No.3009[Last 50 Posts]
Seriously?
No really, you niggas srs?
Alright then.
I, The King of Eggs, with the full backing of The Kingdom, do hereby declare War upon the alliance of The Finite Cauldron. For the crimes of conspiracy, aiding and abetting the enemies of the state, and high treason.
May Luna have mercy on your souls, for we shall not show it to your bodies.
No.3010
>>3009
Was getting caught a part of your plan?
No.3011
File: 1432961211838.png (561.16 KB, 854x740, 427:370, laughing padawans.jpg..jpg.png)
>>3009
>getting war declared on you by the alliance that's getting humiliated by two people
I'm sure they're quaking in their boots
No.3012
>>3011
>humiliated
Someone is showing their newfaginess :3
No.3013
>alliance of 8 people
>full financial backing of the largest alliance as well
>gets forces absolutely BTFO against an alliance of 2 people
>implying this isn't hilariously humiliating
>implying you aren't going to lose your nation now that you're fighting on two fronts
No.3014
>>3013
>implying literally anything at all has changed
No.3015
If only we knew who the data leak could have been!
If only we hadn't been playing up the same saber rattling behavior we always do in chats when people start getting emotional and need to step away from you idiots for a few minutes!
Woe is I! For I have been forsaken from her glorious Celestia by consorting with foul, bestial governments forsaken by all good, pure honorable ponies of the light!
No.3016
>>3015
>Such damage control
K.e.k.
No.3017
>>3016
You're the one attacking a clearly noob player for fun and profit based on statements from Myra and Ty, who was actually pretty unwilling to take action all things considered.
Please, you should have seen the things we said about you before he joined.
No.3018
>>3017
>>3015
I approached Tyhachi about this… indirectly of course. I even offered him a way out.
I was met with statements like:
"[1:28:48 PM] TyHachi _: … I cannot guarantee that members in FC will not act in their own beliefs."
"[1:25:02 PM] TyHachi _: If any player leaves either alliance, this non-aggression pact remains binding for 24 hours after they have left. No attacking forces may be set to or from said player.
You left CoLC, the pact is for CoLC, not KoE. I'm not saying we will attack you, but no one in any alliance is obligated to not attack.
Essentially you left and claimed no association so that NAP holds no ground here. Those are the terms you gave us."
"[1:38:34 PM] TyHachi _: … I can try to talk but I can't stop anyone from acting."
At this point, I'd given up the thin hope that the intel was faulty.
[1:41:46 PM] Sir Scarfalot: Well, I for one hope for peace. At this time, Bug and Loli are cheaters and reviled throughout the metagame
[1:42:06 PM] TyHachi _: Peace is always desirable.
[1:42:19 PM] Sir Scarfalot: Once they die, peace should be at least possible.
[1:42:35 PM] TyHachi _: Will it though?
[1:42:54 PM] Sir Scarfalot: Why wouldn't it
[1:43:05 PM] TyHachi _: There will always be an antagonist somewhere. Otherwise this game wouldn't be what it is.
[1:43:26 PM] Sir Scarfalot: And what is this game?
[1:45:37 PM] TyHachi _: A political simulator.
[1:52:33 PM] Sir Scarfalot: Well put
[1:53:06 PM] Sir Scarfalot: Though, I would argue that antagonism isn't inevitable.
>pic related
No.3019
>>3018
And like I've said before, you're the greatest warmonger in the game.
And I've got Loli, Cloud, and Myra to compare you to.
No.3020
>>3017
I sure am, I'd do it again if you had more noobs to eat.
the funny thing though? I had no interest in attacking you guys, as far as I was concerned you had rehabilitated Myra, and were at least not being flaming cocks.
>>3018
>you could have prevented this
No.3021
>>3019
Its funny I never thought I would have agreed to this when I first met Scarf.
No.3022
>>3019
>>3021
I fight for my friends, against those that would harm them. There never was any question that Loli and Bug were going to, given any opportunity at all.
Your aggression was not in question, until today.
So don't blame me for your fear. You brought that upon yourself.
No.3023
>>3022
I'm not afraid of you.
I'm just a little saddened at what you've become. Though I guess you were always like this to some degree.
No.3024
>>3023
Your attempt at mind games is both disappointing and amusing ^_^
No.3025
>>3024
This isn't a mind game.
No.3026
>>3023
And what of yourself? What about you? You wanted to join, but were held back only by what it could mean for the rest of your alliance.
You could have stopped this, but you wanted it just as much as Eggs and Myra.
So what have you become, TyHachi?
No.3027
>>3026
Yes because I actually care about what happens to the people in my alliance who don't want to get involved, unlike a certain dead alliance and their little council of leaders.
No.3028
Somehow I don't think this was the best idea y'all could have come up with.
No.3029
>>3027
mmmhmm, that's why you risked all their safety by allowing this little plan of yours. if you actually cared, you should have got them all out, or kicked the conspirators. So how about you cut the crap? K? K!
>>3028
>Somehow I don't think this was the best idea y'all could have come up with.
I guess we will see wont we?
No.3030
>>3017
>>3019
>Pretty unwilling to take action
>Myrami
>Scarf
>Greatest warmonger in the game
https://youtu.be/wdYPxFMhEkE?t=8s
>>3026
>>3027
You know what, yeah. The logs did state that you were reluctant to join in on the attack because of the implications it would hold on your alliance. What you didn't factor in is if you would be at the wrong place at the wrong time.
>>3028
>Maud and Derpy in a T-34
Or am I wrong again? The shape of the tank feels too generic for it not be a T-34.
No.3031
>>3030
>Or am I wrong again?
Close. T-34-85.
No.3032
>>3031
Oh. I have yet to reach that tank. They do have the same tailpipes and hatch in the back though.
No.3033
>>3029
Incorrect, try again. I actually do care and was willing to separate rather then drag people who aren't involved into this. I wanted to keep those who wanted to stay out, out. Unlike you who lost countless nations of your own and your casuals as you didn't warn them or inform them of your petty war that held no real justification in the first place. I do not deny that I don't like your lot and I'm paranoid of you all. But I still take my role as leader seriously.
No.3034
Also casual reminded KoE is more cruel and less caring than the Guild because they're greedy and are willing to destroy uninvolved players.
No.3035
>>3029
>mmmhmm, that's why you risked all their safety by allowing this little plan of yours. if you actually cared, you should have got them all out, or kicked the conspirators. So how about you cut the crap? K? K!
Hey, I know you've played CLOP before. How much time do you spend planning out what to do should there be an attack in the future?
Planning isn't a criminal offense. Planning is logical, because you can see how situations could end up going badly and decide against irrational actions.
>>3026
>So what have you become, TyHachi?
You see, it's funny. No one has changed really.
Myra is still defensive and holds long term grudges. TyHachi is worried about the safety of people around him.
Both are defense focused really. FC has not started any notable war.
Scarf has started two since reset.
It's funny really. It's adorable and funny.
And if you're getting materials from CLoC, you're in violation of the NAP which only makes this whole thing much much sillier.
>>3022
> There never was any question that Loli and Bug were going to, given any opportunity at all.
LoliBug's aggression has been minimal at best. Your aggression is wild and unchecked. You want there to be a world war, because you get to be a general. It gives you importance and value.
I'm still terrified of your intents Scarf; a war just means all my fears were completely justified.
No.3036
>>3034
Correction
Willing to destroy uninvolved players while giving them no way to seek safety in other alliances like FFA.
No.3037
>>3035
>Hey, I know you've played CLOP before. How much time do you spend planning out what to do should there be an attack in the future?
You weren't planning an defense in case of a hypothetical attack (which I would completely understand), you were planing a preemptive strike.
>>3035
>LoliBug's aggression has been minimal at best. Your aggression is wild and unchecked. You want there to be a world war, because you get to be a general. It gives you importance and value
Actually, Scarf was pretty against this plan, hence why he tried to get Ty to give him a reason to halt this thing
>>3036
>Willing to destroy uninvolved players while giving them no way to seek safety in other alliances like FFA.
the minute you allowed that treasonous discussion to take place, you involved them, you even recognized that they were now involved, and wanted to ferry them off.
No.3038
>>3032
Best tank. You won't be disappointed.
They have the same hull. The difference is in the turret. The 34-85's is built to mount the 85mm cannon.
No.3039
>>3034
>Are willing to destroy uninvolved players.
Didn't Aryan do that with JollyGreenGI? How do you justify that sort of back stabbing? I think you have enough experience to be a proper authority on that matter.
>>3035
>Myra is still defensive and holds long term grudges.
Whoa, really? If something was up with Myra, he should've said something. Maybe we could've talked about his problems. You know, back when I thought this game's players deserved kindness. Granted, I failed near the end on that part, but that's the past.
>You want there to be a world war, because you get to be a general. It gives you importance and value.
You guys let it be a world war. If you all stayed put like good little boys, didn't try to engage in a sneak attack, and–if you really couldn't help it–continued to supply Bug and Lolipop, then we would have left you alone.
>>3038
I did notice that actually. I just wasn't sure at first if it made a difference in my guess or not until you corrected me. I like the Royal Guard clan emblem on the camo'd version by the way.
No.3040
>>3035
>Scarf has started two wars
Explain to me how I 'started' the war against Lolibug? Loli declared war against me. His aggression, and the aggression of Bugfucker has been halted by their defense, which only proves that our war is working.
>I'm still terrified of your intents Scarf; a war just means all my fears were completely justified.
Never presume to know my intentions.
I've been worried about you ever since you threw your lot in with Myra. Until today, there was at least hope… but it was YOUR attack plans that justified my fears, and forced your own into reality.
No.3041
>>3036
>uninvolved players
You realize Aryan wanted to "cannibalize" an innocent player before having to rescue him from Cloud? Confirmed by admin so no denying it there. If that's the people you affiliate yourself with how does that make you so much better? You obviously don't care about the involved nor the innocent, just covering your own asses, like you're so desperately trying to do on this thread.
But I digress, keep pretending like your acts are justified.
No.3042
>>3040
>Explain to me how I 'started' the war against Lolibug?
Last I checked, sending troops first counts as starting a war.
>>3039
The un-camo'd version is the regular T-34. ;)
[spoier]And it's an okay clan emblem, I guess.[/spoiler]
No.3043
>>3042
Planning attacks, deliberate provocation, and stating intentions to attack are all acts of war. He did all those first; we merely responded to their provocations.
No.3044
>>3040
>ut it was YOUR attack plans that justified my fears, and forced your own into reality.
I've told you I have attack plans regarding every possible situation and player. In fact, you don't even know what my attack plans could have actually been.
I do know that you're engaging attacks on people who haven't attacked you based on private conversation, and Ty not wanting to give you a hug because you're panicked.
I hope you like being the Satan.
>>3040
>Explain to me how I 'started' the war against Lolibug?
Loli made fun of your tiny penis size, and you attacked them.
That's pretty much all you need to do. Once you start attacking people, that means you started the war.
>>3039
>Maybe we could've talked about his problems.
Myra isn't the one who started attacks on other people. Talking shit is annoying, but talking doesn't put troops in motion.
>didn't try to engage in a sneak attack
Yes, when we attacked your…. what exactly?
>continued to supply Bug and Lolipop
Pics please? I'd really like to know where we were supplying them continuously.
Or do you just assume that because we didn't sell things at you to fund your corrupt war effort, we must be supplying the other side?
>>3037
>the minute you allowed that treasonous discussion to take place,
So you're policing thought now? Free Speech is fine as long as it's Speech you approve of?
Actions will continue to speak louder than words Eggy.
>you were planing a preemptive strike.
Which I'm sure you noticed did not arrive, or hit anything around you. It's not the first time this conversation came up.
I hate Scarf pretty unrepentantly. Getting people to be angry at you is surprisingly easy at the moment.
If I wasn't going to side with the LoliBug side before, why wouldn't a baseless attack push my opinion of your splinter group even lower?
>>3043
>Planning attacks, deliberate provocation, and stating intentions to attack are all acts of war
Speech is war clearly.
If I attacked every time I was offended by one of you fuckers, there would be no question that I was a warmonger.
No.3045
>>3044
>So you're policing thought now? Free Speech is fine as long as it's Speech you approve of?
Actions will continue to speak louder than words Eggy.
Speech, fine. Active preparation for an assault. Yeah no.
>Which I'm sure you noticed did not arrive, or hit anything around you. It's not the first time this conversation came up.
… You mean that attack we prempted? Yeah funnily enough that didn't hit.
As to your questioning our knowledge of your supplying lolibug.
Fuck-ing Kek. Nothing more needs to be said.
Your pathetic attempts to try and take the high road here ceases to ammuse me. You fucked up. Own it and live with your consequences.
No.3046
>>3044
>Myra isn't the one who started attacks on other people. Talking shit is annoying, but talking doesn't put troops in motion.
You seemed intent on attacking us the way me, Eggs, Stranger, Bluhtsturm, and Scarf see it.
>Yes, when we attacked your…. what exactly?
It isn't what you attacked, it's about when you were going to attack.
>Pics please? I'd really like to know where we were supplying them continuously.
And I'd like to know how FFA is giving us war supplies.
>Or do you just assume that because we didn't sell things at you to fund your corrupt war effort, we must be supplying the other side?
Stop pretending.
>a baseless attack
The evidence is right there, and you still insist that our reason of attack is baseless?
>Speech is war clearly.
MTVS seemed to feel that way before about FotA. That explains why this is all so familiar…
>fuckers
Mr. Chill finally lost his cool. Interesting.
>Getting people to be angry at you is surprisingly easy at the moment.
I'll say!
No.3047
>>3044
>I've told you I have attack plans regarding every possible situation and player.
>I hope you like being the Satan.
First off, kek "the Satan". Second, plans to do harm to everyone sounds like something Satan digs, defending the worthy is the complete opposite to Satan in the eyes of anyone religious.
>Loli made fun of your tiny penis size, and you attacked them.
Yup, this is Minty for you, ignoring the blatant information we act upon and adding as many irrelevant points/topics to cover the shit stain that is his defense. I don't even recall the size of anyone's genitalia even being mentioned in the thread.
No.3048
>>3034
Really?
I checked up on all of your alliance, just now.
Shrek and Zodiac are in stasis, and Ibiscus is the only other one that hasn't posted on the board.
The pic is is current nation.
What confuses me the most is how in gods' name he's lasted this long without ANY SAT BUILDINGS?? That's a trick I want to learn XD
Also,
>Guild
>Caring
They constantly destroyed uninvolved players that were actually playing the game; this guy is… I don't know what he's doing, but playing the game isn't it.
