/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

>>547311

that shits hilarious

>>547316

OH DEAR GOD HAHAHA

>>547303

What the fuck did they do to Mojo?

>>547344

Reduce the size of his "weapon"

>>547344

They filed off his edges to make him more child-safe.

>>547347

But that makes his body look smaller than it actually is! Did these CalArts fags even watch the original show?

>>547349

If you have to ask, they probably didn't

>>547347

No. Its just squash and stretch is no longer pushed for in Art Schools. The character more then anything is less dynamic.

Its more shit animation then "SJW". And by that I mean it has SJW soul, not SJW voice.

>>547303

>That new Mojo design

Literally looks like a parody from fucking Family Guy. That is atrocious.

>>547400

those teenage powerpuff girls look like living blow up dolls

this is my fetish

>>547400

>>547316

>>547311

These are fantastic. I'm amazed any of them made it past QA.

Also:

>oh shit, the boat's going to crash

>better turn the engine off and take the key out

Why does she have fingers?

>>547456

so if i get this correctly

a T-Rex just opened a breach through time and space to eat some salad

>>547465

No, it came for the plate. The salad was just collateral damage.

Vid related and those Phoenix movies/movie games are pretty much QUALITY the movie.

Part 1

>>547786

Part 2

>>547791

Part 3

>>547791

Part 3

NOT A FLOOD DAMN IT

>>547793

>>547800

Part 4

>>547801

Bonus: Dalmatians 3 by Phoenix Games / Dingo Pictures

>>547928

>Kill La Kill used as an example of good animation.

Fucking weebs.

>>547303

I don't see anything wrong with pic 1, but pic 3 shows how these little personal touches to the redesigns the reboot crew talked about in the interview can fuck shit up.

Lets assume the context for both pictures is Mojo Jojo being on the offensive, he draws first and shit.

Original:

>menacing pose and face, lunging forward ready to attack whenever he wants.

>body slightly smaller than head to emphasize his brain, aligned with arms and face in the direction of the action

>pointyness and less curves makes the body seem more fit and menacing, chest looks large and wider than hips

>holding a bazooka with one hand

In short, a sadistic and competent villain.

Reboot:

>stiff and trained/disciplined pose, face is less evil and more angry; he looks more defensive than agressive

>head same size as the body so no emphasis on brain, torso and legs facing the viewer instead of being aligned with arms and face

>fucking curves, suit looks too tight and makes him look like a fatass

>aiming a pistol with both hands

A villain trying hard.

>>547957

>I don't see anything wrong with pic 1

fingers nigga

also dont forget how static mojo jojo's cape looks in the second pic

>>547958

holy shit I didn't notice that before

>>547928

>oh, If I draw a random red line from feet to hands and draw Xes on faces, maybe people will think I understand line of action and take take it seriously

>>547930

the whole point was that it wasn't well animated but the exaggerated takes were exaggerated enough for it to work, unlike steven universe that's always too soft and controlled and thus just looks like someone drew wrong when they try and do the exaggerated takes

>>547928

>Kill la Kill

>Flirting with Bankruptcy: The Studio

>examples of quality animation

Gainax not only went under for a reason, but they tended to run out of money halfway through any given production so that the quality nosedives so hard you'd think they're Muslims targeting the world trade towers.

>>547303

The new mojo looks like something from family guy.

>>548304

again, the point of that half of the image wasn't fluidity, it was about how steven universe tries to do exaggerated anime takes but doesn't push them far enough

is the image really this obtuse or does everyone just have a hard-on to be able to come here and go >LEL KILL LA KILL? Can´t tell, since I did catch the original thread it was from and thus read the post it was in

>>548310

You can't cherrypick scenes from a cartoon and then bash it with Kill la Kill of all things. There are some gorgeous sequences in it, sure, but the show quality is so erratic the comparison falls to pieces.

>>548311

I don't know enough about SU to say if the comparison's fair, but you certainly can do the comparison it's trying to do, since it's not about the animation quality at all, just that specific kind of scene. The fluidity, animation styles, etc. in KLK are erratic, sure, but the comparison there is specifically just of "exaggerated anime takes", and how SU's just look soft and dumpy because most of the people doing it seem to just be aware of "oh cool anime does really stylised wacky poses sometimes" but then doesn't dare to actually take things far enough to make it work, unlike KLK or similar shows where it'll suddenly go painted, or very sketchy linework, or whatever.

Put another way, if the fact KLK's animation is so inconsistent is triggering you too much to see the point being made, imagine the image's comparing those shots to when Simon goes drawn only as sketchy pencils with exaggerated posing near the end of the 2nd TTGL movie.

SU deserves nothing. The artists occasionally breaking the model because they are lazy hacks (Or for a brief gag because their characters designs are not expressive enough, nor is the writing strong enough to make the gags work on their own), is not impressive.

Its backgrounds are nice, but in animation that is the most worthless thing. 60 years of animation has taught that a focus on more expressive characters is more important then the detail level of your background. You draw a good background once. But it takes actual skill to animated a fluid character.

SU is the one show that truly and completely deserves to be called cancer. Its a tumor in our collective social consciousness.

And as for the asshole who complains about cherry picking: Thats what Quality threads are all about dipshit! Finding parts of the show at its worst!

>>547928

nigger didn't i already told you the last one is an in between frame of a scene were steven shrinks and not an "exaggerated animu face™"

i don't think you have to outright lie to prove your point

>>548380

>nigger didn't i already told you the last one is an in between frame of a scene were steven shrinks and not an "exaggerated animu face™"

But isn't it still one, just one with reason?

>>548338

>random lines

Anon, just because you personally do not understand line of action doesn't mean nobody else does. Go get fucked. The original image is right.

>>548406

i don't think he's saying action lines don't exist, he's saying image poster is wrong

>>548415

Scribbling like a retard isn't much of an argument.

>>548423

but by >>548358 image, then this anon >>548338 would be right about SU , just saying

also, before you start sperging out, no im not that guy

>>548423

>Scribbling like a retard isn't much of an argument.

Exactly, the original post isn't an argument.

Glad you've finally come to the realization anon.

>>548429

Right about what?

What's right about it that >>548400 is wrong about?

>>548443

That SU doesn't follow action lines according to the pics on the macro. That was the original point.

>>548429

From what I can see, the reason Lord Hater looks "good" while Steven looks "bad" is because Hater's lines of action share a general curve, while Steven's are all over the place.

In all the bits picked in the image here >>548338 there's always downward curves, while the lines drawn over Steven don't have a shared curve between them.