about Judy's situation with her being a wannabe cop. But then again, you could just think of Nick as a know-it-all asshole and leave it at that.
What I did like was the crying scene with Judy, because for the first time I actually felt some emotion within this film. However, I personally felt that Judy was laying the tears on a bit too thick. I know she fucked up, but she really imposed a lot of guilt onto herself in that scene. I am not sure if that was fully justified, I'd have to watch it again. My wife disagrees, she says Judy destroyed an awful lot of livelihoods so of course she's very upset, because a lot of what happened was her fault.
Perhaps the biggest turnoff of this movie, at least for us, is how preachy it turned out to be. I have never liked children's entertainment that outright shoves morals down your throats. I can appreciate it when it is done in a clever fashion, but in Zootopia the preachy morals are caked on pretty thick, especially at the end with a groan inducing speech from Judy that everyone can be everything, just keep at it. Sure, unless there is heavy nepotism in the workplace! Judy slaves away for how many years to become a cop? Only for Nick, with a criminal history no less, to be handed the job of a cop within a few days, maybe weeks. And as a small aside, the time lapse in the movie is a bit flakey. They have 48 hours to find the missing otter, but everything felt rushed like it took place within 15 hours. No one ever slept or ate after the 48 hour race began. And on the subject of eating, is everyone a vegetarian in this land? I mean, animals can't eat each other, right? Although that would explain why fish and birds are absent from this animal film.
The Shakira gazelle has no place in this movie. It just doesn't fit! A character that has a few meaningless lines in the film. This movie would have worked fine without her. It is painfully obvious that its a marketing ploy and nothing else. But directed to whom? Kids seeing this movie will have no idea who she is, because when was the last time Shakira was relevant on North American soil? During the Latin music craze of the early 2000s. But then again, I haven't listened to Top 40 pop music in about a decade and it appears she's had a few hits during the 2000s, so maybe she's more well known in this current time then I realize. I'll take the hit if I am incorrect here. I didn't like the song partly because the song is preachy itself and that 'try everything' moral was already beaten over our heads several times (I also didn't like it because the song generally sounds terrible), and I didn't like I heard it twice. Shakira couldn't have preformed at least one other original song for her character? I am sure the Disney crew threw enough money at her, and it would have worked well considering the movie takes place in the modern pop age. The music video is also done poorly. A fully animated video would have been nice (to make it really fit into the Zootopia world), but the real life spliced-in shots of a very casual, almost bored looking, Shakira, just look odd.
No.540766
Some other talking points…
-There was a Times Square reference in a Zootopia poster, was there one in the film? I may have missed it.
-'Try Everything' is an original song, incased in its own world sung by a gazelle, and yet REM's 'Everybody Hurts', among other real life songs, are played through Judy's alarm clock speaker. I get the joke, but the juxtaposition of throwing 'real life' songs into the mix threw me.
-Judy is 24 and Nick is 27, I think. Are they too young to be pulling off all the stuff they did, or do people generally think mid-20s age was good enough? Should Judy have been like 28, 30, 34? I was hoping to see Judy's parents aged a bit 15 years later, but they looked just the same.
-I would have liked a bit more backstory on Nick's past, perhaps seeing his parents. Despite the civilized utopia, Nick is not shown to have a home. I hope he really doesn't just live under a bridge.
-Another stereotype is implied, spices aside: the uneducated southerner, early on in the movie.
-Mr. Otterton was targeted because he is a predator. Otters are predators against fish. Yet there are no fish in the movie. So really, he should not have been targeted with the toxin in the first place.
-Mrs. Otterton was concerned when her husband was missing. But, her reaction to when he was healed was very lacklustre. It was like 'Thank you, kthybye'. I would have expected a bit more reaction. Maybe some tears of joy.
-Judy resigned, so when or how did she call for backup for the police at the end of the movie? When the enemy got hustled? I feel like I am missing a plot piece here. How did Nick and Judy know they would fall into the display? I guess they planned it, but again, when did the cops know? This is one of those movies where you have to go back and watch it again and pay closer attention to all details. I would have liked a flashback at the end of it all explaining things.
-My wife complained about Judy ears, in how its anatomically impossible for bunny ears to flop backwards like that. I told her that's been happening in most 'furry' movies out there, but she says that excuse doest make it better. I guess she was expecting for Judy to have her ears up more often. Her parents did, everyone else did. She also caught how Nick didn't have whiskers, but even the otter and most minor characters had whiskers and other details like that. Perhaps that was cut for budget costs since Nick was a main lead.
-Judy grew up all her life among the flower causing the issues. And yet she didn't know that her parents used them on the farm (I think, I'm forgetting), and that relative went crazy in the past and bit her mothers arm? Her own mother was bit by a relative but they still used the plant anyway? (I'm tired, I could be wrong now). How could Judy, as a child, not ever know that? The parents would have told her and warned her other 275 siblings about it. It was weird that Judy recognized that the onions in the bag weren't actual onions, but the bulbs that grow the flower in question. She knew the scientific name, but didn't know the common name they were called? Even though her own family used them on their field? You would think that in today's Wiki age, that Judy at some point would have discovered the common name of those flowers. I mean really, this sounds like an issue that would have been discovered 30 years before the events of the movie take place. It is a bit of a weak plot point.