No.3049
Is it just me, or is this game just one big circle in which nothing new is ever said/happens and no fun is had?
No.3051
>Ty involving himself
Dunno how comprehensive your logs are, but actually it was I who talked him out of splitting and who told him he shouldn't worry about "the rest of the alliance" (which was only me and ibuscus). So blaming him for involvement means you also blame me. Which I'm okay with; seeing as now ibuscus is under attack, I regret my advice to Ty though.
>>3048
>ibuscus
>hasn't posted on the board
>not even sat buildings, much less any production worthy of that term
Clearly, that means he's involved. [/sarcasm]
See, I get it. He's a strategic target, and you wanted to brag his saddle before. It's war; it's not nice, but it's fine for wartime. But don't try to talk yourself out of attacking casuals. I don't know what he's doing either, but he's both active (as evidenced by not being in stasis and having a living nation) and clearly alright with doing what he does. He outright refused a bunch of stuff I tried to give him after his rebel incident. "playing the game isn't it" just because he does weird things doesn't apply in these circumstances.
No.3052
>>3051
Whoops. Name field left empty. Sorry. Apparently, my Firefox doesn't save it any more.
No.3053
>>3045
>Own it and live with your consequences.
Being stuck in a pillow fight with short bus passengers is hardly a consequence.
>>3046
>You seemed intent on attacking us the way me, Eggs, Stranger, Bluhtsturm, and Scarf see it.
You've been pre-emptively defending against monsters in the shadows. At what point does pre-emptive defense just become offense?
You've been taking bait so obvious Ray Charles can see it.
… yes, I checked. He's still dead.
Plus, I'd like to point out Bluthsturm kicked off that war over in Compounds as well. I really can't take anyone in your list seriously.
>it's about when you were going to attack.
In this specific case, it's more about if we were going to attack. Which will never really be known, because you fixed the problem by declaring war.
Because war is way easier than peace.
>Stop pretending.
Really, I want to know.
>Mr. Chill finally lost his cool. Interesting.
I hate all of you, all the time. In fact I hate people so regularly, I have to filter anything I say on a regular basis, and I still give you all the benefit of the doubt.
Because sometimes you're better than this.
>>3047
>First off, kek "the Satan".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satan
The original Hebrew term satan is a noun from a verb meaning primarily "to obstruct, oppose", as it is found in Numbers 22:22, 1 Samuel 29:4, Psalms 109:6. Ha-Satan is traditionally translated as "the accuser" or "the adversary". The definite article ha- (English: "the") is used to show that this is a title bestowed on a being, versus the name of a being. Thus, this being would be referred to as "the satan".
So now you learned something I hope.
Also, Lucifer doesn't want to harm everyone. His very specific beef is that mankind has free will to choose not to worship the god that created him. And that pisses him off.
Lucifer, in his own mind, is the good guy.
>Yup, this is Minty for you, ignoring the blatant information we act upon and adding as many irrelevant points/topics to cover the shit stain that is his defense.
Reading is hard for you, I know. I would add footnotes for you so you can just skim it, but my posts are long enough as they are, so no reason to inflate them even more.
No.3054
>>3009
Well isn't this a fun little turn of events. Did anyone ever tell you how hard it is to fight a war on multiple fronts?
>>3012
You ain't killed us yet. For an alliance consisting of 19 people that's pretty embarrassing.
>>3030
All this boasting and general dickery from people who think they're on top of the game.
You'll learn in time younglings.
>>3035
>Your aggression is wild and unchecked
Irrational too, don't forget irrational.
Some idiots just can't into war.
>>3039
>You guys let it be a world war. If you all stayed put like good little boys, didn't try to engage in a sneak attack, and–if you really couldn't help it–continued to supply Bug and Lolipop, then we would have left you alone.
1. They never gave us jack or shit
2. More of this boasting and general dickery from faggots who so rarely get to enjoy the sensation of "winning". Soak it in, It won't last long~
>>3040
>Explain to me how I 'started' the war against Lolibug?
A threat does not a war make. You sent the first troops. You started the war.
Just like Britain and France started WWII.
>>3041
> If that's the people you affiliate yourself with how does that make you so much better?
Because they didn't declare war on them in a shitty greedy attempts to acquire more nations?
>>3043
>Planning attacks, deliberate provocation, and stating intentions to attack are all acts of war. He did all those first; we merely responded to their provocations.
No they don't. See point above. And google it
>>3044
>Loli made fun of your tiny penis size, and you attacked them.
Thereby proving the existence of his tiny penis~
I think he's just jealous he can't be as awesome or attractive as me.
>>3044
>Or do you just assume that because we didn't sell things at you to fund your corrupt war effort, we must be supplying the other side?
If you're not with them you're against them darling~
>>3045
>Fuck-ing Kek. Nothing more needs to be said.
Proof you don't have knowladge.
You really shouldn't give away your hand so easy Eggy, it's not good business.
>>3053
>I hate all of you, all the time. In fact I hate people so regularly,
D-do you hate me? :(
No.3055
>>3037
>the minute you allowed that treasonous discussion to take place, you involved them, you even recognized that they were now involved, and wanted to ferry them off.
So I'm not allowed to talk about my thoughts, opinions, or views? In a place that is private I cannot express my distaste or thoughts regarding ideas of attacks? I wanted to get them out before they were involved. I had consistently proposed to separate myself from my alliance and give up leadership if it would keep them out of a fight they didn't belong in. I myself was continuously debating how this would affect our players and how I wanted to protect them and get them somewhere safe. You're the one dragging them into this. Did your spy ever tell you who was in the chat? If so maybe you would have realized those players were not involved and you have no place attacking them, especially when I make it clear I'm removing them from the conflict by putting them in another alliance. You're the one who's being a greedy fuck who can't get past his own desire to conquer, that he would take an uninvolved player's nation
>>3039
>Didn't Aryan do that with JollyGreenGI? How do you justify that sort of back stabbing? I think you have enough experience to be a proper authority on that matter.
I never justified it. I never even knew until someone mentioned it to me. I don't think its the correct action, but It isn't my responsibility to police other players. i don't like the action but I cant protect everyone and I have responsibilities, Sephi. Besides, I think Scarf already has the covered with his plans to control everything via councils.
>>3041
>You realize Aryan wanted to "cannibalize" an innocent player before having to rescue him from Cloud? Confirmed by admin so no denying it there. If that's the people you affiliate yourself with how does that make you so much better? You obviously don't care about the involved nor the innocent, just covering your own asses, like you're so desperately trying to do on this thread.
But I digress, keep pretending like your acts are justified.
I care about my alliance and its members. I have responsibility now. I care about those involved and if you were paying any attention you would've realized these actions were taken and discussed before you leaked. There is no covering my ass, hell I could care less about that. Its about ensuring my alliance is safe and protecting those in it. Also funny you say I don't care, when you watch a nation you presume is in trouble, and hop towards asking to take it, rather than helping them.
Hmm wait a second…That same player is now under attack by you…
Gasp, could it be you were all greedy nation fuckers all along?
>>3045
>Fuck-ing Kek. Nothing more needs to be said.
If you can't supply any evidence then you do know your accusation holds no weight. You haven't prove anything, nor have you stated anything believeable. Come back with evidence before anyone takes your tinfoil seriously
>>3048
>Really?
>I checked up on all of your alliance, just now.
Hmm?
>Shrek and Zodiac are in stasis, and Ibiscus is the only other one that hasn't posted on the board.
>The pic is is current nation.
Its already been posted, quoted, and explained several times that Ibuscus has declined our offers for help, stating that he would be fine and he would ask for help when he needed it. When he did, we obliged and did all we could to assist him. I can't tell him how to play the game, if that's how he wants to play it then alright. I'm not going to control him and tell him how to play. What he does is up to him.
No.3056
>>3049
>And no fun is had
We're working on that right now. Once the heretics and heathens are destroyed, the game's environment will be a lot better.
>>3054
>More of this boasting and general dickery from faggots who so rarely get to enjoy the sensation of "winning". Soak it in, It won't last long~
Is it possible to fight fate?
>Just like Britain and France started WWII.
Careful! If you compare yourself to Nazi, Germany, you might be at risk of enacting Godwin's Law!… Actually, the nazis won last time, so I guess Godwin's Law doesn't exist.
>Because they didn't declare war on them in a shitty greedy attempts to acquire more nations?
Ignoring the fact you're calling the kettle black…
>>3055
>So I'm not allowed to talk about my thoughts, opinions, or views? In a place that is private I cannot express my distaste or thoughts regarding ideas of attacks?
Was it really nothing more than that? You seemed somewhat concerned when you realized people had been listening in on your 'opinions.'
>Did your spy ever tell you who was in the chat?
Yes.
>But I digress, keep pretending like your acts are justified.
And you keep holding a grudge over mistakes I've learned not to make again. I'm trying to move on from the past and enjoy the game.
That reminds me, do lizards experience joy?
>If you can't supply any evidence then you do know your accusation holds no weight.
It literally a nation of two people. If there is in fact non-doctored (you heard me Myra, non-doctored) evidence of them not receiving aid from anybody, especially Finite Cauldron, I will go into stasis right now.
No.3057
>>3056
>Was it really nothing more than that? You seemed somewhat concerned when you realized people had been listening in on your 'opinions.'
I was concerned because I saw what you used your spy for. You declared war and now the people uninvolved were being dragged in. I was and am upset because you're involving players who have nothing to do with this. I don't care if you war with me. I care though if you war with my alliance and target people who have nothing to with this.
>Yes
Would you be a dear and day who was in, then?
>And you keep holding a grudge over mistakes I've learned not to make again. I'm trying to move on from the past and enjoy the game.
I told you once, and I'll tell you again, Sephi. I don't hold a grudge against you. You've already stated and apologized. I have no issue with you. The person I have a grudge against is not you and has never really been you.
>It literally a nation of two people. If there is in fact non-doctored (you heard me Myra, non-doctored) evidence of them not receiving aid from anybody, especially Finite Cauldron, I will go into stasis right now.
Isn't the concept innocent until proven guilty? You're the one making claims here and youre supposed to back your own claims. I would love to give you evidence but the game doesn't really hold logs beyond a certain point. There is no way to prove innocence, but there is no way to prove guilt either.
No.3058
>>3056
> If there is in fact non-doctored (you heard me Myra, non-doctored) evidence of them not receiving aid from anybody, especially Finite Cauldron, I will go into stasis right now.
Fuck me with a bloody stick are you being this stupid on purpose?
This is quite literally the stupidest thing I've heard all year.
How do you provide evidence of something that does not exist?
Please I'd like to know, there's many stupid things people believe in that I'd like to put an end to right now.
You can't prove a negative dear. You just can't.
The burden is on you to provide evidence they did.
There's a reason you all fail so hard at this game.
It's cos you're stupid
Just giving you a little help
In case you didn't figure it out~
No.3059
File: 1433006086065.jpg (145.22 KB, 700x1103, 700:1103, dcd2630e6b5a1dbc40cea34d10….jpg)
>>3058
Back to personal attacks again? Hmm… so I take it you're straining for bits after that unicorn defense you tried to pull off? It would certainly explain why The Horned King suddenly decided to build more malls.
>>3057
>Would you be a dear and day who was in, then?
I know what you're trying to do, but alright. There's you, MintyRest, Boonslayer, Myrami, and Schatten.
>I don't hold a grudge against you. You've already stated and apologized. I have no issue with you. The person I have a grudge against is not you and has never really been you.
Well, now that you say it on the board, that validates things. I'm sorry things came to this, brother.
>There is no way to prove innocence, but there is no way to prove guilt either.
Then let me ask you this: has Myrami been in contact with Bug recently?
No.3060
>>3059
>I know what you're trying to do, but alright. There's you, MintyRest, Boonslayer, Myrami, and Schatten.
You forgot TyrannisUmbra. But still. Let me ask? Who isn't there? Someone who wasn't in the chat who has no reason to be involved with this. Someone who is just a casual player who isn't participating. Now who would that be? Would you say attacking said player is justifiable when they don't have an involvement and the leader attempts to try and get them to a neutral party due to their lack of involvement and is refused?
>Well, now that you say it on the board, that validates things. I'm sorry things came to this, brother.
You should know by now I try to be as sincere as possible when I talk to people. Its the same reason I responded to Scarf. Im not a person who likes or wants to go around lying or being intentionally dishonest. I refuse to go down to that level.
>Then let me ask you this: has Myrami been in contact with Bug recently?
Who hasn't been in contact with players like them? But that still doesn't prove your point. Even if someone talks to someone that is not in game support.
No.3061
>>3059
>Back to personal attacks again?
Sometimes you have to be tough to be kind.
>I take it you're straining for bits after that unicorn defense you tried to pull off?
I got more malls than I can shake a dick at. There's a reason he build more. And that's not it.
No.3062
No.3063
>>3060
>You forgot TyrannisUmbra
I did so intentionally.
>Would you say attacking said player is justifiable when they don't have an involvement and the leader attempts to try and get them to a neutral party due to their lack of involvement and is refused
I'm not responsible for that, but you do have a point.
>Im not a person who likes or wants to go around lying or being intentionally dishonest. I refuse to go down to that level.
You're the diamond in the rough in this game.
>But that still doesn't prove your point.
If I recall correctly, there was something about Bug no longer needing aid because all the "real forces" were just ~100 units.
>>3061
>Sometimes you have to be tough to be kind.
[Insert innuendo about Bug here]
>Bits
Good thing you corrected yourself. I was about to state how full of shit you were.
No.3065
>>3063
>I did so intentionally.
Because…?
>I'm not responsible for that, but you do have a point.
Its not about your responsibility, its about KoE attacking a player with no involvement or reason to be involved who did nothing to garner an attack. Also note how KoE doesn't attack other players, in FC but focus on Ib. Seems odd, no?
>If I recall correctly, there was something about Bug no longer needing aid because all the "real forces" were just ~100 units.
Incorrect.
[7:09:36 PM] Caesar Bug: lel nice, and nope that was the last real wave of units I had incoming for a while, next few waves are under100 units all cav and tanks :D
All that is mentioned here via a quote is them being able to fight off KoE attacks. Myra never mentioned helping them.
No.3066
>>3065
>Also note how KoE doesn't attack other players, in FC but focus on Ib
Last I checked, this is a load of shit. we are attacking multiple people.
No.3067
>>3065
>Also note how KoE doesn't attack other players, in FC but focus on Ib. Seems odd, no?
