>>1615>Gottverdammt, fun nazisThat's an oxymoron I think.
I mean, "Fun" and "Nazi Apologist" could go together. I mean, clearly that could be 'a' definition for things people find fun.
People who are also Nazi Apologists. Generally it's a Venn Diagram of fun that excludes all people who are not Nazi Sympathizers.
>>1605It's actually interesting that this response didn't actually respond to the article in question actually. Because that article could be summarized easily in:
They don't specifically deny the Holocaust; they'd just rather not think about it too much. They're more interested in the Nazi perpetrators, whom they see as cool – powerful, purposeful, casually and overwhelmingly violent, glamorous, almost sexy. Because denying the holocaust is clearly insane once you pass a certain point.
But it's way easier to convince a 'rational', 'free thinking' person that it's not that big a deal really.
Genocides happen all the time, so and it only happened once. Darfur is going on right now and no one's doing anything about it. Why wouldn't you want a strong Nationalist Party to support your hard work and back up your opinions?
It's just as rational as the freshman college student explaining how Anarchy is the only way to true freedom; the hot girls that show up at your door step trying to get you involved with the Mormon Church; Tom Cruise and his group.
It's all pretty much the same section of the primate brain firing. It's actually really easy to abuse once you know how to trick it into agreeing with you.