No.540768
-The film never goes into detail about the antidote. It just states they are working on one, and then they have it and it works fine. So how did the bunny people heal their relative when they went crazy and bit Mrs. Hopps' arm? Did the toxin wear off after a while? Also, what was Bellwether's final plan once she poisons all predators? It would cost them money to always keep them sheltered and fed. Unless the toxin was permanent (which we really don't know cause again, bunny relative), Bellwether would eventually have to dispose of all the animals. On that note, I was surprised Judy used the words 'kill me' in this film. At least they didn't pussyfoot around the term.
-Bellwether states that they have 90% prey and 10% predators in the city, and then she went on to say they outnumber them 10 to 1. Shouldn't that be 9 to 1?
-I am sure shippers were hoping for Judy and Nick to come to some sort of dramatic kiss on-the-lips ending. I kind of expected a little something, but at the same time didn't think any relationship status would be touched. That is why I thought it a bizarre surprise that Disney sort of cut it right down the middle, with how Nick says 'you love me' but in a vary playful tone. And Judy replies 'yes', but not in an overly serious way. It leaves room for interpretation. The type of interpretation that makes fans go wild.
-How many times did you look a Judy's butt in the movie? Silently screaming when it was in shot, but out of focus? You just wanted to grab that firm, bouncy bunny butt, didn't you?
Overall, Zootopia is an entertaining movie in standard Disney fashion. However it is not overly funny, the characters at times are hard to relate to, it doesn't stir much of an emotional feeling, and the story under performs. Its presented well in a nice, well packaged way that gives the eye alot of candy to munch on, but on several other levels the movie tastes bland. Zootopia is good, but it could have used more seasoning.
No.540814
>no gazelle app
Shit marketing/10
No.540836
>>533750
>the screen is still down
No.540902
>>540763
>>540765
>>540766
>>540768
The reason the main point of the movie was about racism while showing tons of animals playing directly into stereotypes is because that's how it actually works in real life.
There's a J.R.R. Tolkien quote I think applies here:
“I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its presence. I much prefer history – true or feigned– with its varied applicability to the thought and experience of readers. I think that many confuse applicability with allegory, but the one resides in the freedom of the reader, and the other in the purposed domination of the author.”
Even as a made up story with talking animals, Zootopia isn't an allegory. It's a reflection of how the world actually works.
As far as your talking points, I'm not going to go over them because most of them are wrong, or from someone who just wasn't paying attention. But I'll address one in particular that's triggering-me-timbers.
>Judy resigned, so when or how did she call for backup for the police at the end of the movie? When the enemy got hustled? I feel like I am missing a plot piece here. How did Nick and Judy know they would fall into the display? I guess they planned it, but again, when did the cops know?
Bellweather called the cops and reported that Judy had been killed. On screen. She was doing this to mock the pair. It was kind of impossible to miss.
No.541166
>>540766
>Perhaps that was cut for budget costs since Nick was a main lead.
There are literally hundreds of thousands of individually rendered hairs on every single character in the film. Even the minor ones have more hair than even their real life counterparts would just to get the "look" right.
Nick having no whiskers was entirely intentional.
>Judy is 24 and Nick is 27, I think. Are they too young to be pulling off all the stuff they did, or do people generally think mid-20s age was good enough? Should Judy have been like 28, 30, 34? I was hoping to see Judy's parents aged a bit 15 years later, but they looked just the same.
Judy is a rookie cop and Nick is a small time con. They should be young.
No.541167
>>540766
>>541166
Nick is 32. "Since I was 12", "plus two decades".
No.541226
>>540440
>>541167
Are we talking rabbit decades or fox decades?
No.541455
>>540768
>posting the wrong version
No.542185
No.542334
I wonder if normies got confused when they called the black panther a jaguar
What animal is the second newscaster in the North American version? Some breed of moose?
No.542425
>>542334
Some more thoughts:
Is there an actual in-universe reason for characters to suddenly become mustache twirlers after they are revealed to be the villain?
It's interesting voice actors like Maurice LaMarche, John DiMaggio and Kath Soucie (thank you Rich Moore?) were given non-background roles, yet they are somewhat unrecognizable
Speaking of Maurice LaMarche, it's so obvious they intended the Mr. Big revival to be a surprise (that we probably would have guessed even if the ad campaign didn't spoil it)
No.542440
>>542334
Yeah, he's a moose.
No.542472
>>516282
>furfaggotry
>good
No.542492
File: 1457775848004.jpg (78.12 KB, 860x929, 860:929, twilight_as_judy_hopps_by_….jpg)

No.542548
I have watched this Jewish bestiality propaganda toon, not I have an urge to fuck a rabbit
No.542551
>>542440
Apparently the moose was replaced with various other animals in other regions.