Come again? Don't you check your incoming when a little (1) appears? No wait, propaganda from FC.. Of course.
No.3068
>>3065
>Myra never mentioned helping them.
He doesn't have to mention it mate.
No.3069
>>3056
>We're working on that right now. Once the heretics and heathens are destroyed, the game's environment will be a lot better.
>heathens are destroyed
>a lot better
My point exactly.
No.3070
>>3068
And before any of you can try to spin this, yes it's a pathetic force, no I don't think this force is the definition of helping. It simply shows the fact that collusion does exist between them
No.3071
Gooooood morning ponies! A fine day we're having here.
>>3063
>I did so intentionally.
This feels almost like forgetting my birthday,
>>3068
>pic
Looks like a paltry force that wouldn't stop much of anything designed to antagonize y'all with the name of the unit?
I'm sure if I sent Bug 5 copper as a joke I'd be accused of all sorts of crimes against Equinity.
>>3070
You're no fun.
No.3072
>>3071
Hey! I'm plenty of fun, just not to my enemies :3
No.3073
>>3070
>And before any of you can try to spin this, yes it's a pathetic force, no I don't think this force is the definition of helping. It simply shows the fact that collusion does exist between them
Thought that was obvious, yet you called it!
No.3074
>>3054
>D-do you hate me?
Eh, about 50% of the time.
I also hate kittens, dramatic upswings in musical scoring, and mexican standoffs in action movies, so my baseline is all wonky.
Don't take it personally. Like I said, I know there are people that aren't worth hating, even though I think our first interaction in this game was 600 troops during noob week.
But it was a Burro at noon, could have easily been Bug.
>>3070
>It simply shows the fact that collusion does exist between them
Clearly.
It's got nothing to do with concepts of friendship and teamwork, concepts that you seem to be having trouble seeing over all.
How impossible could it be that individual desire might go along a line without the express written consent of the alliance to defend other people from attack?
Specifically an attack on a smaller party that's only notable aggressive action was to call your party names.
If I attacked based on name calling, there would be a lot more attacking going on right now.
>>3056
> Once the heretics and heathens are destroyed, the game's environment will be a lot better.
You'll just find new heretics. It's what you're doing now. LoliBug aren't fun, we need to find their supplier.
Lets hit FC, they're heretical and say stuff all the time. Fear my meanness
You have to say the italics in a high pitched, whiny voice to pick up the context though.
>>3072
>Hey! I'm plenty of fun, just not to my enemies :3
You wouldn't know fun if it showed up and offered to give you syphilis.
No.3075
>>3066
Talking about how you're blatently ignore players like Tyrannis and Schatten but going all the way on a noob.
No.3076
>>3074
>You wouldn't know fun if it showed up and offered to give you syphilis.
Good one, Minty.
Eggs really is a massive party pooper.
No.3077
>>3076
Not me. This is my last post to stop these fakes, sad you have to take this approach. What you're trying to accomplish is beyond me.
As I said time and time again, this really shows the desperation of the FC
No.3078
>>3074
Who are you even trying to fool here minty? God I swear you' must be trolling to be this bad at this.
>>3076
>>3077
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery ^_^
No.3079
>>3077
Not me. This isn't my last post to stop these fakes, sad you have to take this approach. What you're trying to accomplish is beyond me.
As I said time and time again, this really shows the desperation of the FC
No.3081
No.3082
>>3078
>Who are you even trying to fool here minty? God I swear you' must be trolling to be this bad at this.
Who's fooling?
I've directly worked with you, I've supplied you, I've negotiated with and against you, and now I've been in open war with you.
I've had every possible form of interaction in these two games with you without being your minion, and you just don't seem to know how fun works.
It's not a big deal really.
No.3083
>>3082
Not the fun comment you fool, the 'I'm not a giant douche' angle you seem to be trying :^
No.3085
>>3009
Tripcode, because apparently it's necessary
No.3086
You tricksy, scaly Tanuki. I knew you'd try something like this.
No.3087
>>3086
Tsk Tsk
An unprovoked attack against the Clients?! I'm shocked and appalled!
No.3088
>>3086
>. I knew you'd try something like this.
It's a war you dumbass
No.3089
>>3088
>It's a war you dumbass
This is a post you dumbass
No.3090
>>3088
Did I miss the part where TCoLC declared war? Or are you agreeing that this is an unprovoked attack?
No.3091
>>3090
They've been in this war from the start. Or have you not been paying attention?
No.3092
>>3090
Yeah not buying it Jowls the Hutt, we know you're in it together hell we have skype logs with darkvessel saying as much.
So of course I'm sending my units I raised in defence back at my enemies you walrus looking Mustard Tiger.
No.3094
No.3095
>>3083
>the 'I'm not a giant douche' angle you seem to be trying
Well, because I'm not the one sending troops to preemptively defend.
Correction, this technically a Preventive Attack, because you feel it will better your position in a coming war that you've done nothing to resolve by weakening our capacity to act, because it's in your best interest to fight this battle with weapon systems at your convenience instead of with words, or in any way that won't get you access to a new supply of land and material.
Which is hilarious, because you're not equiped to handle one war, let alone three.
It's funny. I told you that you're fighting a hydra, and your reaction is to attack a lighthouse? You really need to work on your target selection system.
No.3096
>>3094
See here's the fun part they know it's true, I know it's true, anybody with a brain in their head knows it's true.
But unlike them I don't give a rats ass about public opinion so anyone who doesn't belive it can fuck right off because I honestly don't care =D
No.3097
>>3092
>We totally have proof!
>Doesn't show proof
You know, I was yelled at about that just yesterday, I kind of see the point in it now :^
>Correction, this technically a Preventive Attack,
No shit
>because you feel it will better your position in a coming war that you've done nothing to resolve
I started the war, why the hell would I resolve it :3
>by weakening our capacity to act, because it's in your best interest to fight this battle with weapon systems at your convenience instead of with words, or in any way that won't get you access to a new supply of land and material.
Ok, get off the drugs, try and focus, then rewrite this in a way that makes sense… k?
>Which is hilarious, because you're not equipped to handle one war, let alone three.
>Let alone three.
>three
interesting.
No.3098
>>3096
Well, what we know is true is this, and we have evidence of it that we're willing to provide:
http://pastebin.com/5KkMbH0Z
No.3099
>>3097
>>Correction, this technically a Preventive Attack,
>No shit
Preventive war undertaken without the approval of the United Nations is illegal under the modern framework of international law
Glad you agree.
>I started the war, why the hell would I resolve it :3
Because diplomacy is a lost art, and discussing issues is trumped by throwing several hundred units in a clear land grab.
>interesting.
Yes. I chose my words carefully.
I told you that TMO is a hydra, and you would be fighting them indefinitely. This statement is true.
You are now fighting FC as well, which adds to two.
You are also going to be fighting everyone who's left, because now you're just attacking people at random, much like when Myra went on a warpath against HappyMerchant, and how it helped to poison public perception. Which makes for a third front.
You still have time to cancel your attacks.
No.3100
>>3099
>cancel your attacks
See, can you plausibly cancel your own preparations? Interesting that you would offer that, though…
>at random
No, you were actively preparing for war. Actively.
>without the approval of the United Nations
Doesn't exist. Be nice if there was enough trust for such a thing, but there isn't.
I was hoping that one could be made after Bug/Loli fell, but…
No.3101
>>3099
>because diplomacy is a lost art
Wouldn't that be a reason why I wouldn't resolve things diplomatically? That's literally the opposite of what I asked.
No.3102
>>3099
Minty.
Neither you nor Tyhachi were even considering a diplomatic approach. You were actively preparing your assault.
No.3103
Thus the qualityposting ends, and the real battle begins. All our autism, locked in unending battle 'til the servers burn…
Or you could surrender
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbfkAqd6MAk
No.3105
>>3034
What the fuck do you have to say about this now!?
No.3106
>>3105
>implying anyone owes you explanations for anything
Multifag pls go
No.3107
>>3106
This is very much against the rules. Sacrificing your last nation to prevent an enemy getting it in war is forbidden.
Sephi has exactly one account, so fuck right off.
No.3108
>sacrificing your nation to prevent enemies from taking it
Last I checked enemies did take it, your asshurt is delicious though
No.3109
>>3108
We have clear evidence of collaboration between THK and FC. 1k unarmed and untrained cav, too, only proving the exploit.
Owned by Annuvin (Saddle Arabia)
Cauldronborn
Cavalry
Scrounged Weapons
Scrounged Armor
Size: 1000
Training: 1
No.3110
>>3109
And an unbuilt nation that had rebels in it before the tick along with a precedent established for alliances backstabbing their members
You are are a fucking idiot
No.3111
>>3110
So nation building is fine as long as it's """backstabbing"""? Cool.
Eggs, your waifu a shit, fite me
No.3112
>>3107
>>3109
>>3111
>Thinking throwing Ibu to the wolves without his consent is rule 4
>Forgetting that this exact scenario happened 3 days ago
>Throwing a fit over it and not even trying to sound the least bit calm
pic related
No.3113
>>3105
Calculated loss.
This was clearly about Mazerica.
Considering I was increasing my military presence because I would have to defend Mazerica, based on recent events, should anything occur. Which then immediately did.
Where you guys threw your full weight into trying to take one guy's significantly behind pace land. Probably because you need oil to war like you have been.
So I didn't want you to have Mazerica.
That's pretty much all I have left to say on that note.
>>3107
> Sacrificing your last nation to prevent an enemy getting it in war is forbidden.
Yeah, but that's not what happened.
Which is covered in the rules.
>>3109
>1k unarmed and untrained cav, too, only proving the exploit.
Not an exploit. Troop movement and collaboration.
MTVS is not attacking FC, you are.
So if you didn't want things to happen the way they turned out, maybe you should join the clergy?
>>3111
>So nation building is fine as long as it's """backstabbing"""? Cool.
Well, it's not nation building? Backstabbing is fine. We asked, pleaded, and begged to try to get you to stop attacking ib (ibuscus49).
Diplomacy wasn't working, this was the best way to halt your aggression and get ib out before you stole what little he did have.
Cold and ruthless? A bit. But we did ask you repeatedly to pull back, especially on people who weren't related. So it really was more of a Plan D by that point.
No.3114
File: 1433101353824.jpg (88.63 KB, 850x903, 850:903, sample_c1c911ef80e56c67262….jpg)
>>3113
Had you posted earlier, all of what you just said might have piqued my interest. Check the banner.
No.3115
>>3114
Seen it. I just like to talk. Make sure it's set in stone so to speak.
The banner may change, and it's does completely glaze over the fact that this wasn't the best or first of many options we attempted.
No.3116
>>3114
Ha! Best banner. Perfectly sums up the game.
No.3117
>>3113
D-D-DAMAGE CONTR-
Wait, you're not even trying to control the damage at this point.
I really don't blame you, you've been cucked pretty hard right now.
No.3118
>>3117
What damage control?
You mad bro, accept it and move along.
You really wanted that oil land. It was super important to your goals. You're mad that I defended it in the first place, and you're mad that it was handed to your enemies in a pretty backhanded way.
So, if you kept your aggression focused on parties you had evidence about and left ib alone, MTVS wouldn't have a new saddle to post Nazi propaganda all over.
Remember that plan to call up the Super Powers to put the smack down on unwanted defenders? That was fun times, and pretty effective really.
>>3103
>Or you could surrender
Hah, we're heretical remember? Burning heathens is all you understand any more.
There's no peace in surrender, only supplication and servitude.
Now I'm gonna go watch Die Hard 4, then come back, plan to kill some more of your troops, annoy you a bit more till it stops being so funny.
Which I doubt it ever will, because all I have to do is tell the truth, and understand how counting works.
No.3119
File: 1433111840155.png (179.44 KB, 793x1008, 793:1008, cozy_lyra_by_austiniousi-d….png)
God I'm so buttmad that you cheated us out of that nation.
Well whatever, at least we had to opportunity to force a smaller player out of the game before LoliBug did. You know they were going to do it eventually anyway.
They're such an aggressive, destructive force, their existence is a detriment to the fun of the game, and we don't want the game to be unfun, especially not for the smaller, weaker players.
We were protecting Ibuscus be forcing him out of the game. If anybody else would like to avail of our protection then please message me ingame and I can have a peacekeeping force at your doorstep in as little as six warticks.
No.3120
>>3119
This is why we use trip codes.
No.3121
>>3120
Nothing untrue was said. No need for trips.
No.3123
>>3121
If it wasn't untrue, then there wouldn't be a need for him to be such a pussy and do that, now would there?
No.3124
>>3121
>Nothing untrue was said. No need for trips.
I… don't even… You… K
No.3125
Guys guys, how do units work?
I don't know what I'm doing guys. This is too hard.
Please guys help me out.
Actually I think I'll make a new account and go undercover. They'll never suspect a thing.
…that didn't work. Bug, Loli, if CoLC don't win this war I'd like to join you guys.
What you don't trust me?
I'm such a dependable guy.
Guys please help. This war thing doesn't make sense to me.
A nation was stolen from under out noses, and I still don't know how units work.
Fuck it I quit.
No.3127
>>3125
>Fuck it I quit.
Nothing better to do with your time THK?
No.3128
>>3125
I swear everyone here is five.
Can we not stoop to this level?
As funny as it is its pretty stupid.
No.3129
File: 1433115269964.png (792.71 KB, 952x533, 952:533, Kill-la-Kill-Ryuko-and-Mak….png)
>>3125
I remember back when this shit happened during the FotA era.
Also, you got it wrong. I'm Ryuuko, and Scarf is supposed to be Mako since the two of them are close friends. Dumbass.
>>3127
If it is THK, then he needs to get his shit together. Or re-watch Kill La Kill, assuming he isn't just riding the bandwagon. You know the type. They're people that are fans of a show, movie, or game, yet they never took the time to participate in it themselves.
>>3128
Thank you, TyHachi.
No.3130
What we're at war?
Shit guys what do I do?
This was so sudden and not at all expected in the least.
It's not like we had weeks to prepare for this inevitability
I just can't handle the pressure.
No.3131
>>3130
Oh man I so shamed.
You really burned me.
No.3132
>>3130
This went from annoying to actually being kind of funny.
No.3133
>>3127
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McAeQiLmEYU
>>3129
>Also, you got it wrong. I'm Ryuuko
No you're not, you're autistic. That's all.
>assuming he isn't just riding the bandwagon. You know the type. They're people that are fans of a show, movie, or game, yet they never took the time to participate in it themselves.
