Guys there is already a plan to colonize a place. You don't need a passport to move there it is called the Northwest Imperative. WA also has no state income tax on individuals and none of the states in the Northwest have assault weapons bans.<tinyboard fl

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1422461826244.jpg (72.4 KB, 960x640, 3:2, northwest flag ourselves a….jpg)

Unnamed Wealthy Backer 01/28/15 (Wed) 16:17:06 1578a0 No.56

Guys there is already a plan to colonize a place. You don't need a passport to move there it is called the Northwest Imperative. WA also has no state income tax on individuals and none of the states in the Northwest have assault weapons bans.

Unnamed Wealthy Backer 01/29/15 (Thu) 11:10:06 e08618 No.59

NWF seems like it would draw FBI infiltrators like flies to a dung heap. For one, they openly advocate secession and revolution, which is a big no-no for most regimes.

I also find their constitution a bit odd. They are extremely reactionary, yet still cling to democracy. Also, why not have a judicial branch? I would of thought that the judicial branch has historically been much less badly behaved compared to executive and legislative in USA or elsewhere.

Not saying this criticism, just my observations.

Unnamed Wealthy Backer 01/31/15 (Sat) 13:46:51 d9b86c No.68

>>59

They don't cling to democracy. It's a single party state. The constitution just contradicts itself heavily and is incoherent because it was written by nazi theocrats and libertarian atheists together. Tip top kekkle and hammirth of the lolviet union.

Unnamed Wealthy Backer 02/01/15 (Sun) 23:57:07 e08618 No.69

>>68
I don't think it's that bad. It has some kinks that need to be worked out, but it's a fair start if you wanted a, like you say, nazi theocracy/libertarian atheist state. You certainly can't fault it for failing to deliver on the reactionary, white nationalist premise.

Like I said, though, I don't get these things like single party state. Why? If you want dictatorship, why bother with votes at all? And if you're gonna have votes, why bother with restricting parties? Parties just neatly organize a phenomenon that will happen in any electorate (voting blocks and ideological camps). Seems like a terrible middle ground.

Unnamed Wealthy Backer 02/05/15 (Thu) 16:11:10 a25835 No.89

>Article II. All residents and citizens of the Republic shall enjoy the right to complete freedom of speech, freedom of artistic and creative expression, and freedom of the press. (This article shall not be construed as limiting or interdicting the right of the government of the Republic or competent local authority to control or prohibit expressions of obscenity and/or pornography.)

What an epic failure.

Unnamed Wealthy Backer 02/05/15 (Thu) 16:25:28 e08618 No.90

>>89
It's a very reactionary text in every sense of the word. Half of it is lifted verbatim from reactionary sacred texts like the US constitution, the rest is clearly a reaction to current hot issues (freedom of speech, guns, frivolous lawsuits). It's like if /pol/ was less retarded and made their dream country. Figures that porn is not allowed, since it's degenerate/Jewish.

I personally think it has big problems, but it's amusing to read for how it completely rejects convention.