I think he's actually a raccoon with a leaf on his head, like a tanuki, in the nippon version.
No.542559
>>542440
>>542551
>Apparently the moose was replaced with various other animals in other regions.
I need a photo montage of this, stat!
Is the moose there in the US version? Or is it someone else?
No.542564
>>542563
Also apparently he's a jaguar in BR version
No.542576
>>542563
I really want to see the corgi.
No.542725
>>542576
The corgi was weird since the filmmakers apparently had a "no humans, thus no domesticated animals" rule, but hey, it's just an localization Easter egg.
No.542762
>>542725
That doesn't explain why there's no birds or lizards, but that doesn't explain how they could evolve over millions of years and not crossbreed or create any subspecies that exist right now in the wild alongside all of the species that exist in the movie.
A minor gripe, I suppose.
No.542771
>>542725
Corgis are actually savage beasts that have aligned themselves with the British monarchy to end the world.
True facts, a raven told me.
No.542840
>>542762
They said they decided to focus on a mammal continent, and there are continents of other classes in this world. Franchise bait, basically.
I still want to know if they actually say "Zootropolis" in the UK version.
No.543758
Judy must have not developed gymnophobia yet when she did that school play
No.543772
I dont see a bird only or lizard only movie appealing nearly as much
No.544226
>>543772
They could still have the same main characters
No.544372
>>522611
Those animals look disturbing as fuck, kill them all.
No.544373
>>525974
I never understood why people automatically think that because tumblr is in the filename that they got it directly from tumblr? They most likely took it from google images.
No.544374
>>528888(checked)
>having something blatantly sexual in a family movie
Sure, I thought they were fags at first, but I assumed there'd be a party or something.
No.544508
>>544374
Didn't the directors confirm that they're gay?
No.544529
>>544372
I've got good news for you!
Watch the video.
No.545596
>>544529
>implying I didn't
>implying I didn't mean every animal in that fictional world
>>544508
I dunno.
No.545625
>>544508
>>544374
>>528888
They're two grown men that are different species, share the same small apartment, and have the same hyphenated last name.
Gay as fuck.
No.545669
>>545625
Is this like Frozen's implied gay couple?
No.546870
>>545669
>Frozen
When was that?
No.546889
No.547005
>>535918
yeah where can i watch it? And inevitably skim through it as I do something else
No.547021
>>547009
I'd hope anal, but I may be biased.
No.547025
No.547033
>>547025
hell nah, faggot.
No.547036
>>546870
You werent here when everyone was going on about Frozen being about lesbian incest?
No.547039
>>547033
>wouldn't take it up the ass to please best girl
FAG
No.547048
>>547005
did you try the internet?
No.547109
>>547094
>zootropolis
>all mammals
#cgimoviessowarmblooded #endracism
No.547114
>>521849
goddamn i'd cum on that forever
>>521869
now you are buddy, you want to cum inside that bunny, you know it.
No.547122
I saw it yesterday and loved it. It was pretty redpilled for a disney film. Here's hoping for a sequel, which will probably happen.
No.547282
>>547122
In all honesty I can see this becoming an answer to 'How to Train Your Dragon' by having a series tent polled by movies.
Having COPS Fighting Crime in a Future Time but with animals sounds fun to keep the kids interested. And keeping the non-analogue animals will help undo some of the indoctrination shit going on elsewhere.
Then you can have a big, impressive movie every few years.
I just want an episode where Judy and Nick bust up a Catnip ring only to have a much worse dealer move in.
No.548875
>>542563
>UK/Corgi
Unusual, I'm a Britbong and in the version I saw here, the newscaster was most definitely a moose.
No.548903
>>546870
>>547036
In Oaken's sauna, the only other adult was a man
No.548906
>>547094
Is that every newscaster?
No.548961
>>548875
There was never any official word of corgi from the producers, that was always in secondhand tweets at best.
No.549066
>>539360
How was his post in anyway retarded?
No.549075
>>547036
>implying lesbian incest
>what is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_words_for_love
I still think Disney wanted people to think of that (incest, I mean).
>>548903
What? I swear I saw women….
Oh, actually there's another woman that looks old enough (just looks young), and the big guy could be the oldest son.
And how the fuck would faggots have kids? Magic? Magic only revolves around the main characters in those movies.
No.549237
>>538904
Gideon wasn't gay, he was a redneck, but not gay.
>>539399
I believe he's assuming Gideon was gay because he became a pastry baker, which is completely false. Now, Clawhauser on the other hand is fair grounds to assume he's gay.
No.550690
>>547282
>Judy and Nick bust up a Catnip ring
"Naw, dude, you don't get it, man. That's for medical purposes, my doctor told me to take it so I'm healthy, man. And, look, man, I gotta be really healthy for this Grateful Dead concert, you get me?"
>>547684
That's pretty cute.