…Shows, movies, games are meant to be watched/played. Not obsessed over endlessly. Stop being a virginal loser pls. kthanksbye
No.3134
>>3132
Also you as Mako fits better.
No.3136
Those impersonations are actually quite good. Keep up the good work!
And do me!
No.3137
File: 1433116889701.gif (1019.23 KB, 478x218, 239:109, whythehellisthissoadorable.gif)
>>3134
Given how THK has chosen to be Satsuki and Myra took a liking to Nui, I figured Ryuuko was a pretty good pick in my honest opinion. Plus, I actually feel that Mako is more befitting of Scarf because she is a very loyal friend to Ryuuko. There was the episode where she was Fight Club president and went against this character trait, but she came out of it learning a valuable life lesson about how greed can change a person after Ryuuko literally took the punches without resistance.
With me as Ryuuko, not only does it fall into place thanks to Scarf, but it also implies a frienemy-like relationship with me and The Horned King, who adopted Satsuki. Hell, the first few episodes does well to show that although me and THK fail to get along right now, it might be possible to fix that outside of >CLOP. After all, if he and TyHachi are able to reconcile, and if you take into account his grace during the FotA and MTVS war, then why wouldn't we be able to achieve a friendship, given enough time and patience?
No.3138
I want attention too. Please acknowledge my existence.
I'll cry if you don't. ;_;
What I don't have a personality on the boards?
Maybe I should ham it up more like all the other drama queens.
No.3139
File: 1433117243300.png (149.99 KB, 694x610, 347:305, walfas_custon_____nui_hari….png)
>>3137
>I figured Ryuuko was a pretty good pick in my honest opinion
Are you Horny's sister or what?
No.3140
File: 1433117380131.png (435.89 KB, 1000x898, 500:449, 4d3635822329437c39843243c6….png)
>>3139
Nah, that was just a show reference.
No.3141
>>3133
>…Shows, movies, games are meant to be watched/played. Not obsessed over endlessly. Stop being a virginal loser pls. kthanksbye
No.3142
>>3137
Oh yeah! And claiming Ryuuko allows me to post images like…
No.3143
>>3138
Excuse me while I giggle over here in the corner.
No.3144
RICK AND MORTY 100 TIMES FOREVER DOT COM
No.3145
File: 1433119318686.jpg (Spoiler Image, 25.97 KB, 460x287, 460:287, hitler_2014057c.jpg)
I joined Bug and Loli in their first world war. I didn't need a reason, it was fun.
I took their vast amount of illegitimate weapons and used them to strangle the game for 6 months. I was doing it to protect the world from the warmongers in DUMP.
Mainman rerolled? Well he needs to go. He's an obvious threat to the safety of the game. It's not just because I need my kicks.
THK received all his resources. That's a good excuse to keep the war machine rolling.
Shit people formed a coalition against me. Quick, Stasis so they can't get me.
But I wanna win, I guess I'll sign a deal with a devil and a Nazi. This can't end well for the game, but I've got no choice….right?
I can't attack, I made an agreement. Well what are they gonna do about it? I'll attack anyway.
21 Days into the reset. That single Russian nation is an easy target for expansion. Imma take it. Fuck the little guy.
I'm a nice guy, really.
And I look great in uniform.
No.3146
No.3148
File: 1433119775677.jpg (Spoiler Image, 496.28 KB, 900x1273, 900:1273, 1589002 - Kill_La_Kill Nui….jpg)
>>3145
No good. Too salty, not enough sugar.
I'm not a warmonger. I've never done nothing but defend myself, be it preemptively, in vengeance, or in support of my warmongering friends. Still, I know that I'm in the right because, well, how can I not be? My enemies are my enemies and they'll never be anything else. I can't possibly turn away from my friends, whatever they may do or whoever they may be.
I know that I'm honest and beloved because I always plainly and sweetly state my intentions, even if I later claim the intention was a jest. I mean, surely nobody can analyze my posts past the pr0n images that I put next to most of them :)
No.3149
>>3146
Where's that avatar bitch?! WE HAD AN AGREEMENT RICK
No.3150
>>3149
I almost thought that was an impersonation XD
No.3152
The Kingdom of Eggs is now recruiting.
Come join this aggressive expansionist monarchy today. You'll have no say in political decisions and we'll drag you into war after war without any thought to your well-being or safety.
Please disregard all my previous failures. When you become a member of our resource far…I mean friendly alliance, you will be banned from talking about it. In fact, I've banned a lot of things here, it is mandatory you memorize the list.
I'm not sure how I achieved this power considering my track record of failure and deceit. But dammit I'll abuse it while I have it. If there's a player not at war with me. It's my job to fix that.
No.3153
>>3152
9.5/10
you fucked up my name though :3
No.3154
TKoE spends- soon to be spent- a lot of time playing this game. He is- soon to be was- a donator.
A donator on two fucking multifag accounts.
No.3156
>>3154
I can see some double standards going on here.
No.3157
>>3154
yeah no, feel free to ask any of the people Stranger and I were just in a call with. We're currently in the same building using the same internet.
No.3158
>>3157
I can vouch. We played BGO earlier and both were there and talked. They are separate people.
No.3159
>>3157
GODDAMN IT TKOE IF YOU'RE GONNA HAVE A >CLOP-PLAYING GUEST OVER YOU GOTTA FUCKING WARN ME FIRST BECAUSE YOU FUCKING KNOW WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE ON MY END
and if you did warn me some time ago I sincerely apologize for forgetting
No.3160
>>3158
Heck I'll even pm you to confirm I'm not being impersonated.
No.3161
>>3157
Can confirm, I was in a call with them as well. They're either different people or one hell of a ventriloquist.
No.3162
>>3159
It may have slipped my mind… but seriously you really should have noticed before now :P
Also, you might want to add something to that effect to the rules
No.3163
>>3162
There used to be a guy that had a """""brother""""" that he was """""managing an account for"""""… That's why the rules were modified to no longer allow photo evidence, since it'd be easy to get fake-ass photos. Or just a photo; not like it proves a damn thing.
Thank god for Board Game Online ^_^
No.3164
>>3163
>Thank god for Board Game Online ^_^
This, X100,000,000
No.3165
>>3163
>>3164
>Thank god for Board Game Online ^_^
I notion that Board Game Online becomes a part of >CLOP culture for its fun, randomness, and indirect identity verification.
Those in favor?
No.3166
>>3165
Hear Hear!
…But only if you join the game we're about to play.
No.3167
No.3168
I have accepted Ibiscus into FFA. His involvement in the war was unfortunate, and I hope all butthurt about his last nation will be forgotten (or overshadowed by new butthurt) in three weeks time.
No.3169
>>3168
>I have accepted Ibiscus into FFA. His involvement in the war was unfortunate, and I hope all butthurt about his last nation will be forgotten (or overshadowed by new butthurt) in three weeks time
He's got nothing to fear from The Kingdom, should probably watch his back with FC though :P
No.3170
>>3169
>He's got nothing to fear from The Kingdom, should probably watch his back with FC though :P
We are a super bad ass group that takes shit from no man, that did kind of beg you guys not to attack him specifically, which resulted in the actions taken.
On multiple occasions.
Like I said, if you weren't attacking him, what went down wouldn't have gone down.
But strategic action never seems to come into play with your minions really.
No.3172
>>3170
>On multiple occasions.
Once ~= to multiple now it seems
>Like I said, if you weren't attacking him, what went down wouldn't have gone down. But strategic action never seems to come into play with your minions really.
>Implying we need any other situation
>Implying this isn't exactly what we wanted
>Implying you know shit about strategy
Jeeeeeesus kid, you're approaching full retard. Never go full retard
>Pic related, how I feel trying to explain things to you.
No.3173
>>3170
>On multiple occasions.
Elaborate..?
>strategic action
Giving the the guild a nation to avoid TKoE nabbing it is only temporarily strategic, at best. Til' the guild no longer requires you and noms you up too.
No.3174
No.3175
>>3173
>Elaborate..?
>>3033
>>3034
> I wanted to keep those who wanted to stay out, out.
>>3051
>But don't try to talk yourself out of attacking casuals.
>>3099
>You still have time to cancel your attacks.
Just in this thread, there are three requests from different members of FC to stop attacking, and an explicit request to at least leave ib out of it.
And an explicit statement of having no desire not to, because you feel he's playing wrong.
>>3173
>Giving the the guild a nation to avoid TKoE nabbing it is only temporarily strategic, at best. Til' the guild no longer requires you and noms you up too.
The funny thing about that statement, with the impending 'nomming'. There's only one party trying to nom other players at the moment. In the long term, it's a potential problem.
Not one fixed by capitulation at this point.
Well, and Myra, but Myra's been planning attacks on people for months that we have to talk her out of regularly. It's standard conversation at this point.
>>3172
>Jeeeeeesus kid, you're approaching full retard. Never go full retard
I'm always full retard. Why do you think I never win the oscar, I'm only nominated.
Default setting is full blast. I have to tone it down for you.
The Monarchy is a corrupt system.
No.3176
>>3174
So yeah, once.
>>3175
>There's only one party trying to nom other players at the moment.
>The nation of Maneightoba (JollyGreenGI) has been conquered by the armies of Aryan! 2015-05-28 12:00:06
oh really? I mean, sure technically we're the only ones currently trying but that statement is absurd when there are currently 3 people with more than 1 nation. none of whom are us.
>The Monarchy is a corrupt system.
Only if your king has a horn.
No.3177
>>3174
Oh, right. Thought he meant something other than multiple pleas.
"Let's eat grandma!" / "Let's eat, grandma!"
Commas save lives and confusion.
>>3175
>There's only one party trying to nom other players at the moment
Yeah, that's true, maybe. I have no idea what the guild is planning. The guild has already managed to gain every captured nation so far in the post reset. Nations that never stood a chance against them, might I add. One courtesy of your fears of stronger alliances.
>The Monarchy is a corrupt system.
Still better than anarchy.
>>3176
THAT. AVATAR. WHERE IS IT.
Really leaving me with my dick in my hand here.
No.3178
>>3176
>>3177
>Implying your crusade didn't cause half of the conquered nations in the game to be conquered
>Trying to pass off military action against defenseless players who have no idea what they're doing as beneficial to them
You do know you're supposed to smuggle those drugs, not use them, right?
No.3179
>>3178
Since our Crusade™ started over a week after the captures of Mainman and Boothebug, the latter by you, and our heroic defense of Brightbrook, I'd say you are talking firmly out of your plot.
No.3180
>>3179
>half of the conquered nations
>Not realizing half of 4 is 2
No.3181
>>3180
3 nations were attacked, straight out of noob week.
2 were conquered, and not by us.
One asked us for protection, and he was not conquered.
2/5 isn't half, unless I miss my guess?
No.3182
>>3181
Yes, 2 out of 5 isn't half, but a nation that isn't conquered isn't a conquered nation, bringing the total to 4, not 5. And 2 out of 4 is, in fact, half.
No.3183
>>3182
No, but a nation that THK tried to conquer, and even left Independence for, is important to consider in this case.
CoLC is the only alliance that has actually offered a legitimate defense to the casuals.
No.3184
>>3183
>CoLC is the only alliance that has actually offered a legitimate defense to the casuals.
>when we don't want the nation for ourselves we defend it so nobody else can get it
No.3185
I don't know about you guys, but I think one of our paladins got the message across about FC.
No.3186
>>3184
When we don't want our enemies to get it we defend it. Properly.
Brightbrook is still happily playing, so I'd call that operation 100% successful :3
No.3187
>>3183
>important to consider in this case
It's not, really! Spiteful defense does not negate aggression. It actually kinda shifts your standing down a feeeew pegs.
>>3183
>CoLC is the only alliance that has actually offered a legitimate defense to the casuals.
And your current alliance is also the only alliance that explicitly denied attempts to defend the casuals in favor of publicly declaring your expansionist aggression~
No.3188
>>3187
"Spiteful defense"? That phrase alone killed your point stone dead. gg no re
No.3189
>>3178
>>Implying your crusade didn't cause half of the conquered nations in the game to be conquered
I caused 1/4 the conquered nations to be conquered perhaps
>Trying to pass off military action against defenseless players who have no idea what they're doing as beneficial to them
Nope, that's your side :3
No.3190
The message was removed today, but here it is in screenshot form!
Daily reminder that FC/MTVS are teamkillers
No.3191
> I'll leave that [sic], up for a few weeks
Nice few weeks you have there admin
No.3193
>>3190
Daily remininder KoE are desperate enough for oil that they'd ignore half the players in FC and attack the one not involved because reasons. When asked to let the uninvolved join a neutral party, they refuse because they're too greedy to care.
No.3194
>>3193
>desperate for oil
Uhh, you wot m8?
If we were desperate for oil our saddles wouldn't be attacking.
In reality IB was the easy target, the most effective way to force you to lose the defender bonus, that was until you shanked him like a pedophile in Max-Sec.
^_^
No.3195
>>3193
Rather a reminder that the FC will sell you out to a third party when involved in their pathetic alliance planning to attack others while supporting their enemies.
If you had any consideration for your teammates you would move them out before openly talking about attacks on another alliance.
No.3196
Alright, next time our private Skype chat gets leaked, we'll remember to get people out of our alliance beforehand. *eyesroll*
Especially people as involved as ibuscus, with whom I exchanged fewer words than Scarf or Sephi. Thinking of which, maybe THEY'RE involved, too? Better send an attack, Eggs!
No.3197
>>3196
>>3195
>openly talking about attacks on another alliance.
>talking about
> talking
before the conversation happened.
No.3198
>>3196
Yup, cause we can tell who is active/involved in your chat from one leaked Skype chat. It's weakest link first so don't pull the obvious "wah he's a newfag wah". He's no more a newfag than me.
Come back when you have some new shit to smear.
Yup, same image, cause same bullshit.
No.3200
>>3199
Altered it slightly :3
>>3198
>chat from one leaked Skype chat
Meant alliance from one leaked Skype chat.
Plus, do the FC realize Bug and Loli attacked random members of the CoLC without knowledge of who's involved and who's not? Nope. Probably cause no one really gives the slightest fuck except when they know they're going to lose and have to sell out the member to avoid an enemy gain.. Sad really.
No.3201
>>3196
3 weeks, m8. That's how long it takes for noob week to wear off these days.
I don't know how he survived without a single sat building to his name, in a saddle no less, but he had plenty of opportunity to get gud or stasis out.
I'm happy to see that he's created a new nation in FFA, and wish him good luck in the future. Maybe he'll make a bakery this time…
No.3202
>>3201
>I don't know how he survived without a single sat building to his name
Well, for what it's worth it took a loooot longer than 3 weeks for admin to add sat buildings in the first place :P
No.3203
>>3201
Yeah, he's more suited there, dunno what FC's intentions were for keeping him around, maybe they needed the numbers that badly? :P
Has he built anything from that care package you sent him?
No.3204
>>3198
But you can by looking at his nation and by us telling you. In fact, you asked us if you could have his nnation before, which one doesn't for active members.
And it's not how new he is, it's about how active he is and whether he takes part in stuff. You clearly do, so you're free game. Others may play for several months, but solo, and thus are not.
>>3200
I don't care what Lolibug did. I don't support them, and I don't condone their rampage. When they asked FC for help (attacking you), we declined.
>>3201
It saddens me to hear that from yoou, Scarf. You used to defend players that didn't "get gud" from bullies, becauuse everyone should play how they want. Now look at you. :(
>>3203
We "kept him around" because he joined us of his own free will. What SHOULD we hhave done, reject or kick him? We (both PI and IC) don't even do that in Compounds, and over there, having members does actually have drawbacks.
No.3205
File: 1433253852604.jpg (115.94 KB, 1270x707, 1270:707, Dontwannathisconvoanymoarp….jpg)
>>3204
>But you can by looking at his nation
All I can tell by looking at his nation is that it's pretty shit. Not much different from the rest of the FC.
>you asked us if you could have his nnation before
What? Who asked such a stupid thing and proof?
>I don't care what Lolibug did. I don't support them, and I don't condone their rampage. When they asked FC for help (attacking you), we declined.
That's an interesting statement. Considering you were going to make a war chat with them and all, you must have been on pretty good terms.
>It saddens me to hear that from yoou, Scarf. You used to defend players that didn't "get gud" from bullies, becauuse everyone should play how they want. Now look at you. :(
Ib was playing how he wanted according to you, did he come to us begging to be spared? Nope. You're the only one still crying about this crap. He seems just fine. Scarf even sent him support so fuck off.
>We "kept him around" because he joined us of his own free will. What SHOULD we hhave done, reject or kick him?
Yes, he didn't respond according to you So, what is the point? Seems pretty Suuuus.
>We (both PI and IC) don't even do that in Compounds, and over there, having members does actually have drawbacks.
Don't play Compounds, pretty irrelevant.
No.3207
>>3205
>>We "kept him around" because he joined us of his own free will. What SHOULD we hhave done, reject or kick him?
>Yes, he didn't respond according to you So, what is the point? Seems pretty Suuuus.
New players, this is how you get treated if you join CoLC! Everyone joining the game should do themselves a favor and join FFA instead.
No.3209
>>3205
>Who asked such a stupid thing…?
Scarf. I'm on mobile, and don't know how to make sceens or whatnot, but I know he's honest enough to confirm it himself. And I should look unto making stuff on mobile, I guess…
>Lolibug
Hmm. True. I was only speaking for myself, but since you werre talking about FC and not me, I'll admit that's irrelevant. Sorry.
>ibuscus
A few small things lead me to assume that he was inactive for that time period. But I don't have proof (not that I could prove that anyway). And I'm not really crying, what's past is past, but it lessened my opinion of you considrably.
>Yes, he didn't respond according to you So, what is the point? Seems pretty Suuuus.
>"Kick all casuals!"
Yeah, no. Enough dedgaem.
>Don't play Compounds, pretty irrelevant.
True. But if we don't kick people that actually drag us down, why would you think we would if they're not?
>>3207
It's just an anon, but yeah… you don't make a good case for CoLC, Stranger.
No.3210
>>3205
>What? Who asked such a stupid thing and proof?
No.3211
>>3185
Yeah>>3185
>I think one of our paladins got the message across about FC.
I don't know. I don't really read the spam you guys leave laying around in my yard.
>>3194
> that was until you shanked him like a pedophile in Max-Sec.
Or we could wait for Wave #3 to hit with an assured loss in the future due to lack of coordination.
He's still playing, in a group you're not attacking, and maybe he'll actually respond to messages over there. Sounds like wins all around.
>>3195
>involved in their pathetic alliance planning to attack others while supporting their enemies.
Yeah, that would factor in if ib ever showed up to the town hall meetings.
>before openly talking about attacks on another alliance.
Openly talking about attacks on another alliance in our private chat room where we talk about things like if we want to move forward on attacks at all and if people should leave for their own safety should we decide to do so?
Putting the cart before the horse there I think.
Group discussions need to be brought to the group for discussion. The information leaking is only a factor.
>>3201
>I don't know how he survived without a single sat building to his name, in a saddle no less, but he had plenty of opportunity to get gud or stasis out.
You missed the other time we sent in defense due to rebels. We didn't brag about it because it was the right thing to do.
>>3203
>dunno what FC's intentions were for keeping him around,
He was a comrade, we'd help when we could, even when it wasn't requested.
No one needs numbers, this is CLOP.
>>3205
>Yes, he didn't respond according to you
Doesn't matter. He joined, we protected him as long as it was feasible. Didn't matter if the entire time I got two responses from him, and I was personally obligated with his defense.
Didn't matter that he had 5 oil farms, 2 gasoline plants and just enough materials to run the small group of naval and tanks he kept around to fight rebels.
>>3209
>you don't make a good case for CoLC, Stranger.
It could be someone imitating Stranger no, the trip is there
It could be a really awkward Straw Man attempt.
But I don't think this group is related to CoLC anyways. There's too many… differences.
No.3212
After some thought I decided I would post this. I don't care if it makes me look bad or anything else.
http://pastebin.com/U5Gk1S2P
(The pastebin I sent to Scarf auto deleted, so I made another one. It only details my conversation with Minty, but I have decided to refrain from sharing the one I have with Sephi. http://pastebin.com/vDC4h7KQ)
No.3213
>>3204
>When they asked FC for help (attacking you), we declined.
Guess that didn't stop Bug from joining anyway.
No.3214
>>3213
>actually complaining about the people they declared war on attacking back
I'd consider this a new low, but then again I'm not even surprised
No.3215
>>3213
I guess I'm popular today.
No.3216
>>3209
Yes, I did ask that. Ibiscus was going to die without military intervention. Which, I would like to point out, would have cost more than the buildings in the nation itself.
If we'd taken the nation, at least it wouldn't have been a team-killing backstab. You could even have had the option to keep him in your alliance~
No.3217
>>3216
>I'm a giant hypocritical faggot. I like the smell of my own farts.
FTFY
No.3218
>>3216
>If we'd taken the nation, at least it wouldn't have been a team-killing backstab. You could even have had the option to keep him in your alliance~
So that now you could have had the option to take two nations from Ib? Jee wiz Mister, you sure are greedy!
No.3219
>>3218
Again, 3 weeks noob protection. Though yes, it's certainly better for Ibiscus to be in FFA.
No.3220
>>3213
*looks at radar and blinks*
The fuck? Renard had his training 8 troops shoved up my ass this time yesterday, and now he's rejoined CoLC because I sent a small counterfleet with the intent to push him out of the conflict?
You guys could have at least told me' so I could discuss pulling back my attack even though the NAP has a 24 hour umbrella under it.
http://clop.us/viewnation.php?nation_id=74
No.3221
>>3220
CoLC is sending resources to KoE. Therefore your little NAP has been broken anyway.
No.3222
No.3223
File: 1433286234092.jpg (51.25 KB, 850x481, 850:481, sample_9973e6fcbe5e77a6b55….jpg)
>>3220
Relax, I'm still in the fight. I'm just checking up on the Clients to see how they're doing. Health evaluation, you see. Oh, and the recalled troops was a minor accident on my part, but thanks for checking up on me.
>>3221
First of all, where's your evidence? Second, the NAP is that the Clients and FC are neutral to each other, so I fail to see how it's broken. Third, I am still a part of the Kingdom Of Eggs, so even if I'm temporarily a Client, it shouldn't change the inner workings of the NAP itself.
No.3224
>>3221
> Therefore your little NAP has been broken anyway.
If you have proof, it's change the conversation. How ever right now that's supposition.
My particular point of pissed offitude, is that someone had plans to Use Me to break the NAP, because I would complete an attack against a friendly alliance.
And that is some dick bag diplomacy.
So I want to know if I'm over thinking this scenario, or if someone actually thought this would make me a effective enough bad guy to justify changing the terms of combat.
>>3216
> Ibiscus was going to die without military intervention. Which, I would like to point out, would have cost more than the buildings in the nation itself.
Don't care. Would have done it anyways.
It's not the value that's important. Keeping you from having it is most important. Defending it from an attacker is the goal.
In the old world, we would have recommended burning it.
In the new world, we would have wanted to fortify it.
Because of the lack of communication, it was a clear and obvious liability.
Team-killing backstabbing is in the new world playbook. You gotta play by the rules bro.
If we told ib what was going to happen, it would have been against the rules.
I do hope he's happier not being your target for a few weeks though.
No.3225
>>3222
Dark Vessel pushing his Zebrica to 150b/150m at the beginning of the war was pure coincidence! The same goes for the players who constantly switch between both alliances.
Both alliances are not related at all! There's nothing to see here!
No.3226
>>3224
>My particular point of pissed offitude, is that someone had plans to Use Me to break the NAP, because I would complete an attack against a friendly alliance.
>And that is some dick bag diplomacy.
>So I want to know if I'm over thinking this scenario, or if someone actually thought this would make me a effective enough bad guy to justify changing the terms of combat.
Relax, it was nothing more that radar jumping AFAIK.
No.3227
>>3224
>So I want to know if I'm over thinking this scenario, or if someone actually thought this would make me a effective enough bad guy to justify changing the terms of combat.
>>3226
>>3223
These.
No.3228
>>3226
Really, it was just a checkup to make sure the CoLC were unmolested.
We've actually done it before, nothing serious. Certainly not anything like a violation of NAP; you're innocent of that.
No.3229
>>3210
>>3216
> it wouldn't have been a team-killing backstab. You could even have had the option to keep him in your alliance
So clearence from his alliance so you could take his nation and then they would help him rebuild.
Do you realize that that is exactly what rule 4 is against?
Thats not better then "a team-killing backstab." because unlike that it's actually against the rules. You effectively asked them to let you nation farm their alliance.
Good on you for telling the rule breaking faggot off Cauldron, hope you guys wipe the floor with their smug hypocritical faces.
No.3230
>>3229
> it's actually against the rules
Nope, if IB was involved in the decision then maybe?
No.3231
>>3223
>Second, the NAP is that the Clients and FC are neutral to each other, so I fail to see how it's broken.
Supplying resources/funding to anyone who one party is at war with by the other party is a violation of the NAP.
No.3232
>>3230
Directly from the rules "Giving anyone anything in recompense for taking his last nation is banned, whether you do it yourself or your friends do it for you."
Had they allowed him to take the nation and then kept Ib in their alliance and helped him rebuild his nation they would have been compensating him for the loss of his nation to a friendly force.
>If we'd taken the nation, at least it wouldn't have been a team-killing backstab. You could even have had the option to keep him in your alliance
Demonstrates clearly that this is what Scarf intended
This is precisely what the rule is against and shows that it was his intention to violate it if the Cauldron had not rightfully told him to fuck off.
No.3233
>>3231
>Supplying resources/funding to anyone who one party is at war with by the other party is a violation of the NAP.
Completely false, there is nothing wrong with sending resources to a party but not joining a war yourself.
The only time it would be over the line, is if you are supplying a party who is overwhelmingly wining/starting wars on everyone IE terrorist actions.
No.3234
>>3233
Completely true. It's specifically a clause in the NAP that neither party may supply another for the purposes of attacking the other party.
No.3235
>>3223
> so even if I'm temporarily a Client,
That's terrible.
When the shit with ib went down, it wasn't because we're in collusion with MTVS. It was literally a Friend of a Friend situation.
We don't share members, we don't have matching seats on the board of directors. It was a guy we know is in position to do a thing that could help, let's ask if he will.
If you just pop in and out of that alliance at whim, what the hell is going on?
If you're not affiliated with CoLC, why are your running their radar?
If you are affiliated with CoLC, what the fuck is up with the direct attack on spurious data? It's completely against your NAP which specificly says you can't attack us for 24 hours after leaving CoLC.
If you pop in and out at whim, that clause is meaningless.
>>3225
>The same goes for the players who constantly switch between both alliances.
This is the first time I've seen it, and I'm frankly shocked it continues after you declared war on us.
>>3226
>Relax, it was nothing more that radar jumping AFAIK.
Yeah, see the above.
I am glad this wasn't an attempt to trick me into attacking CoLC. unless it was and this is all damage control
I'm not sure this is the way you should handle radar. Shouldn't CoLC get their own radar in place?
Yay, more paranoia! I was seriously lacking that in the thousands of troops you guys keep leaving on my doorstep.
>>3233
>Completely false, there is nothing wrong with sending resources to a party but not joining a war yourself.
Let me show you that NAP:
~Current Treaties~
Non Aggression Pact with the Coalition of Lunar Clients
1. No player in either alliance may send attacking forces at any player in the other alliance.
2. Similarly, no player in either alliance may send resources to any other player for the purposes of attacking the other alliance.
3. If any player leaves either alliance, this non-aggression pact remains binding for 24 hours after they have left. No attacking forces may be set to or from said player.
4. This NAP means that going SV is no longer a declaration of war, so long as the SV is in the NAP'ed alliance.
We'd put it on the public facing page, but we're pedantic sons of bitches like that.
No.3236
>>3233
>>3234
>>3235
>>3231
>>3228
>>3223
>>3224
Oh
my
fucking
god.
I'm actually at the breaking point right about now.
I don't understand what's with all the fucking war between every single one of you.
Scarf, I thought you would have been better than this.
Eggs, I'm not so much surprised as I am sorely disappointed in you.
As for anyone else in this god forsaken thread right now, the fact that all of your asses are doing is instigating this shit is just COMPLETELY beyond me.
All I wanted to do was play a game.
Just a game.
And this is the result. A *now* dying game that ends up with everyone at war with everyone.
No fucking wonder everyone decided to leave the game.
No.3237
>>3233
>>3234
>>3235
Noted, feel free to continue.
No.3238
>We "kept him around" because he joined us of his own free will. What SHOULD we hhave done, reject or kick him?
>Yes, he didn't respond according to you So, what is the point? Seems pretty Suuuus.
New players, this is how you get treated if you join CoLC! Everyone joining the game should do themselves a favor and join FFA instead.
CoLC? Wat. I'm not a even a member of the CoLC yet alone the leader, or a leader of any alliance for that matter so it's not even up to me. This is my opinion if you don't like having spies and easy targets around, an opinion the FC lacks until the inevitable conflict arrives. FC ruined his chances of a peaceful game by keeping him around and not shipping him off to FFA when they saw he wasn't doing much cause obviously they have a lack of desire in protecting their weaker members. Proves my point they were keeping him around for something.
At least FFA (and CoLC too) will protect you til the enemy eventually halts or succeeds instead of selling you out.
Share those drugs or go back to calling people multi-fags, Minty.
>>3210
That's pretty damn insulting of Scarf and I expect better from him, he does have some amount of justifiable reasons, but still, he is a negotiator in this and tries to find the best solution for everyone. If he was spearheading the war it would look a lot different.
>>3226
>Relax, it was nothing more that radar jumping AFAIK.
Yup, just an extra precaution to prevent FCS partners from getting the jump on innocent players, something the FC claims they're highly against but actions speak louder than words, eh?
>>3229
>So clearence from his alliance so you could take his nation and then they would help him rebuild. Do you realize that that is exactly what rule 4 is against?
You realize this is exactly what the FC did? They rolled out a red carpet for THK and he nommed it.
After talking to Ty personally I feel this has all been a huge preventive measure to keep KoE from becoming the guild.
What I don't understand is joining the guild to prevent a coud-be guild.
I have nothing against the people who aren't even situated to know better. I did however expect better than one wave of defense on IB to stall for time so that THK could have time to take him, really makes the pretense of defending him for anything but bad reasons evaporate into thin air.
The rule is against people willingly giving up their nation to be built up again, either for gain or just to help your allies.
Where in the case of backstabbing you cannot offer any kind of help to the victim after the said backstabbing took place.
Fortunately for FC they have the guild to take it for them so they kept some amount of artificial respect for themselves and thus keeps the belief boat afloat.
All in all you wanted to be safe from the government, so you became a stupid government.
>>3236
>No fucking wonder everyone decided to leave the game.
Because of drama? Pretty sure that's the reason people still play, you can thank the guild for people leaving.
No.3239
>>3236
>Eggs, I'm not so much surprised as I am sorely disappointed in you.
uwotm8?
No.3240
>>3238
Except no it isn't the same because you missed the entire point of what makes it against the rules.
>If we'd taken the nation, at least it wouldn't have been a team-killing backstab. You could even have had the option to keep him in your alliance
>Giving anyone anything in recompense for taking his last nation is banned, whether you do it yourself or your friends do it for you
Really how fucking hard is it to see the one clear diffrence here. What Scarf is endorsing in his post is that the Finite Cauldron could have rebuilt Ib if he'd taken him, THAT'S THE PART THAT'S A BANNABLE OFFENSE nothing else about what you said holds any actual relevance to do whether it would be a rules violation or not, instead it just distracts from it. Scarf wanted to break the rules, Finite Cauldron told him to fuck off.
No.3241
>>3238
>Because of drama? Pretty sure that's the reason people still play, you can thank the guild for people leaving.
Speaking from the perspective of a new player, y'all look like raving lunatics chasing after ghosts and trying to find purpose in reliving and making everyone else relive a bygone age.
To be brutally honest, running around going 'OMG GUILD' is only serving to make y'all look worse for stirring shit up. Again, speaking from the perspective of a new player.
No.3242
>>3241
>Again, speaking from the perspective of a new player.
And a guild sheep. Baaaaa
No.3243
>>3242
Again, you know me better than that, Sephi~
I'm way too much of an arrogant blowhard to be in anyone's pocket.
No.3245
>>3242
>And a guild sheep. Baaaaa
I didn't know you were advertising for the guild? That makes so much sense now in hindsight.
KoE is working to unify the game. That's so cunning, it's brilliant. Is the name of the plan Operation Tapioca?
Because that's what I'd call it.
>>3238
>Share those drugs or go back to calling people multi-fags, Minty.
I haven't called anyone a multifag? I've actually defended Viper/Sephi on a number of occasions by pointing out Sephi's account was deleted, so he's not multifagging.
> FC ruined his chances of a peaceful game by keeping him around and not shipping him off to FFA when they saw he wasn't doing much
The Finite Cauldron is not run with business like effectiveness. We mostly sit around, trade goods, and bro the place up.
We make jokes about things like Myra's shitty repairs and crack jokes about math, language, and cross discipline study.
Also we complain about being annoyed at the board. Who's frustrating us, and what we can do about it and what we shouldn't do about it.
The ruined chances of a peaceful game was the 1.1k troops you were sending at him because he was a weak link that you wanted to use to hurt us because he didn't git gud.
No.3246
>>3244
That's fine~
My opinions are only representative of what people see when they see your aggression without having a history with any of the players.
But that's obviously not important.
No.3247
>>3246
>>3245
Huh … now that's interesting …
> Just because I feel like green texting this, why is it that now I know what's going behind the scenes with everything when I'm by myself?
It's because I'm finally figuring out who's the ones running the damn show.
We're all puppet masters here. The only thing is is that there's one set of strings, and we can't tell who it is in these dark times.
It's very weird how all of this information just POURS out. Don't yall agree?
It's also interesting how the war was even started in the first place. Switching from TMO to FC like that fast? And I didn't even know that was happening?
Wow. Makes me feel like something special here.
No.3249
>>3242
>>3243
That wasn't me. But when I saw what the anon posted, I giggled a little.
>>3245
>I've actually defended Viper/Sephi on a number of occasions by pointing out Sephi's account was deleted, so he's not multifagging.
I don't recall you doing this for me. Could you kindly show me? And why does that light bulb look like it's hooked up to the remains of a smoke detector?
No.3250
>>3247
I wish I knew what you've figured out.
Wow I feel silly for only just realizing what your name means.
No.3252
>>3250
Honestly? A lot.
Am I at liberty to speak about such? Not really.
Maybe at an unprecedented time I will. Not right now, with all of these lovely ponies leading a stampede all around.
/And yes, Kingdom Hearts, SAO and Homestuck are mine :o)/
No.3253
>>3247
>It's also interesting how the war was even started in the first place. Switching from TMO to FC like that fast? And I didn't even know that was happening?
>Pic related
Doesn't pay enough attention = wasn't informed
No.3254
>>3253
> Blames me for not knowing
> Blames FC for some reason related to bugloli
> Decides to go to war over rumors
Yep, sounds like all in a Daus work to me
No.3255
>>3254
>Blames us for not telling him
>Refuses to read the thing where we told him
dude…
> Decides to go to war over rumors
uhhmmm, read the OP image… maybe you should scroll up more often, might stop your confusion
No.3256
>>3255
> Stop the confusion
Being confused is the only way to keep my insanity intact.
Not to mention a new view becomes opened.
No.3257
>>3256
Ah crap. I think we broke Keymaster.
This can't end well
No.3259
>>3254
Dude, I said it in all caps why we decided to go after FC. Also, Full Metal Alchemist, really?
>>3256
Insanity is one thing. Disregarding common knowledge is another.
>>3257
There are worse ways for someone to lose their sanity aside from conspiracy. Pic related.
No.3260
>>3249
>I don't recall you doing this for me. Could you kindly show me?
Because I didn't do it in public? But sure, why not, it's funny in a way.
''[4/22/2015 3:20:42 PM] Princess Candyass: Guess which autistic piece of shit didn't quit Clop after all?
[4/22/2015 3:20:55 PM] Schatten: Oh no.
[4/22/2015 3:20:59 PM] TyHachi _: Huh?
[4/22/2015 3:21:05 PM] TyHachi _: PIBH?
[4/22/2015 3:21:05 PM] Schatten: Please don't.
[4/22/2015 3:21:07 PM] Schatten: PIBH?
[4/22/2015 3:21:45 PM] Princess Candyass: Huh? Pibb's playing with his regular account and he doesn't have autism. Oo
[4/22/2015 3:21:55 PM | Edited 3:22:00 PM] TyHachi _: Sephi?
[4/22/2015 3:22:05 PM] Schatten: Would also be my next guess.
[4/22/2015 3:24:15 PM] Redacted Link
[4/22/2015 3:25:02 PM] TyHachi _: You going to tell admin?
[4/22/2015 3:25:13 PM] TyHachi _: It makes sense now
[4/22/2015 3:25:21 PM] TyHachi _: Why he quit…
Time Jump
[4/23/2015 3:59:46 AM] MintyRest: Though it does mean that Sephi isn't multifagging.
[4/23/2015 4:02:24 AM] MintyRest: Attached Image It does sort of explain this in a little more detail.
[4/23/2015 4:02:53 AM] TyHachi _: Oh
[4/23/2015 4:03:40 AM] Princess Candyass: Well, I guess he won't get banned after all. We'll just kill him over and over until he leaves :P
[4/23/2015 4:03:49 AM] MintyRest: Yeah, I remembered reading it a few days ago and it standing out as super weird.
[4/23/2015 4:55:01 AM] Schatten: I noticed it too. Hmm…''
>>3249
>And why does that light bulb look like it's hooked up to the remains of a smoke detector?
See file name, cause Myra's set ups are creepy looking but effective.
>>3259
Man, porn games just keep getting weirder, don't they?
No.3261
File: 1433302838033.jpg (1.06 MB, 807x1128, 269:376, 6522dc3e7484acd0f1c3d5e55d….jpg)
>>3260
>Man, porn games just keep getting weirder, don't they?
It's literally just a fucking Mario Party clone. Game grumps even did a video on it a while back, along with other Mary Kate & Ashley games, during the best era.
No.3262
>>3260
>[4/23/2015 4:03:40 AM] Princess Candyass: Well, I guess he won't get banned after all. We'll just kill him over and over until he leaves :P
Cute
No.3263
>>3262
>Cute
Because no one talks shit on the internet. Ever.
No.3264
>>3260
>those quotes
I cannot understand why you'd put those in there. I mean, props for honesty, but whaaaat?
The irony of it? None of that would have made us attack you. It wasn't until you started preparing to join Bugipop and Hornyan that we were left with no recourse.
No.3265
>>3263
What, you think people would do that, just go on the internet and tell lies?!?
No.3266
>>3264
>I cannot understand why you'd put those in there. I mean, props for honesty, but whaaaat?
Because the exact response when I came on later needs the context to make sense.
Also it's a framing device, you have to see how it was framed. It wasn't OMG, Sephi's up to subterfuge! It was a fairly conversational Holy Shit, you guys hear about…
Also the multiple assumptions about PIBH are kind of funny in a way.
> It wasn't until you started preparing to join Bugipop and Hornyan that we were left with no recourse.
We weren't preparing to join anyone. FC is kind of free will hippy bullshit.
Your spy seems to have only given you the info that would get you to go to war with TFC, which is also pretty suspect.
The truth is much more complicated.
Personally, I didn't want to back either side. I like Cloud Kicker enough that when he joined your side, I wanted to back away from an attack, I generally liked Sephi and Eggs, and my only beef was with the fact Scarf keeps looking for a crusade and later on that Stranger kept attacking me on the board when ever I'd open my mouth.
I can't speak for anyone but myself, but there was as much push for attacking as against depending on who was speaking at any given time.
The argument was deadlocked, waiting to see what would change.
Then the attacks started, making it really hard to argue against self defense.
If you feel like pointing out that I was in the process of militarizing by building barracks, which I was, I'd like to also point out that thanks to ib, I was central defense for Saddles, and he was sitting very open.
That's also why I changed from Vassal to Decentralized, so that I could handle defense more directly.
No.3267
File: 1433306570416.png (107.98 KB, 699x677, 699:677, lightning_bolt_and_cloud_k….png)
>>3266
Love you too Minty!
No.3268
>>3266
Well, then it's a shame that Myrami specifically said, and I quote:
[1:01:10 PM | Edited 1:01:20 PM] Princess Candyass: K, so I suppose it's only minty and umbra who'll hop into the fight with me?
How else can that sentence be interpreted?
No.3269
>>3268
Because contextually, the last thing I said in the deadlocking at that point was: about a day before boon joined in
[5/26/2015 7:48:43 PM] TyHachi _: This new guy is obnoxious. In regards to >>2922
[5/26/2015 7:49:56 PM] MintyRest: I'm all for attacking KoE if anyone asks later.
[5/26/2015 7:50:22 PM] TyHachi _: ;) The smiley face means it was taken in jest
[5/26/2015 7:50:37 PM] TyHachi _: Also Cloud joined them
[5/26/2015 7:50:41 PM] MintyRest: To the point I might even reignite agressions against LBoS on top, but I'm a mite angry at the moment.
[5/26/2015 7:50:53 PM] TyHachi _: KoE
[5/26/2015 7:51:23 PM] MintyRest: I see, still I want Scarf's head on a pike at the moment.
Because I get angry, and then I type mean things about you all the time. Specifically, when adding Boon to our chat, I said:
[5/27/2015 9:10:43 PM] TyHachi _: Personally I'm okay with it. I mean if we can't accept this person then why have a recruitment topic.
[5/27/2015 9:10:53 PM] MintyRest: That's sort of a yes from me. Worst that could happen is information leak, which is fine.
[5/27/2015 9:11:09 PM] TyHachi _: Yeah if we have a leak the source will be pretty obviois
[5/27/2015 9:11:24 PM] MintyRest: Oh no, Scarf might find out that I hate Scarf, woe is I.
[5/27/2015 9:11:29 PM] TyHachi _: Lol
[5/27/2015 9:12:01 PM] TyHachi _: It is done. ^^
[5/27/2015 9:13:32 PM] * TyHachi _ added Boonslayer *
Because it's a private chat, where we're free to let our hair down, and say what we're thinking. There's disagreements and conflicts, but that's because we're trying to have fun; not rule the world with an iron fist.
No.3270
>>3269
Feelings aren't the issue. Call me a faggot all you like, wish for my head on a pike, whatever. I refuse to care about that.
Actively prepare to attack? That cannot be ignored.
No.3271
>>3270
>Actively prepare to attack? That cannot be ignored.
You see, feelings are exactly the issue. The last thing I said, specificly was a statement that said I swung from neutral to negative.
Just based on the snippet you stole:
>>3268
>so I suppose it's only minty and umbra who'll hop into the fight with me?
It's an unclear statement because there's no statement of support from the named parties. And it's specifically the two people who were most vocal at that time in question. Again, the new guy is obnoxious There's no confirmation from me or Umbra that we're agreeing to the plan Myra was proposing, and TyHachi was still unsure if there was going to be action taken.
I generally burn off my anger about 12 hours after it starts up. I was in the middle of pulling back from the pike statement when you attacked us.
The preparation for attacking? Like I said, in my case it was a shift to decentralized defense, specifically because ib became a high profile target by being underdeveloped and well known to a larger number of people.
We need to be capable of defending ourselves from people like you.
You attacked a group that was generally lukewarm to your plight based on a snippet of information from an individual of questionable intent, which polarized the group against you.
Where there were once conflicted feelings and complex relationships, now there's just war.
Your evidence is two fold.
A conversation between Myra and Ty, Ty who isn't quite behind the plan, and Myra who wants to charge forward.
Both these behaviors make sense if you've ever interacted with either.
And a conversation with Ty, where he wouldn't say there were no plans to attack you. Because there were. No one had enacted them because there was no uniform agreement on if they were necessary.
You read:
You left CoLC, the pact is for CoLC, not KoE. I'm not saying we will attack you, but no one in any alliance is obligated to not attack.
As we will attack you, because that's what you wanted to see, and you used people to get the confirmation of the answer you wanted to see.
As you've seen in the logs I've been showing you, our chat room is very loose, and willing to speak in frank and open terms, about things that can easily be spun into war.
You're just seeing what you want to see.
That's fine, you can send as many troops at me as you like. I've got no reason to stop tending to them just yet. I'm sure I could offer them some lemonade if they're going to be sticking around for a while.
You decided that instead of trying to set up an diplomatic agreement with us, that it was easier to just wipe us out. Which was a miscalculation kemosabe.
Even worse for your position, it establishes you as just plain untrustworthy. So while THK may still be a guild member, he's not the guy who's attacking my best frans.
No.3272
>>3271
I would reply to this, if there was anything new in here that hasn't been refuted, disputed and just plain laughed at 50 times before this.
try harder pls, your pathetic diplomacy is amazingly amusing, but even the best things get dull after a while.
No.3273
>>3272
At this point, I just want everyone to know I'm not on ANYONE'S side here.
Just thought to point that out.
Now, back to what I wanted to say …
how can you deny
>>3271
Whenever I've known him to be true before? Is there no such thing as a logical standpoint? Is there no such thing as talking it out with someone instead of taking such brash actions regarding yalls, uh, "diplomacy"?
I know I may not be the best at diplomacy. Shit, I might be the ultimate failure at it.
However, even I know that the war could have been avoided if it was talked about with each other instead of becoming a pair of dogs circling each other.
No.3274
>>3273
>Is there no such thing as a logical standpoint?
Here's a logical standpoint for you, someone is going to shank you, you shank them first. what is there to talk out? They were planning an invasion, any time that was wasted on diplomacy simply allowed them more time to prepare for the inevitable war.
>However, even I know that the war could have been avoided if it was talked about with each other instead of becoming a pair of dogs circling each other.
"hey, you gonna try and kill us?"
"Yup"
"Could you not?"
"Nope"
"oh… k ;-;"
yup, that would've accomplished sooooo much. you'll note that there was no attempt at a peace talk after the attacks were sent, beyond their requesting I switch targets from IB they seemed pretty fine with this.
No.3275
>>3274
Maybe you're just too power-hungry.
Is there something wrong for being optimistic? For delaying and possibly PREVENTING any of this from happening?
Or are you too stubborn to see this? I don't see how peace talks could NOT have been managed. I don't see how everyone can just turn on each other so fast over words.
You SAY you attack out of an imminent that.
You SAY that if you didn't attack first, they would have.
Did they ever attack?
Did I see any forces come my way, or anyone else, from a group?
No. I did not.
And I didn't see any until much later into the war.
Peace talks could have been managed. The fact that you don't even acknowledge them just shows how much you are power-hungry.
No.3276
>>3275
>Is there something wrong for being optimistic?
It gets you killed
>For delaying and possibly PREVENTING any of this from happening.
Gets you kill and wastes time
> I don't see how peace talks could NOT have been managed.
they could've been managed, it's the fact that they would have achieved nothing except forewarning the enemy and forcing them to move their plans up.
>Did they ever attack?
Do you seriously not understand the word preemptive? The fact that they didn't attack means my plan worked, that was in fact the entire bloody point of preempting them.
>The fact that you don't even acknowledge them just shows how much you are power-hungry.
Not really, just shows how much I trust them to not use any advantage I gave them. Here's a question for you, what sort of terms would you have liked mo to ask for in those 'peace talks' you think would fix everything.
No.3277
>>3275
>Maybe you're just too power-hungry.
Maybe you're just assmad no one held your hand through all of this and jumped to conclusions. You were fine with joining the KoE until you had some kind of retard breakdown.
You could say all of this same crap here about LoliBug but you chose until now? Obviously just mad about something.
>You SAY you attack out of an imminent that.
>You SAY that if you didn't attack first, they would have.
>Did they ever attack?
No that's how a preemptive attack works you moron! Do you even know what you're arguing about??
Jesus kid you're gonna be down in your mums basement for a while with these kinds of reactions, do humanity a favor and don't come out.
>Pic related, how astounded I am by your stupidity.
No.3278
>>3268
I was trying to prepare people for a war since the moment you declared war on TMO. Unfortunately, every time I brought up the issue, I was consequently ignored.
TyHachi was the only person to at least say that he doubts that he can fight a war. Shortly before I wrote the sentence you're quoting, I was asking Schatten if he would join, which he declined. Pushing for a final answer from the remaining members of the Cauldron, I supposed the best idea to find out if we're taking action would be to assume that they will join the war. That way they would have to decline their involvement instead of just continuing to ignore me if they didn't want to join.
I guess I have to thank you for convincing my allies to join the war. I really couldn't have done this without you.
No.3279
>>3278
>I guess I have to thank you for convincing my allies to join the war. I really couldn't have done this without you.
You're welcome!
Let's see if you're still so grateful in a months time eh?
No.3280
>>3279
>Let's see if you're still so grateful in a months time eh?
When you guys are still trying to take Oil Ocean?
Would you like me to just leave the door open for you?
No.3281
>>3210
>>3229
>>3232
>Scarf clearly attempting to collude with FC to have them nation farm for him.
This, why has this been ignored. Buried among a mountain of autism and the same fucking argument spun over and over and over again?
No.3282
>>3281
Scarf trying to break the rules is particularly interesting because 'getting rid of the cheaters' is one of his main excuses for attacking Bug and Loli.
No.3283
>>3276
>>3277
Huh, strange.
I would have thought optimism is what keeps people ALIVE and not fucking dead and depressive.
So what if peace talks would have delayed the SUPPOSEDLY INEVITABLE? You say the enemy would have time to band together. Are you saying that none of you had that same time to do the same?
No. That is not right. I will not accept that stance or view. I don't wish to be "babied" or whatever the fuck you call it.
All I want to do is to play a game. Yeah, so what if a nation gets lost in my end. I'll just start again, learn from the mistakes, and MOVE ON. Yes, I know, I'm a hypocrite for saying that. I'm trying to move on right now. Hence why I'm trying to make a neutral stance with everyone, enemy or friend before.
No.3289
>>3287
Holy shit, this is glorious SUPERGEIL
No.3291
> Are you saying that none of you had that same time to do the same?
The point here is that we didn't need more prep time. We were already at war.
No.3292
>>3291
> were ready at war
So you're saying you've had this planned all along BEFORE any of this started?!?
You're saying you were out to get Finite Cauldron since the beginning?
You're making yourself look really good right now to me. Keep it up! You might even make the rank of dickator some day!
No.3293
>>3292
>So you're saying you've had this planned all along BEFORE any of this started?!?
>You're saying you were out to get Finite Cauldron since the beginning?
Uh, no? what I said was that we were better prepared for war than they were. Any war. Also that we were already at war, WITH TMO…
No.3294
>>3293
Not satisfied with one war, and yet you decided to fight on two fronts. Nice work there. I'll make sure to get you a cookie later.
You're not much different than from the predecessors you defeated, or attempted to. You hunt the weak whenever you even think that that they think about doing something harmful. And I thought I was paranoid.
Go ahead, attack me for all I care at this point for what I say. It's not like any of you actually CARE.
No.3295
>>3292
>>3293
>So you're saying you've had this planned all along BEFORE any of this started?!?
>Uh, no?
Myra was always a planned target.
No.3296
>>3295
>Myra was always the target
yeah, and so were a few other old players. Nothing has changed, and I am no exception to it.
But at least I'm trying to change, unlike some others I can point out.
No.3297
>>3294
>Not satisfied with one war, and yet you decided to fight on two fronts.
Jesus kid, learn to read. I didn't decide to go to war with FC, they did that, I just decided to go to war faster than they wanted.
>You hunt the weak whenever you even think that that they think about doing something harmful.
While I do agree that FC is weak, I thought they were doing something harmful weeks ago, I only attacked once I had proof
>Go ahead, attack me for all I care at this point for what I say.
Don't tempt me.
>>3295
>Myra was always a planned target.
Well, I'll give you that Myra was always an assumed target. Didn't take a genius to figure out we'd be fighting him one day.
No.3298
>>3294
No. Thus far, KoE has not attacked anyone for mere opinion, and I will not let that change.
There's a difference between things like:
"I want Scarf's head on a pike"
and things like
"Okay, I'll attack Scarf, Aryan attacks burro targets, Minty assaults the saddles. Right?"
No.3299
>>3297
>Myra was always an assumed target
Unless I'm wrong, I remember a little birdie mentioning to me that after lolibug was dealt with, the next step was to use it as leverage to force Myra to concede or war.
No.3300
>>3299
>basing an argument on chat
So you concede our point?
No.3301
>>3300
>>3299
BUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRN
No.3302
>>3298
>>3300
Oh hey! I didn't see you post there.
I'm not sure how what I said has to do with anything you said?
>>3301
I notice you're not saying I'm wrong, when I even suggestion that I'm not sure if I'm remembering exactly what I was told correctly.
No.3303
>>3302
>I notice you're not saying I'm wrong
That's because you aren't. that sentiment (or rather, similar ones) has been expressed multiple times in our chat. Tends to happen
No.3304
>>3298
> Thus far, KoE has not attacked anyone for mere opinion, and I will not let that change.
Haha, good one. You started this whole war because you didn't like the things someone said on the board.
No.3305
>>3304
>AND his history
>Either one alone isn't a valid CB
I make my own argument ^^
No.3306
>>3304
>>3305
Isn't it great when they refute their own shit for us? :3
No.3307
File: 1433382440730.png (189.69 KB, 1024x552, 128:69, pinkie flutters microphone.png)
>>3305
>>3306
This just in, Scarf and TKoE don't have a history in this game. More news at 11.
No.3308
>>3307
I've got more history in this game than I'd like really >.>
No.3309
>>3307
TKoE does indeed have a history… as do I, at this point.
But neither of us have ever cheated in free equipment, which is what I was referring to.
No.3310
>>3308
You should delete your account, start a new one, and join a different group with the sole intent to spy on them!
No.3311
>>3310
B-but I like the drama my name causes. Most of the time anyway
No.3312
>>3311
It's CLOP, the inherent drama will follow you.
No.3313
>>3312
Fair enough, expect an alliance request soon then ;)
No.3314
File: 1433400361936.png (Spoiler Image, 1.09 MB, 1200x1500, 4:5, 860282__twilight sparkle_e….png)
No.3315
No.3316
>>3305
History isn't an argument according to your own documents.
No.3317
>>3316
Lolipop/Bugfucker never went nationless ;)
They each stasis'd with 1 nation
No.3318
File: 1433419214868.jpg (126.08 KB, 907x880, 907:880, nui_harime_by_framedodge-d….jpg)
>>3317
Of course they did. Everyone went nationless.
No.3319
>>3318
I… Shit…
T-Those policies were never implemented!
No.3320
>>3319
>>3317
>>3316
>>3318
Hmm … very interesting indeed the turn of events.
Please, tell me how much you hold up to your own policies? Not that I'm judging or anything at all.
No.3321
>>3320
>Those policies were never implemented
No.3323
File: 1433433790464.png (236.73 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, Screenshot_2015-06-04-11-4….png)
You know all this talk about how we have to be removed makes sending your little minions to try and get us to join you even more hilarious. What's the matter starting to sweat?
I mean you could at least grow the spine to do your own groveling you quivering mass of gelatinous failure although I guess you're too afraid of losing plausible deniability when we laugh you off.
You were a joke back in the day and you still are now, collecting your head is going to be oh so fun~
No.3324
>>3323
>Go on a crusade against "cheaters", "warmongers", etc.
>Losing
>Discussions pop up among some people about grabbing nations exactly because they were losing/weakening themselves
>Preemptively attacking said people
>Getting wrecked
>Run to their first target pleading for an alliance
Much wow!
No.3325
>>3323
Holy crap, you guys are pathetic.
KoE don't have the slightest bit of resolve and integrity.
No.3326
>>3323
I can explain. We were all joking around about how we could get Emperor Hirohito into our alliance, and then it evolved into 'recruiting' Myrami, The Horned King, and you (pic related). Bluhtsturm thought it'd be funny to take it one step beyond and actually message you about recruitment.
No.3328
That's some delicious damage control
No.3329
>>3326
Oh. Carry on, then.^^
No.3330
No collusion. Absolutely none.
No.3331
>>3330
Oh, you like that? It's a fitting reward for someone who thinks they can commit to a zero-training poke and reap the benefits.
No.3332
>>3330
Yep, I did indeed send gear to defend Magma. And he sent sugar in return.
Trade is good~
No.3333
No.3334
No.3335
>>3334
Yup. You guys were already hurting on sugar. Have fun getting straight up bent over now.
No.3336
>>3335
You could have at least graced us with troops that were worth a damn. Hell, Scarf ended up puking his guts out from how downright silly they were.
No.3338
>>3336
You realize you lost that nation right?
No.3339
>>3336
Clearly I didn't need. You get the troops if you're worth the troops. But if you can't handle 20 cavalry I don't think I should bother sending more.
No.3340
>>3338
Yes, and the whole point of this discussion is how he feels inclined to bring up that I might have been breaking rule 4.
>>3339
So there was a mild hiccup in upkeep. It was his fault for not telling us what he was missing.
No.3341
>>3333
CHECK THESE QUADS!!!
No.3342
>>3340
>Yes, and the whole point of this discussion is how he feels inclined to bring up that I might have been breaking rule 4.
I can't reconcile with your logic. I'm sorry. What has this got to do with rule 4?
>mild hiccup
>Lost a nation
>His fault
IT's your job to keep him safe right?
No.3343
>>3342
>What has this got to do with rule 4?
The fact that you pointed out one of the last deals before the nation was lost?
>IT's your job to keep him safe right?
Wasn't it also your job to not cannibalize JollyGreenGI, or for FC to protect Ib?
>>3341
Oh yeah, you lift alright!
No.3344
>>3343
>Wasn't it also your job to not cannibalize JollyGreenGI, or for FC to protect Ib?
Not particularly. Both were strategically viable solutions to immediate problems.
Losing a nation to the enemy is pretty terrible though.
No.3345
File: 1433443139450.jpg (143.44 KB, 850x1191, 850:1191, sample_58eccd3d497a52b350a….jpg)
>>3344
It's just one nation. I'm not worried.
No.3346
>>3345
If you're not worried then you're not looking enough steps ahead of you.
No.3347
>>3346
>then you're not looking enough steps ahead of you.
Am I not? Hmm…
No.3348
>>3347
It's a common enough occurrence I think.
No.3349
File: 1433444162194.jpg (33.38 KB, 236x257, 236:257, c85d6a3a6802afcbd56c150de3….jpg)
>>3340
>breaking rule 4
He's pointing out that the clients are supplying KoE ya big dummy
No.3350
>>3349
But is that relevant anymore? MTVS is dragging the Clients into this anyway.
No.3351
>>3350
>Sephi confirming that CoLC broke the NAP
No.3352
>>3350
Exactly this >>3351
That report was the proof to the obvious that kept being asked for.
No.3353
File: 1433447022772.jpg (31.21 KB, 400x302, 200:151, a09dc3337295da38fc90ce2117….jpg)
No.3354
File: 1433447308680.jpg (683.42 KB, 600x1120, 15:28, 600cee0d76749527827bcfdd03….jpg)
Hey Scarfy, you wrote the rules for our NAP. And guess who broke it? It was you, sweetie!
You're a liar and your word is worth nothing. You're just like me. I'm so proud of what you have become!
No.3356
>>3321
>Those policies were never implemented
Of course they weren't.
Under them I'd be classified as a CB 3 for sending 25 tanks at Brightbrook in an attempt to scramble defenses right when everyone was coming out of noob week.
Since you never declared me a CB3, your initiation of aggression based on general faggotry and thinking we are week, would classify your whole gang as CB3.
You were not embargoed more than you already embargoed me anyways, we were not nation building, we had not engaged in any large scale wars, performed any activity checking.
Via general spying faggotry, you decided we were going to war.
>>3328
>That's some delicious damage control
It's still interesting. Even with Damage Control Spin in play.
>>3340
>So there was a mild hiccup in upkeep.
Yeah, that's how small groups sent regularly are designed to get you.
The trick is to… Wait, I'm at war with you at the moment, why the fuck am I being helpful?
>>3343
>or for FC to protect Ib?
Because protecting people has to factor in more options than just butts on the ground.
ib is better protected in newb week, with a group with better defenses. In FC@war he'd be a liability, and as the situation stood it was a question of when he fell, not if.
>>3350
>But is that relevant anymore? MTVS is dragging the Clients into this anyway.
>>3235
FC's Non Aggression Pact with the Coalition of Lunar Clients
1. No player in either alliance may send attacking forces at any player in the other alliance.
2. Similarly, no player in either alliance may send resources to any other player for the purposes of attacking the other alliance.
3. If any player leaves either alliance, this non-aggression pact remains binding for 24 hours after they have left. No attacking forces may be set to or from said player.
4. This NAP means that going SV is no longer a declaration of war, so long as the SV is in the NAP'ed alliance.
FC has never backed or supported TMO's attacks on CoLC specifically because of the NAP we both agreed to.
Because that's what we both agreed on.
For CoLC to support KoE's continued brutal attacks on FC, that's a clear violation of the NAP. You're apparently sharing members, radar, materials regularly. You might as well be the same alliance with a ski mask on trying.
I even wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt, but that seems like it was entirely engineered to garner more sympathy than you're worth.
Because, holy shit, now I'm in Bizzaro CLOP, where Loli and Bug are trustworthy, and people I used to trust are making complicated overflow alliances because they want my Texas Tea!
No.3357
File: 1433459909492.jpg (59.46 KB, 500x433, 500:433, tumblr_m7c8p6ASd21qf8tzeo1….jpg)
>>3356
>Texas Tea
Awww I feel really special right now :3
I'll make sure to make that a resource to trade somehow.
No.3358
>>3356
>2. Similarly, no player in either alliance may send resources to any other player for the purposes of attacking the other alliance.
>Attacking
Yup, seems like defending to me, guess the NAP is still in place :3
No.3359
>>3358
Don't know where you've been. It was agreed to be a violation and the offending player was kicked from CoLC
No.3360
>>3356
CoLC is supplying our defenses. The attacks are 100% within KoE's production capacity.
We share radar because CoLC needs that; MTVS and TMO have been attacking them for some time now, and Magmatic isn't the most active player.
No.3361
>>3360
And the letter of the agreement is "for the purposes of attacking"! That's the point I'm trying to make. There is no violation.
No.3362
>>3356
> people I used to trust are making complicated overflow alliances
>>3358
>seems like defending to me
>>3360
>CoLC is supplying our defenses.
You guys attacked me on two occasions already with troops that you built specifically for defense, that you didn't want to waste because I sent a false attack against you, with the intent to force you into defense for the purpose of weakening the attack on my home base.
Ordos NeoTerra's 1st Deffender Fleet is SITTING ON MY GODDAMN FRONT LAWN!!!!
No.3363
>>3362
and Strum is in KoE. so what's your point?
No.3364
>>3362
>>3363
We actually did build that defender fleet from KoE supplies.
No.3365
>>3363
>>3362
oh, my bad, I see what you mean now. regardless, if TCoLC didn't give resources with the purpose to attack you, it's not their fault we used them for other things now is it :P
No.3366
>>3365
>if TCoLC didn't give resources with the purpose to attack you, it's not their fault we used them for other things
Actually… it kind of is, considering they know there's the possibility that you'll use the resources to attack us. This constitutes criminal recklessness, and they are therefore liable.
No.3367
>>3366
Oh please cite me the >Clop legal code that says that? Oh right, that's not a thing!
No.3368
>>3367
So, what you're saying is, you support lawlessness and unaccountability?
Because I'm pretty sure your entire crusade is based on the idea that CLOP players should be held accountable for the actions they take.
No.3369
>>3367
>Oh please cite me the >Clop legal code that says that? Oh right, that's not a thing!
The only rules state things you get banned over.
The social code is different. Things like honor and trust and emotions and friendship. You know, vague unquantifiable statements based on human interaction and history.
The problem is, unquantifiable in measurement though it is, it is my reasonable belief that you would backstab me or my allies at any point that it would be of any value to you.
Then you would try to find a loophole in the system to make the transaction okay in the eyes of the social order.
Yes I know >inb4 Mazerica, but I feel bad for doing that. It sucks when the best possible option is the shit sandwich, but that's how it goes. But rationalize it all I can, I won't not have done it.
You guys are taking money and goods from CoLC and using it to perpetuate war on FC.
Even if you're only using it on defense still means you're using it to offset costs of continuing your attacks.
And as you can see, I have both a defense fleet, and a battlefleet with Bluhtsturm's particular naming pattern all up in my shit. And I'm not getting defense subsidies from CoLC either, so that's still an attack by proxy.
No.3370
>>3368
Nope, what I'm saying is they stuck to the letter of your NAP, they did not at any point supply us For the purpose of attacking specifically the for the purpose part. You don't like the letter of your NAP? write a better one next time.
> And I'm not getting defense subsidies from CoLC either, so that's still an attack by proxy.
Should've written that into the NAP then. though then, that would be something other than a NAP, which iirc scarf did offer.
No.3371
>>3370
Fucking semantics, eggs.
Just face it. You've sent the forces out of butthurt spite.
No.3372
>>3370
And what I'm saying is, any deniability they could claim would never hold up under official examination. When I mentioned criminal recklessness, it's essentially because it's the legal equivalent of "Yeah, right, you expect us to believe that?"
There's a reason DV chose to err on the side of caution when dealing with this, and it's because he knows he's completely accountable.
At this point, any more you could say on the matter is simply more admission of guilt.
ffs I lost my post from a board derp. This is as best as I can approximate it, I guess.
No.3373
>>3369
>Attackers
>1st Deffender Fleet
I love you guys, and every moment I spend watching you play my game is a joy and a treasure
No.3374
>>3371
If I was the kind of person to do that, you'd have incoming right now. So how about you butt out, k?
>>3372
Fair enough. and yet they still haven't broken anything, and I imagine they're still fine with upholding the NAP.
>>3373
We love you too admin! :3
No.3375
>>3373
Aww, we love you too! <3
No.3376
>>3374
So please explain to me why you haven't yet? Is it because i'm not worth your time?
Hey, guess what? Neither is starting 3 fucking wars with 3 fucking alliances.
No.3377
>>3373
…It's something!
>>3376
Because you haven't made plausible, or for that matter any threats against us or the Clients, nor made preparations to attack us that we know of?
Also you're a good person. That's worth something, even these days.
No.3378
>>3377
Being a good person is always something I would love to be.
But not everyone thinks the same like that. I want peace between all. I'll fight for that any day.
But once the boat has sailed, the course is set into place. Don't let me set sail like that.
No.3379
File: 1433479191668.png (206.24 KB, 900x1073, 900:1073, Since when do you trust an….png)
>>3369
Minty. . . You of all people should know that there is always a proxy supplier in any war in >CLOP.
No.3380
>>3379
I'm very good at pretending otherwise.
And I can understand proxy battling. That's why there's a clause in the NAP to not do that very thing.
As one of our other NAP's states:
8ros don't attack each other
No.3382
>>3380
NAP's. . . Peace treaties. . . . Non-aggression pacts. . . . These are by far the least useful things in >CLOP. I have never seen one actually do any good in this game.
Anyway, hope you get to ascend a second time.
No.3386
>>3327
>I mean really despite having two accounts both Bug and Loli are failing xD
>12 hours later loses war.
This is some historically bad timing.
No.3387
>>3382
>sees your nation lost
I'm sorry to see that cloud ;-;
In another point, as ineffective as NAPs seem like, at least it's a try to help conserve peace, right? It's still something.
No.3388
File: 1433481630058.gif (489.64 KB, 500x215, 100:43, tumblr_mxlm09yDbU1qd9rjto1….gif)
No.3389
>>3279
>You're welcome!
>Let's see if you're still so grateful in a months time eh?
Could you at least hold up for at least 48 hours after saying something like that? Please?
>>3382
> I have never seen one actually do any good in this game.
That's all paper and legal bullshit. The part that matters is the handshake and the intent behind them.
Now all I have is a bunch of troops with no targets, and a burning question…
If TKoE and DocViper went into stasis at 23:37 and 23:53, why did I still have to fight their troops at 00:00:07?
Is Stasis aggression intentional?
No.3391
>>3387
Don't worry about it, I was only here because Scarf wanted me to help and once we saw that there was no way to survive until tomorrow, I decided to just concede.
Anyway. . . .
No.3392
>>3391
I guess you'll never strike us off the list~
No.3395
>>3394
methinks you are of the caring~
No.3396
I'm just sorry to let down the Admin. A whole reset, just to solve this exact problem, and it's gone in a single moment.
Your game is dead, now. The most active members of the community are now gone, and can never hope to return. If any of us left stasis, we'd be attacked by forces we can't hold off, due to the now inflated production capacities of FC/MTVS/TMO. And if we don't leave stasis, there's no more drama to keep the game running.
I'll try to come back to the chat in a day or so, after my stasis lock expires. (I won't leave stasis, but I'd like to talk to Admin… I think we've become friends, at least somewhat.)
No.3397
>>3396
The parting words of a loser. Goodbye.
No.3398
>>3396
>I'm just sorry to let down the Admin.
Unless Admin asked you to stir up shit, there's not much to let him down with.
>due to the now inflated production capacities of FC/MTVS/TMO.
Umm, just from the trenches in FC and all, but we were doing what we did from via communication and coordination.
I couldn't do it without help from my friends, and we couldn't have done it without your laser like focus on trying to bury us under a small number of unit types.
>there's no more drama to keep the game running.
That's an inflated sense of self you've got there. There's always someone with more drama.
I'm not going to say I'm not glad I don't have to fight 1.5k troops every 12 hours consistently for weeks on end though.
No.3400
>History repeating itself.
No.3401
File: 1433502517832.png (963.47 KB, 754x1213, 754:1213, kill_la_kill___nui_harime_….png)
Next time you should let Cloud Kicker take the lead. At least he survived an entire week against me.
You're an even bigger failure than he is and that really says something.
>>3279
I hope I can grab some nice nations. You may have entered stasis but I think most people can remember what I did to THK after killing Merchant.
>>3395
Well, he cared enough to make a list in the first place.
Maybe we should make one, too. There are lots of players that need to get raped if they ever leave stasis/noob protection again.
No.3459
So Rule four includes crimes against equinity now?
Like aiming for a -10168 tick out of stasis to avoid retribution?
I feel sort of bad about it really. In one way Bluhtsturm clearly just wants to end the conflict.
In another, it seems like he's just trying to avoid reprisal.
Yet another plan to seek vengeance has failed so spectacularly, that it's now even less likely to be an viable option. There's really no way to fix it now as well. He made the decision to stasis to avoid an attack, then he made the decision to self distruct and kill everything instead of dealing with his problems directly.
He also decided to attack me for about a week non-stop, which any observer could have told him while he was insulting my troop choices in his naming conventions that he could not sustain an attack while they had still declared war on another, traditionally more violent army.
Technically he decided to move forward with a vengeance plan lead by individuals of questionable logic, that was clearly spinning out of control, and with the failure of that plan he decided to try talking his way out of military response , because social standards currently thinks saying you're sorry has more value than not doing that harm in the first place.
So in the end, I'm pretty sure this was just a yet another horrible decision, at the end of a string of very bad decisions.
And while I do accept the apology for the very very questionable army sitting on my lawn for days on end, shooting up everything; I feel the sudden ejection when no one is looking to be a cheap tactic to avoid other people receiving restitution for billions spent dealing with your bad decisions.
No.3504
>>3459
And he's just been banned, for that and for spamming this board.
No.3679
Sry for beating a dead horse but I have found this gif about an hour ago and I couldn't keep myself from modifying it. Now I want to share my work with the world because I'm that desperate for attention.